People Cannot Believe Donald Trump Shared This "Disgusting" Fake AI Video Of Barack Obama Being Arrested
The clip begins with a speech from Obama, during which he says, "No one, especially the president, is above the law."
Related:
Then, later in the video, an AI-rendered clip of Trump and Obama sitting together in the White House appears.
Soon, the two are surrounded by FBI agents...
...but the agents shift their focus to Obama.
The former president is pushed down to his knees — much to Trump's apparent delight.
Related:
AI Obama's hands are brought behind his back...
...and he's arrested.
The clip — which surpassed 1.6 million views on X after news of Trump's post circulated on the platform — ends with AI Obama behind bars.
Related:
The MAGA core was all for it.
But others? Not so much.
A lot of people called out racist undertones. One person wrote, "This is not funny. It is particularly disgusting to show an innocent Black person getting arrested--particularly one who has spent a lifetime trying to overcome the stereotypes that racists like Trump favor."
"this who y'all voted for?" another asked.
Related:
Others pointed out what could be viewed as hypocrisy, considering Trump was previously convicted of 34 felony counts of falsifying business records in one case and found liable for sexual abuse in another.
Ergo:
Timing-wise, Trump's post coincides with Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard's claims that she has evidence of an 'Obama Administration Conspiracy to Subvert Trump's 2016 Victory and Presidency.' In a tweet, she wrote: "Their goal was to usurp President Trump and subvert the will of the American people."
According to the New York Times, Democrats have called her claims baseless. This, however, does not appear to be stopping Trump from bolstering the idea.
What are your thoughts? Let us know in the comments.
Also in In the News:
Also in In the News:
Also in In the News:
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
11 minutes ago
- CNN
Wrongfully imprisoned Maryland man who spent 32 years behind bars sues former authorities
A Maryland man who was wrongly imprisoned for 32 years, including a decade on death row, for two killings he did not commit is suing former law enforcement officials in a lawsuit announced Thursday, though four of the five people named as defendants are deceased. John Huffington was pardoned by then-Gov. Larry Hogan in January 2023. Hogan cited prosecutorial misconduct in granting a full innocence pardon to Huffington in connection with a 1981 double slaying in Harford County. A Maryland board approved $2.9 million in compensation for Huffington later that year during Gov. Wes Moore's administration. Huffington said in a statement Thursday that 'it took many, many painful years, but the truth eventually came out.' Just 18 at the time of his arrest, he said neither of his parents ever got to see and understand that his name had been cleared and he was set free. 'All of those years I spent behind bars damaged and strained my relationships, cost me the ability to have a family of my own, cost me the ability to be with my mother when she died, cost me precious time with my father who was in his nineties and suffering from Alzheimer's when I finally was released,' he added. Huffington, 62, always maintained his innocence. He was released from Patuxent Institution in 2013 after serving 32 years of two life sentences. He was convicted twice in the killings known as the 'Memorial Day Murders.' Diane Becker was stabbed to death in her recreational vehicle, while her 4-year-old son, who was inside, was not harmed. Joseph Hudson, Becker's boyfriend, was fatally shot and found a few miles away. A second suspect in the slayings testified against Huffington, was convicted of first-degree murder, and served 27 years. Prosecutors relied on testimony that was later discredited about hair found at the crime scene purportedly matching Huffington's. He appealed his first conviction in 1981. In 1983, a jury found him guilty of first-degree murder and he was sentenced to death. Prosecutors later commuted that sentence to two life terms. Questions about evidence in the case arose when The Washington Post uncovered an FBI report in 2011 that found the FBI agent who analyzed hair evidence in Huffington's case may not have used reliable science, or even tested the hair at all. The report had been written in 1999, but Harford County State's Attorney Joseph Cassilly didn't provide it to Huffington's lawyers. A Frederick County judge vacated Huffington's convictions and ordered a new trial in 2013 after Huffington presented new evidence using DNA testing that was not available during his earlier trials. When the hair evidence was tested for DNA more than 30 years later, the results showed it was not Huffington's hair. Maryland's highest court unanimously voted to disbar Cassilly in 2021. The court found he withheld exculpatory evidence in the 1981 double murder and lied about it in the following years. Cassilly, who maintained he did nothing wrong, retired in 2019. He died in January. His brother, Bob Cassilly, who is now the Harford County executive, said in a statement that his brother was a decorated war hero who was injured while serving his country and served as the county's state's attorney for 36 years while in a wheelchair. 