logo
New polls showing rising support for independence are revealing

New polls showing rising support for independence are revealing

The National22-04-2025
It is encouraging, but more than that – it's revealing.
Something is shifting and people are starting to see clearly what many of us have felt for a long time: that Scotland is not an equal partner in this so-called Union. That our democracy can be dismissed, delayed and diluted by powers we didn't vote for.
But if this is the result when the public see a glimmer of what's happening, imagine if we exposed it all, with front and centre headlines. When people in Scotland vote for one party and end up governed by another, that alone tells a story.
When we have more MPs in London than we do in the whole of Scotland. When we vote to remain in the European Union and were dragged out regardless, the message couldn't be clearer. And now, when some placed their hopes in a Labour revival, they've been met with a reheated version of Tory policy but faster and with fewer apologies.
These moments aren't just disappointing, they're disempowering and hopefully more people are beginning to join the dots. At Holyrood, I'm there to debate, to challenge, to listen, and to shape real change for the people who sent me. All of us are elected by people in Scotland to work for Scotland.
READ MORE: John Curtice gives verdict as poll predicts huge pro-independence majority
And while devolution has let us do a great deal of good, we're constantly forced to do it within boundaries we didn't choose. We legislate with purpose, often with broad support, only to see our decisions picked apart or even blocked entirely.
We saw it with the use of Section 35. We saw it in the Supreme Court ruling that forced changes to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (Incorporation) (Scotland) Act, despite it passing unanimously in the Scottish Parliament.
And now again in another court ruling that has significant implications for how we apply equality-based policy here in Scotland.
We debate. We vote. We pass the law. And then we wait to see if the UK institutions will let it stand.
This is the kind of erosion that people don't always see unless they're looking closely. Take the UK Internal Market Act. It didn't come with flashy headlines, but it has had serious consequences.
It means that even when the Scottish Parliament takes decisions in devolved areas, such as banning single-use plastics, we can be told we have to accept goods from elsewhere in the UK that don't meet our standards. It locks us into Westminster's way of doing things, even when we are trying to do something better.
And while we're constantly fighting to hold on to our ability to make decisions, we're also doing the hard work of using those devolved powers to improve people's lives.
We've introduced world-leading policies such as the Scottish Child Payment. We've made period products free to access via local authorities. We brought in minimum alcohol pricing to save lives. We've prioritised housing, climate action, and progressive taxation. And now, the Scottish Government has committed to removing the two-child benefit cap in Scotland, which has punished families for too long.
That's a massive step forward. But even as we move in that direction, we're still doing it within the confines of a UK system that could snatch that power away again if it suits it.
So much of what we do now is about mitigating the damage caused elsewhere. We protect people from the worst of Westminster's decisions, while trying to build something better. But how much further could we go, how much faster, if we weren't constantly having to shield people from policies we didn't vote for?
Brexit, too, continues to hit economy. We see the impact every day, in labour shortages, rising costs and disrupted trade. My constituency, with its proud fishing and farming industries, knows the cost of that vote better than most. And for what? We're still waiting to see any benefit.
We've seen how powerful devolution can be, but what we're consistently seeing now isn't protection of our devolution by the UK, it's erosion. It's slow but very deliberate. I see it in the Parliament from our Unionist MSPs. A disdain by some for our political institution. Step by step, they are chipping away at Scotland's ability to make its own choices. Just as we make headway, there's that pull on our collar to get back in our box.
And yes, I know that in any democracy, we won't always agree with every decision made. That's the deal. But true democracy means having the right to make those decisions in the first place, and for those decisions to be ours, not made or unmade by a government we didn't elect or a judiciary that is not wholly ours.
If only that were the front-page story across the country, that Scotland has passed good, progressive, compassionate laws, only to be told they can't be implemented.
If only more people knew how often we're overruled. I wonder how it would feel across civic society if that truth were told more clearly, instead of being buried beneath 'SNP bad' headlines and recycled outrage.
Because the truth is, we have the proof. We've lived the consequences. And we're now seeing, through polling, that people are beginning to connect those dots. We need to bring this specific conversation to doorsteps and living rooms, and community halls. Not to win an argument, but to let people see clearly what's happening.
Because if Scotland's Parliament was fully respected and free to act on the will of the people, we wouldn't just be mitigating harm. We'd be building the country we know we can be. We shouldn't be overruled, we shouldn't be content to allow it, and we shouldn't stay quiet about it either.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

