China Scolds Marco Rubio for Dalai Lama Comments
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
China scolded U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio after he extended birthday wishes to the Dalai Lama, the Tibetan spiritual leader.
"Xizang affairs are purely China's internal affairs, which brook no external interference," Chinese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Mao Ning said at a press briefing on Tuesday, July 8, using the Chinese name for Tibet.
"As is widely known, the 14th Dalai Lama is not a pure religious figure but a political exile engaged in anti-China separatist activities under the cloak of religion.
"He and the so-called 'Tibetan government in exile' are in no position at all to represent the people in Xizang, still less decide the future of Xizang."
Mao said China is protecting and promoting the freedoms of various religious and ethnic groups in Xizang.
"The world can clearly see that, and the U.S. is in no position to point its fingers at China," Mao said.
"We urged the U.S. to be fully cognizant of the importance and sensitivity of Xizang-related issues, see clearly the anti-China separatist nature of the Dalit group, honor the commitments that the U.S. has made to China on issues related to Xizang, stop meddling in those issues, and stop sending any wrong signal in any form to the Tibet independence forces."
In a July 5 post to his official X account, Rubio said: "Extending best wishes to His Holiness @DalaiLama on his 90th birthday. The Dalai Lama continues to inspire with his message of unity, peace, and compassion."
This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
7 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Trump Admin Sues California Over Soaring Egg Prices
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The Trump administration has sued California over its animal cruelty laws, saying the state's regulation of chicken farms has led to high egg prices across the country. Lowering the cost of eggs, which spiked in recent years as an avian flu outbreak ravaged American flocks, was one of President Donald Trump's key campaign promises in the lead-up to the 2024 election. But almost six months into his second mandate, his administration has struggled to keep the cost of the staple down. The administration now says California's regulations create "unnecessary red tape" in the production of eggs and are responsible for stubbornly high prices. The lawsuit is the latest flash point in the ongoing battle between the U.S. president and the Democratic-led state, which has clashed with the Trump administration over its aggressive immigration policies and transgender rights. "Trump's back to his favorite hobby: blaming California for literally everything," the office of California Governor Gavin Newsom wrote on X, formerly Twitter, about the lawsuit. "Next up: @CAGovernor Gavin Newsom caused the fall of Rome and sent the asteroid that wiped out the dinosaurs!" What Is the Lawsuit About? The lawsuit, which the Trump administration filed in Los Angeles federal court, blamed the Golden State's animal cruelty laws—widely regarded as among the strictest and most progressive in the nation—for creating the conditions that led to the current spike in egg prices across the country. The laws, the Trump administration argued, have prevented "farmers across the country from using a number of agricultural production methods which were in widespread use—and which helped keep eggs affordable." Under Proposition 2, an initiative approved by California voters in 2008 and implemented in 2015, the state forbids farmers from packing chickens together so close that a hen cannot "lie down, stand up, fully extend its limbs, and turn around freely." Essentially, the state bans the use of chicken battery farms, a method of intensive egg production where hens are stacked in rows and rows of tiny cages, which restrict their natural movements and can cause the animals high levels of stress and frustration. A composite image of a supermarket shopper walking past an egg display in Monterey Park, California, on February 10 and an inset of President Donald Trump in the State Dining Room of the White House... A composite image of a supermarket shopper walking past an egg display in Monterey Park, California, on February 10 and an inset of President Donald Trump in the State Dining Room of the White House in Washington, D.C., on July 9. More FREDERIC J. BROWN/AFP via Getty Images;Proposition 12, an initiative backed by California voters in 2018 and implemented in January 2022, outlawed the use of cages for egg-laying hens, sows and calves raised for veal, giving specific requirements of how much space farmers must give to their animals. Crucially, it also banned the in-state sale of products from caged animals raised out of state. The Trump administration's lawsuit argued that the federal Egg Products Inspection Act of 1970 should preempt any California state laws related to eggs. This law, the lawsuit says, gives the Departments of Agriculture and Health and Human Services the authority to regulate eggs to protect consumers' health and welfare, and it requires "national uniformity" in egg safety standards. "It is the prerogative of the federal government alone to regulate the quality, inspection, and packaging of eggs," the Justice Department wrote in its civil complaint. "Americans across the country have suffered the consequences of liberal policies causing massive inflation for everyday items like eggs," Attorney General Pam Bondi said in a statement. "Under President Trump's leadership, we will use the full extent of federal law to ensure that American families are free from oppressive regulatory burdens and restore American prosperity." It is not the first time that California's animal cruelty laws have been challenged in court. In 2014, six states—Missouri, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Alabama, Kentucky and Iowa—sued California over its egg regulations. The states lost both in a federal district court and the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. Other states—including Colorado, Massachusetts, Michigan, Nevada, Oregon and Washington—have laws requiring eggs sold in the state to be from cage-free hens. In February, Nevada temporarily relaxed its cage-free requirements because of the shortages, but the rules were restored in June. How High Are Egg Prices? According to the latest consumer price index, egg prices nationwide averaged $4.55 per dozen in May—up from $2.69 a year earlier, according to data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The main reason behind higher egg prices is that supply has shrunk as a direct consequence of the avian flu that broke out in the country in February 2022 and has since wreaked havoc among American flocks. Under federal policy, to prevent the spread of the virus, entire flocks must be culled if even a single infected bird is found on a farm. Cage-free hens proved to be particularly vulnerable to the virus. In 2024, according to NerdWallet, cage-free hens represented almost 60 percent of all bird flu cases for the year, even as they accounted for about a third of egg-laying hens in the U.S. In January, the White House blamed the Biden administration for killing more than 100 million birds, most of which were egg-laying hens. The Trump administration's lawsuit against California does not mention the avian flu that has laid waste across the U.S. egg industry and led to the culling of millions of birds across the country over the past few years.
