Shawnee Tribe clashes with Kansas Historical Society, others in effort to reclaim boarding school
TOPEKA — State, city and tribal leaders scrutinized Tuesday an attempt from the Shawnee Tribe to acquire control of a former Native American boarding school amid disagreements over their shared history.
In the tribe's second attempt to reclaim the land where Native American children from 1839 to 1862 endured assimilation tactics, resistance came from the Kansas Historical Society, the city of Fairway and a nonprofit organization, all of which currently help operate the Shawnee Indian Manual Labor School, also called the Shawnee Indian Mission.
Shawnee Chief Ben Barnes of Oklahoma told legislators during a bill hearing the school was 'built on Shawnee lands by Shawnee hands and using Shawnee funds.'
House Federal and State Affairs Committee chairman Tom Kessler, a Republican from Wichita, introduced the bill earlier this month. House Bill 2384 mimics one that received a hearing in 2024 to authorize the historical society to transfer the nearly 12 acres to the Shawnee Tribe with stipulations. The bill would forbid the tribe from opening a casino on the land.
Barnes said his tribe's efforts have been misrepresented with some opponents saying a transfer would put the site's history at risk.
'The reality is that history is already being lost,' he said.
Barnes expressed concerns with the current operations of the boarding school site, including hosting things like yoga lessons and chili competitions, along with narrow educational efforts and a lack of long-term planning. The historical society is required to create a five-year plan for the landmarks under its purview each year.
The historical society has worked in tandem with the city of Fairway since 2016 to operate the site, and a three-way agreement is currently in the works between the society, the city and the Shawnee Indian Mission Foundation, a nonprofit that doesn't declare affiliation with any tribe, according to its tax filings and mission statement.
All three opposed the bill, including Fairway Mayor Melanie Hepperley and Patrick Zollner, the executive director of the historical society.
'We absolutely are invested in telling everyone's story,' Zollner said.
He said it's arguably the state's most historic site, highlighting its use as barracks for Union soldiers and one of the only remaining stops used by travellers on the Oregon, California and Santa Fe trails. It is the most visited historical landmark in the state, second only to the state Capitol building, Zollner said.
'It's not falling down. It's in good shape,' he told legislators Tuesday. 'It's better than some of our other state historical sites and we know there's still work. We do have a plan.'
The Shawnee Tribe hired Architectural Resources Group, a firm that specializes in historic architecture, to evaluate the site, and the resulting report found it was in need of $13 million in repairs and preservation and restoration efforts.
In response, the Shawnee Tribe came up with a 10-year plan to fund millions of dollars in restoration that involves crafting and construction techniques that adhere to the time the school was built, Barnes said. With the backing of the tribal government, he said, the tribe has pledged to fully fund the project.
Republican Rep. Clarke Sanders of Salina recalled hearing the same bill last year.
'It seems to me the problem is the opponents don't believe you're going to do what you say you're going to do,' said Sanders.
The bill itself contains language requiring the tribe to adhere to its plans, Barnes said in response.
Representatives from four federally recognized tribes in Kansas signed a joint resolution supporting the land transfer. Those four tribes — the Prairie Band Potawatomi Nation, the Kickapoo Tribe of Kansas, the Sac and Fox Nation of Missouri in Kansas and Nebraska, and the Iowa Tribe of Kansas and Nebraska — also want to weigh in on the future of the school site.
Any financial contribution to the Shawnee Tribe's restoration efforts from other tribes has not been discussed, said Joseph Rupnick, chairman of the Prairie Band Potawatomi Nation's tribal council.
'We just want to make sure that we're being consulted on any work that's being done out there to make sure that it fits within our vision of what that site should look like,' he said.
On the other hand, members of the Kaw — or Kanza — Nation, which originally possessed much of present-day northeast Kansas, and other tribes were unsupportive.
Melissa Garrett, an enrolled citizen of the Cherokee, Quapaw and Seneca-Cayuga nations, described her grandfather as a survivor of the Carlisle Indian Industrial School, the first off-reservation boarding school in the U.S. While assimilation did occur in Kansas, Garrett cautioned against oversimplifying history and comparing it to federally mandated boarding schools.
'Instead of transferring ownership to a single tribe, we should try to preserve an inclusive, multi-tribal, state-supported preservation model that reflects the full history and the complex history,' Garrett said.
