
With every fragile ‘peace' in Middle East, the West sows seeds of a conflict
My interest in petroleum and a postgraduate thesis on oil for goods barter trade by Iran was sparked by the Yom Kippur War between Egypt /Syria and Israel in 1973. The war triggered a four-fold increase in the international price of oil and global stagflation. My first job in the Petroleum sector with Phillips Petroleum in London (after a short stint in the IAS ) was in 1980, a year after the Shah of Iran was deposed by Ayatollah Khomeini and months before Iran and Iraq commenced a bloody and inconclusive eight-year war. The Iranian revolution had doubled the price of oil and set off another global stagflation and the Iran-Iraq war embroiled the US when in April 1988, it sank the Iranian frigate 'Sahand' after a US frigate had hit an Iranian mine in the Straits of Hormuz. I am reminded of 'Operation Praying Mantis' every time there is talk of choking the straits through which pass nearly 20 per cent of internationally traded crude oil and one-third of Liquefied Natural gas (LNG).
In 1990 when President Saddam Hussein moved his tanks into Kuwait and aimed SCUD missiles at the Shell-Saudi Refinery and Petrochemical complex in Al Jubail on the East coast of Saudi Arabia, I was in the Middle East Region of Shell International based in London. Shell Management decided that the head office must support the evacuation of Shell expatriates from the complex and as the lowest rank executive on the ME Regions totem pole, I was dispatched into the war zone. I could write much about the three days I spent surrounded by agitated rednecks desperate to get out of the region but that would take too many lines. Suffice it to say, I gained first-hand insight into the mental and emotional turmoil caused by rumours, misinformation and fear.
More than a decade later in 2003, when President George W Bush ordered a US-led coalition to overthrow the Baathist Government of Saddam Hussein on grounds that Iraq had 'weapons of mass destruction' and was an accomplice of the al Qaeda terrorist group — allegations dismissed by the 9/11 Commission in 2004 — I was with the Shell Group in India. Although no longer in the thick of events, I was impacted. The international price of crude oil crossed into triple digits and the newly elected UPA government of PM Manmohan Singh reintroduced administered pricing of petroleum products. That put paid to Shell India's plans to break into the petroleum main fuels markets.
Today I observe the fifth major eruption in the region — I define 'major' loosely — conflict has been endemic and continuous in the region so the distinction between 'major' and the rest is subjective — from the vantage point of an armchair commentator. I am no longer directly involved with the petroleum Industry nor engaged with the ME Region but I have the luxury to reflect on this half-century of involvement.
I have read countless commentaries on the current state of affairs. Many questions have been raised.
What is the extent of damage caused to Iran's nuclear programme? Does it still have fissile material and the centrifuges and equipment to enrich this feedstock and build systems to deliver nuclear warheads? Does it have the capability (or indeed the inclination — their leaders cannot have forgotten Operation Mantis) to choke the Straits of Hormuz? How stable is the ceasefire given Israel's PM Netanyahu has not achieved his goal of regime change? What about President Trump? Will he green-light a second round of bombing by Israel? What is China's game plan? And many more.
Experts have weighed in with the answers. I too have views but on reflection, I hesitate to proffer them. For if there is one lesson that a historical overview throws up it is that ultimately the answers will not be derived through political, economic, strategic and humanitarian logic but by the ambitions of autocratic individuals. These individuals may well craft their responses around the enlightenment ideals of freedom, democracy, social justice and human rights but that is optics. The drivers of actions are subjective predilections. Few commentators have an insight into the psychological make-up of these leaders. I certainly do not.
One further thought comes to the fore on reflection. All five major wars have been brought to a close either through diplomacy or military might/stalemate. But the closures have been fragile. For, the root cause of war has never been adequately addressed. I read Henry Kissinger's book 'CRISIS: The Anatomy of Two Major Foreign Policy Crisis' which described the telephonic diplomacy that brought about the ceasefire in 1973. Seen through the narrow lens of the objective to end hostilities, it was a success. All combatants salvaged something out of the fighting and America kept its hegemonic foothold in the region. But the plight of the Palestinian refugees was not on the agenda. Similarly, the Iran-Iraq war ended with no effort to address the core issues that triggered the conflict. It drew to a halt because both sides were exhausted and could no longer accept the high death toll. In a comparable vein, the two Gulf wars ended because the immediate objectives were met (viz the defeat of the Iraqi army and the execution of Saddam Hussein). The geopolitical, economic, religious and ideological cleavages that triggered the wars were tackled only in passing.
Today, the Western world is focused on the proliferation of nuclear weapons. There is a good reason for this focus. Were such weapons to fall into the 'wrong hands' it could have catastrophic consequences. But, by failing to use their heft to address humanitarian needs, the genocide in Gaza, by ignoring the cascading anger and resentment they are in fact creating the conditions for this proliferation. Commentators can speculate but those with a historical perspective know this is the consequential reality.