Fox News
22 minutes ago
- Fox News
Trump cautioned Putin he would ‘bomb the s---' out of Moscow if Russia invaded Ukraine, new book claims
President Donald Trump told donors in 2024 he had cautioned Russian President Vladimir Putin that bombs would drop on Moscow if the Russian leader invaded Ukraine, a new book claims. The book, "2024: How Trump Retook the White House and the Democrats Lost America," was published on Tuesday and chronicles how Trump secured his victory in the November 2024 election, and how former President Joe Biden's team dismissed concerns about his age in the campaign cycle. According to the book, Trump told donors that he'd issued a harsh warning to Putin about any potential invasion. Additionally, he said he'd issued a similar warning to Chinese President Xi Jinping, should the Chinese leader invade Taiwan, the book said. "I was with Putin and I told him, 'Vladimir, if you do it, we're going to bomb the s--- out of Moscow,'" Trump revealed, according to an audio recording, also shared with CNN. "'If you go into Taiwan, I'm going to bomb the s--- out of Beijing.' He thought I was crazy… He didn't believe me either, except 10 percent. And 10 percent is all you need." In response, the White House said that Russia only invaded Ukraine in February 2022 — after Trump's first term in office. "As President Trump has said time and again, Russia never dared invade Ukraine when he was in office. It happened only when Biden was in office," White House spokesperson Anna Kelly said in a Wednesday statement. "Thanks to this President's leadership, America is once again the leader of the free world, and peace through strength is restored. President Trump won on an America First agenda, and he is working hard to implement the mandate the American people gave him." The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Fox News Digital confirming the authenticity of the audio. The book "2024" is one of several that have been released in 2025 detailing how Trump secured victory in the 2024 election and how Biden's mental acuity declined. It is authored by Josh Dawsey of the Wall Street Journal, Tyler Pager of the New York Times and Isaac Arnsdorf of the Washington Post. The authors did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Fox News Digital. Trump has recently voiced frustration with Putin as he's sought to bring an end to the war between Russia and Ukraine. Tuesday, Trump said during a Cabinet meeting he was fed up with Putin and said he was eyeing potentially imposing new sanctions on Russia. "We get a lot of bulls--- thrown at us by Putin, if you want to know the truth. He's very nice all the time, but it turns out to be meaningless," Trump said Tuesday.
Politico
33 minutes ago
- Politico
How an Arizona special election is inflaming Democratic divides
'As a mother and lifelong public servant in this community, I've lived the challenges our families face under Trump's anti-Latino policies, and have spent my career standing up for immigrant rights,' Grijalva said in a statement. 'I will bring the same fight and resistance to this anti-immigrant Administration.' Foxx, who would be one of two Filipino Americans in Congress if elected, has been calling out the party's failure to stand up to President Donald Trump and is going after the late Grijalva for not resigning and thus making Republicans' megabill easier to pass. She has also painted Adelita Grijalva as part of the 'establishment.' 'Hundreds of thousands of people in my district, myself included, my friends, my family, my neighbors have been without a representative because of the passing,' Foxx said in a Tuesday interview. 'At a time where this budget bill stands to impact so many of us, we have had nobody voting on our behalf, nobody fighting for us.' Hogg and his PAC did not respond directly to BOLD PAC's statement, instead focusing on highlighting their endorsed candidate. Foxx, Hogg said in a statement, 'brings unmatched clarity, conviction, and lived experience to some of the toughest challenges working families face.' 'She is equipped to fight back against Trump because he's attacking the very programs that she's relied on for her survival,' he added. Foxx brushed aside concerns about Hispanic representation, saying the role 'can look a lot of different ways' and citing her ties to the the district's younger, working-class communities. Hernandez and Grijalva are vowing to stand up to Trump. But like Foxx, Hernandez has painted Grijalva as an extension of the Democrats whom they view as somewhat acquiescent and has pointed to the support from national groups like BOLD PAC as evidence nothing will change. 'It's not surprising that the daughter of a congressman who was in Congress for over 20 years is getting the establishment endorsement,' Hernandez said in an interview on Tuesday. With under a week before the election, Hernandez spent almost $479,000 on TV ads, to Foxx's roughly $471,500 and Grijalva's near $309,000, according to AdImpact, which tracks political advertising. Outside spending has ramped up in the race as well. Some pro-Grijalva groups have also played in the race. The Working Families Party, which endorsed her in late May, spent just under $150,000, mostly on broadcast ads. Progressive Promise, the Congressional Progressive Caucus and the League of Conservation Voters have also bought ads in the area, per AdImpact.
