
Trump's Fed attacks puncture veneer of central bank independence: McGeever
ORLANDO, Florida - If U.S. President Donald Trump's public attacks on Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell have achieved one thing, it has been to thrust the issue of central bank independence firmly into the spotlight. But this raises the question, what does 'independence' really mean?
Central bank independence is widely considered a bedrock of modern-day financial markets. Economists, investors and policymakers almost universally agree that monetary policy should be set for the long-term good and stability of the economy, free from short-term and capricious political influence.
But maintaining that theoretical separation between policymakers and politicians is very challenging in practice.
Ultimately, central banks are creations of – and, to varying degrees, extensions of – their national governments. The legislatures determine their statutes, parameters, goals, and key policymaking personnel.
One need only look at the intertwined and often coordinated responses of countries' central banks and governments to the global financial crisis and pandemic for evidence that complete independence doesn't actually exist.
DE FACTO OR DE JURE
'Independence' has two primary meanings in studies of monetary policy.
Academic studies often refer to 'de jure' independence, essentially legal or institutional independence, and 'de facto' or operational independence. Importantly, de jure independence is no guarantee of de facto independence or vice versa.
Perhaps surprisingly, the U.S. scores pretty low on a de jure basis, mainly because the Fed's statutes have barely changed since it was created over a century ago in 1913.
Davide Romelli, associate professor at Trinity College Dublin, has updated a central bank independence index created by Alex Cukierman, Steven Webb, and Bilin Neyapti in the 1990s. The index, in which 0 is no independence and 1 is total independence, shows the US scoring 0.61. That suggests the Fed is a less institutionally independent body than the European Central Bank, which scored 0.90, and even the People's Bank of China, which scored 0.66.
But on a de facto basis, the Fed would almost certainly rank as higher than the PBOC, given its design, transparency, and accountability mechanisms such as the chair's regular press conferences and appearances before Congress.
And look at how the Fed resisted the clamor to raise interest rates when inflation first exploded after the pandemic as well as its patience in lowering them now given the uncertainty surrounding the U.S. trade agenda. You can argue the wisdom or folly of the Fed's actions in either case, but both episodes put its operational independence on full display.
'BANANA REPUBLIC'
When experts talk about threats to central bank independence, they are usually referring to concerns about de facto independence.
Indeed, this is why Fed-watchers have grown increasingly troubled by Trump's excoriating verbal attacks on Powell over the last six months for not cutting interest rates. If there is a line demarcating political interference, however amorphous, Trump has crossed it.
"The words that Trump uttered are the ones one expects from the head of a banana republic that is about to start printing money to fund fiscal deficits," former Fed Chair and U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen told The New Yorker earlier this month.
Of course, even if Trump were to replace Powell with a more amenable chair, this would not completely eliminate Fed independence. The Fed chair does not single-handedly set interest rates and represents only one of 12 votes at each policy meeting.
But in many ways he or she is the first among equals, as University of Maryland's Thomas Drechsel shows in a recent working paper.
Analyzing over 800 personal interactions between Fed officials and each U.S. president from Franklin D. Roosevelt to Barack Obama in 2016, Drechsel found that 92% were with the Fed chair. President Richard Nixon interacted with Fed officials 160 times, reflecting his infamous efforts to influence then chair Arthur Burns, while only six interactions took place during Bill Clinton's two terms.
To be sure, not all meetings or telephone calls involve political pressure, and for purely logistical reasons, it makes sense that the president would prioritize speaking with the head of the monetary policy body as opposed to all its members.
As such, appointing the governor is a key area where a central bank's independence can be damaged. In a 2022 academic paper titled "(In)dependent Central Banks" revised in February analyzing 317 governor appointments in 57 countries between January 1985 and January 2020, the authors noted that as central banks' powers – and perceived independence – have expanded, political incentives to control them have intensified, "especially in an era of growing global populism."
Thus, in many cases, the more power a central bank has to ignore political pressure, the more motivated government leaders are to apply it. If that is a global trend, Trump appears to be at the vanguard.
(The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.)
