UAE: Couple get 10 years in jail for framing Indian business partner in drug case
The Ras Al Khaimah Criminal Court sentenced the Emirati man, identified as S.R., and his wife to 10 years in prison each, along with fines of Dh50,000. The wife's brother, A.A., who played a central role in executing the plot, received a 15-year prison term and was fined Dh100,000.
Investigations revealed that S.R., influenced by his wife, devised a plan to eliminate his Indian business partner, who had been running a rapidly growing business with substantial profits. In an attempt to assume full control of a highly profitable venture, they decided to fabricate a drug possession charge against the partner.
S.R. enlisted the help of his brother-in-law, A.A., who had a history of drug use, to place drugs in the Indian partner's vehicle. Following the setup, S.R. reported his partner to the police, leading to a search of the vehicle by the authorities and the subsequent arrest of the Indian businessman.
Plot twist
However, a drug test conducted on the Indian partner returned negative results, prompting investigators to delve deeper into the circumstances. During interrogation, the partner disclosed ongoing tensions with S.R. over the business, including attempts by the Emirati to dissolve the partnership and seize all profits. These revelations led to a comprehensive investigation that uncovered the premeditated nature of the accusations.
Confronted with mounting evidence, S.R. confessed to orchestrating the false charges with the assistance of his wife and A.A., who had placed the drugs in the vehicle.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arabian Post
a day ago
- Arabian Post
SEBI Expands Investigation into Jane Street Trading Practices
The Securities and Exchange Board of India has escalated its investigation into the trading activities of Jane Street, a global proprietary trading firm, as part of a broader probe into alleged market manipulation. The regulatory body has now requested trading data from several Indian stock exchanges, further deepening its scrutiny of the firm's involvement in the country's financial markets. SEBI's action stems from claims that Jane Street engaged in manipulation of stock indices through derivative positions. This move follows a regulatory ban imposed on the firm in early July, which temporarily barred it from conducting any trading activities in Indian markets. The ban was issued after SEBI's preliminary findings suggested that Jane Street had used complex strategies to artificially influence the performance of key stock indices. As part of the ongoing investigation, SEBI is focusing on obtaining detailed trading records from exchanges including the Bombay Stock Exchange and the National Stock Exchange of India. The goal is to determine whether the firm's activities, particularly its use of derivatives, involved any illegal practices that could have distorted market prices or harmed retail investors. ADVERTISEMENT Industry experts suggest that the regulator's heightened interest in Jane Street reflects a broader concern about the role of large institutional traders in shaping market dynamics. Derivative positions, often leveraged and high-risk, can be used to exert significant influence on the underlying stocks, especially in a market as liquid as India's. By examining data from exchanges, SEBI aims to clarify the extent of Jane Street's trading strategies and assess whether they align with Indian securities laws. The investigation is seen as a key test of SEBI's ability to enforce its regulations on foreign firms operating in India's rapidly growing financial markets. Despite the firm's global operations, Jane Street has a significant presence in India, with its trading strategies often tied to the country's major stock indices. The firm's complex use of derivatives, particularly index futures, has drawn scrutiny from both regulators and market participants, who have raised concerns about potential market distortion. Jane Street, which is based in the United States, has yet to publicly comment on SEBI's request for trading data or the investigation itself. The firm has previously maintained that its activities are compliant with global market regulations, including those in India. However, the SEBI inquiry underscores growing concerns among global regulators about the tactics employed by large-scale traders in emerging markets. The investigation into Jane Street is part of a broader initiative by SEBI to strengthen its oversight of foreign investment in India. Over the past few years, SEBI has been increasingly focused on improving market transparency and curbing potential manipulative practices, particularly in high-frequency trading and derivative markets. While foreign firms play an essential role in providing liquidity to Indian markets, their influence has raised alarms about potential market imbalances. Market analysts point out that the use of derivatives and other sophisticated financial instruments by international trading firms has brought India into closer alignment with global financial markets. However, the rise of algorithmic and high-frequency trading has led to concerns over market stability, especially in volatile times. In response, SEBI has ramped up its efforts to ensure that such trading does not compromise the fairness or integrity of the market. In the wake of SEBI's actions, some market participants have called for more stringent regulations governing the use of derivatives in India. While derivatives are legal and widely used, their impact on the underlying markets can sometimes be opaque, especially when large institutional players use them in tandem with other strategies to influence stock movements. Calls for greater transparency and stricter enforcement mechanisms are expected to intensify as the investigation continues. The timing of SEBI's investigation is significant, as it comes at a time of heightened global scrutiny on market manipulation and the role of high-frequency traders. In the wake of high-profile cases involving market abuses in other jurisdictions, regulators are under pressure to ensure that trading practices do not undermine investor confidence or market integrity.
