Trump admin sues Washington over 'anti-Catholic' law
President Donald Trump's Justice Department announced on Monday that it was taking legal action and filing a lawsuit against a new law in Washington State, claiming that it violates the First Amendment by forcing Catholic priests to break the 'confidentiality seal of Confession' by reporting certain confessions to government officials.
In a Monday press release, the Justice Department confirmed that it had filed legal action against Washington state over a new state law, known as Senate Bill 5375. The Justice Department claimed that the state's new law 'violates the free exercise of religion for all Catholics, and requires Catholic priests to violate the confidentiality seal of Confession.'
According to The Post Millennial, Washington's Senate Bill 5375, which was signed into law by Gov. Bob Ferguson (D-Wash.), requires Catholic priests to report confessions to government authorities if the confessions involve cases of suspected child neglect or abuse.
READ MORE: FBI's targeting of Catholics, pro-lifers exposed by House GOP
The Justice Department argued on Monday that Senate Bill 5375 forces Catholic priests to 'violate their vows to uphold the confidentiality seal that accompanies the sacred rite of Confession, subjecting them to immediate excommunication from the Catholic Church.'
In Monday's press release, the Justice Department said its lawsuit shows that the Democrat-run state's new law violates the First Amendment's Free Exercise of Religion Clause and the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause by targeting Catholic priests and members of Catholic churches while establishing a double standard of confidentiality for religious and secular institutions.
Harmeet K. Dhillon, assistant Attorney General of the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division, said, 'Laws that explicitly target religious practices such as the Sacrament of Confession in the Catholic Church have no place in our society.'
'Senate Bill 5375 unconstitutionally forces Catholic priests in Washington to choose between their obligations to the Catholic Church and their penitents or face criminal consequences, while treating the priest-penitent privilege differently than other well-settled privileges,' Dhillon added. 'The Justice Department will not sit idly by when States mount attacks on the free exercise of religion.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
32 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
A book that changed my mind: ‘The Screwtape Letters'
Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up By high school, I had discovered a predilection for Nietzsche's 'The Genealogy of Morality,' believing that many of society's shortcomings were the direct result of Christianity's 'turn the other cheek' mentality, which seemed to me to be the antithesis to the establishment of justice. Advertisement By 18, I had gone through 12 years of school without ever once having encountered religious texts, doctrines, or ideas in a positive light. Reared on the scientific method, I saw the universe as a series of models: Mathematics could explain the optimal number of people to date before settling down, and cost-benefit analysis could calculate whether having children was worth the carbon footprint. I aligned myself with atheist intellectuals — Sam Harris, Robert Sapolsky, Christopher Hitchens — whose frameworks I believed would help me best make sense of our complex world. Advertisement Around that same time, I was assigned books from the Old Testament in my freshman literature seminar and learned to look at the Bible as a collection of stories that had informed the development of literary history rather than as a religious text to be taken seriously. That same year, the election of Donald Trump caused me to roll my eyes once more at religious fanatics who were blindsided by some words written in an old book. It might not have been until my early 20s that I first directly interacted with anyone who held religious sensibilities. I had met secular people from religious backgrounds, but I had never encountered anyone who believed any of the words printed in the Holy Bible or who spent their weekends at church or a synagogue. And I distinctly remember the first devout Catholic I had ever had a conversation with, because he did not strike me as your typical Catholic at all: He was raised by Buddhist parents in Hong Kong and converted to Christianity after becoming convinced that Christianity would bring him closest to 'the Truth.' I was puzzled. How could someone with whom I had just spent 30 minutes arguing about creationism possibly have any sort of stake in 'the Truth'? But my new friend — who likely believed that I was going to Hell for my atheism — wanted me to be open-minded. As he saw it, I might never believe in the same version of reality that guided his day-to-day experiences, but I could certainly find value in many of religion's moral teachings. Advertisement I was skeptical. My idea of religious morality had always come from Nietzsche — the philosopher who believed that religion was a system designed to glorify meekness and guilt while stifling human potential. What could religion possibly have to teach me about morality? But my friend recommended that I read C.S. Lewis's 'The Screwtape Letters' — a book he believed would speak to my English-major sensibilities — and I decided to humor him. 'The Screwtape Letters' is an epistolary novel written from the perspective of Screwtape — one of Satan's senior demons — to his nephew Wormwood, a novice demon who is assigned an unnamed 'Patient' to lead away from God and down the path of temptation. Though I went into the book with an open mind, I was initially unconvinced that I would find anything to relate to in its pages — my way of life was so vastly different, after all, from that of someone like C.S. Lewis, a devout Anglican convert whose world was populated by formal theology and Latin quotations. But the further I read, the more I forgot that the book had anything to do with God or the Devil or Christianity at all — Lewis was simply proposing a philosophy for how to live well. In one letter, for instance, Lewis, speaking through the voice of Screwtape, explores the idea that doing nothing is worse than doing something actively evil, because it suggests an utter absence of purpose. How many times have we gleaned similar prescriptions from studies demonstrating the harm, for instance, of scrolling for hours on end through social media? In another letter, Lewis critiques the modern obsession with constant change and progress, arguing that such a fixation can lead to restlessness and dissatisfaction. Wasn't I witnessing this very phenomenon at Columbia University, where students lost nights of sleep and popped Adderalls just to chase the latest thing to add to their resume? Advertisement And in my favorite letter, Lewis underscores the ideal of love