DPS steps up enforcement for annual distracted driving campaign
"We've seen an alarming rise in incidents where our Troopers are being struck while working roadside — often due to distracted driving," DPS Colonel Freeman F. Martin said in a news release. "Distracted driving is not just dangerous, it's deadly. For the safety of all Texans, we urge every driver to stay alert, put the phone down, and give the road your full attention."
THP will increase enforcement as part of Operation CARE (Crash Awareness and Reduction Effort), which runs nationwide from April 7 through April 14. Last year, during DPS' 2024 Distracted Driving enforcement efforts, there were more than 67,441 citations and warnings issued. This included over 4,815 speeding violations; 303 seat belt and child seat violations; 1,630 violations for driving without insurance; and 345 felony and fugitive arrests.
To comply with Move Over or Slow Down, Texas law states that a driver must either:
— Vacate the lane closest to the applicable vehicles stopped on the side of the road (if the road has multiple lanes traveling in the same direction) or
— Slow down to 20 mph below the speed limit. (If the speed limit is below 25 mph, the driver must slow down to 5 mph)
Violations of the law result in a misdemeanor that is punishable by a fine of up to $1,250. Subsequent offences can increase fines, and if the offence results in bodily injury, the penalty can be up to a state jail felony.
DPS offers the following safety tips:
— Eliminate distractions while driving, including the use of mobile devices. Texas law prohibits the use of portable wireless devices to read, write or send an electronic message unless the vehicle is stopped. If you're using a navigation device or app, have a passenger operate it so you can keep your eyes on the road.
— Move Over or Slow Down for police, fire, EMS, Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) vehicles and tow trucks stopped on the side of the road with emergency lights activated. Show the same courtesy to fellow drivers who are stopped on the side of the road. So far in 2025, there have been more than 3,184 Move Over, Slow Down violations. View Governor Greg Abbott's Move Over or Slow Down PSA here.
— Don't drink and drive. Make alternate plans if you consume alcohol.
— Buckle up everyone in the vehicle — it's the law.
— Slow down, especially in bad weather, heavy traffic, unfamiliar areas or construction zones.
— Drive defensively, as holiday travel can present additional challenges.
— Report road hazards or anything suspicious to the nearest law enforcement agency.
— Monitor weather and road conditions wherever you are traveling. For road conditions and closures in Texas, visit Drive Texas.
Remember to keep the Texas Roadside Assistance number stored in your phone. You can always dial 1-800-525-5555 for any assistance when you're traveling. That number can also be found on the back of a Texas Driver License.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC Sports
a day ago
- NBC Sports
Tony Buzbee responds to Shannon Sharpe's claim that he targets Black men
Anyone who has been following the NFL since 2021 knows the name Tony Buzbee. He arrived on the scene as the lawyer representing the first plaintiff who sued then-Texans quarterback Deshaun Watson for misconduct during massage-therapy sessions. Eventually, Buzbee represented more than 20 plaintiffs against Watson. Most recently, Buzbee settled a lawsuit on behalf of a woman who claimed that Hall of Fame tight end Shannon Sharpe committed sexual assault. After the lawsuit was filed in April, Sharpe attacked Buzbee personally, claiming among other things that he 'targets Black men.' In a new Esquire profile, Buzbee responded to that claim. 'I didn't wake up one morning and say, 'I want to sue Shannon Sharpe.' He has no relevance in my life,' Buzbee said, via Sean Keeley of 'I actually think he's very entertaining when he yells and screams and talks about sports that he's not involved in. But if I think it's a legitimate case, then I pursue it. And I think this is worth my time.' Buzbee's business model, if he's doing it properly (and the results would suggest he is), doesn't discriminate. He told Esquire that he receives as a fee roughly 40 percent of any recovery his clients get. That's how the American civil justice system works. Individuals who have grievances and who can't afford to pay lawyers by the hour hire them based on a contingency fee. This creates a strong business incentive for those lawyers to take good cases, not weak ones. The question of whether a case is worth pursuing has three prongs: clarity of liability, amount of damages, and the ability to collect on a settlement or verdict. Beyond that, nothing else should matter. And given that Sharpe's lawyer immediately admitted that at least $10 million was offered to settle the case before it was filed and that the case was eventually settled without Sharpe ever responding to the civil complaint, chances are that Buzbee walked away from the Sharpe case with at least $4 million in fees. That's how it works. Find strong cases, pursue strong cases, settle or try strong cases. Buzbee did that after the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in 2010, generating more than $500 million for more than 10 thousand clients who pursued claims against BP. 