How Bioz Came to Be: The Benefits of AI-Powered Product Recommendations From a Researcher's Perspective
The idea for Bioz originated from a personal challenge faced by Dr. Karin Lachmi, Chief Revenue Officer and Co-Founder of Bioz, during her time as a researcher. 'As a researcher myself, I often found it difficult to navigate the sea of products available on the market. Selecting reliable tools that would actually help my work was always a time-consuming and uncertain process,' Lachmi explains. 'That's when I realized there needed to be a smarter way - an AI-powered platform that could provide transparency, helping researchers make confident decisions based on data-driven insights.'
Bioz addresses this problem by offering a simple yet powerful way for researchers to assess the credibility of products. By leveraging Bioz's proprietary AI engine, which analyzes tens of millions of published research articles, clinical data, supplementary data, patents, and Ph.D. theses, Bioz Badges indicate which products are the most cited, trusted, and effective within specific scientific disciplines. This makes it easier for researchers to identify top-performing products without having to manually track down citation data. The badges offer immediate recognition of a product's quality, helping scientists save time and focus more on their research. With Bioz Badges, researchers can be confident that the products they choose have been validated by the scientific community, offering the highest levels of efficacy and reliability. Bioz also ensures that the latest, most innovative products are always highlighted, enabling researchers to stay at the forefront of scientific advancements. As a former researcher herself, Dr. Lachmi understands how critical it is to rely on trusted tools, and Bioz Badges were designed to make that process as straightforward and reliable as possible.
About Bioz
Bioz is the world's most advanced AI search engine for scientific research, offering evidence-based product ratings and recommendations to guide scientists toward the most validated products for their discoveries. Bioz's solutions for suppliers include Bioz Badges and Content Hubs, web-based widgets that enhance user engagement and increase sales conversion.
SOURCE: Bioz, Inc.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
7 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Tank Turn Returns: Rivian Teases Long-Awaited Feature
When Rivian first burst onto the EV scene with the R1S SUV and R1T pickup in 2019, few features grabbed more attention than "Tank Turn" – a party trick that allows the EV to spin in place like an off-road ballerina. The system, also found in the electric G-Class, rotates the wheels on either side in opposite directions to pivot the car 360 degrees. The tank turn quickly became a sensation, but before Rivian could make it to production, CEO RJ Scaringe nixed the feature, citing concerns over trail damage. That move was intended to reinforce Rivian's environmentally responsible image, but left early fans disappointed. Now, in a teaser clip posted to social media, Tank Turn appears to be making its long-awaited return. The six-second video shows a second-gen R1S performing a 90-degree turn before revealing the etched launch date of July 8, 2025, written in dust on its side. The feature will debut with the company's most powerful configuration yet: the Quad-Motor R1S and R1T, which are expected to bring this long-shelved feature to life. Rivian announced its second-generation R1 models last year, including overhauled mechanicals, a better electrical architecture, and greatly improved autonomy and infotainment systems. Among those updates was the new Quad-Motor drivetrain, delivering a staggering 1,025 horsepower and 1,198 lb-ft of torque, allowing a 2.5-second sprint to 60 mph for the R1T (2.6 seconds for the R1S). However, at the time, it was only available for reservation, without an exact delivery timeline. That changes next week. The Quad Launch Edition, which will arrive with every update for second-generation Rivians, will finally open for orders. These new Rivians go beyond spec-sheet frenzy; they come with real improvements: zonal electrical layouts that reduce wiring, a redesigned heat pump for range efficiency, a 420-mile Max Pack, and a new Autonomy Platform with 360-degree vision and AI-powered driving assistance. Even the interior experience has been elevated, with Dolby Atmos audio, Apple Music integration, and a new Unreal Engine-based UI. Getting access to the return of Tank Turn – and everything else the second-gen R1S and R1T offer – won't come cheap. Pricing starts at $75,900 for the R1S and $69,900 for the R1T, but the Quad Launch Edition is expected to be priced at around $115,900. We'll know the exact figures soon enough, but for now, know that reservations require a $3,000 refundable deposit. Deliveries are expected to begin shortly after the official July 8 announcement. If you missed the hype the first time around, now's your chance to spin back in. Copyright 2025 The Arena Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Miami Herald
a day ago
- Miami Herald
2027 BMW M5 LCI Spied With Cleaner Neue Klasse Looks
Our spies on the Old Continent have caught the facelift of the G90 BMW M5, and they tell us to expect plenty of changes, and not just on the surface. The current super sedan and its wagon sibling were only introduced a year ago, but BMW is not one to withhold new technology or even new design cues for future generations. Instead, the M5's mid-cycle update, or Life Cycle Impulse, as BMW calls it, will bring with it a look inspired by the Vision Neue Klasse concept and an interior with BMW's new Panoramic iDrive system, which was previewed at the Consumer Electronics Show at the beginning of the year. The new M5 will change little about its lower front and rear fascias, but the top half of each end of the car will gain completely new lighting units. At the front, the trademark kidney grilles will frame the width of the car, with Iconic Glow illumination giving the M5 a distinctive nighttime signature. Moving backward, the hood may be slightly massaged, but the wing mirrors seem unchanged, as do most of the other body lines, including the door panels and side skirts. Interestingly, however, the roof does not appear to be made of carbon fiber or BMW's incoming plant-based alternative, and we don't see a recess down its spine as on the current M5. Recent leaks reveal that the next-generation M3 is unlikely to get a composite roof