logo
G20 Climate Action Plans: Lost, Not Found, In Bonn

G20 Climate Action Plans: Lost, Not Found, In Bonn

Scoop01-07-2025
Bonn, July 1 2025 - The just wrapped up SB62 climate talks in Bonn missed the opportunity to raise the bar of Nationally Determined Contributions, due to the G20's lack of political ambition. The NDCs are crucial as they are the cornerstone of the Paris Agreement, reflecting countries' commitments to protect people, livelihoods and ecosystems to the best of their capacities and responsibilities.
The G20 represents about 80% of greenhouse gas emissions. Not all countries in the G20 have the same historic responsibility or capacity, but given the concentration of emissions in these countries, they must show ambition for climate action in line with their fair shares. Despite an initial deadline in February, so far, only five G20 countries have submitted revised NDCs: Brazil, Canada, Japan, the UK, and the US, under the Biden Administration prior to rolling back commitments on climate.
Tasneem Essop, Executive Director, Climate Action Network International, said: 'These NDCs are not just technical documents - they are moral and political declarations that will shape the course of our shared future. They reveal whether governments are ready to confront the climate crisis with courage, or whether they will keep hiding behind greenwashing, delay and distraction.'
Of the G20 NDCs that have been released, none has established concrete and time-bound plans for phasing out fossil fuels. Many have instead opted for obscure ways to increase oil and gas production, including the US, Canada and Brazil, and describe how to use carbon capture and storage (CCS) to decarbonise their energy sector, with the UK committing up to £22 billion to CCS.
Another concern is the continued reliance on carbon markets, especially with this being the first round of NDCs released since Article 6 of the Paris Agreement, which governs international carbon markets. Japan has already signed 29 bilateral agreements under Article 6, and in the plan that accompanies its NDC, it frequently mentions its intention to expand carbon market activity through Article 6 and the Joint Crediting Mechanism. Through the JCM, Japan collaborates with developing countries on low-carbon projects: a portion of the credits generated from the emission reductions of the project could then count towards Japan's NDC emission reduction targets, but Japan should first and foremost achieve its binding climate target domestically.
'Too many G20 countries continue to rely on loopholes and false solutions like carbon markets, while communities on the frontlines pay the price with their lives and livelihoods. Weak or delayed NDCs don't just miss climate targets - they condemn millions to deeper injustice and suffering. But it doesn't have to be this way. Ambitious, justice-driven NDCs - anchored in real emissions cuts, real climate finance, and a just transition - can still change the trajectory. This is not about ticking boxes. This is about whether we rise to meet this moment with the urgency, honesty, and solidarity it demands,' continued Essop.
In addition, there is a lack of clarity and ambition in climate finance to enable the energy transition. Under the Paris Agreement, developed countries have a responsibility to provide international climate finance for mitigation and adaptation in developing countries. Yet, none of these five NDCs align with their fair share contributions.
Chiara Martinelli, Director at CAN Europe, said: 'As the second largest historical polluter, the EU has a responsibility to set an ambitious climate target in its NDC: CAN calls for the EU to reach climate neutrality by 2040 and therefore to establish an ambitious 2035 NDC from there and without relying on international credits. EU leadership is critical for setting international NDC dynamics and will determine the ambition that other countries show in their revised NDCs.'
Transformative NDCs must act as comprehensive action plans that include mitigation, adaptation, loss and damage, just transition, and alignment with sustainable development and human rights. In this context, the G20 must produce particularly strong NDCs that show the world how to collectively remain on track for 1.5 degrees. These NDCs must include economy-wide phase out timelines for coal, oil and gas use that are aligned with reaching net zero emissions by 2040 at the latest for developed countries, and 2050 at the latest for developing countries. Developed countries must provide grant-based finance that match the needs and enable the fast implementation of climate action.
David Knecht, climate expert at Fastenaktion Switzerland, said: 'We have only five NDCs from the G20 in our hands. This cannot be. We expect political leaders to step up and present NDCs that truly respond to the climate urgency. We hope the delayed NDCs are at least taking the time to meaningfully engage those most affected by the climate crisis - this is key to root climate action in lived realities.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

