logo
With every fragile ‘peace' in Middle East, the West sows seeds of a conflict

With every fragile ‘peace' in Middle East, the West sows seeds of a conflict

Indian Express12 hours ago
I have followed the recent '12-day war' in the Middle East through a 50-year-old personal prism.
My interest in petroleum and a postgraduate thesis on oil for goods barter trade by Iran was sparked by the Yom Kippur War between Egypt /Syria and Israel in 1973. The war triggered a four-fold increase in the international price of oil and global stagflation. My first job in the Petroleum sector with Phillips Petroleum in London (after a short stint in the IAS ) was in 1980, a year after the Shah of Iran was deposed by Ayatollah Khomeini and months before Iran and Iraq commenced a bloody and inconclusive eight-year war. The Iranian revolution had doubled the price of oil and set off another global stagflation and the Iran-Iraq war embroiled the US when in April 1988, it sank the Iranian frigate 'Sahand' after a US frigate had hit an Iranian mine in the Straits of Hormuz. I am reminded of 'Operation Praying Mantis' every time there is talk of choking the straits through which pass nearly 20 per cent of internationally traded crude oil and one-third of Liquefied Natural gas (LNG).
In 1990 when President Saddam Hussein moved his tanks into Kuwait and aimed SCUD missiles at the Shell-Saudi Refinery and Petrochemical complex in Al Jubail on the East coast of Saudi Arabia, I was in the Middle East Region of Shell International based in London. Shell Management decided that the head office must support the evacuation of Shell expatriates from the complex and as the lowest rank executive on the ME Regions totem pole, I was dispatched into the war zone. I could write much about the three days I spent surrounded by agitated rednecks desperate to get out of the region but that would take too many lines. Suffice it to say, I gained first-hand insight into the mental and emotional turmoil caused by rumours, misinformation and fear.
More than a decade later in 2003, when President George W Bush ordered a US-led coalition to overthrow the Baathist Government of Saddam Hussein on grounds that Iraq had 'weapons of mass destruction' and was an accomplice of the al Qaeda terrorist group — allegations dismissed by the 9/11 Commission in 2004 — I was with the Shell Group in India. Although no longer in the thick of events, I was impacted. The international price of crude oil crossed into triple digits and the newly elected UPA government of PM Manmohan Singh reintroduced administered pricing of petroleum products. That put paid to Shell India's plans to break into the petroleum main fuels markets.
Today I observe the fifth major eruption in the region — I define 'major' loosely — conflict has been endemic and continuous in the region so the distinction between 'major' and the rest is subjective — from the vantage point of an armchair commentator. I am no longer directly involved with the petroleum Industry nor engaged with the ME Region but I have the luxury to reflect on this half-century of involvement.
I have read countless commentaries on the current state of affairs. Many questions have been raised.
What is the extent of damage caused to Iran's nuclear programme? Does it still have fissile material and the centrifuges and equipment to enrich this feedstock and build systems to deliver nuclear warheads? Does it have the capability (or indeed the inclination — their leaders cannot have forgotten Operation Mantis) to choke the Straits of Hormuz? How stable is the ceasefire given Israel's PM Netanyahu has not achieved his goal of regime change? What about President Trump? Will he green-light a second round of bombing by Israel? What is China's game plan? And many more.
Experts have weighed in with the answers. I too have views but on reflection, I hesitate to proffer them. For if there is one lesson that a historical overview throws up it is that ultimately the answers will not be derived through political, economic, strategic and humanitarian logic but by the ambitions of autocratic individuals. These individuals may well craft their responses around the enlightenment ideals of freedom, democracy, social justice and human rights but that is optics. The drivers of actions are subjective predilections. Few commentators have an insight into the psychological make-up of these leaders. I certainly do not.
One further thought comes to the fore on reflection. All five major wars have been brought to a close either through diplomacy or military might/stalemate. But the closures have been fragile. For, the root cause of war has never been adequately addressed. I read Henry Kissinger's book 'CRISIS: The Anatomy of Two Major Foreign Policy Crisis' which described the telephonic diplomacy that brought about the ceasefire in 1973. Seen through the narrow lens of the objective to end hostilities, it was a success. All combatants salvaged something out of the fighting and America kept its hegemonic foothold in the region. But the plight of the Palestinian refugees was not on the agenda. Similarly, the Iran-Iraq war ended with no effort to address the core issues that triggered the conflict. It drew to a halt because both sides were exhausted and could no longer accept the high death toll. In a comparable vein, the two Gulf wars ended because the immediate objectives were met (viz the defeat of the Iraqi army and the execution of Saddam Hussein). The geopolitical, economic, religious and ideological cleavages that triggered the wars were tackled only in passing.
Today, the Western world is focused on the proliferation of nuclear weapons. There is a good reason for this focus. Were such weapons to fall into the 'wrong hands' it could have catastrophic consequences. But, by failing to use their heft to address humanitarian needs, the genocide in Gaza, by ignoring the cascading anger and resentment they are in fact creating the conditions for this proliferation. Commentators can speculate but those with a historical perspective know this is the consequential reality.
The writer is former Chairman of Shell India. Views are personal
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Israel strikes Yemen's port city of Hodeida, prompts retaliatory attacks by Iran-backed Houthis
Israel strikes Yemen's port city of Hodeida, prompts retaliatory attacks by Iran-backed Houthis

