91% of individual traders saw losses in equity derivatives segment, up 41% YoY, finds SEBI study
Moreover, a similar trend was observed in FY2024.
The study indicated that the net losses of individual traders widened by 41 per cent to ₹ 1,05,603 crore in FY25 from ₹ 74,812 crore in FY24.
Alongside this, the number of unique individual investors trading in the futures and options segment declined by 20 per cent compared to the previous year, though it was up by 24 per cent from two years ago.
Sebi conducted this analysis to evaluate trading activity in the Equity Derivatives Segment (EDS), especially after introducing measures on October 1, 2024, to strengthen the equity index derivatives framework. The analysis covered all investors and focused on individual traders from December 2024 to May 2025.
"Analysis of profit and loss of individual traders in EDS suggests that at the aggregate level, nearly 91 per cent of individual traders incurred net loss in EDS in FY 2025 (a similar trend was observed in FY 2024)," the study noted.
During this period, index options turnover saw a year-on-year decline of 9 per cent in premium terms and 29 per cent in notional terms. However, when compared to two years ago, index options volume increased by 14 per cent in premium terms and 42 per cent in notional terms.
The study further found that the turnover of individuals in premium terms in EDS decreased by 11 per cent year-on-year, but rose by 36 per cent over a similar period two years ago.
Despite these fluctuations, India continues to witness relatively high levels of trading in the EDS, particularly in index options.
"Trends in turnover of index options will continue to be observed from the perspective of ensuring investor protection and market stability," Sebi said.
In order to ensure that the rapid growth in the derivatives market matches with commensurate risk monitoring metrics, Sebi on May 29, 2025, introduced a set of measures aimed at enhancing risk monitoring and disclosure in the derivatives market.
These measures also aimed to reduce instances of spurious ban periods for derivatives on single stocks and ensure better oversight to prevent concentration or manipulation risks in index options.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
Retail traders lose Rs 1.05 lakh crore in FY25 amid Jane Street manipulation allegations
Mumbai: The Securities and Exchange Board of India's (Sebi) latest study showed that retail traders in equity derivatives made losses of ₹1.05 lakh crore in FY25, a 41% increase from ₹74,812 crore in FY24. The report was published Monday, hot on the heels of an interim order against US trading giant Jane Street, which has been accused by the regulator of manipulating India's stock indices to profit from its equity derivative bets. A look at the interlinkages: ADVERTISEMENT What is the Sebi order about? The interim, ex-parte order probes into alleged index manipulation by Jane Street involving bank shares and the Bank Nifty index futures and options (F&O). Sebi's investigations showed that the trading firm was engaged in manipulative trades on the expiry days of Bank Nifty derivatives that pushed the outcome in its favour. How and when did the alleged manipulation happen? According to the Sebi probe, the manipulation by Jane Street occurred on expiry days of index options. The expiry day is the last day until which the derivative contracts - weekly and monthly - are valid. It is the day when contracts are most actively traded. On the expiry day, the smallest of the price moves in shares (cash market) and futures can result in big profits or losses in options. That's what Sebi has accused Jane Street of doing: Manipulating shares in the cash market and futures prices to make outsized profits through options. Shares, futures, and options: How are they interlinked? Prices or values of shares, futures and options move together in a liquid market. If they don't, traders step in to take advantage of the price anomalies in these contracts. Such trades are known as arbitrage, which end up linking price moves of shares and derivatives. It's often seen that when a stock price moves in the cash market, its futures and options values also move in the same direction. If arbitrage is legal, why has Jane Street's trading strategy been termed manipulation? This is because the American firm's trades in shares and futures, according to Sebi, were aimed at steering the option values in their favour. In this trading strategy, the regulator alleged Jane Street made losses in shares and futures, while earning big money in options. The Sebi probe showed the alleged intraday index manipulation through an analysis of the trading on January 17, 2024. Step 1: Jane Street bought a large quantity of shares and futures that are constituents of the Bank Nifty index, such as HDFC Bank, ICICI Bank and Axis Bank, among others, earlier in the day. It was the single biggest buyer then. This resulted in the Bank Nifty index going up. ADVERTISEMENT Step 2: Simultaneously, they sold Bank Nifty call options and bought Bank Nifty put options. When a trader buys a put option, s/he is betting that the index will fall. Similarly, when a trader sells a call option, s/he is betting that the market will not rise. So, isn't buying Bank Nifty put options and selling its call options the exact opposite of the trade where it purchased shares and futures of Bank Nifty constituents? Yes, but don't let that confuse you. This is where the strategy, described by Sebi as manipulative, unfolded. ADVERTISEMENT Step 3: After midday, Jane Street started aggressively selling bank shares and liquidating bullish futures positions that it had accumulated in the morning. This put downward pressure on the Bank Nifty, resulting in its Bank Nifty call and put option bets turning profitable (please note that the option wagers were betting on the Bank Nifty falling). In this trading strategy, Jane Street made profits from Bank Nifty index options of Rs 734.93 crore, while it booked losses of Rs 61.6 crore in the cash and futures segment on January 17. This trade could have helped the firm make an approximate net profit of Rs 673 crore on a single day, according to the Sebi probe. So, the profits came from options, where small index movements resulted in a big payoff. ADVERTISEMENT Was this a one-off instance? According to the Sebi probe, this trading strategy was repeated on 15 expiry days. Moreover, Jane Street allegedly ignored Sebi's caution letter and continued these trades despite the warnings Is Sebi's analysis of retail traders losing money in derivatives linked to the Jane Street probe? ADVERTISEMENT Sebi has not explicitly stated any linkages between the Jane Street probe and the separate study on retail traders losing money in derivatives trading. But the timing of the Sebi publication, soon after its unprecedented order against Jane Street, has sparked such a debate. That said, the regulator, in the order against Jane Street, said: 'JS Group was undertaking an intentional, well-planned, and sinister scheme and artifice to manipulate cash & futures markets and, hence, manipulate the Bank Nifty index level, to entice small investors to trade at unfavourable and misleading prices, and to the advantage of the JS Group.' What are Jane Street's chances of winning against the Sebi order? According to media reports, the trading firm plans to challenge Sebi's ban on Jane Street from trading in India. Lawyers and market participants are of the view that the firm's trades involving Bank Nifty are not illegal per se and are allowed within the regulatory ambit. Sebi, on the other hand, may argue that Jane Street's trades have been detrimental to the interests of retail traders, most of whom have been losing money in equity derivative trades.