'I guess a bunch of old white men could say I'm targeting them, and a bunch of multinational corporations could say I'm targeting them as well,' Buzbee said. 'I guess you could say I was targeting BP. . . . Well, I probably was targeting BP.' That's how it works. For anyone who represents individuals on a contingency fee. For Buzbee, the Watson case made him a go-to choice for anyone with valid claims against current or former NFL players. Without the Watson cases, there's a good chance the plaintiff in the Sharpe case wouldn't have known Buzbee's name. That also explains Buzbee's publicity-driven style. At a time when plenty of lawyers advertise their services with gigantic billboards and goofy TV commercials, the best advertisement remains free advertisement from news coverage. Buzbee knows that. His business thrives on that. And there's no reason to pursue a weak case simply to harass someone. That said, a case that seemed strong can turn out to be weak, if the lawyer mistakenly believed a client whose story didn't hold up under scrutiny. That's what may have happened in Buzbee's misadventures with Jay-Z, which resulted in the plaintiff acknowledging inconsistencies in the story she was telling about allegations of rape when she was 13 and the case eventually being dismissed without a settlement. The Esquire profile contains this curious statement: 'Buzbee later withdrew from the case because he has not been admitted to practice law in the Southern District of New York.' The presence of that assertion in the final product, frankly, shows that whoever wrote and/or edited the story has no idea how the legal system works. Lawyers licensed in one jurisdiction routinely seek and receive what's known as pro hac vice (Latin, 'for this occasion') admission in other jurisdictions in a specific case. As long as a local lawyer who is licensed to practice in that court is personally involved in the case, pro hac vice admission is routinely granted. Actually, that's how Buzbee pursued Sharpe. The primary lawyer on the complaint filed in Las Vegas was Nevada lawyer Micah D. Nash. Buzbee's name appears on the document below Nash's, with this designation: 'Pro Hac [Vice] Forthcoming.' This doesn't mean Buzbee was targeting Jay-Z because of his race. The more plausible explanation is that Buzbee took on a case that ended up being far weaker than he thought it was, so he found a way to retreat. Of course, he's now facing a lawsuit from Jay-Z claiming that the lawsuit sparked $190 million in business losses. Unfortunately for Buzbee, he's got the money that would make him a target for a lawyer who represents plaintiffs on a contingency fee. That's the primary motivation in this specific form of legal practice. It's good business to take strong cases with significant damages against defendants who have money. The personal characteristics of the defendants do not matter. All that matters is: (1) did they do something they shouldn't have done?; (2) did those actions cause tangible and significant harm?; and (3) can they easily write a check to make things right?
CBS News
2 days ago
- CBS News
18-wheeler driver who allegedly fell asleep on the highway, killing 5, indicted on 9 felony charges
The man who allegedly fell asleep behind the wheel of an 18-wheeler causing a deadly crash in Kaufman County has been indicted on nine felony counts related to the crash. Alexis Osmani Gonzalez-Companioni, 27, was indicted on four counts of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and five counts of manslaughter, according to Kaufman County court records. Five people died and a sixth person was hospitalized after the crash on I-20 near Hiram Road on June 28, authorities said. The crash happened at about 2:40 p.m., when the Texas Department of Public Safety said Gonzalez-Companioni allegedly fell asleep behind the wheel of his 18-wheeler and did not see stalled traffic in front of him. He then struck a Ford F-150 carrying five people. Four of the five people in the Ford F-150 were pronounced dead at the scene, while the fifth was flown to a hospital in critical condition, DPS said in a news release. The 18-wheeler driven by Gonzalez-Companioni was then pushed into two other 18-wheelers, causing one to jack-knife and strike a Jeep Compass, a Ford Mustang, and a Honda passenger vehicle, according to DPS. One person in the Jeep Compass struck by the jack-knifed semi was also pronounced dead at the scene, DPS said.