World's highest court sends shot across bow of NZ's climate policy
World's highest court sends shot across bow of NZ's climate policy

Newsroom

time4 days ago

  • Newsroom

World's highest court sends shot across bow of NZ's climate policy

A landmark ruling from the International Court of Justice has found increasing fossil fuel production could breach international human rights law, said all nations must tackle climate change even if they are not parties to the Paris Agreement, and renders polluting states responsible for climate reparations. The advisory opinion, released early Thursday morning at the court's headquarters in The Hague, had the unanimous support of all 15 justices. Legal experts said it had serious implications for developed countries' climate policies, including New Zealand's.

STATEMENT: Gov't Of Vanuatu Response To ICJ Climate Change Ruling
STATEMENT: Gov't Of Vanuatu Response To ICJ Climate Change Ruling

Scoop

time4 days ago

  • Scoop

STATEMENT: Gov't Of Vanuatu Response To ICJ Climate Change Ruling

International Court of Justice Delivers Landmark Decision for Climate Justice; Pacific Islands and Global South to Move Forward with Clarity on Obligations and Accountability of Polluter States. ICJ confirms the legal obligations of States to address the climate crisis; Voluntary pledges and promises under the UNFCCC and Paris Agreement are not enough THE HAGUE (23 July 2025) — The International Court of Justice (ICJ) today issued its ruling on the Obligations of States in respect of Climate Change and the legal consequences for failing to fulfil those obligations. Vanuatu and the large majority of the 96 States and11 International Organisations that presented evidence that States obligations were not limited to voluntary contributions and pledges found in the UNFCCC and Paris Agreement during the hearings in December 2024. The ICJ agreed with the majority and confirmed that international legal obligations - including the duty to cooperate, human rights, duties to prevent transboundary and environmental harm, including marine harm, and to act with due diligence — were also applicable to States' conduct in the context of climate change. Additionally, all States, whether they are parties to the UNFCCC, Kyoto and Paris Agreements or not, were bound by these legal obligations under customary international law. Breaches of any of these primary obligations confirmed as 'most directly relevant' to climate change would result in legal consequences. The Court also confirmed that harm from climate impacts could be established and scientifically attributed to specific polluter States whose acts or omissions resulted in significant harm. Legal consequences include cessation, including requirements to regulate private polluters and end fossil fuel subsidies; assurances of non-repetition; and a duty to make full reparations to injured States and individuals. This ruling is expected to take center stage when the United Nations General Assembly meets in September and at the next conference of parties to the UN Convention on Climate Change (COP30), in November in Brazil. These legal proceedings were requested by the UN General Assembly in a Resolution passed by consensus on 29 March 2023. The campaign for the resolution was initiated by the Pacific Island Students Fighting Climate Change and spearheaded by the Government of Vanuatu seeking climate justice. Statement by Ralph Regenvanu, Minister of Climate Change Adaptation, Meteorology & Geo-Hazards, Energy, Environment and Disaster Management for the Republic of Vanuatu 'The Government of the Republic of Vanuatu commends the International Court of Justice (ICJ) on its landmark advisory opinion on climate change, issued today in response to a UN General Assembly Resolution requesting the opinion following the initiative of the Government of Vanuatu and our fellow Small Island Developing States. 'The ICJ ruling marks an important milestone in the fight for climate justice. We now have a common foundation based on the rule of law, releasing us from the limitations of individual nations' political interests that have dominated climate action. This moment will drive stronger action and accountability to protect our planet and peoples. 'We will now take the ICJ ruling back to the United Nations General Assembly, and pursue a resolution that will support implementation of this decision. The implementation of this decision will set a new status-quo and the structural change required to give our current and future generations hope for a healthy planet and sustainable future. 'Even as fossil fuel expansion continues under the US's influence, along with the loss of climate finance and technology transfer, and the lack of climate ambition following the US's withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, major polluters—past and present—cannot continue to act with impunity and treat developing countries as sacrifice zones to further feed corporate greed. 'Vanuatu is proud and honoured to have spearheaded this initiative, and the number of States and civil society that have joined to fight the same fight is a powerful testament to the leadership, courage, and determination of Small Island Developing States (SIDS) and youth activists. Their persistence has transformed a grassroots movement into the biggest case in the history of international law, placing climate justice at the heart of international discourse. 'The Global South is bearing the brunt of a crisis it did not create. Families are losing their homes, entire cultures are at risk of disappearing, and lives are being shattered by man-made climate disasters. The nations most responsible for emissions should be held accountable for any violations of legal obligations and they must also step up and lead in providing resources and support to aid those most affected. 'This ruling provides a critical foundation for lawyers and activists to further strengthen and affirm that climate destruction is 'against the law.' It also confirms that environmental harm violates fundamental legal principles. 'A victory in the world's highest court is just the beginning. Success will depend on what happens next through coordinated efforts across diplomacy, politics, litigation, and advocacy to turn this moment into a true turning point. 'Vanuatu looks forward to collaborating with other States on implementing the Court's decision, and ensuring that the structural changes needed to increase accountability, demand real financial commitments, and reframe climate justice become the heart of every negotiation, every policy, and every court where our peoples' futures are at stake."

