
Trump supporters angry over Jeffrey Epstein case. Here's what to know
The Justice Department last week said Epstein, who was facing charges of sex trafficking, did not leave behind a 'client list.' Attorney General Pam Bondi suggested in February it was on her desk, though she later said she was referring to the overall case file.
Bondi also said officials were poring over a 'truckload' of previously withheld evidence. The Justice Department concluded, however, that public disclosure would not be appropriate and that much of the material was placed under seal by a judge. That has angered right-wing influencers who were once bolstered by Trump's own claims on this case, but are now feeling their demands are being squelched by his administration.
Figures like commentator Tucker Carlson, right-wing activist Laura Loomer, and former Trump adviser Steve Bannon claim the government's handling of the case shows a lack of transparency. Anger over the case threatens to divide the MAGA faithful.
Here's a look at the Epstein sex trafficking case, how the Trump administration has handled it and how his supporters have reacted to recent developments.
What is the Epstein case?
Epstein was a wealthy financier arrested in 2019 on federal sex trafficking charges. His former girlfriend, Ghislaine Maxwell, was charged with helping him abuse teenage girls.
Epstein was found dead in his cell at a federal jail in New York City about a month after he was arrested. Investigators concluded he killed himself. Maxwell later was convicted at trial and sentenced to 20 years in prison.
The case attracted attention because of Epstein and Maxwell's links to famous people, including royals, presidents and billionaires. It also led to some of the biggest conspiracy theories animating Trump's base.
Conservatives, led by key figures in the MAGA movement, have pressed unsubstantiated claims that Epstein was murdered and that 'deep state' actors in the government are hiding lists of his clients, videos of crimes being committed and other evidence. Trump himself suggested there was a cover-up.
What are the 'Epstein Files'?
Trump lately has tried to change the subject, but the Epstein matter commands attention because of the words and actions from his administration.
In February, far-right influencers were invited to the White House and provided with binders marked 'The Epstein Files: Phase 1' and 'Declassified.' The binders contained documents that had largely already been in the public domain.
Bondi said in May there were 'tens of thousands of videos of Epstein with children or child porn.' That fueled a belief that details about powerful figures had been suppressed.
'It's a new administration and everything is going to come out to the public,' Bondi said at one point.
Multiple people who participated in the criminal cases of Epstein and Maxwell told The Associated Press that they had not seen and did not know of a trove of recordings along the lines of what Bondi had referenced.
What happened last week?
The Justice Department on July 7 acknowledged that Epstein did not have a list of clients and said no more files related to Epstein's case would be made public.
A two-page memo that bore the logos of the FBI and Justice Department, but that was not signed by any individual, said the DOJ determined that no 'further disclosure would be appropriate or warranted.' It said much of the material was placed under seal by a court to protect victims and 'only a fraction' of it 'would have been aired publicly had Epstein gone to trial.'
It was a huge retreat from what Bondi and others had previously claimed. And it prompted anger — and more suspicion and conspiracy theories — from the MAGA faithful.
Some MAGA world influencers, including Loomer and Glenn Beck, have explicitly called on Bondi to resign. Former Fox News personality Megyn Kelly, who is now a podcaster, called Bondi 'either lazy or incompetent.'
What had Trump said about Epstein before his second term?
As far back as 2019, Trump suggested that Epstein's death was a cover-up and called for a full investigation.
In retweeting a post by conservative pundit and comedian Terrance K. Williams, who suggested that former President Bill Clinton may have been involved, Trump wrote that Epstein 'had information on Bill Clinton & now he's dead.'
When asked about his retweet, Trump said he was merely 'demanding' a full investigation, a day after then-Attorney General Bill Barr said there had been 'serious irregularities' at the prison where Epstein was being held.
In a 2023 interview, Trump told Carlson he believed that Epstein had committed suicide. But he couched his response, saying it was also 'possible' that he had been murdered, a theory he said 'many people.' believed.