(By Jamie McGeever. Editing by Mark Potter)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Crypto Insight
8 minutes ago
- Crypto Insight
35 companies now hold at least 1,000 Bitcoin as corporate adoption booms
Corporate adoption of Bitcoin is accelerating, with 35 publicly traded companies now holding at least 1,000 BTC each, signaling growing institutional interest in the world's largest cryptocurrency. Demand for Bitcoin is soaring among public companies four months after US President Donald Trump's executive order outlined the creation of a federal Bitcoin reserve for the world's largest economy. According to Chris Kuiper, vice president of research at Fidelity Digital Assets, at least 35 public companies have now surpassed 1,000 BTC in holdings on their balance sheets, worth more than $116 billion at the time of writing, up from 24 companies at the end of Q1. The growing Bitcoin-holding companies signal a 'notable increase in Bitcoin exposure,' said Kuiper in a Thursday X post. 'Bitcoin purchases became more widely distributed across public companies rather than concentrated among a few large buyers,' he added. Fidelity's data was published shortly after Bitcoin flipped Amazon's $2.3 trillion market capitalization to become the world's fifth-largest asset by total valuation, Cointelegraph reported on July 14. Following the new wave of institutional buying, over 278 public entities are now holding Bitcoin, up from 124 just weeks ago, according to The US leads all countries with 94 public entities holding Bitcoin, followed by Canada with 40 and the UK with 19 public BTC holding entities. Corporate Bitcoin investments rise 35% in Q3 2025 The growing institutional accumulation saw total Bitcoin purchases increase 35% quarter-on-quarter, from 99,857 BTC in the first quarter of 2025 to 134,456 BTC in the second quarter. 'Not only did the total purchases increase from Q1 to Q2 of 2025 […], but there are a lot more companies doing the buying,' said Fidelity's Kuiper. Bitcoin's open interest, which is near record levels, also points to growing institutional engagement, according to Iliya Kalchev, dispatch analyst at digital asset platform Nexo. 'Open interest in Bitcoin futures remains elevated above $45 billion, just shy of its historical peak, pointing to continued institutional engagement and speculative leverage,' the analyst told Cointelegraph, adding that the 'short-term trend remains sideways, but positioning suggests markets are bracing for a pivotal stretch.' Source:


Gulf Business
3 hours ago
- Gulf Business
ENEC, Westinghouse ink MoU to accelerate nuclear energy deployment in US
Image: Supplied The Emirates Nuclear Energy Company (ENEC) and US-based Westinghouse Electric Company have signed a memorandum of understanding (MoU) to explore the deployment of advanced nuclear technologies in the United States, the companies said. The agreement, signed in Washington, DC, aims to support the expansion of nuclear power in the US, in line with federal ambitions to quadruple the country's nuclear capacity by 2050. It comes as the US seeks to meet growing electricity demand driven by emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence and data center expansion. Supporting US plans to quadruple nuclear capacity Under the terms of the MoU, ENEC and Westinghouse will explore opportunities to accelerate the rollout of Westinghouse's AP1000 reactors. The companies also plan to collaborate on US nuclear new build and restart projects, reactor deployment models, fuel supply chain cooperation, and operations and maintenance. ENEC touts Barakah experience as model 'This marks a significant step in supporting the United States' bold ambitions to rapidly expand its nuclear fleet,' said Mohamed Al Hammadi, CEO of ENEC. 'With The AP1000 is currently the only large modular reactor design fully licensed and ready for construction in the U.S., according to Westinghouse. Interim CEO Dan Sumner said the company is working with partners to meet a federal target of having 10 new large-scale reactors under construction by 2030. 'A fleet of AP1000 reactors would generate billions in direct economic impact and create tens of thousands of skilled jobs,' Sumner said. 'ENEC's expertise in nuclear deployment is a valuable asset to this goal.' The partnership also aligns with ENEC's international strategy to export nuclear development expertise gained from the Barakah Nuclear Energy Plant in the UAE, which is now fully operational and supplies approximately 25 per cent of the country's ENEC is pursuing global opportunities through its ADVANCE programme, which includes an interest in small modular and advanced reactor technologies. Westinghouse, which built the world's first commercial pressurized water reactor in 1957, is involved in about half of the world's operating nuclear plants. Financial details of the agreement were not disclosed.


Khaleej Times
4 hours ago
- Khaleej Times
Astronomer gets Chris Martin's ex-wife Gwyneth Paltrow to 'answer' questions after Coldplay controversy
In a surprising turn of events, Astronomer has hired Gwyneth Paltrow to 'answer questions' from the internet. Paltrow and Martin announced their split in 2014, after a decade of marriage. This comes after the company's now former-CEO was mired in controversy after being seen at a Coldplay concert with the firm's HR head. Paltrow, who is a popular actor, says in the video that she has been hired on a "very temporary" basis to answer common questions that people have been asking on the internet. While the star doesn't actually answer any questions or address any real concerns that netizens may have conveyed earlier, the actor does redirect the conversation to the products that the firm already offers. Watch the video below: Thank you for your interest in Astronomer. — Astronomer (@astronomerio) July 25, 2025 Just last week, Astronomer's CEO Andy Byron put in his resignation, according to a statement issued by the tech company. The company said on X, "As stated previously, Astronomer is committed to the values and culture that have guided us since our founding. Our leaders are expected to set the standard in both conduct and accountability, and recently, that standard was not met." "Andy Byron has tendered his resignation, and the Board of Directors has accepted. The Board will begin a search for our next Chief Executive as Cofounder and Chief Product Officer Pete DeJoy continues to serve as interim CEO," they said.