The boarding school was founded by Thomas Johnson, a Methodist missionary, slaveholder and pro-slavery advocate. He is also the namesake of Johnson County, where the historical site is located.
Children from 22 different tribes attended the boarding school. Most of the attendees were from the Shawnee and Delaware — historically called Lenape — tribes, which lived in present day Indiana, Ohio, Pennsylvania, New York and New Jersey. Indigenous people either moved eastward on their own to avoid encroaching colonialism or were forced eastward into 'Indian Territory,' including present day Kansas. Both the Shawnee and Delaware tribes were removed from Kansas to Oklahoma once Kansas became a state.
A collection of records about Johnson and the school was published in 1939.
A September 1854 entry from the Daily Republican in Massachusetts reads: 'He draws pay for every one present the first day, and it always happens that after the first few days, the school diminishes wonderfully in numbers. No restraint is exercised over those children who wish to go, and some who wish to stay and learn are abused to such a degree that they are obliged to go.'
The state of Kansas acquired the 12 acres of land in 1927, and it was designated as a historical landmark in 1968.
Attention to the problematic history of Native American boarding schools has been piqued in recent years. Former President Joe Biden issued a formal apology on behalf of the U.S. government in October for the country's boarding school program. Former Secretary of the Interior Deb Haaland created the Federal Indian Boarding School Initiative to examine and document the troubled history of Native American boarding schools in the U.S.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Politico
20 minutes ago
- Politico
Democrats wrestle with shutdown strategy
Two GOP senators — Appropriations Chair Susan Collins of Maine and another senior appropriator, Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski — voted against Trump's rescissions package. Several more voted 'yes' but still spoke critically of the Trump administration's unwillingness to detail specific accounts that will be cut, as well as the chilling effect the Republican clawbacks could have on bipartisan funding negotiations. After Vought told reporters Thursday that 'the appropriations process has to be less bipartisan,' Collins urged fellow appropriators that 'the best way for us to counter what has been said by the OMB director is to continue to work in a bipartisan way. And I hope that we are going to do so.' But Democrats need more than just Collins to come to the defense of Congress' funding prerogative. 'We've got to work to make sure that there are several others on the other side of the aisle who have the stomach and the strength and the spine to stand up and say: 'No, don't take it away from the Congress. It's our job,'' Connecticut Rep. Rosa DeLauro, the House's top Democratic appropriator, told reporters Thursday night before the House passed the package to nix $9 billion. Democrats also need to help boost the legal fights against Trump's funding moves, DeLauro added, as more than 100 of those lawsuits play out in courtrooms throughout the country. As Democrats hope for a critical mass of Republicans willing to defy Trump, some are testing out a more hardline position of warning Republicans they could have to go at it alone in a funding fight this fall. In a joint statement after House Republicans cleared Trump's recessions package just after midnight Friday, the House's top three Democrats fired off a warning shot that pinned the onus on Republicans to avoid a funding lapse in the coming months. 'Tonight's vote, coming hours after the Trump White House abandoned the bipartisan appropriations process, makes it clear that House Republicans are determined to march this country toward a painful government shutdown later this year,' said Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, Minority Whip Kathrine Clark and Democratic Caucus Chair Pete Aguilar. And Schumer said in a letter to his caucus earlier this month that Republicans 'know it is absurd' to count on Democrats supporting the pursuit of fiscal 2026 funding bills if the GOP votes along party lines to delete existing funding or pile on more cash. That's what Republicans did in boosting military and border security budgets through their tax and spending megabill Trump signed on July 4. But Schumer also stopped short of delivering a clear threat ahead of the September shutdown deadline. And Democrats aren't yet willing to give up on funding negotiations with their GOP colleagues, even after Republicans ignored their warnings about eroding trust in bipartisan talks by backing the clawbacks package last week. In fact, Democratic appropriators are largely leaning in, especially in the Senate, where GOP leaders plan to bring bipartisan funding measures to the floor as soon as this week. 'I think the most important thing for us to do is to continue to move the appropriations process as expeditiously as we can, to try and find bipartisan agreement,' Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.), a top appropriator, said in an interview, 'because it's in everybody's interest to do this and to move forward.' Cassandra Dumay and Calen Razor contributed to this report.

USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Trump is racking up GOP wins no one else could. What do Never Trumpers say now?