First Post

timean hour ago

  • First Post

Israel strikes Yemen's port city of Hodeida, prompts retaliatory attacks by Iran-backed Houthis

Israel's military said its latest wave of air strikes hit the ports of Hodeida, Ras Isa, and Salif. Hours later, Israel said two missiles were launched from Yemen. Houthi military spokesman Yehyaa Saree claimed responsibility for it read more In this photo taken from video released by Al Masirah TV channel shows a burning oil tanker after U.S. airstrikes targeted the Ras Isa oil port held by Yemen's Houthi rebels in Hodeida, Yemen. AP Israel said Monday (July 7) that it had launched air strikes on multiple sites in Yemen's Houthi-controlled Red Sea port city of Hodeida and nearby areas, prompting retaliatory missile attacks by the Iran-backed rebel group. The Houthis, who have supported the Palestinian cause since war erupted in Gaza in October 2023, have repeatedly targeted Israel with drones and missiles. Monday's exchange marks another escalation in the regional fallout from the conflict between Israel and Hamas. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Israel's military said its latest wave of air strikes hit 'terror infrastructure belonging to the Houthi terrorist regime,' including the ports of Hodeida, Ras Isa, and Salif. Among the targets, it claimed, was the Galaxy Leader cargo ship, which was captured by the Houthis in November and allegedly outfitted with a radar system to track commercial shipping in the Red Sea. 'These strikes were in response to the repeated attacks by the Houthi terrorist regime against the State of Israel,' the Israeli army said in a statement. Houthi missile response Hours after the Israeli bombardment, the Israeli military reported that two missiles had been launched from Yemen. Houthi military spokesman Yehyaa Saree later claimed responsibility, saying in a video statement that the group had targeted Ben Gurion airport, the ports of Ashdod and Eilat, and a power station in Ashkelon. 'These were in retaliation for this aggression,' Saree said. Houthi-run Al-Masirah television confirmed the Israeli attacks, reporting that 'the Israeli enemy is targeting the port of Hodeida,' and also cited strikes on Ras Isa, Salif, and the Ras Al-Kathib power station. The television station said the strikes came roughly 30 minutes after an Israeli army spokesman warned of imminent action on social media. The Houthis have framed their campaign as an act of solidarity with Palestinians in Gaza. They resumed attacks on Israel in March after a two-month ceasefire in Gaza broke down and Israel resumed its military operations. Since November, the Houthis have targeted commercial shipping in the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden, especially vessels they claim are linked to Israel. Continued maritime threats On Sunday (July 6), unidentified gunmen in skiffs attacked a commercial vessel off Yemen's coast in the Red Sea, forcing the crew to abandon ship after it was hit by rocket-propelled grenades and other weapons. The United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations centre said the crew were rescued by a passing merchant ship and were 'all well and safe.' While no group claimed responsibility for that attack, UK-based security firm Ambrey said the targeted vessel matched 'the established Houthi target profile.' The Houthis expanded their maritime campaign earlier this year to include US and British-linked ships after the two nations began air strikes against rebel sites in January in an attempt to protect vital sea lanes. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Although the Houthis reached a ceasefire deal with the United States in May that ended weeks of intense US-led strikes, the group has insisted it will continue targeting Israeli vessels. With inputs from AFP

