logo
What New ROAD to Housing Act Means for Homeowners

What New ROAD to Housing Act Means for Homeowners

Newsweek3 days ago
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Bipartisan legislation trying to boost the country's supply of homes is moving through the legislature and drawing praise from industry insiders.
Supporters are hailing the package as a significant step toward solving the ongoing housing affordability crisis in the U.S.
The package, known as the ROAD to Housing Act of 2025, is led by Sen. Tim Scott, a South Carolina Republican, and Sen. Elizabeth Warren, a Massachusetts Democrat. It contains directions to increase the nation's housing supply, encourage construction, improve affordability, and increase oversight and efficiency of federal regulators and housing programs.
These measures should help make housing more affordable after skyrocketing prices and historically elevated mortgage rates over the past five years have pushed homeownership out of reach for millions of Americans.
The bipartisan legislation tries to tackle the main reason behind the unprecedented surge in home prices which followed the outbreak of the pandemic—a chronic lack of inventory across the U.S, the result of underbuilding after the subprime mortgage crisis which started in 2007.
The bill, which represents the most substantial housing package since the 1990s, unanimously passed the Senate Banking Committee on Tuesday. It was a historic markup for the committee, which hadn't held one on housing in roughly 17 years.
What Is In The Bill?
A very important part of the 315-page bill is Section 203, which directs the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to "develop best practice frameworks for zoning and land-use policies, helping communities identify and overcome barriers to housing development."
Zoning laws have often been blamed for slowing down or altogether halting new construction projects in states like California, which are strictly regulated. Under the bill pushed forward by Sens. Scott and Warren, pro-housing state and local politicians would be able to refer to a national template for zoning laws to fight against strict rules in their jurisdictions.
Sections 207 and 208 also aim to streamline construction by cutting down on red tape around environmental restrictions. This is in line with what state lawmakers are already doing: in California, Gov. Gavin Newsom recently signed two bills scaling back the state's environmental restrictions to allow for more housing development.
What Impact Will It Have On Homebuyers?
Housing has become increasingly unaffordable for Americans in recent years. Prices have surged by double digits since the pandemic, when low mortgage rates spurred a homebuying frenzy across the country and buyers engaged in ruthless bidding wars while fighting for very limited inventory.
Historically high mortgage rates, which have spiked in 2022 as a result of the Federal Reserve's aggressive campaign to reduce inflation, have further eroded Americans' purchase power. As of June, the latest data available, the median sale price of a typical U.S. home was $447,054, according to Redfin, and the 30-year fixed-rate mortgage was 6.8 percent.
Additionally, other rising costs—including higher property taxes, home insurance premiums, and homeowners association (HOA) fees—are making homeownership more expensive than ever for those who can afford to buy a home in the first place.
Committee Chairman Sen. Tim Scott (R-SC) chats with ranking member Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) as Fed Chair Jerome Powell testifies before the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs during a hearing to "examine...
Committee Chairman Sen. Tim Scott (R-SC) chats with ranking member Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) as Fed Chair Jerome Powell testifies before the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs during a hearing to "examine the Semiannual Monetary Policy Report to the Congress" on Capitol Hill on June 25, 2025, in Washington, D.C. More"Housing is the #1 monthly expense for families across the U.S," Sen. Warren wrote on X on Tuesday. "The Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs unanimously passed landmark legislation that will boost supply, reduce homelessness, and expand homeownership nationwide."
A majority of housing experts and pro-housing advocates have rallied around the package, saying that the bill would be able to unlock the current standstill in the housing market, where buyers are being solidly kept to the sidelines by rising costs.
The American Planning Association (APA) Advocates, which has publicly expressed its support for the bill, said that "the ROAD To Housing Act is the first step in tackling housing affordability in communities throughout the nation." On X, it wrote: "As a result of bipartisan compromise, federal support for locally led reforms will reduce regulatory barriers to increasing housing supply and attainability for all."
The U.S. Conference of Mayors wrote a letter to Sens. Scott and Warren expressing their appreciation for their initiative, saying that "America's mayors know firsthand that a challenge as great and wide spread as housing affordability needs a comprehensive response."
According to the mayors, the bill "lays the groundwork to address the nation's urgent need to boost housing supply, improve housing affordability, and increase oversight and efficiency of federal regulators and housing programs."
"Homeownership is a hallmark of the American dream. The ROAD to Housing Act of 2025 is a great first step to making that dream a reality," Sen. Katye Boyd Britt of Alabama wrote on X on Tuesday.
In a statement shared with Newsweek, chairman of the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) Buddy Hughes said: "Building more homes is the only way to ease America's housing affordability crisis and the ROAD to Housing Act includes favorable provisions aimed at zoning and land-use policies, rural housing and multifamily housing that will stimulate construction of sorely needed housing."
'No Game-Changer'
While hailing the move as a step forward, several experts are wary of the fact that the bill is unlikely to single-handedly fix the housing affordability crisis in the country.
Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody's Analytics, wrote on X that the bill is: "no game-changer, but policymakers are finally in the game."
In a statement reported by Housing Wire, Isaac Boltansky, head of public policy at Pennymac, said: "This bill is a welcome step in the right direction. It's not a panacea, but it moves the ball forward on supply, affordability and program efficiency. With a few targeted fixes, especially relating to appraisals, it has real potential to become law and deliver meaningful improvements across the housing landscape."
In a letter to Sens. Scott and Warren, America's Credit Unions, a national trade association for both state- and federally chartered credit unions located in the U.S., said that more efforts should be made by federal lawmakers to allow credit unions to offer longer loan terms.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Kevin O'Leary Rips Donald Trump for 'Whacking' Labor Bureau Chief
Kevin O'Leary Rips Donald Trump for 'Whacking' Labor Bureau Chief

