After federal funding cut, Alaska Legislature asks Congress to help rural schools
A group of Alaska's rural school districts are asking for help after the federal government failed to renew a program that sends grant money to logging-dependent areas.
On Monday, the Alaska Legislature joined the call for help by passing House Joint Resolution 5, which asks Congress to reauthorize the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000.
That act sent $12.6 million to Alaska schools in federal fiscal year 2023, but Congress has thus far failed to reauthorize the program.
The state Senate passed HJR 5 by a 19-1 vote on May 9 after modifying a version originally written by Rep. Jeremy Bynum, R-Ketchikan. The House agreed with the changes, 37-3, on Monday.
The votes against the resolution came from conservative Republicans who generally oppose federal spending.
The Secure Rural Schools Act, as it is commonly known, was designed to compensate rural school districts for tax revenue lost as the federal government began to restrict logging in the 1990s.
In 2023, the law provided more than $250 million to districts nationwide, with about 5% of the funding coming to Alaska.
For some of Southeast Alaska's rural school districts, the money was a big part of the local budget. Yakutat, for example, received more than $6,500 per student. Wrangell had almost $3,500, and the money was worth $584 for each of Ketchikan's 2,045 students.
HJR 5, which will be sent to every member of Congress, asks for retroactive funding and for a permanent funding source to pay for the bill.
It also encourages Congress to open more federal land to timber cutting 'in a manner that supports rural economic revitalization, conserves habitat, and promotes forest health.'
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
an hour ago
- Politico
Senate passes first funding package ahead of shutdown cliff
'It's taken a great deal of work, good faith and negotiation to get to this point,' Senate Appropriations Chair Susan Collins (R-Maine). 'Congress has a responsibility, a constitutional responsibility under Article I, for the power of the purse. We are executing that responsibility.' The package would provide almost $154 billion for military construction and veterans programs. It would send more than $27 billion to the Agriculture department and FDA. Both represent a roughly 2 percent boost over current levels. The Senate rejected an amendment from Sen. Jeff Merkley, an appropriator and the top Democrat on the Senate Budget Committee, that would bar the rescission, or clawback, of funds in the bill by the White House. Democrats are worried that the administration will send another rescissions package ahead of the fall funding deadline, which would likely implode any hopes of getting a larger funding deal. Still, Sen. Patty Murray, the top Democrat on the Appropriations Committee, defended the smaller deal reached among senators, saying that the package 'rejects damaging cuts from Trump and House Republicans.' The Senate adopted by voice vote an amendment from Democratic Sens. Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut and Alex Padilla of California that would bar the use of any funds in the bill to reduce services provided by the Veterans Crisis Line. Senators rejected other amendments from Democrats including one that would have halted funding of the Agriculture Department reorganization and another to require a report on staffing reductions at the VA. They also rejected amendments from Sens. John Kennedy (R-La.) and Rick Scott (R-Fla.) that would have made deeper cuts to the Agriculture-FDA bill. The chamber also voted 75-21 to reject a proposal from Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin that would bar lawmakers from taking credit for earmarks. It would require the funding to be revoked if a lawmaker were to ever tout their earmarks in interviews, mailings, speeches or even on the campaign trail.
