Corn Bears Hold onto Losses at Monday's Close
USDA reported a private export sale of 225,000 MT of corn to Mexico this morning all for 2025/26. Another 229,000 was sold to unknown destinations, with 35,000 MT for 2024/25 and 194,000 MT for 2025/26.
More News from Barchart
Does the 2025 Corn Crop Have a Pollination Problem?
Weather Shocks vs. Oversupply: Are You Trading SRW Wheat's Next Big Move?
Adverse Brazilian Weather and Tariff Concerns Boost Coffee Prices
Get exclusive insights with the FREE Barchart Brief newsletter. Subscribe now for quick, incisive midday market analysis you won't find anywhere else.
Crop Progress data indicated 76% of the US corn crop was silking as of 7/27, 1 point back of the 5-year average. The crop was 26% in the dough stage, vs. the 24% average. Condition ratings were down 1 point at 73% gd/ex and 384 on the Brugler500 index.
USDA tallied corn export shipments at 1.522 MMT (59.93 mbu) during the week ending on July 24. That was up 54.55% from last week and 42.16% above the same week last year. Of that total, 610,316 MT was headed to Japan, with 460,381 MT on its way to Mexico. Marketing year exports have totaled 60.34 MMT (2.376 bbu), which is 29.25% above the same period last year.
Over the weekend, President Milei of Argentina announced a reduction in the export tax for corn back to 9.5%, from 12%. AgRural estimates the Brazilian second corn crop at 68% harvested as of Thursday, shy of the 91% complete from the same week last year.
Sep 25 Corn closed at $3.93 3/4, down 5 3/4 cents,
Nearby Cash was $3.78 1/2, down 6 1/4 cents,
Dec 25 Corn closed at $4.14, down 5 cents,
Mar 26 Corn closed at $4.31 1/4, down 5 1/4 cents,
New Crop Cash was $3.71 5/8, down 5 1/4 cents,
On the date of publication, Austin Schroeder did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Barchart.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump deciding trade deals by August 1: Lutnick
US President Donald Trump will make his trade deal decisions this week even as separate negotiations with China and the European Union continue, US Commerce chief Howard Lutnick says ahead of Trump's self-imposed August 1 deadline. US and EU officials were still discussing steel and aluminium tariffs as well as digital services regulations following their framework announced on Sunday, Lutnick told CNBC in an interview, adding that talks with China were also "their own thing". "But for the rest of the world, we're going to have things done by Friday," he said in the interview. Asked about remaining uncertainties surrounding the US-EU agreement, Lutnick said Trump was working "to get things done now". .@POTUS: "We just signed a very big deal, as you know, with the European Union, but also with the United Kingdom ... A great deal for the country." — Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) July 29, 2025 He said pharmaceuticals were a key part of the EU deal so that medicines made in EU member countries - home to several major drug makers - would have their products included in the 15 per cent tariff. "It was important for them to have pharmaceuticals be part of the deal at 15 per cent because President Trump is going to come out in the next two weeks with his pharmaceutical policy, and it is going to be higher," he said. South Africa's trade ministry said on Tuesday that it still wanted to negotiate a trade deal with the United States, before a 30 per cent tariff on its exports to the US is due to kick in on Friday. South Africa's government has been tight-lipped about its negotiations with the US administration ahead of the August 1 deadline, which comes as the two countries' relationship has deteriorated over South Africa's domestic race policy and its genocide case against Israel, which Israel denies. In a statement, the trade ministry said it was still waiting for "substantive feedback from our US counterparts on the final status on our framework deal". .@SecScottBessent and @USTradeRep give an update from Stockholm following the latest round of trade talks with China: "We had great momentum going into the meeting thanks to the President's trade deals. I think that the Chinese were surprised by the magnitude." — Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) July 29, 2025 Trump said on Tuesday he had spoken with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent who told him that he had a very good meeting with Chinese officials in Sweden. "He felt very good about the meeting, better than he felt yesterday," Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One on his way back to Washington DC after five days in Scotland. US and Chinese officials agreed to seek an extension of their 90-day tariff truce following two days of talks in Stockholm aimed at defusing an escalating trade war between the world's two biggest economies. No major breakthroughs were announced and US officials said it was up to Trump to decide whether to extend a trade truce that expires on August 12 or potentially let tariffs shoot back up to triple-digit figures. Asked about a possible trade deal with India, another major trading partner, Trump said no deal had been finalised and noted that India had higher tariffs than nearly all other countries.


Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
EU's Neliupšienė Says US Trade Deal Brings Stability to Markets
Bloomberg Markets: The Close Jovita Neliupšienė, European Union ambassador to the US, says an EU-US trade deal brings stability and predictability to global markets on "Bloomberg The Close." (Source: Bloomberg)


New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Israel gets the blame — but Hamas controls hungry Gazans' plight
Hamas started a war, rejected a cease-fire, and stole and profited from humanitarian aid, and we are supposed to believe that it's all Israel's fault. International attention is focused on food shortages in Gaza, with the blame and the pressure — as always — on Israel to do something about it. It is always difficult to get to the ground truth in Gaza, which is shrouded in the fog of war, of Hamas propaganda, and of slanted media coverage, but there appears indeed to be a brewing humanitarian crisis. Israel stopped shipments of aid into Gaza in March after a temporary cease-fire expired, and then started them up again in May, using the so-called Israel- and US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation as the conduit. The pause in aid, coupled with inadequate GHF operations, led to the current situation. It's necessary to understand the larger context, though: Israel halted food shipments as a means to deny Hamas revenue, not to target the general population. The terror group had perfected the art of exploiting humanitarian aid (and commercial transactions) for its own purposes via theft and taxes, plowing the proceeds into its military operations. Although there is now an effort by Israel's critics to portray the concern over Hamas profiteering as fabricated or exaggerated, there is no doubt that this business model was crucial to the terror group. Both The Wall Street Journal ('A Depleted Hamas Is So Low on Cash That It Can't Pay Its Fighters') and The Washington Post ('Hamas Facing Financial and Administrative Crisis as Revenue Dries Up') have run reports on the squeeze felt by Hamas. The Journal article back in April noted that the cash crunch following the cut-off in aid was 'making it harder for Hamas to bring in new recruits and maintain cohesion.' The Washington Post reported about a week ago: 'With its coffers depleted, Hamas' military wing can no longer adequately pay the salaries of its fighters, though it is still able to recruit teenage boys for missions like keeping lookout or placing explosives along Israeli military routes.' Making it harder for your enemy to pay its fighters and secure new ones is an important and legitimate military goal. The problem is the potential cost to people in Gaza who aren't combatants. The shortages are just another consequence of how deeply embedded Hamas is in Gaza society. This isn't a group of terrorists who moved into territory adjacent to Israel to launch the Oct. 7 attacks and could be quickly extricated by an intense military operation. Hamas has been the government of Gaza for a couple of decades, and has used every instrument of political and social influence at its disposal — including the distribution of food — to build its military capacity. It's important to remember that Israel didn't start this war, that it'd much rather be fighting a conventional military force that abided by the rules of war, and that Hamas still holds Israeli hostages and has taken a rejectionist attitude to cease-fire talks. Even Japan's Emperor Hirohito thought his people had suffered enough at the conclusion of World War II, but Hamas considers the agony of Gazans a useful weapon in its narrative war. From this perverted point of view, a famine would be welcome news — perhaps forcing Israel to stay its hand and leave Hamas to fight another day. Clearly, Israel needs to find better ways to get aid into Gaza. The GHF hasn't gotten the support that it needed from the UN and other agencies (they are too invested in the corrupt status quo), while the distribution points for aid are chaotic and dangerous. The best thing that could happen would be an end to the war with a decent political authority — more invested in the general welfare than in tunnels and rockets — finally in charge of Gaza. But Hamas would rather see the population starve than give up on the war, or its grip on power. Twitter: @RichLowry