Apex court lifts HC stay on West Bengal OBC list
Mamata Banerjee government
, the Supreme Court on Monday lifted the Calcutta HC stay on implementation of the new list of OBC sub-groups, including 80 belonging to the Muslim community, and said it is well settled that the Executive can notify such a list without passing a legislation.
On June 17, the HC had stayed the new OBC List entitling to quota benefits 140 sub-groups under OBC-A and OBC-B categories. The earlier list, which was struck down by HC, had 113 OBC sub-groups, with 77 from the Muslim community and 36 from others. The appeal of the Bengal govt challenging the quashing of the earlier list is still pending before the SC.
Appearing for the state, senior advocate Kapil Sibal said the stay has put the govt in a piquant position as it faces the task of recruiting 40,000 teachers and preparing a roster.
A bench of Chief Justice B R Gavai and Justices K Vinod Chandran and N V Najaria said, "Prima facie the HC order is erroneous. A 9-judge constitution bench of the SC has settled the law and ruled that List of sub-groups for availing quota can be notified by the Executive without a legislation".
On a petition by one Amal Chandra Das challenging the new OBC list, an HC bench of Justices Tapabrata Chakraborty and Rajasekhar Mantha had on June 17 directed that executive notifications issued between May 8 and June 13 about OBC categories will not go into effect till July 31.
The SC bench said: "How the HC stay the notification without giving reasons? It is in the teeth of a constitution bench judgment of the SC. If you all agree, we can request the HC chief justice to assign the matter to a special bench, other than the judges who heard the matter, and decide the issue on merits".
Appearing for the petitioners, senior advocates Ranjit Kumar and Guru Krishna Kumar said the HC has not imposed any stay on the implementation of OBC reservations based on the list existing prior to 2010, which had 66 sub-groups.
"It is the state which has enacted legislation laying down the procedure for inclusion and exclusion of sub-groups from OBC List. Once the procedure is laid down in law, it must be followed scrupulously, which the govt didn't, thus, inviting a stay from the HC," they said. "The state law mandates that the State Backward Class Commission is to be consulted, which was not done by the state. No survey was undertaken to identify the sub-groups which should be included.
What they did was to reintroduce the list of sub-groups whose inclusion was quashed by the HC earlier," they held.
Sibal, on the other hand, said a survey was done and 76 new sub-groups were added to the earlier list. The petitioner had not challenged the survey done for this purpose, he said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
43 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Israeli minister Ben-Gvir says he prayed at Al-Aqsa mosque compound
Israel's far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir visited the flashpoint Al-Aqsa mosque compound in Jerusalem on Sunday and said he prayed there, challenging rules covering one of the most sensitive sites in the Middle East. Israel's official position accepts the rules restricting non-Muslim prayer at the Al-Aqsa mosque compound, which is Islam's third holiest site and the most sacred site in Judaism.(File/Reuters) Under a delicate decades-old "status quo" arrangement with Muslim authorities, the Al-Aqsa compound is administered by a Jordanian religious foundation and Jews can visit but may not pray there. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in a statement after Ben-Gvir's visit that Israel's policy of maintaining the status quo at the compound "has not changed and will not change". Videos released by a small Jewish organisation called the Temple Mount Administration showed Ben-Gvir leading a group walking in the compound. Other videos circulating online appeared to show him praying. Reuters could not immediately verify the content of the other videos. The visit to the compound known to Jews as Temple Mount, took place on Tisha B'av, the fast day mourning the destruction of two ancient Jewish temples, which stood at the site centuries ago. The Waqf, the foundation that administers the complex on a hillside in Jerusalem's walled Old City, said Ben-Gvir was among another 1,250 who ascended the site and who it said prayed, shouted and danced. Israel's official position accepts the rules restricting non-Muslim prayer at the compound, which is Islam's third holiest site and the most sacred site in Judaism. Ben-Gvir has visited the site in the past calling for Jewish prayer to be allowed there. Ben-Gvir said in a statement he prayed for Israel's victory over Palestinian militant group Hamas in the war in Gaza and for the return of Israeli hostages being held by militants there. He repeated his call for Israel to conquer the entire enclave. Suggestions that Israel would alter rules at the Al-Aqsa compound have sparked outrage in the Muslim world and ignited violence in the past. There were no immediate reports of violence on Sunday. A spokesperson for Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas condemned Ben-Gvir's visit, which he said "crossed all red lines." "The international community, specifically the U.S. administration, is required to intervene immediately to put an end to the crimes of the settlers and the provocations of the extreme right-wing government in Al-Aqsa mosque, stop the war on the Gaza Strip and bring in humanitarian aid," Nabil Abu Rudeineh said in a statement.