'Joe cannot defend himself in this decades-old matter because he is now deceased, as are the other named defendants, except for one who is almost 80,' Cassilly said. 'Harford County government, in which I currently serve as county executive, has no role in this case – the county was never the defendants' employer.' Huffington also is suing the assistant state's attorney on his case, Gerard Comen, the Harford County government, and the county sheriff's office detectives, David Saneman, William Van Horn and Wesley J. Picha. All but Saneman are now dead, according to the lawsuit filed July 15 in federal court in Baltimore. Saneman told The Washington Post on Wednesday he had not seen or heard of the lawsuit and declined to comment.
CNN
13 minutes ago
- CNN
Wrongfully imprisoned Maryland man who spent 32 years behind bars sues former authorities
A Maryland man who was wrongly imprisoned for 32 years, including a decade on death row, for two killings he did not commit is suing former law enforcement officials in a lawsuit announced Thursday, though four of the five people named as defendants are deceased. John Huffington was pardoned by then-Gov. Larry Hogan in January 2023. Hogan cited prosecutorial misconduct in granting a full innocence pardon to Huffington in connection with a 1981 double slaying in Harford County. A Maryland board approved $2.9 million in compensation for Huffington later that year during Gov. Wes Moore's administration. Huffington said in a statement Thursday that 'it took many, many painful years, but the truth eventually came out.' Just 18 at the time of his arrest, he said neither of his parents ever got to see and understand that his name had been cleared and he was set free. 'All of those years I spent behind bars damaged and strained my relationships, cost me the ability to have a family of my own, cost me the ability to be with my mother when she died, cost me precious time with my father who was in his nineties and suffering from Alzheimer's when I finally was released,' he added. Huffington, 62, always maintained his innocence. He was released from Patuxent Institution in 2013 after serving 32 years of two life sentences. He was convicted twice in the killings known as the 'Memorial Day Murders.' Diane Becker was stabbed to death in her recreational vehicle, while her 4-year-old son, who was inside, was not harmed. Joseph Hudson, Becker's boyfriend, was fatally shot and found a few miles away. A second suspect in the slayings testified against Huffington, was convicted of first-degree murder, and served 27 years. Prosecutors relied on testimony that was later discredited about hair found at the crime scene purportedly matching Huffington's. He appealed his first conviction in 1981. In 1983, a jury found him guilty of first-degree murder and he was sentenced to death. Prosecutors later commuted that sentence to two life terms. Questions about evidence in the case arose when The Washington Post uncovered an FBI report in 2011 that found the FBI agent who analyzed hair evidence in Huffington's case may not have used reliable science, or even tested the hair at all. The report had been written in 1999, but Harford County State's Attorney Joseph Cassilly didn't provide it to Huffington's lawyers. A Frederick County judge vacated Huffington's convictions and ordered a new trial in 2013 after Huffington presented new evidence using DNA testing that was not available during his earlier trials. When the hair evidence was tested for DNA more than 30 years later, the results showed it was not Huffington's hair. Maryland's highest court unanimously voted to disbar Cassilly in 2021. The court found he withheld exculpatory evidence in the 1981 double murder and lied about it in the following years. Cassilly, who maintained he did nothing wrong, retired in 2019. He died in January. His brother, Bob Cassilly, who is now the Harford County executive, said in a statement that his brother was a decorated war hero who was injured while serving his country and served as the county's state's attorney for 36 years while in a wheelchair. 'Joe cannot defend himself in this decades-old matter because he is now deceased, as are the other named defendants, except for one who is almost 80,' Cassilly said. 'Harford County government, in which I currently serve as county executive, has no role in this case – the county was never the defendants' employer.' Huffington also is suing the assistant state's attorney on his case, Gerard Comen, the Harford County government, and the county sheriff's office detectives, David Saneman, William Van Horn and Wesley J. Picha. All but Saneman are now dead, according to the lawsuit filed July 15 in federal court in Baltimore. Saneman told The Washington Post on Wednesday he had not seen or heard of the lawsuit and declined to comment.