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
Texas Senate once again tries to give the attorney general authority to prosecute election crimes
The Texas Senate voted 17-12 Wednesday to preliminarily approve a bill that would allow the attorney general to independently prosecute election crimes without waiting to be invited by a local district attorney, a long-standing priority for the office's GOP incumbent, Ken Paxton. A similar proposal stalled out just before the finish line during the regular session, with the House and Senate unable to agree on how quickly the attorney general should be allowed to take the case from local authorities. This time around, both chambers are starting from the same spot on that issue, directing the attorney general to immediately step in and take over election fraud cases. But a potential new line of disagreement has opened. In setting the agenda for the Legislature's ongoing special session, Gov. Greg Abbott asked lawmakers to grant this authority to the attorney general with a constitutional amendment, after Texas' highest criminal court ruled in 2021 that the state constitution bars the agency from unilaterally inserting itself into criminal cases. A constitutional amendment requires a two-thirds vote from both chambers — including 12 House Democrats — and final signoff from voters to take effect. In the House, Plano GOP Rep. Matt Shaheen took up that call, filing a joint resolution to accompany his bill. Sen. Bryan Hughes, the Mineola Republican carrying the Senate version of the bill, said during a hearing he does not believe a constitutional amendment is necessary. Sen. Nathan Johnson, a Dallas Democrat who is running for attorney general, tried to get Hughes' bill thrown out Wednesday on the grounds that it did not comply with the governor's call. Johnson's point of order was overruled by the Senate parliamentarian. Hughes said the Legislature might eventually end up passing a constitutional amendment, but he believed his proposal was 'a clean way to get this done.' Abbott, a Republican who previously served on the Texas Supreme Court, did not respond to an inquiry about whether he would sign a bill if it were not a constitutional amendment. In its 2021 ruling, the Court of Criminal Appeals found that the separation of powers clause of the Texas Constitution only allows the attorney general to step into a criminal prosecution — election-related or otherwise — at the invitation of the local district or county attorney. Paxton and his political allies say the attorney general's office should have the power to investigate and prosecute allegations of voter fraud because district attorneys in the state's largest and bluest counties won't properly pursue such cases. After the ruling, which was reaffirmed in 2022, Paxton called on the Legislature to 'right this wrong,' arguing cases of fraud would otherwise go unpunished. Evidence of widespread voter fraud is scant. While Paxton's office has opened more than 300 investigations of suspected crimes by voters and election officials, they have successfully convicted only a handful. Voting rights experts say these investigations often ensnare people who made honest mistakes, rather than legitimate schemes to undermine Texas elections. 'We sure don't want to intimidate voters,' Hughes said on the Senate floor Wednesday. 'We want to intimidate cheaters.' At a Senate State Affairs committee hearing last week, Sen. Bob Hall, an Edgewood Republican, asked Hughes if a constitutional amendment was necessary to avoid another court decision striking down the measure as unconstitutional. Hughes pointed to a state statute that says the attorney general 'shall perform other duties as may be required by law,' arguing his proposal would pass constitutional muster because it adds to those duties by mandating that the attorney general 'shall' prosecute election fraud, rather than making it optional as in the law that was struck down in 2021. 'We hope that gives the Court of Criminal Appeals sufficient legal basis to see the constitutionality' of the new law, Hughes said. Andrew Hendrickson, with the ACLU of Texas, said at the hearing he was skeptical that this would successfully sidestep the need for a constitutional amendment. While the court's ruling is often understood to limit what the attorney general can do, it technically took aim at the Legislature for telling the attorney general he could prosecute election crimes in violation of the separation of power protections, Hendrickson said. 'It was the Legislature, by assigning a power that the constitution assigned to another branch of government without amending the constitution first, that creates the problem,' he said. But the makeup of the Court of Criminal Appeals has changed significantly since those rulings in 2021 and 2022, after Paxton vowed political retribution against the judges who found against him. Last year, he helped unseat three longtime incumbents; two more have already said they won't run for reelection in 2026. The lineup for The Texas Tribune Festival continues to grow! Be there when all-star leaders, innovators and newsmakers take the stage in downtown Austin, Nov. 13–15. The newest additions include comedian, actor and writer John Mulaney; Dallas mayor Eric Johnson; U.S. Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minnesota; New York Media Editor-at-Large Kara Swisher; and U.S. Rep. Veronica Escobar, D-El Paso. Get your tickets today! TribFest 2025 is presented by JPMorganChase.