Straight out of a spy film: Ex-Mossad officer explains how Israeli spies infiltrate Iran's deepest circles
Straight out of a spy film: Ex-Mossad officer explains how Israeli spies infiltrate Iran's deepest circles

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Straight out of a spy film: Ex-Mossad officer explains how Israeli spies infiltrate Iran's deepest circles

Mossad spy network in Iran : Former officer reveals secrets of recruitment inside enemy territory- Israel's Mossad spy network in Iran has long remained a mystery. But now, former Mossad officer Oded Ailam, who served for 24 years in the Israeli intelligence agency, is offering rare insight into how Israeli spies are recruited and protected deep inside hostile Iranian territory. In an exclusive interview with German outlet Bild , Ailam, 71, explained how Israel's most secretive agency built a wide-reaching network of agents—even in one of the world's most tightly controlled and adversarial nations. Despite Iran's ongoing crackdown on espionage and public calls from the regime to expose collaborators, Mossad has managed to operate by understanding the deep fractures within Iranian society—and using them to its advantage. Why is Iran's diversity a key to Mossad's recruitment success? Ailam pointed out that Iran is far from a united nation. 'Only 40% of Iran's 90 million citizens are Persian,' he said. That leaves a large population of minorities, including Kurds, Azeris, Baluchis, and Turkmen, who often feel disconnected or even oppressed by the central government. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Fungo nas unhas: um truque simples reduz facilmente Acabe com os Fungo Undo 'This makes it extremely difficult for the Iranian regime to control the population,' Ailam told Bild . Unlike East Germany's notorious Stasi, which maintained strict surveillance, Iran's intelligence system still has major blind spots. 'The surveillance system has enormous gaps,' Ailam explained. 'It can't be compared to what the Stasi did in the GDR.' These ethnic and social divides have created opportunities for Mossad to recruit insiders who are not necessarily pro-Israel—but who are deeply disillusioned with the regime. Live Events What motivates Iranians to become Mossad informants? According to Ailam, many Iranians who agree to spy aren't doing it for ideology or loyalty to Israel. In fact, many are motivated by anger at their own government or by simple economic need. 'There are many dissatisfied people in Iran. Large parts of society are impoverished,' he said. Iran has some of the world's largest natural gas reserves, but 'instead of investing this money in their own country, the mullahs have poured billions into terror organizations like Hezbollah,' Ailam added. This mismanagement, he said, creates fertile ground for discontent. Mossad agents target this dissatisfaction—offering money, safety, and sometimes the chance to make a real difference against the system they hate. How does Mossad protect spies operating inside Iran? Working as a spy inside Iran is a life-threatening risk. But Mossad takes steps to ensure the safety of both the agents and their families. 'When someone works for us, we take care not only of them but also of their family,' Ailam said. If necessary, Mossad is capable of extracting an agent and their loved ones and relocating them to safety. This promise of family protection is a critical part of the recruitment strategy. It helps build trust with informants and offers a powerful reason for them to commit—even in dangerous conditions. How does Mossad pick the right people to become spies? Ailam was clear: Mossad doesn't recruit just anyone. The selection process is long, careful, and methodical. 'We take a lot of time to make sure the person is the right fit,' he said. Even when targeting a specific objective, Mossad doesn't rely on a single source of information. 'For a target, not only one agent's information is used, but always multiple sources to be sure the right person is hit,' Ailam added. This multi-source verification helps prevent misinformation, protects the safety of operations, and ensures only the most trusted individuals are activated for critical missions. Can anything really be smuggled into Iran? One of Mossad's strategic advantages, according to Ailam, is Iran's porous borders. Despite the regime's efforts, Iran's vast size makes it difficult to control everything. 'There is also the fact that Iran is a large country with borders that can't always be monitored,' Ailam said. 'It makes it possible to smuggle anything into the country.' This includes encrypted communication tools, surveillance gear, and even explosive devices when necessary for sabotage missions. This logistical loophole allows Mossad to maintain contact with field agents and deliver the tools they need—without relying on risky internal infrastructure. Why is Mossad's spy network in Iran so important now? With tensions between Iran and Israel running high, and Iran's involvement with Hezbollah, Hamas, and other regional militias deepening, Mossad's intelligence from within Iran is critical to Israeli national security. The success of this network not only helps Israel anticipate attacks but also plays a major role in sabotage operations, cyberwarfare, and targeting Iranian nuclear development. Though Mossad rarely comments on its operations, leaks and interviews like Ailam's offer a rare glimpse into the complex, dangerous, and deeply human world of espionage in one of the world's most secretive nations. FAQs: Q: How does Mossad recruit spies in Iran? Mossad uses ethnic divisions, dissatisfaction with the regime, and offers protection to recruit Iranian spies. Q: Why is the Mossad spy network in Iran important? It helps Israel gather vital intelligence and counter threats from inside Iran's borders.