India.com
43 minutes ago
- India.com
Shiv Sena (UBT) Should Exit MVA, INDIA Bloc If Committed To Hindutva: Manisha Kayande
Senior Shiv Sena leader Manisha Kayande launched a scathing attack on opposition leaders, questioning their stance on Hindutva and accusing them of maligning the Hindu community for political gains. In a pointed statement, she demanded that Shiv Sena(UBT) walk out of the Maha Vikas Aghadi (MVA) and the INDIA bloc if it still stands by its saffron ideology. Kayande's remarks came in response to recent comments made by NCP (Sharad Pawar faction) leader Jitendra Awhad, who said, "Sanatan Dharma has ruined India". Kayande, while slamming Awhad, told IANS, 'His only agenda has been to defame Hindus and indulge in Muslim appeasement. He consistently questions police investigations and state systems just to further his political ambitions.' Targeting former Maharashtra Chief Minister Prithviraj Chavan, she said, 'We went to the Tilak Bhavan, the Congress headquarters here, and sought its shutdown. This party behaves like the 'Pakistan National Congress'. The term 'saffron terrorism' was first coined by Congress and Sharad Pawar, but the truth is, a Hindu has never been a terrorist. Sadhvi Pragya and Lt. Col. Purohit were falsely implicated, but the NIA court has proven that the so-called Hindu terrorism narrative was fabricated.' Speaking on Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur's claim that there was a conspiracy to trap Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Kayande said, 'She was tortured mentally, physically, and socially for 17 years. Despite being a Member of Parliament, she was denied justice. Col. Purohit, who served the nation, was also a victim of this conspiracy. We welcome the NIA court's verdict.' On Uddhav Thackeray attending the INDIA bloc meeting on August 7, she remarked, 'If Uddhav ji is attending the INDIA bloc meeting, he must show courage. Shiv Sena's mouthpiece 'Saamana' had earlier criticised the idea of saffron terror. Now, the Congress, which leads this bloc, openly uses that term. If Shiv Sena truly believes in its saffron ideology, it should immediately withdraw from both the MVA and the INDIA bloc.'
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Col Purohit joined Abhinav Bharat for intel? Court junks claim in Malegaon case
A special NIA court, which acquitted all accused in the 2008 Malegaon blasts case, rejected Lieutenant Colonel Prasad Purohit's defence that he joined Abhinav Bharat, an outfit that was allegedly linked to the blast, to gather a detailed judgment, made public on Saturday, special Judge AK Lahoti said Purohit did not have any documentary proof to show that he was participating in Abhinav Bharat meetings and collecting money through donations as part of his duty. advertisementPurohit was serving as an Army officer in military intelligence when the blasts rocked Maharashtra's Malegaon, a town with a sizeable Muslim population, on September 29, 2008. It left six dead and nearly 100 injured. Earlier this week, the special NIA court acquitted all the seven accused, including Purohit and former BJP MP Pragya Thakur, who had become the face of the case. The court said there was no evidence on record that Purohit brought RDX and assembled the bomb used in the court also exonerated Abhinav Bharat, saying there is no evidence that the group was involved in any "terror activity".In his petition, Purohit claimed that, as part of military intelligence, his job involved infiltrating banned organisations, and he had kept his superiors in the loop about court, however, held that while Purohit was one of the trustees of the Abhinav Bharat Trust, there was no documentary evidence on record to show that his superiors had granted permission to him to join the outfit and collect court said as the alleged acts were not in discharge of his official duties, no sanction was required under Section 197 of the Section 197, agencies need to obtain sanction for prosecuting public servants for offences committed while discharging official duty."I did not find the alleged acts of Purohit were in discharge of his official duties. The prosecution could not prove the charges or alleged act merely because of lapses by police officers, witnesses turning hostile and no material evidence on record. Therefore, the question of taking sanction under Section 197 doesn't arise," said special Judge AK Lahoti.'NO STRAIGHT JACKET FORMULA FOR SANCTIONS'Purohit had challenged the sanction accorded by the government to prosecute judge said there cannot be a straight jacket formula for granting sanctions and each case must be examined individually based on the facts and judge said that the protection granted under Section 197 was not absolute and does not extend to acts committed by public servants that constitute criminal misconduct or act falls outside the purview of official duty and therefore does not require any prior sanction for prosecution," the court further Purohit, after getting acquitted, asserted that he loved the Army for standing by him, the court noted that the Army had done nothing to save him when he was arrested by the anti-terrorism squad (ATS) of Maharashtra police.- Ends