European Union assumes its faces 15% tariffs in the US from Friday. But a key text still isn't ready
European Union assumes its faces 15% tariffs in the US from Friday. But a key text still isn't ready

The Independent

time14 minutes ago

  • The Independent

European Union assumes its faces 15% tariffs in the US from Friday. But a key text still isn't ready

The European Union is working on the assumption that the United States will impose a 15% tariff on most EU exports from Friday, even though the two sides have yet to complete a key document clarifying how the agreement will operate. Last weekend, U.S. President Donald Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen reached a political agreement that would see 15% duties imposed on around two-thirds of EU produce, worth around 380 billion euros ($434 billion). The tariffs are set to enter force on Friday, but as of Thursday the two sides were still working on a joint statement that would lay out the terms of their understanding, European Commission spokesman Olof Gill said. The document wouldn't be legally binding. 'It is the clear understanding of the European Union that the U.S. will implement the agreed across the board tariff ceiling of 15%,' Gill said. The commission negotiates trade terms on behalf of the the EU's 27 member countries. Carve outs were agreed for a range of 'strategic' goods like aircraft and aircraft parts, certain chemicals, some drug generics or natural resources. Gill said that 'it is also our clear understanding that the U.S. will implement the exemptions to the 15% ceiling.' 'The U.S. has made these commitments. Now it's up to the U.S. to implement them. The ball is in their court,' Gill said. European wine and spirits won't escape the 15% levy on Friday, but may do later as negotiations on additional exemptions to the new tariff regime continue, he said. Before Sunday's meeting, Trump had threatened the bloc with 30% tariffs, which the EU's top trade official said would effectively mean the end of trade between them. Over the last three months, the commission drew up retaliatory measures worth tens of billions of euros to enact should the talks fail. Those countermeasures are due to take effect on Aug. 7, but Gill said that 'if everything goes as expected,' they would be frozen. 'If we have reached a deal, we don't need the retaliatory tariffs,' he said.

Donald Trump issues major announcement on Fox News in humiliating blow to UK
Donald Trump issues major announcement on Fox News in humiliating blow to UK

Daily Record

time14 minutes ago

  • Daily Record

Donald Trump issues major announcement on Fox News in humiliating blow to UK

Donald Trump has hit out at the UK live on Fox News, saying he is hearing reports of Brits being locked up for social media posts and branding it a 'mean' country Donald Trump has sparked outrage after a blasting attack on Britain's free speech laws during a live Fox News appearance, describing reports of individuals being jailed over social media posts as an alarming sign of decline under left-wing government. ‌ The US President, who is currently spending several-day in Scotland combining business and diplomatic engagements, was asked about claims that British citizens had faced arrest for online remarks. His reply, aired live during a Fox News interview, was scathing. ‌ Speaking about Air Force One to various media representatives when questioned about Brits being sent to jail for social media posts, Trump declared: "Are you saying that's taking place in the UK? Well we're hearing that. They said they cancelled Truth Social, I'll bet it's uncancelled very quickly. No it's very different. I see it in some countries, and you would never suspect it." ‌ He went on to draw comparison between Britain's present atmosphere and socialist administrations, suggesting that freedom of expression was being targeted, the Express reports. He went on to say: "Not only there I've seen it in other countries and then all of a sudden they become somewhat violent. ‌ "You know when people go socialist over it you get the radical left or the left going and the countries actually become very mean. They become mean and incompetent simultaneously." The comments come during Trump's prominent Scottish visit where he recently held discussions with Prime Minister Keir Starmer for bilateral talks centred on trade and international aid. However, despite the formal diplomatic setting, it was his televised interview that sparked controversy. The President's journey to Scotland included the opening of a new golf course in Balmedie, named in honour of his mother, Mary Anne MacLeod. ‌ While the event was designed to spotlight his business endeavours, the visit has been overshadowed by increased security measures, political backlash and now his explosive remarks on UK speech laws. Over 7,000 police officers were mobilised to monitor Trump's movements, and he also had a meeting with Scotland's First Minister John Swinney. ‌ Meanwhile, his discussions with Starmer centred around trade, aid for Gaza, and global stability - though there was little to none reference to domestic UK policies. Trump's comments are set to escalate tensions with Starmer's Labour government, which has already come under fire over growing complaints about free speech and police crackdown. ‌ As the state visit in September approaches, Downing Street may now be compelled to directly address the US leader's claims. A broader look at UK enforcement revealed that police made over 12,000 arrests in 2023 for social media offences under the Communications Act 2003 and Malicious Communications Act 1988-averaging around 33 arrests per day. Civil liberties organisations have raised concerns that the laws underpinning these cases are vague and often lead to arrests for speech that many argue should be protected