The writer is former Chairman of Shell India. Views are personal
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
IAS coach faces legal action over ‘defamatory' remark against judiciary
Ajmer: The Judicial Magistrate Court No-2 here has taken cognisance against Vikas Divyakirti, founder and managing director of Drishti IAS coaching institute, for allegedly making defamatory remarks against the judiciary. The court presided over by Manmohan Chandel Tuesday charged Divyakirti under multiple subsections of Section 356 of the BNS Act 2023. Divyakirti has been directed to appear in person before the court on July 22. A petition filed in the court refers to controversial statements made by Divyakirti in a YouTube video titled "IAS versus Judge, who is powerful," where he allegedly made inappropriate comments about the process of becoming a high court or a Supreme Court judge. The complainant, advocate Kamlesh Manowliya, presented social media clips where Divyakirti discussed "jugaad" (informal arrangements) in relation to judicial appointments and the collegium system. The court was told that in the controversial video, Divyakirti allegedly claimed that files of potential judges could be delayed through govt red tape, even after collegium approval. He also allegedly made controversial comparisons between the powers of district judges and district magistrates, suggesting that judicial power is dependent on police cooperation. The complainant's legal team, including advocates Ashok Singh Rawat, Rajkumar Rawat and Rajesh Bhati, argued that such statements damage the judiciary's image.


Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
UP govt to plant record 37cr saplings in a single day today
Lucknow: The Yogi Adityanath-led Uttar Pradesh govt is set to script history with a massive green initiative, aiming to plant 37 crore saplings in a single day on Wednesday. The ambitious endeavour is part of the 'Ek Ped Maa ke Naam– 2.0' campaign, blending ecological responsibility with emotional and cultural sentiment by encouraging people to dedicate a tree to their mothers. The Plantation Mega Drive–2025 will be officially launched by CM Yogi from Ayodhya and Azamgarh, setting a new benchmark for environmental conservation. During his visit, the CM will engage in public dialogue and distribute cheques to seven farmers under the carbon credit initiative. Forest minister Arun Kumar Saxena will also participate in the event in these districts. Inspired by Prime Minister Narendra Modi's call, the campaign symbolically honours mothers through mass tree plantation. To ensure its success, a record 52.4 crore saplings have been prepared across nurseries and designated sites statewide. Governor Anandiben Patel will lead the event in Barabanki, deputy CM Keshav Prasad Maurya in Meerut and deputy CM Brajesh Pathak in Lucknow. According to CM Yogi's directives, all cabinet ministers, ministers of state (independent charge), and ministers of state will participate in the campaign by planting saplings in their respective districts under the theme 'Ek Ped Maa ke Naam'. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Esta IA está generando ingresos (Ver más) Finanzas y economía Prueba ahora Undo Senior IAS officers — additional chief secretaries, principal secretaries and secretaries — have been appointed as nodal officers for each district. On Tuesday, all nodal officers reached their designated districts and finalised preparations for the campaign in coordination with forest department officials. Citizens can upload photos of plantation activities by visiting or or by scanning the QR code.


United News of India
3 hours ago
- United News of India
US President Donald Trump wishes peace with Iran, eyes sanctions relief at ‘right time'
Washington, July 8 (UNI) Amid his talks with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the US capital, President Donald Trump said that he has no wish to hurt Iran any further and wants to make peace, even expressing a willingness to lift the sanctions from Tehran 'at the right time'. 'I would love to be able to take those sanctions off and give them a chance,' Trump said during his White House dinner with Netanyahu. 'They want to meet and make peace. We have scheduled Iran talks. They want to talk,' reports Iran International. Meanwhile, US Special Envoy to the Middle East Steve Witkoff has said that nuclear negotiations between the two countries are expected to take place 'in the next week or so", in what would mark the first official diplomatic engagement between Washington and Tehran since the 12-day conflict between Iran and Israel. This was however refuted by Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei today, who denied Tehran had requested a meeting with the American side. "No meeting request has been made to the American side from our end." When asked for a specific date for the talks, Trump had declined to provide details. 'I'd rather not say, but you'll be reading about it tomorrow or seeing it tomorrow,' he said. Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said this week that he believes Iran can resolve its differences with the United States through dialogue, but trust would be an issue after the US and Israeli attacks on Iran. Responding to whether the Israel-Iran conflict had truly ended, Trump said 'I hope it's over", adding: 'I think (the Iranians) want to make peace and I'm all for it. Now, if that's not the case, we are ready, willing, and able. But I don't think we're going to have to be.' Netanyahu, answering the same question, said the Israeli and US strikes last month 'set back the two tumours that were threatening the life of Israel: The nuclear tumour and the ballistic missile tumour,' reported the Times of Israel. 'But when you remove a tumour, that doesn't mean it can't come back. You have to constantly monitor the situation to make sure there's no attempt to bring it back,' he added. The Israeli PM stated that the situation had to be carefully monitored to ensure that no hostilities resumed, with both him and Trump discussing the issue. 'I'd like to believe that Iran would not test our fortitude, because it would be a mistake,' Netanyahu added. The US President also lauded the Iranian people, and commented on their potential. 'They have the oil power. They have great people, smart people, energetic people—amazing,' he said. 'I would like to see Iran build itself in a peaceful manner. They were the bully of the Middle East and now they are not anymore.' UNI ANV RN