&w=3840&q=100)
Satin Creditcare Q4: Profit falls 67% on higher credit costs, weak AUM
For the financial year ended March 2025, Satin's net profit fell by 48.8 per cent to Rs 217 crore, from Rs 423 crore in FY24. Its stock closed 2.66 per cent lower at Rs 167.60 per share on the BSE.
Revenues for the reporting quarter (Q4FY25) declined by 5.4 per cent Y-o-Y to Rs 562 crore, the company said in a statement.
Net interest margins fell from 14.2 per cent in Q4FY24 to 11.8 per cent. Impairment costs of financial instruments rose from Rs 64.16 crore in Q4FY24 to Rs 105.19 crore in Q4FY25.
H P Singh, chairman and managing director, Satin Creditcare, told Business Standard that the decline in profit was attributable to a significant rise in credit costs and muted growth in assets under management (AUM).
The company's AUM grew by 6.8 per cent Y-o-Y to Rs 11,316 crore as of the end of March 2025.
At present, the company is not providing growth guidance. It will assess how the first quarter ending June 2025—which coincides with the summer season and potential heatwave risks—unfolds. Growth in FY26 is expected to be better than FY25, Singh added.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
2 minutes ago
- Indian Express
SC dismisses KAL Airways, Kalanithi Maran pleas against Delhi High Court order in SpiceJet case
The Supreme Court on Wednesday dismissed appeals by KAL Airways and media baron Kalanithi Maran, challenging the Delhi High Court order which rejected their plea seeking Rs 1,323 crore in damages from SpiceJet and its chief Ajay Singh. A bench of Justices P S Narasimha and A S Chandurkar dismissed the appeals challenging a May 23 high court order, which dismissed their pleas on grounds of delay. The dispute among the parties arose after Singh, who owned SpiceJet earlier, bought it back from Maran after it was grounded for months due to a resource crunch. Differences arose subsequently with Maran and his firm accusing SpiceJet and Singh of breaching the agreement for issue of share warrants and preference shares to them. The matter went to arbitration, which rejected KAL Airways' claim for Rs 1,323 crore but ordered a refund of Rs 579.08 crore, with interest. The two sides challenged this before the high court, where a single judge on July 31, 2023, directed SpiceJet and Singh to refund Rs 270 crore plus interest to KAL Airways and Maran. On appeal, the division bench set aside this order and remanded it back to the single judge for reconsidering the petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Though KAL Airways and Maran moved the Supreme Court against this, the top court had dismissed it on July 26, 2024. They once again challenged the single judge order before a division bench, which by order dated May 23, 2025, dismissed it on grounds of delay. This led to the present appeals before the Supreme Court, which were dismissed on Wednesday.
Time of India
2 minutes ago
- Time of India
ED files Fema case against Myntra for Rs 1,654 crore FDI violation
Myntra is accused of misusing the wholesale 'cash & carry' route to conduct multi-brand retail trading (MBRT), which is restricted under the FDI policy. The ED found that Myntra received foreign direct investment (FDI) claiming it was for wholesale trading, but routed the majority of sales through Vector E-Commerce Pvt Ltd, a related-party entity that sold directly to consumers. This structure was allegedly used to bypass norms by bifurcating B2B and B2C operations, while actually engaging in retail trade. As per the FDI policy amendments dated April 1, 2010, and October 1, 2010, only 25% of wholesale sales can go to group companies — a cap Myntra allegedly breached. The ED concluded that Myntra and others contravened Section 6(3)(b) of Fema, along with the consolidated FDI policies, resulting in a total contravention amounting to Rs 1,654.35 crore. The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has filed a complaint under the Foreign Exchange Management Act (Fema), 1999, against Flipkart-owned fashion etailer Myntra, and its related entities for allegedly violating foreign investment rules to the tune of Rs 1,654.35 crore.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
2 minutes ago
- Business Standard
RTI could help you in knowing EPF claim status: How to file an application
If you are struggling with delays or lack of clarity about your Employees' Provident Fund (EPF) account, filing an application under the Right to Information (RTI) could help cut the red tape. Under the RTI Act, 2005, you can request information from the Employees' Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO) and receive a response within 30 days. Whether it is a pending claim, incorrect employer contributions, or transfer issues, here's a simple guide to filing an RTI online. What information can you seek? Before filing an application, be clear about the information you need. RTI is designed for seeking factual data, not explanations or opinions. You can request: Status of EPF withdrawal or transfer claims Employer contribution details Updates to your EPF passbook Reasons for delays in claim settlements Filing RTI online The simplest way to file an RTI is through the government's RTI portal: Here's how to do it: Go to the portal and click 'Submit Request'. Read the usage guidelines and tick the checkbox confirming you understand them. Click 'Submit' to proceed. On the online form, under 'Select Ministry/Department', choose Ministry of Labour and Employment. Then, under 'Select Public Authority', select Employees' Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO). Fill in your details carefully -Your full name, gender, and contact details -RTI is only for Indian citizens -Your query regarding EPFO -Any relevant details like claim IDs to help officials trace your request -Pay the application fee -The standard RTI application fee is Rs 10, payable online via debit card, internet banking, or UPI. -Applicants falling under the Below Poverty Line category are exempt but must upload proof. When to expect a response Once submitted, the Public Information Officer has 30 days to respond. Replies are sent via email or post. Keep a copy of your RTI application and payment receipt for future reference. If there's no response within 30 days, you can file a first appeal through the same portal
