Trump invites romanian president to US during phone call: Reports
Dan took office on Monday after winning the May 2025 election. On Tuesday, he launched talks on forming a new cabinet with the participation of four parties - the Social Democratic Party, the Save Romania Union party, the National Liberal Party and the Democratic Alliance of Hungarians in Romania.
The opposition Alliance for the Union of Romanians announced a boycott of Dan's inauguration ceremony, accusing the authorities of election fraud and foreign interference.
The conversation between the two leaders lasted about ten minutes, the report said on Tuesday.
In recent years, US-Romanian relations have strengthened in the areas of defense, energy security and economic cooperation. The US missile defence base in Deveselu has been operating on Romanian territory since 2016, and in 2023, the countries signed an agreement on cooperation in the field of nuclear energy development.
UNI SPUTNIK ARN
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
21 minutes ago
- News18
"Unjustified, Unreasonable" India Hits Back As Trump Threatens To Raise Tariffs Over Russian Oil
Donald Trump announced a sharp increase in tariffs on Indian goods, citing New Delhi's continued import of Russian oil. The US President accused India of 'buying massive amounts of Russian oil and selling it on the open market for big profits." Trump had earlier imposed 25% tariff on India and an unspecified penalty for buying Russian crude oil and military equipment. India responded strongly to Trump's latest 'tariff" threat, saying that targeting New Delhi is 'unjustified and unreasonable" and highlighted how the US continues to import uranium hexafluoride from Russia for its nuclear industry. n18oc_world n18oc_crux
India Today
21 minutes ago
- India Today
India's hard-hitting response after Trump's fresh tariff threat: Key points
Hours after US President Donald Trump threatened to raise tariffs on India over its continued purchase of Russian oil amid the ongoing Ukraine conflict, the Indian government issued a strongly worded statement on Monday questioning Washington and the European Union for their duplicity in their stance. In the statement, the Ministry of External Affairs said that India's oil imports are guided by national interests and energy security considerations and rejected what it described as "unjustified and unreasonable" pressure from Western STATEMENT - KEY TAKEAWAYS The statement issued by the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) explained that India began buying discounted Russian oil after the Ukraine conflict disrupted global energy flows. As traditional suppliers shifted their focus to meet Europe's demand, India turned to Russia to secure its energy needs. The ministry highlighted that at the time the US in fact had 'encouraged such imports', viewing them as a means to 'strengthening global energy markets stability'. MEA also pointed out that the countries criticising India are themselves engaged in trade with Russia. However, unlike India, where such trade is a critical national necessity, their dealings lack the same justification and are 'not even a vital national compulsion'. The ministry's statement went on to explain that India's energy imports from Russia are essential to ensuring affordable and predictable fuel prices for Indian consumers. They are a necessity compelled by the global market situation. Highlighting the disparity in global trade practices, the ministry pointed out that the European Union maintained significant economic ties with Russia. In 2024, EU-Russia bilateral trade in goods reached Euro 67.5 billion, while trade in services was estimated at Euro 17.2 billion in 2023, underscoring the ongoing commercial engagement despite public criticism directed at India. The ministry also drew comparisons between India's and Europe's trade with Russia, noting that the EU's commercial engagement was significantly higher than India's total trade with Russia during the same period or afterward. It highlighted that European imports of liquefied natural gas (LNG) from Russia hit a record 16.5 million tonnes in 2024, surpassing the previous high of 15.21 million tonnes recorded in 2022. India also highlighted that Europe's trade with Russia extends well beyond energy, encompassing a wide range of sectors. This includes fertilizers, mining products, chemicals, iron and steel, as well as machinery and transport equipment. Furthermore, the ministry drew attention to US imports from Russia and said Washington continues to import uranium hexafluoride for its nuclear industry, palladium crucial to the electric vehicle sector, as well as fertilisers and various chemicals from Russia. advertisementConcluding its statement, the ministry asserted that the criticism directed at India is both unjustified and unreasonable. It said that, like any major economy, India is fully entitled to take all necessary steps to protect its national interests and ensure its economic security. The developments come after US President Donald Trump imposed a 25 per cent tariff on India from August 1, 2025 onwards. The tariff, as per Trump, comes in response to India's rates for the US which are the 'highest in the world'. Trump said that the tariff comes as a penalty for India's purchase of Russian oil and its participation in the BRICS bloc, which Trump deems as 'anti-American.' - EndsTune InMust Watch IN THIS STORY#United States of America#Donald Trump