Ursula von der Leyen's deal exposes the delusions of EU boosters
Ursula von der Leyen's deal exposes the delusions of EU boosters

New Statesman​

time14 minutes ago

  • New Statesman​

Ursula von der Leyen's deal exposes the delusions of EU boosters

Photo byThe French prime minister François Bayrou said it was a 'dark day' for Europe. Under the trade deal that Donald Trump and European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen announced in Scotland on 26 July, the US would impose a 15 per cent tariff on most European imports, but the European Union would not increase tariffs on American imports in return. According to Bayrou, 'an alliance of free peoples' had 'resolved to submission'. It was definitely a climbdown for the EU. Ever since Trump was re-elected last year and threatened new tariffs on imports to the US, the European Commission had threatened counter-measures – just as it did during the first Trump administration, when it responded to US tariffs on European aluminium and steel with its own tariffs on American products like bourbon. In the end, though, the EU simply accepted the new US tariffs this time – and on top of that, promised to increase purchases of American liquified natural gas and weapons. To be clear, what was agreed in Scotland is a political or 'framework' deal and a lot of the important details have yet to be worked out. In particular, it is not yet clear whether pharmaceuticals – a hugely important sector for the EU and especially Germany – will be included or how much steel will be exempt from tariffs. Moreover, the promises that von der Leyen made to increase investment in the US have already turned out to be empty – there is no way the EU can buy $750bn of American oil and gas in the next few years and it cannot direct companies to invest in the United States. Nevertheless, in the few days since the deal was announced, it has widely been seen as a humiliating European capitulation to Trump. Many critics of deal – especially EU boosters who fantasise about the idea of 'strategic autonomy' or a 'geopolitical Europe' – seem to imagine that the EU could have followed an alternative approach and stood up to Trump. In reality, though, there was little alternative to what Bayrou called 'submission'. Critics of the deal think EU member states undermined von der Leyen and forced her to negotiate from a position of weakness. It is true that some member states, especially Germany and Italy, ultimately backed off from threats of retaliatory measures because they feared that a full-on transatlantic trade war would ultimately hit important sectors of their economies harder than they are now being hit by the new US tariffs. But the idea that the EU had leverage over the US that it had but did not use – and that if it had used it, it could have struck a much better deal – is wishful thinking. As the world's largest trading bloc, the EU has long thought of itself as an economic superpower and prided itself on its ability to negotiate trade deals – that, of course, was one of main arguments why the UK should remain within in the EU. This deal has somewhat undermined that self-image. After all, in May, the UK was able to negotiate a slightly better deal with the Trump administration, with a baseline tariff of 10 per cent. But what really makes the EU weak relative to the US is its vulnerability in security terms. The idea that the EU had leverage over the US that it did not use only makes sense if you think that economics and security are completely separate realms and that security issues are irrelevant to trade negotiations and cannot be linked. But deep down, despite all the tough talk and the threats of retaliation to Trump's tariffs, European politicians knew that taking such a confrontational approach could have consequences for US support for Ukraine – or even for Nato and the US security guarantee to Europe itself. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe It's striking that this trade deal was being negotiated just as Trump seemed to be becoming increasingly frustrated with Vladimir Putin and more supportive of Ukraine. Earlier in July, Trump had reinstated supplies of US weapons to Ukraine – albeit paid for by Europeans – and threatened new economic sanctions against Russia if Putin did not make progress in negotiations within 50 days. (The day after the EU-US trade deal was announced, Trump said he was now giving Putin even less time.) As tentative as European leaders know Trump's shift on Ukraine is, they do not want to jeopardise it. EU trade commissioner Maroš Šefčovič, who apparently spent hundreds of hours in frustrating negotiations with Trump administration officials, hinted at this in a briefing the morning after the announcement of the deal. He said he could not go into the details of everything that was discussed with Trump in Scotland, but 'it was not just about trade'. In the end, what has made the EU so dependent on the US, and made the EU's 'submission' inevitable, is the war in Ukraine – or, to be more precise, the way that, for the last two and half years since the Russian invasion in 2022, European leaders have insisted that their own security depends on a Ukrainian victory. Related

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store