Iranian supreme leader makes first public appearance post war with Israel
Iranian supreme leader makes first public appearance post war with Israel

United News of India

timean hour ago

  • United News of India

Iranian supreme leader makes first public appearance post war with Israel

Tehran, July 7 (UNI) Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamanei made his first public appearance in the country yesterday, post Tehran's 12-day war with Israel. The appearance got a mixed reception, with the state media and political leaders backing it, though it was reportedly dismissed or slammed by several, both within the country and outside it. According to Iran International, Former Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif heaped praise on the leader who had not been seen in public since June 10 before his reappearance at a religious ceremony on the night of July 5. 'The fearless presence of Ali Khamenei in a traditional public gathering permanently shattered the delusional lies that paid pundits have been pushing. Time to wake up and admit that Iranians never surrender,' he said. Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, called the reappearance 'the most beautiful image I saw upon arriving in Brazil' as he arrived for the BRICS summit, and added: 'With you, one can brave the seas.' Mehdi Fazaeli, a member of Khamenei's office, wrote on X that "the mourning hall exploded", referring to the crowds' excitement for the reappearance of the elusive leader at the mourning ceremony held on the occasion of Ashura. Public sentiment however, has been extremely negative with some even calling him out for his 'shameless' reappearance 'after sowing death and destruction in the country', vehemently criticising him for coming back. Iranian Nobel laureate and lawyer Shirin Ebadi criticised Khamenei on her Telegram page, saying that while he emerged from his bolthole, the Iranian public who had no shelter from the Israeli barrage were left mourning. "History will record him as a dictator of the same era as Saddam Hussein, Gaddafi, and Mubarak — but one who lacked even a shred of dignity," Ebadi said. "Unlike other dictators who at least believed in themselves, he begged for power, and in complete contradiction to the ideals he once shouted from the rooftops, appeared on the eve of Ashura with a smile among a group of hand-picked loyalists saying they were ready to sacrifice their lives for him — while political prisoners and ordinary people had already been sacrificed as his human shields.' Many Iranians viewed his appearance as little more than a sign of a desperate way to save face and be on the public's good side, with netizens derisively mocking him as 'Supreme Mouse', 'Spineless Great Satan', and accused him of cowardly hiding while making grand speeches, all the while using the public as 'meat shields.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store