as self-sacrificial, rooted in action rather than in fleeting 'romantic' emotion. The strongest relationships were based not on passion but on commitment — and I had seen this play out in the loving household that I came from. These were not solely 'Christian' beliefs — these were ideas that anyone could adopt to live a better life. After finishing 'Screwtape,' I grew fascinated by the development of religion in our society. I read Thomas Aquinas and St. Augustine and began to see their ideas crop up in day-to-day life — even in many of the tenets of secular humanism that I had so deeply idolized from childhood. I didn't believe that Eve had been created out of the rib of Adam or that Adam had been created in the likeness of God, but I sure as hell believed in something like sin — the idea that some actions, such as murder, were categorically immoral. In abandoning religion, we — the secular rational humanists of progressive dogma — might be missing a large chunk of the puzzle of human existence. Religion, after all, is a set of narratives that grapple with morality — ideas that teach us to discern right from wrong. Today, when we are in desperate need of societal harmony, borrowing ideas from religious morality systems can help many of us avoid falling into depression, raise our children in stable two-parent households, and promote learning over violence. Such values are not arbitrary — they are ideas that have kept many societies from devolving into anarchy. They are the values that have upheld civilizations for centuries — and perhaps even made them possible. Advertisement I'm still far from religious, but I've come to appreciate the moral architecture that religion provides in a stable society — and I believe that it deserves a place in contemporary life. After all, are those of us who turn up our noses at religious people any better than the same religious people who reject evolution or believe in the afterlife? We secular humanists might have lots to teach creationists, but they have plenty to teach us. Perhaps true enlightenment lies not in rejecting tradition, but in rediscovering the wisdom buried within it. This is part of a series from Globe Ideas about how people change their minds. If you'd like to write about a book or film or other work that made you reconsider your point of view on an issue, we're accepting submissions at ideas@
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Iran could start enriching uranium for bomb within months, UN nuclear chief says
Iran has the capacity to start enriching uranium again - for a possible bomb - in "a matter of months", the head of the UN's nuclear watchdog has said. Rafael Grossi, head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), said the US strikes on three Iranian sites last weekend had caused severe but "not total" damage, contradicting Donald Trump's claim that Iran's nuclear facilities were "totally obliterated". "Frankly speaking, one cannot claim that everything has disappeared and there is nothing there," Grossi said on Saturday. Israel attacked nuclear and military sites in Iran on 13 June, claiming Iran was close to building a nuclear weapon. The US later joined the strikes, dropping bombs on Iran's three nuclear facilities: Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan. Since then, the true extent of the damage has been unclear. On Saturday, Grossi told CBS News, the BBC's US media partner, that Tehran could have "in a matter of months... a few cascades of centrifuges spinning and producing enriched uranium". He added that Iran still possessed the "industrial and technological capacities... so if they so wish, they will be able to start doing this again." The IAEA is not the first body to suggest that Iran's nuclear abilities could still continue - earlier this week, a Pentagon intelligence assessment found the US strikes only set the programme back by months. Trump retorted furiously by declaring that Iran's nuclear sites were "completely destroyed" and accused the media of "an attempt to demean one of the most successful military strikes in history". For now, Iran and Israel have agreed to a ceasefire. But Trump has said he would "absolutely" consider bombing Iran again if intelligence found that it could enrich uranium to concerning levels. Tehran is coming back to life, but its residents are deeply shaken How a volatile 24 hours edged Iran and Israel to a ceasefire US gained nothing from strikes, Iran's supreme leader says Iran, on the other hand, has sent conflicting messages on how much damage was caused. In a speech on Thursday, Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said the strikes had achieved nothing significant. Its foreign minister Abbas Araghchi, however, said "excessive and serious" damage was done. Iran's already-strained relationship with the IAEA was further challenged on Wednesday, when its parliament moved to suspend cooperation with the atomic watchdog, accusing the IAEA of siding with Israel and the US. The two countries attacked Iran after the UN body last month found Tehran to be in breach of its non-proliferation obligations for the first time in 20 years. Iran insists that its nuclear programme is peaceful, and for civilian use only. Despite the Iranian refusal to work with his organisation, Grossi said that he hoped he could still negotiate with Tehran. "I have to sit down with Iran and look into this, because at the end of the day, this whole thing, after the military strikes, will have to have a long-lasting solution, which cannot be but a diplomatic one," he said. Under a 2015 nuclear deal with world powers, Iran was not permitted to enrich uranium above 3.67% purity - the level required for fuel for commercial nuclear power plants - and was not allowed to carry out any enrichment at its Fordo plant for 15 years. However, Trump abandoned the agreement during his first term in 2018, saying it did too little to stop a pathway to a bomb, and reinstated US sanctions. Iran retaliated by increasingly breaching the restrictions - particularly those relating to enrichment. It resumed enrichment at Fordo in 2021 and had amassed enough 60%-enriched uranium to potentially make nine nuclear bombs, according to the IAEA.
Newsweek
42 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Trump Urges Israel-Gaza Ceasefire: 'Make the Deal'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump has pressed for Israel and Hamas to clinch a ceasefire and secure the release of the remaining captives held in Gaza. Trump fired off an all-caps demand fire in a Truth Social post at 1:19 a.m. ET Sunday: "MAKE THE DEAL IN GAZA. GET THE HOSTAGES BACK!!! DJT" It follows comments the president made on Friday in the Oval Office, when he told reporters that he believed a ceasefire could come "within the next week." "I think it's close. I just spoke with some of the people involved. It's a terrible situation," Trump said. This is a breaking news situation and will be updated