For all the hand-wringing over Donald Trump in the past decade, I think his detractors on the right need to take a moment and consider what this president has accomplished. He'll destroy the Republican Party. He'll end democracy. He's not a conservative. He's a bad guy who can't be trusted. For all the hand-wringing over Donald Trump in the past decade, I think his detractors on the right need to take a moment and consider what this president has accomplished. He's racking up huge conservative wins that no other Republican president in modern history has come close to matching. What others only talked about, Trump is doing. I'll walk you through some of the biggest wins. Trump assassination attempt: Trump almost died a year ago. That moment changed the direction of America. | Opinion Taxpayers are now free from funding liberal NPR. Hallelujah. I've advocated for ending taxpayer funding of NPR and PBS for years. So it came as welcome news that Congress last week finally rescinded funding for these progressive outlets. From the start of his second term, Trump made it clear this was a priority for him. And he worked with the slim GOP majority in Congress to make it happen. House Republicans made it official on July 18, voting to axe about $1 billion in federal funding for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which allocates the funds to stations across the country. 'This vote is an unwarranted dismantling of beloved local civic institutions, and an act of Congress that disregards the public will,' Katherine Maher, president and CEO of NPR, complained. Here's the thing. If the stations are so beloved by their local communities, then local residents and businesses are more than welcome to donate to the cause. NPR has a right to exist. That doesn't mean it has a right to my tax dollars. | Opinion But there is not a First Amendment requirement for the government (taxpayers) to fund any specific outlet – especially one that so glaringly ignores the perspectives of half the country. This has been a purported Republican goal for years, but squishy conservatives facing reelection didn't want to be the ones to pull the plug on Big Bird. In fact, according to PBS, every Republican administration (save for Gerald Ford) has sought to cut funding for CPB since its inception in 1967. Only Trump succeeded. Finally! Penn will erase trans athlete's records. But are they just biding time? | Opinion Trump is dismantling the Education Department, like Reagan wanted to do As he promised, Trump is also working to dismantle the U.S. Department of Education, a behemoth of bureaucracy that has done nothing to improve education in the country. Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court greenlighted his efforts to slash the department's workforce in half, an action that began in March with an executive order. Trump celebrated the victory on social media, saying his administration can follow through with his goal of giving 'the Power back to the PEOPLE' in regard to education. Betsy DeVos, who served as education secretary during Trump's first term, has told me that she is 100% on board with closing the Education Department and empowering the states, which should be the level of government that oversees public schools. Much of the work the department does could easily transfer to other branches of government, as it was done before the Education Department's creation in 1979 under Democratic President Jimmy Carter. Since that time, Republicans have regularly advocated for doing away with the department. Opinion alerts: Get columns from your favorite columnists + expert analysis on top issues, delivered straight to your device through the USA TODAY app. Don't have the app? Download it for free from your app store. President Ronald Reagan, the darling of conservatives, talked about doing this in the 1980s, although he didn't follow through. In 1996, the Republican Party platform included abolishing the department and ending 'federal meddling in our schools' and promoting school choice. Yet, it took Trump to get the job done. He's also taken a strong lead in expanding education options for families. The 'big, beautiful bill' he just signed into law creates the first federal private school choice tax credit program. Education system is failing: Trump trusts parents to know what's best for their kids. What a concept! | Opinion As the American Enterprise Institute's Nat Malkus told CNN, 'Trump's big changes in education are the federal retreat many conservatives have long called for, with some new attacks added in for good measure.' And don't forget about Roe v. Wade Last but not least, Trump is the one to thank for the overturning of Roe v. Wade in 2022. Since 1973, when the Supreme Court fashioned a constitutional 'right' to abortion, conservatives had fought hard to overturn it. During his first term, Trump had the exceptional opportunity to appoint three Supreme Court justices, which effectively sealed the court's conservative majority for years to come. His excellent choices of Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett paved the way for the groundbreaking decision that gave abortion regulation back to the states, where it belongs. The Never Trumpers have told us Trump is bad news for the Republican Party. Those of us who line up on the right can't look at these significant conservative wins, however, and not be thoroughly impressed. Ingrid Jacques is a columnist at USA TODAY. Contact her at ijacques@ or on X, formerly Twitter: @Ingrid_Jacques You can read diverse opinions from our USA TODAY columnists and other writers on the Opinion front page, on X, formerly Twitter, @usatodayopinion and in our Opinion newsletter.


