New Jersey Transit train engineers OK tentative deal that ended strike which had halted NYC routes
New Jersey Transit's train engineers have overwhelmingly approved a tentative deal that ended their three-day strike last month that halted service for some 100,000 daily riders, including routes to Newark airport and across the Hudson River to New York City.
The agency and the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen announced the results Tuesday. They said the seven-year agreement, covering the years 2020-2027, was supported by 398 members, while 21 voters rejected it.
NJ Transit's board of directors is scheduled to vote on the agreement when they meet Wednesday.
Details of the contract have not been released, but the union said it includes a 'significant pay raise' and addresses other issues for the roughly 450 engineers who serve the agency. The main sticking point during negotiations had been how to accomplish a wage increase for the engineers without creating a financially disastrous domino effect for the transit agency.
The walkout that began May 16 was the state's first transit strike in over 40 years, forcing people who normally rely on New Jersey Transit to take buses, cars, taxis and boats instead or consider staying home. It came a month after union members had overwhelmingly rejected a labor agreement with management.
NJ Transit CEO Kris Kolluri said the deal represents 'a fair and fiscally responsible agreement for our locomotive engineers, NJ Transit, our customers, and the taxpayers of New Jersey.'
Union leaders voiced similar views.
'All along we've said we didn't want to be the highest paid engineers, we only wanted equal pay for equal work,' said Tom Haas, who works as an NJT engineer and serves as BLET's general chairman at the commuter railroad. 'This agreement brings us close to what our peers make for doing the same type of work with the same levels of experience and training. This agreement gives us the pay raises we needed, but also was done without a major hit to NJT's budget and should not require a fare hike for passengers.'
NJ Transit — the nation's third-largest transit system — operates buses and rail in the state, providing nearly 1 million weekday trips, including into New York City. The walkout halted all NJ Transit commuter trains, which provide heavily used public transit routes between New York City's Penn Station on one side of the Hudson River and communities in northern New Jersey on the other, as well as the Newark airport, which has grappled with unrelated delays of its own recently.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Auto Express
41 minutes ago
- Auto Express
Electric car appeal is at its lowest since 2019
It's been a manic few weeks. And here's the proof: my A-Z of the final days of the first half of 2025… on planet car. Antonio Filosa wins the bravest in the business gong for taking on the CEO role at Stellantis. Good luck, Ant. You'll need it. BYD founder Wang Chuanfu is more relaxed as he plays with his Yangwang and Fangchengbao brands. China's Government warns car makers not to brutally undercut each other – I think they should. De Meo's decision to quit as Renault CEO is a tragedy. The industry can't afford to lose Luca – its best and most respected chief executive. Electric car appeal is at its lowest since 2019 – at least in the US. Ferrari delays plans for a second EV thanks to lack of demand. Goodwood has an unlikely new lap record holder – an eight-year-old pedal car driver. HS2 is an 'appalling mess, a litany of failure,' says the Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander. Ideas for the Dragons' Den for Motorists stage at August's British Motor Show are being sought. Perhaps you have one? Jaguar remains disabled at the halfway point of the year. I've never known the firm to be saying, producing and selling less. It desperately needs its new plan to work. Kia's EV9 GT is marred by its greedy £82,000 price tag. Leaf EV from Nissan (starting at £30k-£35k) shows appropriate pricing is possible. Advertisement - Article continues below Skip advert Advertisement - Article continues below Musk's response to accusations of taking ketamine? A drugs test – which showed negative results, the Tesla boss says. Norris of McLaren crashed his F1 car then did what public figures rarely, if ever, do: admit guilt before apologising. Lando's honesty is refreshing. OneHealth is Renault's new wellbeing scheme to give global employees access to physical and mental healthcare and should therefore be applauded. Power outages adversely affected me and many others last week – just as France's energy industry was signed up to keep the lights on and the EVs recharged in Britain this winter. Yikes! Is Qoros the latest Chinese car brand bound for Britain? Maybe. Renault 4 the best car buy of the year so far? I think so. Suzuki's e Vitara: from £29,999, including free finance, home charger and a 10-year warranty. Tunnelling at Kent's Lower Thames Crossing will cost £9 billion, says the Government – which pays just £590 million towards it. Eh? UN warning: autonomous cars could be a terrorist threat. VW's Polo wins the official Best Car of the Half Century ('75-'25) prompting a special edition. WOMAC's cancer charity run by motor industry women staged its annual fundraiser (I was honoured to attend) – but the wealthy car business should do more voluntary work like this. X (as in Aygo X) emerges as Europe's 'cleanest' non plug-in car. Yuki Tsunoda wins my vote as worst-dressed driver at the F1 The Movie world premiere. Zero per cent finance deals are the new norm. At least that's what you must tell the hard-nosed sales execs you're negotiating with in the showroom! Find a car with the experts New Volvo EX60 electric SUV: latest details and confirmed reveal date New Volvo EX60 electric SUV: latest details and confirmed reveal date The upcoming, all-electric Volvo XC60 alternative is designed to 'keep learning and evolve with time' New Skoda Epiq vRS to headline brand's hot-SUV onslaught New Skoda Epiq vRS to headline brand's hot-SUV onslaught Every future Skoda will get the go-faster treatment, with the brand also working on making cars sharper and more engaging Nissan Qashqai e-Power hybrid gets more efficient, powerful and eco-friendly for 2025 Nissan Qashqai e-Power hybrid gets more efficient, powerful and eco-friendly for 2025 The mid-size family SUV segment has just got a whole load tougher thanks to Nissan