either, but perhaps BMW wants to reserve that for Competition models, as was once the case. At the back of the M5 LCI, the new taillight clusters are still placeholder units that won't be offered to customers, but their shape indicates that they won't deviate much from the current design. Future M cars are expected to have unique headlight graphics (and possibly colors), so we expect something similar at the rear. Then again, a quad-exit exhaust with a massive diffuser panel may be enough. We're not expecting much in the way of changes under the hood. The 4.4-liter twin-turbo V8 hybrid powertrain will carry over, and our spies say we should not expect any increases in output (a combined 717 horsepower and 738 lb-ft of torque, for the record). A debut will happen sometime in 2026, possibly near the end of the year. Unfortunately, even though the M5 was just hit with a price increase for the 2026 model year, our spies say the facelift will cost around €150,000, or over $176,000. That's more than 50 grand pricier than the M5 is today, so we hope BMW can justify the extra outlay. Less weight, perhaps? We can only hope... Related: The BMW M2 CS Just Destroyed The Audi RS3's Nürburgring Record Copyright 2025 The Arena Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Forbes
2 days ago
- Forbes
New Google AI Changes Are Detrimental To Old News Models
Palo Alto, California, USA - January 02, 2018: Googleplex office in Silicon Valley. Huge Google ... More sign, Android robot sculpture and main Google office. In some ways, our news model has been the same for hundreds of years. But that way of providing a service to readers seems to be going obsolete pretty quickly. In recent times, news publishers are getting unpleasant surprises in the form of decreasing Internet traffic. That's a problem, because these publishers have already had to pivot away from a physical print medium to the web, and for many of them, that's been challenging. (Think, newspapers.) Now we see that Google's most recent changes to its model are throwing these traditional businesses another curveball. Reports in The Information and other sources show that traditional publishers are losing out as Google introduces AI search mechanisms that compete with the old blue hyperlink SERP directory search engine. We're Using AI to Search As I mentioned in covering remarks by Sam Altman of OpenAI a while ago, even Altman himself uses ChatGPT to find out things that he would have previously used Google for. Multiply that by millions of people, and you have a scary situation for anyone who's in the news business. We're transfixed by the power of these LLMs to scour the entire Internet in seconds, build responses based on collective consciousness, and get us our answers right away, without that tedious old job of doing the research. But it comes at a price for those relying on the old ways. Watching Traffic Decline Publishers, who have already seen their revenue model change, are now seeing that the Internet footprints they use for visibility and conversion are not doing as well as they did previously. Rebecca Bellan at Techcrunch reports on the New York Times having a certain percentage less of organic traffic in its overall numbers (down to 36.5% in April, from 44%) – which is sort of a strange way to measure declining search, but still one facet of describing a real problem. A Little Damning Then there are additional reports based on Apple's internal communications that suggest the company actively decided to make a power play based on its monopoly on traditional search. Reporters looking at Alphabet internal directives suggest that the company could have offered publishers more, but decided to force those who want to be included in traditional search to let their content be used by the AI, a Faustian bargain in which, presumably, the agreeing party is an active participant in its own demise. On the other hand, Google's apologists claim that it has created something called Offerwall as a potential new revenue model for publishers. Offerwall, they contend, offers these creators revenue beyond ads. But that's only if readers take the offers. Why Don't Micropayments Work? There's also another mostly theoretical solution in the mix – having people buy individual news articles with micropayments. This move, however, is almost certain to fail, according to some close to the industry who point out some major problems with the micropayments method. One is that news media is often seen as a package deal. 'If a subscription is worth a hundred dollars a year to a publisher, then even one person clicking on the twenty-cent button instead means the publisher needs five hundred people to buy articles to make up for the lost revenue,' writes James Ball at the Columbia Journalism Review. 'The ratios are different for different outlets, but the math remains intimidating. … There's also a philosophical objection. As noted, newspapers and magazines have been conceived as a package—a mix of the light and the heavy. Some stories cost far more to produce than others, but it balances out because you buy the whole thing. That logic dies if you separate them out.' As an aside, what few parties have tried is building a hyper-local newsroom on a shoestring budget, tying it to a mobile phone app, and charging subscribers very low prices for getting all the tea about what's happening in their neighborhoods. Perhaps people are scared of the legal liability. Does it Really Know? Then there's the question of whether the Google AI Overviews results are actually accurate. Some users claim the model is often wrong. And its track record is spotty. 'It became the laughingstock of the internet in mid-2024 for recommending glue as a way to make sure cheese wouldn't slide off your homemade pizza,' writes Max Delaney at TechRadar. 'And we loved the time it described running with scissors as 'a cardio exercise that can improve your heart rate and require concentration and focus.'' Figuring Out the Endgame In any case, publishers are between a rock and a hard place - they have to choose from a lot of bad options, and figure out the best ways to try to stay afloat in a scenario that seems wildly slanted against them. Some would say it's just free market economics – that publishers will have to do what many other businesses have done over the years, to be Netflix instead of Blockbuster, and change with the times. But we're certain to see more of this wider debate about how we consume information, and what it means in the second quarter of the 21st century.