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
21 minutes ago
- First Post
Israel mulls Gaza annexation, military rule after failed ceasefire talks
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is expected to decide on renewed military action in Gaza after the collapse of ceasefire negotiations with Hamas. As diplomatic channels falter, Israeli leaders are weighing options ranging from expanded military operations to annexation, even as internal divisions deepen and hostages remain in captivity. read more Israeli troops deploy with their tanks near the border fence with the Gaza Strip on August 1, 2025. AFP Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is set to meet with his security cabinet this week to decide the country's next steps in Gaza, following the collapse of indirect ceasefire talks with Hamas. A senior Israeli official suggested that renewed military action remains a likely option. During a visit to Israel last Saturday, US Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff said he was working closely with the Israeli government to devise a strategy for ending the conflict. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Despite international pressure, Israeli leaders have floated plans to escalate the military campaign in Gaza and potentially annex parts of the war-torn enclave. The failed negotiations in Doha were aimed at advancing a US-backed proposal for a 60-day ceasefire, during which humanitarian aid would enter Gaza and Hamas would release half of the hostages in exchange for Palestinian prisoners held in Israeli jails. Following Netanyahu's meeting with Witkoff last Thursday, a senior Israeli official stated that 'an understanding was emerging between Washington and Israel' of the need to transition from a truce to a comprehensive agreement that would 'release all hostages, disarm Hamas, and demilitarise the Gaza Strip,' one of Israel's key conditions for ending the war. According to a person acquainted with the situation, Israel saw the envoy's visit as 'very significant.' But later on Sunday, the Israeli official signalled that pursuit of a deal would be pointless, threatening more force: 'An understanding is emerging that Hamas is not interested in a deal and therefore the prime minister is pushing to release the hostages while pressing for military defeat. Israel's Channel 12 on Monday cited an official from his office as saying that Netanyahu was inclining towards expanding the offensive and seizing the entire Palestinian enclave. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'Strategic clarity' What a 'military defeat' might mean, however, is up for debate within the Israeli leadership. Some Israeli officials have suggested that Israel might declare it was annexing parts of Gaza as a means to pressure the militant group. Others, like Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich and National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir want to see Israel impose military rule in Gaza before annexing it and re-establishing the Jewish settlements Israel evicted 20 years ago. The Israeli military, which has pushed back at such ideas throughout the war, was expected on Tuesday to present alternatives that include extending into areas of Gaza where it has not yet operated, according to two defence officials. While some in the political leadership are pushing for expanding the offensive, the military is concerned that doing so will endanger the 20 hostages who are still alive, the officials said. Israeli Army Radio reported on Monday that military chief Eyal Zamir has become increasingly frustrated with what he describes as a lack of strategic clarity by the political leadership, concerned about being dragged into a war of attrition with Hamas militants. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD A spokesperson for the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) declined to comment on the report but said that the military has plans in store. 'We have different ways to fight the terror organization, and that's what the army does,' Lieutenant Colonel Nadav Shoshani said. On Tuesday, Qatar and Egypt endorsed a declaration by France and Saudi Arabia outlining steps toward a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, which included a call on Hamas to hand over its arms to the Western-backed Palestinian Authority. Hamas has repeatedly said it won't lay down arms. But it has told mediators it was willing to quit governance in Gaza for a non-partisan ruling body, according to three Hamas officials. It insists that the post-war Gaza arrangement must be agreed upon among the Palestinians themselves and not dictated by foreign powers. Israel's Foreign Minister Gideon Saar suggested on Monday that the gaps were still too wide to bridge. 'We would like to have all our hostages back. We would like to see the end of this war. We always prefer to get there by diplomatic means, if possible. But of course, the big question is, what will be the conditions for the end of the war?' he told journalists in Jerusalem. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