Newsweek

timean hour ago

  • Newsweek

Kevin O'Leary Rips Donald Trump for 'Whacking' Labor Bureau Chief

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Shark Tank investor Kevin O'Leary ripped President Donald Trump over his firing of U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Commissioner Dr. Erika McEntarfer on Friday after a disappointing jobs report. Newsweek reached out to an economic analyst via email for additional comment. Why It Matters Trump's decision to oust McEntarfer has triggered widespread concern among economists, business leaders and former government officials about the independence of U.S. economic data reporting. The abrupt dismissal followed the release of lackluster job numbers and marked a rare direct intervention by a president in the work of a nonpartisan federal agency responsible for compiling critical economic statistics. The number of new jobs for July dipped well below even modest expectations, with only 73,000 positions added, compared to the Dow Jones estimate of 100,000. This move has now fueled debate over the politicization of federal agencies, the integrity of government data and potential impact on market and public trust in official economic indicators. What To Know Trump announced McEntarfer's firing on Truth Social Friday, also accusing her of manipulating data to benefit former Vice President Kamala Harris around the 2024 presidential election "to try and boost Kamala's chances of Victory." While speaking on CNN after Trump's announcement, O'Leary was asked about Trump's economic policies impacting him as an investor. "I don't look at one day's trading and decide I'm going to change my strategy," O'Leary said. "I want markets to correct. I want them to go up and down. We're used to volatility. We had a bad print on jobs. I did not agree on whacking the commissioner. I don't like that." O'Leary continued: "Whacking statisticians makes no sense whatsoever. You don't shoot the messenger. They used to do that in Ancient Rome. Bad news. They'd kill a guy off the horse. You don't need to do that now. It doesn't matter. This is a job where you just print data. So, I didn't like that story." "I think the market is a little concerned about major trading partners not getting deals yet that make sense. It's not a good idea to have 35 percent tariffs on Canada, we know that that's coming into place at midnight right now, unless something magic happens," O'Leary added. McEntarfer's firing coincided with a significant drop in U.S. stock markets on Friday. The Dow Jones Industrial Average lost 542 points (1.2 percent), the S&P 500 fell 1.6 percent and the Nasdaq composite dropped 2.2 percent. This downward movement was attributed to both weak job figures and a new round of U.S. tariffs announced by Trump. Kevin O'Leary, chairman of O'Leary Ventures, is poised to speak before a Senate joint hearing on April 9 in Washington, D.C. (Photo by) Kevin O'Leary, chairman of O'Leary Ventures, is poised to speak before a Senate joint hearing on April 9 in Washington, D.C. (Photo by) What People Are Saying JB Pritzker, Democratic governor of Illinois, posted to X on Friday: "Donald Trump just fired the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics because she stated the facts. And the facts show his policies are a disaster for the American economy. Trump said he'd be a dictator on day one and that's just what he's acting like." Trump, in an interview with Newsmax's Rob Finnerty on Friday: "We had some difficulties with her, and there had been a lot of questions and we fired her because we didn't believe the numbers today." What Happens Next It remains uncertain who will be nominated as the next permanent BLS commissioner. Trump announced on Truth Social that McEntarfer "will be replaced with someone much more competent and qualified." Former BLS chief William Beach and other Friends of BLS Co-Chairs called for an investigation of Trump's firing of McEntarfer.