ICJ Advisory Opinion On Climate Change
ICJ Advisory Opinion On Climate Change

Scoop

time5 days ago

  • Scoop

ICJ Advisory Opinion On Climate Change

Today, the world's highest court, the International Court of Justice, released its landmark advisory opinion clarifying States' legal obligations in relation to climate change. 'The Advisory Opinion is incredibly significant. It is a defining moment for climate litigation and state responsibility on climate change', says Jessica Palairet, Executive Director of Lawyers for Climate Action NZ Inc. 'The 133-page judgment of the United Nations' top court found that: Greenhouse gas emissions have unequivocally caused climate change, which is an existential threat. States have legal duties to reduce emissions and regulate businesses' climate impacts. Granting fossil fuel exploration licenses or providing fossil fuel subsidies may constitute a breach of international law. States have to act in line with limiting warming to 1.5°C - not 2°C. States have to exercise due diligence and do everything possible to avoid causing significant harm to the climate system. States' obligations on climate change extend beyond climate treaties, also encompassing many other areas of international law, including human rights law, environmental law, and laws restricting cross-border harms.' 'The Advisory Opinion is non-binding, but it carries significant legal and moral weight. It provides an authoritative statement on states' obligations under international law that will be used by courts around the world, including in New Zealand, as they ask whether governments are meeting their legal obligations', says Palairet. 'In New Zealand, the Advisory Opinion is also of particular importance given our Free Trade Agreements with the European Union and United Kingdom require us to effectively implement the Paris Agreement. The Advisory Opinion provides greater clarity on what effectively implementing the Paris Agreement entails'. 'This Advisory Opinion provides a beacon of hope at a time when we are witnessing both the devastating impacts of climate change and backsliding from many countries, including New Zealand.' 'Our Government is set to make a series of important decisions on climate change in the coming weeks, including whether to cut our 2050 biogenic methane target to 14%. This judgment calls into question whether such a decision would be consistent with our international obligations, which require us to aim to limit warming to 1.5°C'. 'It also raises sharp questions around the Government's repeal of the ban on offshore oil and gas exploration, and recent announcement that it will provide $200m in co-investment for new gas fields. The ICJ has now made clear that this could constitute a breach of international law'. 'Today's opinion would not be here without the work of the Pacific Islands Students Fighting Climate Change, and the support of Pacific Island states, including Vanuatu. It is an incredible story of Pacific leadership on the world stage.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store