The National
2 days ago
- The National
It's time to make reporting cyber crimes easier
When it comes to cyber attacks and online fraud, it seems that big banks, major companies and tech giants can often be as vulnerable as the individual customers and investors they serve. On Sunday, Germany-based insurer Allianz Life became the latest victim of the digital underworld, suffering a security breach that compromised the data of most of its 1.4 million customers in North America. This was not an isolated incident. Earlier this month, computer security experts said hackers had exploited a vulnerability in Microsoft's SharePoint collaboration software that potentially compromised private and public computer networks in the US. And it is not just private businesses that are at risk. In January, the International Civil Aviation Organisation – a UN agency – confirmed that it had suffered a data breach of its recruitment application records, something that affected almost 12,000 people. The Middle East is not immune to this growing threat. Research from cyber-security company Kaspersky has found that the number of users in the region hit by mobile financial threats jumped 146 per cent in 2024 from the previous year. In a region where interest in digital assets and cryptocurrencies is flourishing, this is a cause for concern. There is something of a cyber security arms race taking place between private and public institutions on one hand and criminal groups on the other, with each using rapidly evolving technology – especially AI – to either defend or compromise sensitive networks and databases. Banks, businesses and investment platforms have a duty of care to make sure their customer's assets are safe; they also have the resources to protect themselves. However, in a great many cases, online fraud is not some darkly impressive feat of digital know-how – it more about tricking people and companies into giving up valuable information. Cyber security and online safety are not new concepts, and most people are well-aware of the need to check emails, vary passwords and use common sense. Many companies spend millions on cyber security measures. But we live in a fast-paced world of distraction and as attacks grow more sophisticated, even the most astute can be caught out. Earlier this month, one Dubai resident told The National how he had lost more than Dh700,000 ($190,605) after being invited to join an online investment platform for gold mining. What makes this story truly unusual is the victim's willingness to speak out. We live in a fast-paced world of distraction and as attacks grow more sophisticated, even the most astute can be caught out The reality is that many cyber crimes go unreported. Individual victims may feel embarrassed or guilty about being tricked and giving away personal data. Businesses may fear reputational damage. There may also be a perception that given that sheer number of cyber crimes – big and small – there is little point in reporting them. Given this, it is important to dispel the embarrassment around being scammed and to improve reporting and blocking mechanisms thereby helping companies and individuals to quickly and effectively report online crimes. This is not a problem that will go away or be solved in one fell swoop. But removing from cyber crimes the secrecy upon which digital criminals thrive and empowering people to flag up where security measures have fallen short would be valuable steps forward.
Gulf Today
2 days ago
- Gulf Today
Victim's brother denies pardon for Kerala nurse Nimisha Priya in Yemen, questions legitimacy of negotiations
Gulf Today Report Confusion surrounds the status of Indian nurse Nimisha Priya's death sentence in Yemen, as conflicting reports have surfaced regarding its cancellation. News agency ANI, citing reliable sources, reported on Tuesday that her death sentence has not been overturned, contradicting earlier claims made by other parties. 'Information being circulated by certain individuals regarding the Nimisha Priya case is inaccurate,' the sources told ANI. Despite recent reports hinting at a potential breakthrough in the case of Nimisha Priya, the victim's family has publicly denied any agreement or pardon. Abdul Fattah Mahdi, brother of the murdered Yemeni national Talal Mahdi, issued a strong rebuttal on Facebook, rejecting claims that he had forgiven Priya. He also raised concerns over the credibility of the ongoing negotiations surrounding the case. Mahdi argued that, under Islamic law, granting clemency in murder cases is not permissible. He also criticised the mediators involved in the talks, alleging that they failed to consult or coordinate with Talal's immediate family. Earlier, the office of Indian Grand Mufti Kanthapuram A.P. Aboobacker Musliyar issued a statement claiming that a high-level meeting in the Yemeni capital, Sanaa, had resulted in the full cancellation of the death sentence, which had previously been suspended. 'The death sentence of Nimisha Priya, which was earlier put on hold, has now been completely revoked,' the Grand Mufti's office had said. As of now, there is no official confirmation from Yemeni authorities regarding the reported decision. Priya's family, including her 13-year-old daughter Mishel and her husband Thomas, had travelled to Yemen in support of her case. They were accompanied by Indian Christian evangelist Dr. KA Paul, who has been advocating for her release. Together, they made an appeal to the Houthi authorities for leniency. In an emotional video shared by PTI, Mishel is seen expressing her love for her mother in both Malayalam and English, saying, 'I love you, mamma.' The audio, however, is not clearly audible. Last week, India's Ministry of External Affairs confirmed that it is closely monitoring the case and providing full support to Priya and her family. The ministry also stated that it is coordinating with 'friendly governments' to help resolve the matter diplomatically. Nimisha Priya had been sentenced to death in Yemen for the murder of a Yemeni national. Her case has drawn significant attention in India and abroad, with calls for diplomatic intervention and clemency on humanitarian grounds.