Auto Blog
43 minutes ago
- Auto Blog
Walmart is selling a ‘convenient' $70 electric screwdriver set for $33, and shoppers ‘love how easy it is to use'
Autoblog aims to feature only the best products and services. If you buy something via one of our links, we may earn a commission. Sometimes you need a tiny screwdriver set for tiny screwdriving tasks. Maybe your larger screwdrivers are too big for the puny screws commonly found on electronic devices, and maybe you just want a small, portable screwdriver set on hand for the sake of convenience. Whatever the case, check out the Fanttik E1 Pro Cordless Electric Screwdriver Set, which is now on sale at Walmart for 53% off, dropping the price from $70 to $33. According to previous buyers, 'you won't be disappointed.' Fanttik E1 Pro Cordless Electric Screwdriver Set, $33 (was $70) at Walmart The Fanttik E1 Pro Cordless Electric Screwdriver Set includes one electric screwdriver with 24 precision bits, all of which are held in a compact storage case that is magnetic, preventing the bits from falling out and disappearing forever. The screwdriver offers several precision torque settings, which allow you to drive screws to exactly the right tightness. Its 350mAh battery will operate continuously for up to two hours, which translates into roughly 400 screws. And because it's recharged via USB-C, there's no need to worry about replacing batteries. Previous buyers say this 'convenient' set is 'perfect' if you're looking for 'plenty of torque.' It 'works great,' wrote several reviewers, a number of which asserted that you'll 'love it.' As one put it, it's the 'best cordless little screwdriver I have ever bought.' It has 'great design with several bits in a tray that stores them conveniently,' explained one buyer. Another added, 'Love how easy it is to use.' Act now if you want to bring home this great screwdriver set for less, because Walmart is only offering the Fanttik E1 Pro Cordless Electric Screwdriver Set at 53% off for a limited time. Buy yours today and find out why reviewers call it such a 'great tool.' About the Author Nick Hilden View Profile
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
‘Lidar is lame': why Elon Musk's vision for a self-driving Tesla taxi faltered
After years of promising investors that millions of Tesla robotaxis would soon fill the streets, Elon Musk debuted his driverless car service in a limited public rollout in Austin, Texas. It did not go smoothly. The 22 June launch initially appeared successful enough, with a flood of videos from pro-Tesla social media influencers praising the service and sharing footage of their rides. Musk celebrated it as a triumph, and the following day, Tesla's stock rose nearly 10%. What quickly became apparent, however, was that the same influencer videos Musk promoted also depicted the self-driving cars appearing to break traffic laws or struggle to properly function. By Tuesday, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) had opened an investigation into the service and requested information from Tesla on the incidents. If Tesla's limited rollout of the robotaxi service was the culmination of more than a decade of work, as Musk touted on X, its struggles are also emblematic of technical decisions and fixations that the world's richest person has embraced as he pursues the goal of a fully autonomous car. Musk has cast the concept of a driverless car as a core part of the company's future business, and, as sales have sharply fallen this year, he has vowed that its robotaxi service will rapidly and drastically expand. Yet the faltering launch this week suggests Tesla is still facing technological challenges that have attracted regulators' notice, delayed Musk's vision of a robotaxi on every corner, and highlighted the gulf between it and its driverless rival, Waymo. The robotaxi launch featured about 10 cars traveling in a limited area of Austin with safety drivers in the passenger seat. The pilot included other restrictions, such as not operating in bad weather or during certain nighttime hours. Rides, which the company offered to a host of handpicked influencers, cost $4.20, in keeping with Musk's proclivity for cannabis memes. 'Tesla self-driving can be deployed anywhere it's approved. It does not require expensive, specialized equipment or extensive mapping of service areas,' an official Tesla account posted on X the day of the launch. 'It just works.' Footage from at least 11 rides showed that the trial run did not pan out as flawlessly as Tesla's tweet suggested. In one case, a robotaxi failed to make a left turn and instead drove into a lane meant for oncoming traffic, then corrected itself by driving across a double yellow line. Other videos appeared to show the cars exceeding the speed limit, braking for no discernible reason and dropping passengers off in the middle of an intersection. The videos drew the attention of the NHTSA, which said in a statement it was aware of the incidents and had contacted Tesla to obtain more information. Musk, meanwhile, posted throughout the technical failures and regulatory inquiry, retweeting pro-Tesla influencers who praised the service. One account Musk posted showed off a video of a robotaxi stopping to avoid running down a peacock crossing the road, and another told followers: 'Don't listen to the media.' Musk has long insisted that using only cameras on driverless cars is the singular way to achieve