Suspect killed, officer injured in Baltimore shooting as bodycam captures cries of 'cease fire'
According to the Baltimore Police Department (BPD), the incident occurred at approximately 7:17 p.m. June 17 in West Baltimore, near the intersection of Pennsylvania Avenue and Laurens Streets.
The incident resulted in the death of Abdullah, and one officer was shot in the foot during the confrontation.
According to authorities, officers patrolling the area observed a man they believed to be armed. The initial engagement began from an unmarked cruiser, where officers attempted to speak with Abdullah, the department said.
When one officer exited the vehicle to approach on foot, Abdullah began to walk away. As the officer followed, Abdullah shifted a crossbody bag to the front of his body and fled.
A second officer exited the cruiser to assist, while a third officer, who was stationed in a nearby marked patrol vehicle, responded. As officers closed in on Abdullah, he allegedly pointed a handgun and fired, striking an officer in the foot.
"Cease fire, cease fire," an officer is heard yelling in the footage.
In response, three officers returned fire, striking Abdullah.
Both the injured officer and Abdullah were transported to the University of Maryland Shock Trauma Center.
At 11:14 p.m., Abdullah was pronounced dead. The injured officer, an eight-year veteran of the department, underwent surgery and was listed in fair condition the following afternoon.
A gun was recovered and secured by police.
Body camera footage captured a crowd gathering after the shooting. Authorities noted that the crowd delayed their ability to provide immediate aid.
Once the scene was stabilized, officers rendered emergency medical assistance until paramedics arrived.
The shooting is under joint investigation by the Baltimore Police Department's Special Investigative Response Team (SIRT), the Homicide Section and the Maryland Office of the Attorney General.
Fox News Digital has reached out to the Baltimore Police Department for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'Smoke' showrunner reveals why he dropped that major twist in Apple TV Plus' new true crime thriller
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Apple TV Plus just dropped the first two episodes of "Smoke," its new true crime thriller starring Taron Egerton and Jurnee Smollett, this morning. So there's a good chance you haven't seen it yet. If you haven't, then be warned — there are spoilers ahead. But if you have seen the two-episode premiere or listened to "Firebug," the true crime podcast this show is loosely adapted from, then you know the shocking reveal from the end of episode 2: Taron Egerton's character, David Gudsen, is an arson investigator who is also a serial arsonist. To be fair, the show's official trailer doesn't entirely hide this. It avoids showing the reveal directly, but it's clear that Detective Calderone (Jurnee Smollett) thinks her new partner could be a prolific arsonist. So when I had a chance to sit down with showrunner Dennis Lehane ("The Wire," "Black Bird") to discuss the true crime limited series, I asked him about the choice to drop what would normally be a major reveal so early on in the show. For his part, Lehane simply doesn't want to deceive audiences just for the sake of shock value. Especially when, if you've already listened to "Firebug" anyway, you know who the arsonist in "Smoke" is likely to be. We tried the third episode. We tried the second. We tried the first. And second just worked. Because it's not about the twist at all. It's about how deep does this rabbit hole of this guy's mind go, and what are we going to find at the end of it? "Smoke" showrunner Dennis Lehane "Audiences are so smart now, man," Lehane rightly pointed out. "I hate shows when I'm sitting there, and I figured it out — I figure [it] out in episode 2, and you're telling me in episode 6? It's annoying." However, that doesn't mean that the plan was always to go with a reveal at the end of the two-episode premiere. In fact, Lehane and the show's creative team tried multiple options. "We tried the third episode. We tried the second. We tried the first. And second just worked. Because it's not about the twist at all. It's about how deep does this rabbit hole of this guy's mind go, and what are we going to find at the end of it?" As someone who has seen "Smoke" and certainly thinks there are more than a few missteps in the miniseries' nine-episode run, I have to agree with the decision to go with a reveal at the end of episode 2. For starters, any further really would feel like the show is just dragging it out. But given the premiere's two-episode structure, it also leaves you on a high note. You walk away from the episode desperate to see what's next now that you know the cat-and-mouse game between Calderone and Gudsen is afoot. As I've already mentioned on more than one occasion, "Smoke" is a true crime thriller miniseries based on the true crime podcast "Firebug." That podcast examined the life and crimes of John Leonard Orr, one of the most prolific arsonists in history. In this show, showrunner Dennis Lehane has opted for a fictional stand-in, Pacific Northwest arson investigator Dave Gudsen (Taron Egerton). Along with Detective Michell Calderone (Jurnee Smollett), he's part of a team chasing down a pair of serial arsonists. But as you now know, one of the people they're chasing is really Gudsen, and the show is, to quote Lehane, "not about the twist at all." Instead, this show is a deep dive into the mind of more than a few twisted individuals as they investigate a spate of arson cases that lead to more than a few deaths. Stream the first two episodes of "Smoke" on Apple TV Plus now 'The Life of Chuck' star discusses screening film with director Mike Flanagan, his favorite performances from the Stephen King adaptation and more I just saw one of my favorite movies in theaters for its 40th anniversary — but you can stream it for free right now Tom Hardy's 'MobLand' just wrapped up with a stunning finale — and I can't wait for a season 2
CNN
41 minutes ago
- CNN
Laws with lookback windows gave Cassie Ventura and others the chance to fight back against accused abusers. Advocates say survivors deserve more
EDITOR'S NOTE: If you or someone you know has experienced sexual assault, you are not alone. Visit RAINN's National Sexual Assault Hotline for help. Call (4673), chat at or text 'HOPE' to 64673. Getting help around the world: If you, or someone you know, is being affected by domestic violence, a worldwide list of directories is provided by UN Women. You can also find a list of national agencies on The Pixel Project. Music mogul Sean 'Diddy' Combs was acquitted Wednesday of the most serious charges against him in a trial that exposed allegations of sexual assault and abuse of power, placing a renewed spotlight on survivors who choose to speak out. Combs was acquitted of racketeering conspiracy and sex trafficking pertaining to two of his former girlfriends, including the singer Cassie Ventura, who provided vivid and emotional testimony while eight months pregnant. Ventura first alleged years of physical and sexual abuse at the hands of Combs in a lawsuit filed in November 2023, just before the expiration of New York's one-year lookback window, which suspended the statute of limitations for civil lawsuits related to adult sexual assault cases. The suit was settled shortly after. New York's Adult Survivors Act was part of a suite of legislation passed in New York and California in the last several years that temporarily dropped the statute of limitations for lawsuits related to child or adult victims of sexual assault. Thousands of lawsuits were filed under the laws against powerful figures and institutions, including President Donald Trump, once-renowned movie producer Harvey Weinstein, state prison systems, the Boy Scouts of America and the Archdiocese of New York. Every 68 seconds, someone in the US is sexually assaulted, according to the Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network, or RAINN, the nation's largest advocacy organization against sexual violence. While the laws and temporary lookback windows were a huge step forward, advocates say they weren't a panacea for survivors seeking justice. Now advocates say the #MeToo movement's momentum is waning and they are struggling to maintain the public attention and legislative support to push through additional protections for sexual assault survivors. Lawmakers in New York had been working to pass legislation for child victims of sexual assault for more than a decade when they recognized a unique moment in the cultural landscape, according to New York State Assemblywoman Linda Rosenthal, who helped lead the legislative effort. The MeToo movement, launched by activist Tarana Burke nearly two decades ago, went viral around 2017, as allegations of sexual assault and harassment were leveled at Weinstein. People were willing to talk about sexual assault out in the open, in a way they hadn't been before, Burke told CNN in June. Accounts of sexual assault and harassment spanned industries, and survivors didn't just want to be heard, they wanted accountability. 'It became harder for those who were opposed to the effort to say, 'Oh, this isn't such a big deal. It doesn't happen that often. It's not really a thing that we need to be changing the laws about,' when you couldn't open the paper or see a movie without this being a central topic,' said Michael Polenberg, vice president of government affairs at Safe Horizon, a national non-profit that offers services to victims of sexual assault and other forms of abuse. After years of trying, there was finally enough public pressure and legislative support to overcome the fierce lobbying effort against the Child Victims Act, Rosenthal said. The law, enacted in 2019, allowed child victims to file civil lawsuits up to the age of 55 and created a one-year lookback window for civil lawsuits from victims of any age, regardless of when the abuse occurred. That window was later extended for another year to account for difficulty accessing the courts during the Covid-19 pandemic. It was a recognition that trauma takes time to process and strict statutes of limitations do not account for the experience of survivors, who are often not ready to tell their stories for years, Rosenthal said. Nearly 11,000 lawsuits were filed under the Child Victims Act in New York during its two-year span. 'Once we passed the Child Victims Act, the dam sort of broke, and we were able to pass the Adult Survivors Act. People understood how many victims there are out there,' Rosenthal said. New York's separate Adult Survivors Act passed in 2022 and created a one-year lookback window for adult victims. Similar legislation in California created lookback windows for child victims in 2020 and adults in 2023. Former magazine columnist E. Jean Carroll accused Trump of raping her in a New York department store in the mid-1990s and later defaming her in his denial of her claims. A Manhattan federal jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse and ordered him to pay about $5 million in damages. Trump has denied all claims. 'Some of the people that it helped bring down really makes me even prouder that I got to pass that bill into law,' Rosenthal said, citing Caroll's lawsuit against Trump. 'She used the Adult Survivors Act to get justice.' But some of the survivors who chose to pursue legal action faced additional legal hurdles. Advocates say a patchwork of sexual assault policies can sometimes feel like it exists less to protect survivors and more to weed out cases deemed illegitimate. If one year seems like an arbitrary period to file lawsuits for old cases, that's because essentially, it is. In New York, the time frame was born out of political compromise and reflects what some lawmakers believed was reasonable, Rosenthal said. She's since pursued legislation that would eliminate the statute of limitations in the state for child victims entirely, but interest among some legislators has waned. 'Once the momentum has stopped, you have to reenergize and get it back and prove all over again why some of these bills are needed,' she said. Some cases brought against the state – like those filed by formerly incarcerated women who say they were sexually assaulted in New York's prison system – have to be heard in the Court of Claims, which requires a more precise degree of detail about the time and place of the abuse. That requirement has resulted in cases being dismissed in New York, Polenberg said. 'It's chilling when you think about the Adult Survivors Act, where the preponderance of cases were brought on behalf of formerly incarcerated individuals – many women – for sexual abuse that took place in a prison. It is unfathomable to ask survivors to know the exact day that something took place, if they were locked up for six years or eight years,' Polenberg said. Rosenthal authored a bill to try to remedy the issue, which had the support of Safe Horizon and other survivor advocates, but it failed this year. Nationally, only a handful of states, including Kentucky, Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia, West Virginia and Wyoming, have removed statutes of limitations for all felony sex crimes, according to RAINN. Survivors in other states are limited to set time frames or temporary lookback windows. Even then, a number of other factors are at play, like so-called intoxication loopholes that can prevent sexual assault survivors from getting justice if they were unable to consent after becoming voluntarily intoxicated. The loophole exists in nearly half the nation, a 2022 analysis of sexual assault laws from all 50 states and Washington, DC, found. Texas closed its loophole on June 20 with a law that expands the definition of consent and clearly outlines sexual assault to include cases in which a victim 'cannot consent because of intoxication or impairment by any substance.' Rosenthal sponsored legislation in New York last month aimed at closing the state's intoxication loophole; it also failed to advance. Christina Maxwell, a New York-based singer, actress and public speaker, advocated for the elimination of that loophole. It was a legal hurdle she never thought she would have to contend with in 2020, after the #MeToo movement went worldwide and legislators were throwing their weight behind survivors of sexual assault. That was the year Maxwell was sexually assaulted after drinking an alcoholic beverage she believes was drugged while at a workplace event, she told CNN. Maxwell pulled the surveillance footage which captured much of the night's events and went to the police, she said, but she was told by detectives and lawyers that she likely did not have a case. 'They verbatim said to me that drunk consent is still consent,' Maxwell said. She returned to her job and spent the next three years working in the office where the alleged assault took place, she said. 'In order to keep working there and to keep doing what was a dream job for me at the time, I had to fully separate – for myself – what happened from the physical space because I didn't want him to take my dream job from me too,' she said. Maxwell has since found camaraderie with the advocates she now works with to rally for protections for other sexual assault survivors. Rosenthal said survivor voices will be key as she and her colleagues work to increase protections for victims of sexual assault, sometimes inch by inch. 'You can read about it, but the most convincing strategy is to have a survivor sit down with you and look you in the eye and tell their truth about what happened to them and the reasons that they were unable to seek justice,' Rosenthal said. The fact that Combs was acquitted on the most serious charges in the federal trial was disappointing, said Polenberg, who believes there's been a recent backlash towards the MeToo movement and survivors' rights. He cited a willingness to dismiss serious allegations from survivors. But just the fact that Ventura was able to file her original civil suit against Combs was a success, he said. 'Back in November of 2023, Cassie had a choice. She could accept an eight-figure settlement offer and move on with her life and sign non-disclosure agreements, or she could file a civil lawsuit and hold Sean Combs responsible for what he did to her and shine a light on his behavior,' Ventura's lawyer, Doug Wigdor, told CNN after the verdict. 'She showed great courage, great bravery, to choose the latter of those two options.' During Combs' criminal trial, Ventura said she received a $20 million settlement in her 2023 civil suit. The significance of Ventura's lawsuit will extend far beyond the trial, Burke, the founder of the #MeToo movement, previously told CNN. 'You can't unring this bell,' she said. 'We all listened to Cassie. We all saw that video. We've heard this testimony that's not going anywhere.' Rosenthal said she hopes the moment will recapture the attention of her colleagues and other lawmakers around the nation who hold the power to shape policy. 'Cassie and others did file in the waning days of the Adult Survivors Act, and perhaps the depravity exposed in the trial will give renewed momentum to bills that will allow survivors to seek justice,' she said. CNN's Elizabeth Wagmeister, Dan Heching and Kara Scannell contributed to this report.
Washington Post
43 minutes ago
- Washington Post
‘Illegal fireworks' bring arrests on Fourth in D.C.
One of Washington's great official traditions is the annual fireworks show on the Fourth of July. What seems to be a sort of unofficial tradition is the detonation of prohibited fireworks in neighborhoods, and on the holiday, the D.C. police said they cracked down. Fifteen people were arrested late Friday and early Saturday in the Navy Yard area of Southeast Washington 'on fireworks related charges,' police said.