Business Insider
13 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Elon Musk fires back at Trump's claim that his companies will still enjoy subsidies
President Donald Trump said on Thursday that he won't touch the federal subsidies Elon Musk's companies are enjoying because he wants Musk to continue to prosper. Musk, however, begs to differ. "The 'subsidies' he's talking about simply do not exist," Musk wrote in an X post on the same day. The Trump administration has already scrapped or slapped expiry dates on every clean energy incentive "while leaving massive oil & gas subsidies untouched," Musk wrote in his post. Musk's EV company, Tesla, is already feeling the pinch. Tesla said during its earnings call on Wednesday that removing the $7,500 EV credit under Trump's " One Big Beautiful Bill" would affect its US sales. Vaibhav Taneja, the company's chief financial officer, said the "abrupt change" meant the company has a " limited supply of vehicles in the US this quarter." SpaceX, on its part, wins federal contracts on merit, Musk said in his X post on Thursday. Musk said his rocket company is "doing a better job for less money. Rerouting SpaceX's work to "other aerospace companies would leave astronauts stranded and taxpayers on the hook for twice as much," he added. The White House, Tesla, and SpaceX did not respond to requests for comment from Business Insider. Threats and market jitters Musk had been a prominent backer of Trump during last year's presidential campaign and enjoyed a close relationship with Trump. Musk spent at least $277 million supporting Trump and other GOP candidates in the 2024 elections. Shortly after Trump's victory in November, he headed the White House DOGE office and led the administration's cost-cutting efforts. That was until last month, when Musk and Trump began to turn on each other. Their relationship started to break down on June 5, when Musk attacked Trump's signature tax bill in an X post, calling it a "MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK." He also claimed credit for Trump's victory in last year's election. "Such ingratitude," Musk wrote. Hours later, Trump threatened to cancel Musk's government contracts in a Truth Social post, saying it would be the "easiest way to save money in our Budget." That drew a tit-for-tat response from Musk, who said he would decommission SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft, which is used in NASA missions, before walking it back. Musk expressed regret over what he had said about Trump a few days later. Some of his posts about Trump "went too far," Musk said. The détente, however, didn't last. On July 1, Trump said DOGE should take a "good, hard, look" at Musk's companies after Musk said he would start a new political party and defeat GOP politicians who voted for Trump's tax bill. "Elon may get more subsidy than any human being in history, by far, and without subsidies, Elon would probably have to close up shop and head back home to South Africa," Trump wrote on Truth Social. "No more Rocket launches, Satellites, or Electric Car Production, and our Country would save a FORTUNE," he added. Musk dared Trump to follow through on his threat: "I am literally saying CUT IT ALL. Now." The markets were not as confident as Musk. Tesla's stock fell by 5% after Trump's post on July 1. Tesla's shares are down by over 24% year to date. Musk's business empire has received at least $38 billion in government contracts, loans, subsidies, and tax credits over the last 20 years, per an analysis published by The Washington Post in February. On Wednesday, Musk told investors on Tesla's earnings call that the company is entering a "weird transition period where we will lose a lot of incentives in the US." "Does that mean like we could have a few rough quarters? Yeah, we probably could have a few rough quarters," Musk said.
