
A new megabill red line
Good Tuesday afternoon. We've been closely following all the megabill action in the Senate, but we've also been keeping an eagle eye on the House.
In particular, we've been watching how members have been drawing red lines even after they passed the bill last month and trying to put senators in a box — a big, beautiful box? — as they ponder changes to the legislation.
The latest example is just in, exclusive to POLITICO: Rep. Lloyd Smucker (R-Pa.) and 37 other members are warning against the use of 'budget gimmicks' in the Senate version of the megabill — saying they will insist 'that any additional tax cuts ... must be matched dollar for-dollar by real, enforceable spending reductions.'
The signers include the likes of Budget Chair Jodey Arrington, Conference Vice Chair Blake Moore and Freedom Caucus Chair Andy Harris.
The upshot for Senate leaders? They will have to be extra careful to find real offsets as they strain to make key business tax provisions permanent, ease the phaseout of clean energy tax incentives and sand down the House's cuts to Medicaid and SNAP.
One thing that probably won't pass muster back in the House is simply writing off the costs of extending the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act using the 'current policy baseline' tactic and calling it a day.
Add this to the list of emerging House demands on the Senate, which now includes members of the vaunted SALT crew demanding their state-and-local-tax deduction deal stay entirely intact, and Rep. Chip Roy's insistence that the clean energy phaseouts remain untouched, while 13 other House Republicans say they want those same provisions watered down before they vote again.
Keep in mind all of this is happening as the House prepares to take yet another crucial megabill vote this week — on a package of changes to the bill to address procedural 'fatalities' under Senate rules.
Yes, these are small tweaks, and leadership is likely to present them as a mere 'technical' formalities to members. But it's another reminder of the House GOP's tiny majority and the power that a small handful of members has to grind the process to a halt at just about any moment.
WHAT'S STILL COMING TODAY: The House Rules Committee is meeting and will vote this afternoon to establish parameters for floor debate on the White House's rescissions package at 2 p.m., setting up a floor vote that is expected Thursday. The House will vote on multiple bills at 5 p.m., including one that would prohibit non-citizens from voting in the District of Columbia.
ICYMI:
NRCC chair lays out GOP message on LA protests — Rep. Richard Hudson told House Republicans in a closed-door conference meeting this morning to hammer Democrats on the unrest in Los Angeles, according to people granted anonymity to share details of the private discussion. Hudson, a North Carolina Republican who leads the House GOP's campaign arm, said Americans are 'tired' of 'chaos.'
CBC chair goes off-message on LA protests — Rep. Yvette Clarke (D-N.Y.), chair of the Congressional Black Caucus, called President Donald Trump's decision to send 4,000 National Guard members and 700 Marines to Los Angeles an impeachable offense.
SecDef sends a message to Dems on LA protests — Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth clashed with several Democratic lawmakers today over the California unrest. During a House budget hearing in front of the Defense Appropriations panel, Hegseth argued that California Gov. Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, both Democrats, mishandled the situation.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
13 minutes ago
- The Hill
House could vote on ‘big, beautiful bill' by Wednesday morning, Emmer announces
The House could vote on the GOP's 'big, beautiful bill' as early as Wednesday morning, House Majority Whip Tom Emmer's (R-Minn.) office announced Sunday, officially notifying members that they will have to return to Washington, D.C., to vote on the megabill. The beacon came as Senate Republicans were racing to pass the sprawling tax cuts and spending package, with GOP leaders hoping to send President Trump the measure by their self-imposed July 4 deadline. Once the Senate approves the bill, the House has to give it a final stamp of approval. 'Members are advised that votes are now expected in the House as early as 9:00 a.m. Wednesday, July 2. Please stay tuned to future updates for additional information regarding this week's schedule. This is a change from the previously announced schedule,' the whip's office wrote in a notice Sunday night. The House was scheduled to be on recess this week for July 4. If the Senate clears the legislation and sends it across the Capitol, the measure will first head to the House Rules Committee, where the panel will hold a vote to set parameters for debate. Then, the entire chamber will have to adopt a procedural rule for the legislation — which could happen as early as Wednesday morning — followed by general debate and a final passage vote. It remains unclear when the House will get its hands on the package. The Senate is scheduled to begin what is known as a vote-a-rama Monday morning at 9 a.m., giving senators in both parties an opportunity to introduce and vote on an unlimited number of amendments to the package. It remains unclear when the process will wrap up. Afterward, the chamber will hold a final passage vote. It is not yet certain that the legislation will have enough support to clear the upper chamber. Moderate Republicans have raised concerns about cuts to Medicaid, and conservatives have gripes about the level of spending cuts, prompting uncertainty about the measure's odds in the Senate. The bill, however, could change during the vote-a-rama process to shore up support. Senate Republicans can only lose three members and still clear the package, assuming full attendance and united Democratic opposition. The dynamics are similar in the House, where at least six moderate Republicans have said they will not support the bill in its current form, The Hill has learned, because of Medicaid language and the rollback of green-energy tax credits, among other provisions. Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), one of the two Republicans to vote against the House version of the bill last month, is also expected to vote against the bill, bringing the current number of opponents to seven. House Republicans can also only lose three of their own members and still pass the bill if there is full attendance and all Democrats vote 'no.'


Axios
27 minutes ago
- Axios
Retiring GOP senator savages Medicaid cuts in Trump's "big, beautiful bill"
Fresh off announcing he'll retire next year, Sen. Thom Tillis gave a lengthy floor speech Sunday night attacking cuts to Medicaid in the " big, beautiful bill." Why it matters: The North Carolina Republican is accusing the GOP of breaking President Trump's campaign promises to protect Medicaid. Tillis voted Saturday against starting debate on the bill, and has declared he'll vote "no" on the final version. Zoom in: "I'm telling the president, you have been misinformed," Tillis said on Sunday night. "What do I tell 663,000 people in two years, three years, when President Trump breaks his promise by pushing them off of Medicaid because the funding's not there anymore," Tillis asked. He compared Trump's promise on Medicaid to former President Obama's "if you like your health care plan, you can keep it" quote on the Affordable Care Act. The Senate's version of the "big, beautiful bill" would result in 12 million more people without health insurance in 2034 than today, the Congressional Budget Office projects. Between the lines: The Senate is expected to vote on Monday on an amendment by Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.) that would lower the federal matching share (FMAP) for states that have expanded their Medicaid programs.


Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
Kudlow: We have to be very careful not to give China these 'crown jewels'
All times eastern FOX News Radio Live Channel Coverage WATCH LIVE: Senate convenes over President Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill'