logo
Zubiri calls VP Sara impeachment a witch hunt; House prosecutors slam ‘insult'

Zubiri calls VP Sara impeachment a witch hunt; House prosecutors slam ‘insult'

GMA Networka day ago
Senator Juan Miguel Zubiri on Tuesday described the looming impeachment trial of Vice President Sara Duterte as a "witch hunt," which in turn drew a sharp rebuke from House prosecutors.
'I think that it is a witch hunt because they want to remove her from public service; para 'yung iba makaupo [so that others may take her place]. At 'yung iba ay mawawalan ng kandidato na kalaban pagdating sa halalan ng 2028,' Zubiri alleged.
(And some people will lose a rival in the 2028 election.)
Still, Zubiri said, the Senate impeachment court will have to do what is right.
'I'll set my bias aside because we have to follow the process. There is a process under the Constitution. It cannot be changed. If we violate that, then we violate our oath of office when we say that we will defend and protect the Constitution of the Republic of the Philippines. We have to do what is right here,' he said.
Article 11 Section 4 of the Constitution states that, 'In case the verified complaint or resolution of impeachment is filed by at least one-third of all the Members of the House, the same shall constitute the Articles of Impeachment, and trial by the Senate shall forthwith proceed.'
The House of Representatives impeached Duterte on February 5, with over 200 lawmakers—more than the one-third required—endorsing the complaint. The Vice President was accused of betrayal of public trust, culpable violation of the constitution, graft and corruption, and other high crimes over alleged misuse of P612.5 million worth of confidential funds and for threatening to kill President Ferdinand "Bongbong" Marcos, Jr., his wife Liza and his Speaker Martin Romualdez of Leyte.
The trial, after delays, is expected to start after the 20th Congress opens session on July 28.
'Insult to the House'
At least two House prosecutors, Iloilo Representative Lorenz Defensor of Iloilo and ML party-list Representative Leila de Lima, pushed back against Zubiri's remark.
'It's very unbecoming of a senator-judge in an impeachment trial to say that the impeachment complaint and the trial is a witch hunt. Those words should not come from a Senator-judge who is expected to receive the evidence with impartiality and to treat the impeachment as a constitutional process,' Defensor told reporters.
'Sana hindi na maulit yun [I hope that does not happen again]. Maybe let's limit our statements to how the process should go about during the trial, and not on the substance, Let's wait for the evidence and let's wait for their decision instead of calling it a witch hunt,' he said.
Defensor stressed that the impeachment is a constitutional process that must be adhered to, not an action taken whenever a person sees fit.
'This is a constitutional process which must proceed to find justice not for the complainants, but for the Filipinos. If it's an acquittal, we should accept it. If it's a conviction, we should accept it. But they [senators] should receive the evidence first,' he said.
De Lima, for her part, said Zubiri's comment is unfair, given the gravity of the allegations against the Vice President.
'It's really unfortunate. It's an insult to the House as the initiator of the impeachment process, and an insult to the various groups that filed those first three impeachment complaints,' she said.
"That's so unfair because as far as the House is concerned, may batayan [there is a foundation]. Kaya nga in-impeach, pinirmahan ng more than one-third of the members of the House of Representatives,' de Lima added.
(That is why more than one-third of all members of the House signed off on this.)
De Lima said senator-judges should avoid making public their biases on the impeachment.
"Ibig sabihin ng witch hunt, walang batayan, para lang mang-harass, para lang i-persecute ka. Yun ang ibig sabihin ng witch hunt, which is far from the very characteristics of this impeachment trial. So sana they avoid mga ganyan mga comments which exhibit their personal biases with respect to the impeachment issues," de Lima said.
(In a witch hunt there is no basis, and is only to harass and persecute. That is what a witch hunt means, which is far from the very characteristics of this impeachment trial. So I wish they would avoid these kinds of comments, which exhibit their personal biases with respect to the impeachment issues.)
"Witch hunt is out of the question here. You talk about witch hunt kung walang basahan [if there is no basis]. Pwede yun siguro dun sa mga ginawa nila sa akin [You can use it to describe what they did to me]. The past administration, kinusuhan na po ng mga [they charged me with] trumped-up bogus charges, yung witch hunt kangaroo hearing," she added.
The legislator also criticized Zubiri's pronouncement that despite his biases, he still wants the impeachment trial to continue because they have to follow what is stated in the Constitution.
"Parang pro forma na lang. Yun ang parang pinaka-sense noong kanyang sinasabi. Kailangan sundin ang konstitusyon pero pro forma na lang yan. I mean, 'yun ang interpretation ko sa mga sinabi niya. It's really unfortunate. It's an insult to the House as the initiator of the impeachment process. Also an insult to the various groups that filed those first three impeachment complaints bago nag-adopt diretso yung [before the fourth was adopted by] more than one-third of the members of the House," de Lima stressed.
(It sounds as if they're doing it pro forma. That's the sense from what he's saying. The Constitution must be followed but only as a matter of form. I mean, that's how I interpret what he said.)
She also added that Duterte should take this opportunity to clear her name.
"At hindi ba dapat i-welcome ito ni VP Sara? Kasi ngayon ang pagkakataon na ihayag niya yung kanyang mga depensa, i-explain niya yung mga akusasyon laban sa kanya. At hindi ba pag wala namang kasalanan, dapat hindi matakot? Akala ko ba, because she's been saying about, she said before about the bloodbath pero bakit gusto niyang ipa-dismiss yung impeachment case," de Lima said.
(And shouldn't VP Sara welcome this? this is her opportunity to put forward her defense against the allegations against her. And isn't it, 'If you've done nothing wrong, you have nothing to fear?' And she talked about the bloodbath so why does she want the impeachment case dismissed.) — BM, GMA Integrated News
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

VP Sara to join Pinoy event in South Korea on July 27, to return to PH on SONA day
VP Sara to join Pinoy event in South Korea on July 27, to return to PH on SONA day

GMA Network

time4 hours ago

  • GMA Network

VP Sara to join Pinoy event in South Korea on July 27, to return to PH on SONA day

Vice President Sara Duterte announced on Wednesday that she will visit South Korea on July 27 to attend an event for the Filipino community and return to the Philippines on July 28, the day of the President's State of the Nation Address (SONA). 'There is a Filipino community event already confirmed on July 27 in South Korea. They organized it, and we were invited as the speakers,' Duterte said. 'During the SONA, I'll be traveling back to the Philippines. It's the travel date,' she added. Duterte said she accepted the invitation to the event to 'personally' express her gratitude to Filipinos in South Korea. The Vice President is currently abroad to visit her father, former president Rodrigo Duterte, who has been in detention at The Hague since March. The elder Duterte is facing crimes against humanity charges before the International Criminal Court in connection with the killings under his war on drugs when he was mayor of Davao City and when he was president of the Philippines. President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. will deliver his fourth SONA on July 28. House Secretary General Reginald Velasco earlier said the Vice President will not be attending this year's SONA but noted that the House remains prepared should she change her mind. —Mariel Celine Serquiña/LDF, GMA Integrated News

OVP scores 'unmodified opinion' from COA for 2024
OVP scores 'unmodified opinion' from COA for 2024

GMA Network

time7 hours ago

  • GMA Network

OVP scores 'unmodified opinion' from COA for 2024

The Office of the Vice President (OVP) has received an "unmodified opinion" from the Commission on Audit (COA) for the third consecutive year. In its 2024 annual audit report, the COA stated that the financial statements of Vice President Sara Duterte's office present "fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of OVP as of December 31, 2024." The state auditors also said that the OVP's "financial performance, cash flows, changes in net assets/equity, and comparison of budget and actual amounts for the year then ended, and notes to the financial statements, including a summary of significant accounting policies are in accordance with International Public Sector Accounting Standards." The OVP, for its part, said that the COA's unmodified opinion for 2024 highlights its "continuing commitment to transparency, accountability, and the judicious use of public funds, as well as compliance with the principles of good governance and sound financial administration upheld by state auditors." The COA issues an unmodified opinion or unqualified opinion when the state auditor "concludes that the financial statements are prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with the applicable financial reporting framework." The COA, however, only issues an unqualified or qualified opinion on the Financial Audit part of the Annual Audit Report on government agencies, including the OVP. Other parts of the Annual Audit Report include Performance Audit and Compliance Audit. The COA has clarified that an audit opinion 'should not be viewed as a rating, score or grade, with ranking of lowest to highest,' stressing that it only pertains to the financial audit done by state auditors on the agencies. To recall, the House of Representatives impeached Duterte on February 5, with over 200 lawmakers endorsing the complaint. On June 10, the Senate impeachment court convened, with the trial proper expected to begin in the 20th Congress. Among the seven articles of impeachment against Duterte was the alleged malversation of P612.5 million in confidential funds with questionable liquidation documents. Duterte denied the allegations. —LDF, GMA Integrated News

PAOCC: 15,000 complaints filed vs. online lending apps
PAOCC: 15,000 complaints filed vs. online lending apps

GMA Network

time8 hours ago

  • GMA Network

PAOCC: 15,000 complaints filed vs. online lending apps

Some 15,000 complaints have been filed against abusive online lending apps with the Presidential Anti-Organized Crime Commission (PAOCC), with numerous victims reporting severe harassment and mental anguish when they struggle to repay their loans. During a public briefing on Wednesday, PAOCC Executive Director Undersecretary Gilbert Cruz reported the figure as he assured that the government is intensifying its crackdown against online financial platforms that violate data privacy and human dignity. "So far, nasa 15,000 na po ang complaints [sa PAOCC]. What we're looking at is may 156,000 na complaints every month na nare-receive po ng law enforcement agencies," Cruz said. (So far, there are already 15,000 formal complaints filed with the PAOCC. Law enforcement agencies are now receiving as many as 156,000 complaints each month.) According to Cruz, victims are often low-income Filipinos who turned to online lending apps for emergency cash to pay for rent, medical bills, or tuition. Instead of receiving help, many fall into a cycle of intimidation and abuse. "Karamihan ng mga nakakausap namin, they're being harassed whenever nagkakaroon ng singilan," he said. (Most of the victims we've spoken with say they are being harassed whenever they are asked to pay.) After users agree to the loan terms, Cruz said, some apps would use personal information— including photos, contacts, and online profiles—against them. "Sinisingil ka nila with the interest na talagang umaabot ng 35% to 40%, wala kang magawa. Papadala nila ng mga kung anu-anong pananakot sa social media mo... may mga picture na edited," Cruz said. (They charge interest that reaches 35% to 40%, and users have no choice but to pay. They send threats on social media and even use edited pictures to shame victims.) Cruz said the psychological toll has become alarming, forcing some to resign from their jobs while others suffer mental illnesses. Some online lenders resort to messaging co-workers and relatives with obscene or defamatory messages, the PAOCC chief said, forcing many victims into isolation and silence. "Ang mga office workers nila... pinadadala ng kung ano-anong malalaswang messages. Dapat tandaan natin, iba 'yung obligasyon mo na nangutang ka, iba rin 'yung kaso 'pag ikaw naman hina-harass," he added. (Their office co-workers receive obscene messages. We must remember: owing money is one thing, but harassment is a separate issue.) To support victims, the PAOCC has launched a one-stop shop for complainants, providing free legal advice, support through the Department of Justice (DOJ), and even assistance with transportation and meals. Cruz urged the public to verify lenders with banks, the Department of Information and Communication Technology (DICT), or the PAOCC before using online platforms. — VDV, GMA Integrated News

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store