Mint
2 hours ago
- Mint
Best midcap stocks to buy today, 9 July, recommended by NeoTrader's Raja Venkatraman
Midcap and small-cap segments represent dynamic and critical components of the equity market, offering both enticing growth opportunities and distinct risks. These segments typically include companies that, while not as well-established as large-cap firms, have significant expansion potential. The last few months have been quite challenging, and we will need to mix our approach with the objective of generating some returns. Here are three midcap stocks to buy as recommended by Raja Venkatraman for Wednesday Navin Fluorine International (Cmp ₹5,040) Also Read: Lodha Developers pre-sales dull, but business development activity remains solid Cummins India (Cmp ₹3,478) Datamatics Global Services (Cmp ₹669.05) Also Read: With ₹3.4 trillion already in, are DIIs the new market movers from here on? Sentiment holds onto positive vibes Midcap stocks have staged a strong comeback by June 2025, reclaiming investor confidence after a turbulent start to the year. The midcap indices closed at an encouraging point, marking a steady uptrend and staying above key moving averages. This resurgence is underpinned by a confluence of favourable factors: softening inflation, a dovish monetary policy stance, and robust earnings growth in the midcap segment. The Reserve Bank of India's recent 50 basis point rate cut—its third in 2025—has improved liquidity, while a 100 bps CRR reduction is expected to inject ₹2.5 lakh crore into the system. These moves have bolstered domestic sentiment and revived foreign institutional flows. Midcap companies, in particular, have outperformed, with the Nifty Midcap 150 reporting a 21% rise in profits in Q4 FY25. Valuations, which had corrected sharply earlier in the year, are now seen as attractive, especially in sectors like capital goods, financials, and building materials. With above-average monsoon forecasts supporting rural demand and global rate stability on the horizon, analysts believe the midcap rally has legs—provided earnings momentum and macro stability persist. Raja Venkatraman is the co-founder of NeoTrader. His Sebi-registered research analyst registration no. is INH000016223. Investments in securities are subject to market risks. Read all the related documents carefully before investing. Registration granted by Sebi and certification from NISM in no way guarantees performance of the intermediary or provide any assurance of returns to investors. Disclaimer: The views and recommendations given in this article are those of individual analysts. These do not represent the views of Mint. We advise investors to check with certified experts before making any investment decisions.
Economic Times
2 hours ago
- Economic Times
Sebi order reflects misunderstanding of standard hedging practices: Jane Street
Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel Mumbai: US-based Jane Street said the Indian capital market regulator's order accusing the trading firm of manipulative trading in equity derivatives reflects a 'misunderstanding of standard hedging practices and the interrelationships between derivative and underlying markets'.The firm, in an internal communication that ET has accessed, said the Securities and Exchange Board of India's claim that the firm's activity is "prima facie manipulative", disregards the role of liquidity providers and arbitrageurs in markets, while contesting claims that it was uncooperative with Sebi regarding its trading strategies."This just isn't true. It doesn't line up with the facts of how we engaged with Sebi," the communication week, Sebi banned Jane Street from dealing in Indian securities market and directed it to pay ₹4,844 crore, which the regulator deemed as unlawful Indian regulator used a specific metric for market impact and trading aggressiveness which is disconnected from actual market dynamics, the trading firm firm said when Sebi asked for information about its trading in August 2024, it promptly provided information and maintained transparent communication throughout follow-up questions. Similarly, upon receiving letters from the Indian stock exchanges in February this year, it immediately "turned off" trading activity to understand their concerns. Senior Jane Street leaders from Hong Kong and New York also flew to Mumbai and based on the conversation, made modifications to its trading, it said. Upon completion of the process, it believed that Sebi was comfortable with its approach."Since February, we have made ongoing efforts to communicate with Sebi and have been consistently rebuffed. The order claims that this is an "urgent" situation, yet Sebi could have responded to any one of our requests to discuss their concerns."Countering Sebi's allegations that it was most active on expiry days of index options, Jane Street said the nature of the Indian market, where participants predominantly engage in cash-settled index options, results in liquidity providers (including themselves and others) accumulating stock price exposure that terminates at options expiry. "Replacing expiring deltas with non-expiring deltas is a standard and well-understood practice in markets throughout the world," the firm the Sebi order emphasising examining the first eight minutes of trading on January 17, 2024, as crucial for understanding the intent and design of its options strategy, which the regulator termed as intra-day index manipulation, Jane Street explained that those eight minutes illustrate basic index arbitrage trading, a standard financial market mechanism that maintains the prices of related instruments in line."One can easily observe that there was a large divergence between the Bank Nifty index price shown in the options markets and the price implied by the stock levels. Jane Street (presumably alongside other participants) traded in a direction consistent with closing that gap and bringing the two markets more in line with one another," the firm said. Such synchronisation, Jane Street said, was "unambiguously good for the health of financial markets".
