logo
Tim Ryan: Kathy Hochul's Balanced and All of the Above Energy Approach Can Be a Blueprint for Democrats

Tim Ryan: Kathy Hochul's Balanced and All of the Above Energy Approach Can Be a Blueprint for Democrats

Newsweek12 hours ago
Advocates for ideas and draws conclusions based on the interpretation of facts and data.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
In today's hyper-polarized political landscape, common sense often feels like a radical act. That's why Governor Kathy Hochul's (D-N.Y.) embrace of a balanced, all-of-the-above energy strategy deserves more than polite applause. Governor Hochul can create a model for Democrats across the country.
Natural Allies for a Clean Energy Future, a group I co-chair, conducted polling last month from showed a strong majority of New Yorkers want energy that is reliable and affordable. Sixty-six percent of New York voters, including 74 percent of state Democrats, oppose efforts to block natural gas. This isn't a red or blue issue. It's a kitchen table issue. It's time Democrats leaned into it.
Energy policy doesn't happen in a vacuum. It's the backbone of everything we care about—economic growth, national security, public health, and affordability. Nowhere is this more apparent than in New York—a state whose infrastructure powers not just the local economy, but vital national assets.
New York Governor Kathy Hochul attends the 2025 New York City Pride March on June 29, 2025, in New York City.
New York Governor Kathy Hochul attends the 2025 New York City Pride March on June 29, 2025, in New York City.
TheStewartofNY/Getty Images
Wall Street. Fort Drum. Billion-dollar semiconductor facilities like Micron's new plant near Syracuse. Brookhaven National Laboratory on Long Island. These institutions depend on a resilient energy grid and gas network. That's what made the findings from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC)—which are responsible for maintaining the reliability of the grid—report on Winter Storm Elliott in 2022 so alarming. The storm strained the Northeast's grid to the brink. Millions lost power. Natural gas supply failed to meet demand. The region, and especially New York, was one bad break away from widespread blackouts and loss of heating that would have taken weeks not days to restore.
That's also what was concerning about a recent report from New York ISO, which maintains the state's electric grid. They are sounding the alarm that New York's grid is under such severe strain "every plausible option and opportunity to bolster reliability and resource needs should be on the table," including "new conventional supply" in addition to repowering older retired assets.
Governor Hochul's recent acknowledgment that natural gas must be part of New York's energy future is a critical turning point. It signals that the governor understands what many in her party have struggled to admit: that achieving a clean energy future does not mean discarding the tools that work today. Natural gas remains a cornerstone of grid reliability. During times of peak demand—like Winter Storm Elliott—it's often the last line of defense.
The politics of this are just as important. Republicans have long used energy affordability as a cudgel, accusing Democrats of raising costs and prioritizing ideology over working families. There's some truth in that critique. But Hochul is offering a way forward. By embracing natural gas, nuclear, and renewables, she's demonstrating a pragmatic path—one that reflects the needs of real people.
There's also a broader political narrative at play. If New York's grid falters again, figures like President Donald Trump will be quick to assign blame. And unless Democrats take bold action, they'll be left playing defense—even on issues like Micron's investment, where President Trump has tried to undercut bipartisan economic growth efforts.
Governor Hochul has a chance to flip the script. She can show that Democrats don't have to choose between environmental progress and economic reality. We can lead on both fronts. We must.
By continuing to move toward a balanced energy policy that includes natural gas, Hochul can define what Democratic leadership looks like in a second Trump term. And if she succeeds, it won't just be New York that benefits—it'll be the whole country.
Tim Ryan is a senior advisor at the Progressive Policy institute.
The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump said he made ‘no progress' in latest call with Putin
Trump said he made ‘no progress' in latest call with Putin

The Hill

time33 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Trump said he made ‘no progress' in latest call with Putin

President Trump said Thursday he made 'no progress' during his call with Russian President Vladimir Putin on attempts to broker a ceasefire in Ukraine. 'We had a call. It was a pretty long call. Talked about a lot of things, including Iran,' Trump told reporters on Thursday as he departed for Iowa. 'And we also talked about, as you know, the war with Ukraine, and I'm not happy about that. Asked if he had made any progress in brokering an end to the fighting in Ukraine, Trump responded, 'No. I didn't make any progress with him today at all.' The two leaders spoke on Thursday morning. The call took place a day after the Pentagon confirmed a decision to halt the delivery of some air defense missiles and munitions to Ukraine, citing concerns about U.S. military stockpiles being depleted. Trump downplayed the impact when asked about the pause on Thursday evening. 'We're giving weapons…and we're working with them and trying to help them,' Trump said. 'But we have – you know Biden emptied out our whole country giving them weapons. And we have to make sure we have enough for ourselves.' The U.S. has given tens of billions of dollars in military aid to Ukraine since Russia launched its full-scale invasion of its neighbor in February 2022, though many Trump allies have expressed skepticism about continued American support for Kyiv. Democrats, and a small number of Republicans and European allies, have warned that abandoning Ukraine would be a major victory for Putin and Russia. Trump campaigned on a pledge to end the war in Ukraine within 24 hours, a timeline he has since described as sarcastic. Still, he has struggled to make progress in bringing the fighting to an end, lashing out at various points at Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.