Atlantic
an hour ago
- Atlantic
Trump Gets Rid of Those Pesky Statistics
For decades, Donald Trump has been at war with numbers. Some capitulated more swiftly than others. His weight, his golf scores, and his net worth have long fallen in line. As I understand it, a Trump doctor appointment consists of going to a medical professional and announcing how much you would like to weigh and what your resting heart rate ought to be, and the wise doctor's patriotic, good equipment cooperates to measure you correctly. (I have tried this myself without success. My scale is not a true patriot.) Mean, wicked scales that display unflattering numbers, and foolish, incompetent golf balls that do not traverse the correct distance are promptly discarded and replaced with their more loyal counterparts. This is how value works! As Trump testified once in court, 'My net worth fluctuates, and it goes up and down with the markets and with attitudes and with feelings, even my own feelings … Yes, even my own feelings, as to where the world is, where the world is going, and that can change rapidly from day to day.' Some data, such as the number of votes he received at the polls in 2020, initially refused to budge. But with a little bit of threatening from some extra-patriotic patriots, the election turned out to have been a Trump blowout. Just ask any elected Republican; he'll tell you! Now these politicians are working on gerrymandering the country so that it will understand that Republicans are in the majority everywhere—which poll results would already be saying if they were more patriotic. And now at last Donald Trump has fired the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Once these disloyal statisticians are out of the way, the data will finally start to cooperate. The ONLY possible reason the economy could be doing anything other than booming is Biden-legacy manipulation. The economy is not frightened and exhausted by a man who pursues his tariffs with the wild-eyed avidity of Captain Ahab and seems genuinely unable to grasp the meaning of a trade deficit. No, the numbers are simply not patriotic enough. We must make an example of them! When they are frightened enough, I am sure they will show growth. Fumbling around in a fog of vibes and misinformation and things you saw on Fox News is good enough for the president; why should the rest of us ask for anything better? Soon no one will know what is happening—what the problem is, or what remedies to apply. What sectors are booming and which are contracting; whether interest rates should be higher or lower; whether it's hotter or colder than last year; whether mortality has gone up or gone down. It will be vibes all the way down. Soon we will all be bumping helplessly around in the dark. That's a good thing. We can all breathe easier and know that the economy is doing just what the president wants it to do. Try feeling like eggs are cheaper! Try feeling like you have a job. Try feeling like you can buy the amount of goods and services with your dollar that you desire. Close your eyes and try a little harder. Then you'll feel the prosperity. Trickling down, so warmly, from Trump on high. And the invisible hand, lifting you up.
NBC News
an hour ago
- NBC News
Republican Senators raise concerns about Trump's firing of BLS Commissioner
Some Republican Senators have expressed concern about President Donald Trump's decision Friday to fire the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics hours after the release of the July jobs report. Several Republicans told NBC News that they would take issue with the firing of Erika McEntarfer, the commissioner of the BLS, if it is the result of Trump disliking the jobs report numbers, which showed the U.S. job market in the past months has been considerably weaker than previously thought. Trump defended his decision Friday, saying without evidence that the report's numbers were 'phony' and accused McEntarfer of releasing favorable jobs numbers before the election to give former Vice President Kamala Harris an edge. Sen. Cynthia Lummis, R-Wy., said if the data is untrustworthy, the public should find out, but firing the commissioner before knowing whether the numbers are inaccurate is 'kind of impetuous.' 'If the President is firing the statistician because he doesn't like the numbers but they are accurate, then that's a problem,' Lummis said. 'It's not the statistician's fault if the numbers are accurate and that they're not what the President had hoped for.' Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., blasted Trump's decision to fire McEntarfer as well. 'If she was just fired because the President or whoever decided to fire the director just did it because they didn't like the numbers, they ought to grow up,' Tillis said. Tillis announced in June that he does not intend to run for re-election, a day after opposing Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill,' and subsequently drawing the president's ire, including a threat to back a primary challenge against the senator. Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., who found out about the commissioner's firing from NBC News' question to him about it, said he did not know much about the topic but proceeded to question whether the move would be effective in improving the numbers. 'We have to look somewhere for objective statistics. When the people providing the statistics are fired, it makes it much harder to make judgments that you know, the statistics won't be politicized,' Paul said. 'I'm going to look into it, but first impression is that you can't really make the numbers different or better by firing the people doing the counting,' he added. Paul also opposed Trump's Big Beautiful Bill last month. The Senator said in June that due to his vocal opposition, he was uninvited from an annual White House picnic in the weeks leading up to the vote on the sweeping domestic policy package. However, Trump later said Paul and his family were invited. Democratic Senators have spoken out against McEntarfer's firing, too, with Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., accusing Trump of acting like 'someone who imitates authoritarian leaders' during remarks on the Senate floor Friday. Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., called the move 'the sign of an authoritarian type' and added, 'what that means is, I think the American people are going to find it hard to believe the information that comes out of the government, because Trump will always want it to be great news, and when that happens, it's hard for us to deal with the problems, because we don't know what is going on.' Sen. Brian Schatz, D-Hawaii, went a step further, calling McEntarfer's dismissal 'The stuff of fascist dictatorships.'