true self-driving capability. Tesla's consumer vehicles come with what it calls 'autopilot' and 'full self-driving' features that allow drivers to cruise on the highway hands-free. They rely on multiple external cameras to navigate, steer and brake. The company's robotaxis use similar software and also depend solely on cameras. The reliance on cameras alone stands in sharp contrast with other autonomous vehicle companies such as Waymo and Zoox. Those companies use arrays that combine cameras and sensors, including radar and lidar. For example, the newest version of a driverless Waymo uses about 40 external cameras and sensors, whereas a Tesla with one of the latest versions of full self-driving uses about eight external cameras, according to an analysis by Bloomberg. Lidar and radar allow for self-driving cars to better detect objects in bad weather and poor lighting. Despite the advantages to lidar and radar, Musk has been adamant that Tesla remain lidar-free. 'Lidar is lame,' Musk said during a Tesla autonomy day in 2019. 'In cars, it's friggin' stupid. It's expensive and unnecessary.' Lidar is far more expensive, costing roughly $12,000 per vehicle, as compared with cameras, which come in at around $400 per car, according to Bloomberg. Musk maintains that camera-only technology is the most 'human' way to approach self-driving, since people use their eyes to navigate the road. Musk's insistence on camera-only technology has landed Tesla in hot water over fatal crashes involving drivers using the full self-driving feature. The company is now the focus of government investigations and civil lawsuits, which allege that full self-driving is impeded by weather conditions such as sun glare, fog, dust and darkness. There have been at least 736 crashes and 17 deaths involving the technology, according to an analysis by the Washington Post. 'Tesla continues to have this fetishistic view that it's going to operate its system solely on cameras, despite every intelligent human being in this entire space saying that can't be done,' said Brett Schreiber, an attorney who represents several alleged victims of Tesla's autopilot failures. 'Everyone who has been following collision-avoidant technology since the 90s knows that the holy trinity is radar, lidar and cameras.' Schreiber said he was not surprised to see the wobbling rollout of Tesla's robotaxis in Austin. 'What you're also going to see, which is the true tragedy of this thing, is people continuing to be injured and killed by this technology,' he said. 'And that's where it becomes less of a 'Oh, isn't that cute? The vehicle can't make a left' to now we're actually at someone's funeral because of the choices Tesla makes.' Tesla did not respond to a request for comment on the lawsuits, government investigations and crashes involving full self-driving. The differences between Waymo and Tesla's approaches to launching commercial self-driving services in dense cities don't end with the debate over lidar versus cameras. Waymo is seen widely as the frontrunner in the self-driving race in the US – a race that was once crowded with dozens of automakers, VC-backed startups and ride-share companies and has since been whittled down to just a handful of major players. There are numerous reasons why Waymo has outlasted so many of its competitors and why it's ahead of the curve. The Google subsidiary has historically spent months, if not years, mapping cities and testing its vehicles in them before launching. In San Francisco, one of the first cities where Waymo launched its fully driverless commercial service, the company began mapping out and testing its service in 2021 before launching it to the public in 2024. Even with a careful and gradual city-by-city approach, Waymo, which launched as a project under Google's X research lab in 2009, has encountered problems with its self-driving cars. Earlier this year, Waymo had to recall more than 1,200 of its vehicles over a software issue that was causing collisions with chains, gates and other stationary roadway barriers. The NHTSA also launched an investigation into the company last year after the agency received 22 reports of Waymo vehicles acting erratically or potentially violating traffic safety laws. Contrast Waymo's approach with Tesla's. While Tesla is still in the testing phase of its service, its robotaxi launch in Austin is the first time the car company's fully self-driving technology is being unleashed in the wild. The company has not released information on whether, or how long, it has spent mapping out or testing the driverless technology on Austin's streets. The launch is reminiscent of Uber's first foray into a self-driving ride-share service in 2016. The company launched a self-driving pilot in San Francisco without seeking a permit from the California department of motor vehicles, as was required. On the first day of the pilot, an Uber vehicle ran a red light. The company was forced to shut down the service a week later after the DMV revoked its registration. An Uber self-driving executive at the time had pushed the company's engineers to rush to launch the San Francisco pilot to attract more investor and public attention. After being sued by Waymo over its self-driving operations and struggling to catch up to its competitors, Uber sold its self-driving arm in 2020. Tesla also did not have a permit to operate its robotaxi service in Austin. Texas does not currently have a process to acquire a permit and won't have one in place until September. While there's at the moment less visibility into what Tesla's rollout of its robotaxi service looked like behind the scenes, the automaker is no stranger to rushing to meet deadlines set publicly by Musk. With the launch of robotaxis, Musk, who has been promising that Teslas will be fully self-driving since at least 2016, is perhaps getting closer to meeting the deadline that he set and has deferred several times over the past 10 years.