Time Magazine
an hour ago
- Time Magazine
Trump Threatens Washington Commanders' RFK Stadium Deal Over Team Name
'Our country has far bigger problems! FOCUS on them, not nonsense,' Donald Trump tweeted in 2013. Then-President Barack Obama, Trump said, 'should not be telling' Washington, D.C.'s NFL team 'to change their name.' But now, there is a need to focus on the nonsense, it seems. As President Trump continues to try to turn attention away from scrutinizing his relationship with the late alleged sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein, he posted twice on his Truth Social platform on Sunday about the name of the football franchise in the nation's capital as well as that of the MLB team in Cleveland, Ohio. 'The Washington 'Whatever's' should IMMEDIATELY change their name back to the Washington Redskins Football Team,' he posted. 'There is a big clamoring for this. Likewise, the Cleveland Indians, one of the six original baseball teams, with a storied past. Our great Indian people, in massive numbers, want this to happen. Their heritage and prestige is systematically being taken away from them. Times are different now than they were three or four years ago. We are a Country of passion and common sense. OWNERS, GET IT DONE!!!' In a follow-up, Trump added: 'I may put a restriction on them that if they don't change the name back to the original 'Washington Redskins,' and get rid of the ridiculous moniker, 'Washington Commanders,' I won't make a deal for them to build a Stadium in Washington. The Team would be much more valuable, and the Deal would be more exciting for everyone. Cleveland should do the same with the Cleveland Indians. The Owner of the Cleveland Baseball Team, Matt Dolan, who is very political, has lost three Elections in a row because of that ridiculous name change. What he doesn't understand is that if he changed the name back to the Cleveland Indians, he might actually win an Election. Indians are being treated very unfairly. MAKE INDIANS GREAT AGAIN (MIGA)!' (Dolan, a Republican who served five years in the Ohio House of Representatives and eight years in the state senate and whose father purchased the Cleveland baseball team in 2000, ran unsuccessfully for U.S. Senate in 2022 and 2024.) Amid widespread concern about social injustices across the U.S. in 2020, both the Washington Redskins and Cleveland Indians decided to change their controversial names out of respect for Native Americans. Washington became the Washington Football Team that year, and in 2022 adopted the name the Washington Commanders, while the Cleveland Indians transitioned to its current name, the Cleveland Guardians, in 2021. Read More: A Linguist's Analysis of the Redskins Defense Trump was never a fan of the name changes, tweeting in 2020: 'They name teams out of STRENGTH, not weakness, but now the Washington Redskins & Cleveland Indians, two fabled sports franchises, look like they are going to be changing their names in order to be politically correct. Indians, like Elizabeth Warren, must be very angry right now!' (Sen. Warren, a Massachusetts Democrat, has been mocked by Trump and other Republicans for her claims of Cherokee ancestry.) Trump's urging of the sports organizations to reverse their rebrandings comes as his second-term Administration has targeted diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives in both the public and private sector. Speaking to reporters Sunday, Guardians' president of baseball operations Chris Antonetti said, 'We understand there are different perspectives on the decision we made a few years ago but obviously it's a decision we made. We've got the opportunity to build a brand as the Guardians over the last 4 years and are excited about the future.' The Commanders did not immediately issue a statement, but earlier this year, controlling owner Josh Harris said his team had no plans to change its name again. 'In this building, the name Commanders means something,' Harris said during a February press conference. 'It's about players who love football, are great at football, hit hard, mentally tough, great teammates.' It's unclear whether Trump has the authority to upend a deal that the Commanders and D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser announced in April to return the team in 2030 to its former home at the capital's Robert F. Kennedy Memorial Stadium after having moved to Landover, Md., in 1997. Amid years of discussions about redeveloping the storied-but-defunct sports and events campus, Trump's predecessor, Joe Biden, signed into law in January a bill that transferred the land of the RFK Stadium from federal to local control for the next 99 years. Still, earlier this month, as some members of the D.C. Council expressed skepticism about the timeline and financing of the mayor's deal with the Commanders, Trump suggested he could intervene if the council doesn't approve it. 'It's a very important piece of property. It's a great piece of property,' Trump said, referring to the RFK Stadium site, 'You know, ultimately we control that. The federal government ultimately controls it, so we'll see what happens.'