Donald Trump Reveals Details of Vladimir Putin Call
Donald Trump Reveals Details of Vladimir Putin Call

Newsweek

time37 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Donald Trump Reveals Details of Vladimir Putin Call

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump revealed the details of his conversation with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Thursday Trump told reporters before he boarded Air Force One for an "America 250" rally at the Iowa State Fairgrounds, "We had a call, it was a pretty long call, we talked about a lot of things, including Iran. We also talked about the war with Ukraine. I'm not happy about that. "No, I didn't make any progress with him today," Trump said when asked about a potential deal with Putin to end the war in Ukraine. Trump on his call with Putin: "We also talked about the war with Ukraine, and I'm not happy about that ... I didn't make any progress with him today at all." — Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) July 3, 2025 Putin and Trump talk Ukraine, Iran and other issues, Kremlin says During Thursday's call, Russian President Vladimir Putin stressed the importance of resolving issues with Iran through political and diplomatic means, according to his foreign affairs adviser, Yuri Ushakov. On the topic of Ukraine, Ushakov said President Trump reiterated his desire for a swift end to the fighting, while Putin expressed Moscow's willingness to engage in negotiations. However, Putin also made clear that Russia remains committed to achieving its objectives in Ukraine and addressing what he described as the "root causes" of the conflict. Ushakov added that the recent pause in U.S. military assistance to Ukraine was not discussed during the conversation. Left: President Donald Trump speaks to reporters in the Oval Office of the White House, May 23, 2025, in Washington. Right: Russian President Vladimir Putin speaks during a plenary session of the 5th annual forum... Left: President Donald Trump speaks to reporters in the Oval Office of the White House, May 23, 2025, in Washington. Right: Russian President Vladimir Putin speaks during a plenary session of the 5th annual forum Strong Ideas for a New Time hosted by the autonomous non-profit organization Agency for Strategic Initiatives to Promote New Projects (ASI) in Moscow, Russia, Thursday, July 3, 2025. More Associated Press Trump and Putin's Call History The call marked the sixth publicly acknowledged conversation between the two leaders since Trump returned to office earlier this year. Their last confirmed call took place on June 14, just one day after Israel launched an attack on Iran. The renewed contact between Trump and Putin appears to reflect a mutual interest in restoring U.S.-Russia relations, which have sharply deteriorated during the ongoing war in Ukraine — now entering its fourth year. The Trump-Putin conversation comes just two days after Russian President Putin held his first direct phone call in nearly three years with French President Emmanuel Macron. U.S. and Russian Leader Talk After Major Pentagon Announcement Thursday's call also follows the Pentagon's announcement that it is temporarily halting shipments of certain weapons to Ukraine. The pause, part of a global reassessment of U.S. military stockpiles, affects deliveries of air defense systems, precision-guided artillery, and other critical equipment. A U.S. official and a former national security official, both speaking on condition of anonymity, confirmed the types of weapons being withheld, as the Defense Department has not yet disclosed specifics. Russia has intensified its military offensive in Ukraine, making significant territorial gains, particularly in the eastern Donetsk region and the northeastern Sumy Oblast. Russian forces have captured key towns such as Kostiantynivka in Sumy, bringing them within artillery range of the city of Sumy itself. In Donetsk, heavy fighting continues around Pokrovsk and Kostiantynivka, with Russian troops aiming to disrupt Ukrainian supply lines and advance toward the Dnipropetrovsk region. These advances have been facilitated by Russia's deployment of approximately 50,000 troops near Sumy and the use of small assault groups, drones, and light vehicles to exploit gaps in Ukrainian defenses. The situation is further complicated by a recent pause in U.S. military aid to Ukraine, including critical air defense systems and precision-guided munitions, which has raised concerns about Ukraine's ability to repel ongoing Russian offensives. This article includes reporting by The Associated Press. This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow.

Democrats say companies are ‘bribing' Trump. Legal experts are skeptical.
Democrats say companies are ‘bribing' Trump. Legal experts are skeptical.

Politico

time37 minutes ago

  • Politico

Democrats say companies are ‘bribing' Trump. Legal experts are skeptical.

Accusations that Paramount executives bribed the president to ensure government approval of the company's pending merger with Skydance media are just the latest example of elected Democrats crying foul at private sector companies kowtowing to the president. Earlier this year, a group of House Democrats claimed law firms' deals to provide pro bono legal services to causes Trump favors, among other elements, could violate state and federal laws, including bribery statutes. But legal experts say that the Paramount settlement and law firm deals don't appear to rise to the level of criminal bribery. 'A lot of these things have a bribey feel to them,' said law professor and former federal prosecutor Randall Eliason. 'These are the kind of things that feel corrupt… but the term 'corruption' is far broader than the term 'criminal bribery.'' Charging Paramount executives with criminal bribery would require evidence that they negotiated with Trump to ensure Federal Communications Commission approval of the merger in exchange for the settlement payment to Trump's presidential library, experts say. 'All criminal bribery arrangements are abuses of power, but not all abuses of power are criminal bribery arrangements,' said Ryan Crosswell, a former public corruption prosecutor turned Democrat candidate for Congress in Pennsylvania. It wouldn't be enough for prosecutors to say Paramount executives decided to settle the case in the hopes that doing so would protect the merger or because they were trying to curry favor with Trump, Eliason said. 'You'd have to show a real explicit quid pro quo agreement,' he said. 'Just the coincidence of timing is not enough.' Paramount did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Warren and Wyden, along with Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), have been raising alarm about Paramount's conduct since May, after '60 Minutes' said the company had begun more closely supervising the program's news content. Trump sued CBS and Paramount in October of last year claiming that '60 Minutes' hurt his election chances by deceptively editing an interview with former Vice President Kamala Harris. Paramount's lawyers called the lawsuit an affront to the First Amendment 'without basis in law for fact' in court filings earlier this year. The company did not apologize to Trump as part of the settlement.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store