Senate confirms Trump's pick to oversee higher ed, a man tied to for-profit colleges
Senate confirms Trump's pick to oversee higher ed, a man tied to for-profit colleges

USA Today

timean hour ago

  • USA Today

Senate confirms Trump's pick to oversee higher ed, a man tied to for-profit colleges

The Senate confirmed President Donald Trump's pick to oversee higher education policy, a man with deep ties to the for-profit college industry, by a 50-to-45 vote on August 1. Senate Majority John Thune filed cloture on Kent's nomination earlier in the week. And the education committee had already advanced Kent on a 12-11 vote without a hearing in late May. The undersecretary at the Department of Education oversees billions in federal financial aid and is charged with ensuring America's colleges provide a quality education. Education Secretary Linda McMahon had previously told USA TODAY that Kent is a 'natural leader' whose experience and concern for students 'make him the ideal selection for under secretary of education." He had won the support of several prominent university trade groups who are opposed to Trump's attacks on universities, but said they supported Kent's nomination. His confirmation comes as the Trump administration seeks to reshape higher education and has launched numerous investigations into high profile universities. Kent had already been working at the agency on the administration's initiatives like K-12 school choice. But prior to working in the government, Kent had a long history working for or close to for-profit colleges. From 2008 to the end of 2015, Kent worked for Education Affiliates, a for-profit college company. When he left, he was a vice president of legislative and regulatory affairs. In 2015, the Department of Justice announced the company had agreed to a $13 million settlement to settle accusations it had gamed the federal financial aid system. The company told USA TODAY Kent was not involved in the settlement or the allegations of fraud. Critics, including student advocacy groups and teacher unions, had called on the Senate education committee to put Kent through a public hearing to answer questions about his time working for the company. And one of the original whistleblowers tied to that case, Dorothy Thomas, expressed concern about someone from the company's leadership holding the under secretary position. Kent had also worked for Career Education Colleges and Universities, a for-profit college trade group. He developed a reputation for deep policy knowledge while speaking against regulations geared toward the for-profit college industry. That group's CEO, Jason Altmire, said Kent was not driven by partisan politics and would bring an unbiased view to the under secretary position. He then went to work for Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin's administration as a deputy secretary of education. Youngkin, in a prepared statement, said Kent improved how Virginia manages colleges and made them more accountable to students and families through increased transparency. Chair of the Virginia Senate's education committee, Democrat Ghazala Hashmi, told USA TODAY Kent had tried to destabilize accreditation in the state and he was aligned with efforts to dismantle consumer protections. In a departing message to the commonwealth, Kent said he was proud of reducing costs while pushing for free speech and accountability at Virginia's colleges. Chris Quintana is an investigative reporter at USA TODAY. He can be reached at cquintana@ or via Signal at 202-308-9021. He is on X at @CQuintanaDC

No nominees deal
No nominees deal

Politico

timean hour ago

  • Politico

No nominees deal

The Senate will try to break an impasse Friday to advance three spending bills in hopes of showing progress after days of discord. A separate holdup over presidential nominations, meanwhile, could come down to direct talks between Democrats and the White House. A patchwork of objections from senators on both sides of the aisle have held up the spending legislation for days and foiled a plan for what some had hoped would be a four-bill package. But members expressed new optimism Friday that a second, more limited attempt could move forward. It's one of two pieces of major business Republican leaders are hoping to wrap up before the Senate starts its traditional summer recess. In addition to the spending bills — where they are keen to show some progress ahead of the Sept. 30 government shutdown deadline — they also want to confirm a broad tranche of President Donald Trump's nominees. The nominee conversations appear more dicey, senators said, and Senate Majority Leader John Thune said Friday that he has put Trump officials 'into conversation directly' with Minority Leader Chuck Schumer's team. Top White House staffers were also in the Capitol on Thursday night after Thune met with Trump at the White House. 'This is how this is ultimately going to get resolved,' Thune said. Meanwhile, GOP senators said leaders are running traps on a possible deal that would advance the smaller package of spending bills. Under the pending proposal, leaders would seek unanimous consent to tie together the fiscal 2026 spending bills funding the Veterans Affairs and Agriculture departments, as well as military construction projects and the FDA. A third spending bill, funding Congress itself, could be voted on separately. Senate Appropriations Chair Susan Collins said Friday morning she expects a unanimous consent request on some constellation of those three bills. The Maine Republican is eager to show progress on bipartisan spending bills before the Senate leaves for its lengthy August recess. Upon their return, members will have only a handful of session days to make further progress ahead of the shutdown deadline. Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.) has made clear he will object to including Legislative Branch funding in the package and wants the chance to vote against the $7.1 billion bill. It's the smallest of the 12 annual appropriations bills, but Kennedy maintains it still costs too much. 'They agreed to my proposal,' he told reporters Friday. 'They're going to have one vote on [Military Construction–VA] and [Agriculture-FDA] together and separate vote on [Legislative Branch] so I can vote no. Then they'll marry them up later if all three pass, as they probably will.' Coming to a nominations deal could be much trickier, given Trump's determination to get all of his 150-plus pending nominees confirmed quickly. Trump on Thursday said on Truth Social that the Senate 'must stay in Session, taking no recess' until all of the nominees are confirmed. Even if senators stay in Washington, that goal will be all but impossible to meet absent Democratic cooperation. Democrats under Schumer are exploring whether to quickly confirm a smaller subset of nominees in exchange for other concessions, such as the release of government funding they claim has been illegally 'impounded' by the Trump administration. Hailey Fuchs contributed to this report.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store