Last year, Trump was asked on Fox News whether he would declassify documents regarding the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks and the 1963 assassination of President John F. Kennedy, and he answered 'yeah.' He was then asked about the 'Epstein files,' and he said 'yeah, yeah, I would,' but then added 'I think that less so because you don't want to affect people's lives if it's phony stuff in there, because it's a lot of phony stuff with that whole world. But I think I would.'
What has Trump said recently?
In a Cabinet meeting last week, Trump called it 'unbelievable' and a 'desecration' that people were still talking about 'this creep,' given other pressing matters, including the catastrophic flooding in Texas.
In a social media post on Saturday, he expressed support for Bondi.
'What's going on with my 'boys' and, in some cases, 'gals?'' Trump wrote. 'They're all going after Attorney General Pam Bondi, who is doing a FANTASTIC JOB! We're on one Team, MAGA, and I don't like what's happening.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Time of India
32 minutes ago
- Time of India
WATCH: Jeffries Blasts Trump & Bondi For 'Fanning Epstein Conspiracy For Years'
House minority leader Hakeem Jeffries weighed in on the Jeffrey Epstein case. 'American people deserve the truth,' said Jeffries while criticising POTUS. Jeffries said Trump administration should reveal what it knows about Epstein. The backlash came as MAGA camp boiled over administration's handling of the case. As per Justice Department's recent memo, Epstein did not leave behind a 'client list'. This came in contrast to Attorney General Pam Bondi's earlier claims on Epstein 'list'. Watch- Read More


Time of India
37 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump to unveil $70 billion in AI and energy investments
President Donald Trump will announce $70 billion in artificial intelligence and energy investments in Pennsylvania on Tuesday, the latest push from the White House to speed up development of the emerging is expected to share details of the new initiatives at an event outside Pittsburgh, according to an administration official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the planning. Investments from a range of companies will include new data centers, power generation expansion and grid infrastructure upgrades, along with AI training programs and apprenticeships, the official added. Trump will be joined by Republican Senator David McCormick who's hosting the inaugural Pennsylvania Energy and Innovation Summit at Carnegie Mellon University. AI and energy leaders, including as many as 60 executives, are expected to attend. Among those slated to participate are BlackRock Inc.'s Larry Fink, Palantir Technologies Inc.'s Alex Karp, Anthropic's Dario Amodei, Exxon Mobil Corp.'s Darren Woods and Chevron Corp.'s Mike Wirth, the official said. Blackstone Inc.'s Jon Gray is expected to announce a $25 billion project for data-center and energy infrastructure development and a joint venture to increase power generation, which is expected to create 6,000 construction jobs annually and 3,000 permanent jobs, according to Jake Murphy, a spokesman for McCormick. Blackstone declined to comment. Axios reported the details of summit earlier. The announcements Tuesday would mark the latest step by Trump toward meeting his pledge of ensuring US leadership in artificial intelligence. Since the start of his second term, the president has taken a wide-ranging approach that includes drawing in private-sector investments, moving to ease regulations and accelerating the permit process for new projects. Earlier this year, Trump announced a $100 billion investment in AI data centers from SoftBank Group Corp., OpenAI Inc., and Oracle Corp. The administration has also rescinded Biden-era AI chip curbs as part of a broader effort to boost American innovation and ease US allies' access to advanced technology. The administration's moves are aimed at keeping the US ahead of China in the race for an advantage in AI. China has invested significantly in the emerging technology, and the Chinese startup DeepSeek rattled investors on Wall Street in January with its breakthrough R1 model that suggested AI could be developed for far lower cost. Trump and other administration officials have also stressed the importance of meeting another tech industry priority: ensuring the US has enough power to run energy-hungry AI data centers . In their view, adequate electricity supply is intertwined with national security, essential to keeping the US ahead of global competitors in the race to dominate artificial intelligence. By 2035, data centers are projected to account for 8.6% of all US electricity demand, more than double their 3.5% share today, according to data from Bloomberg NEF. The Trump administration has said expanding the use of coal-fired power, along with electricity from natural gas and nuclear, is needed to help fuel the boom and has warned of future blackouts if the that fails to happen. The US Energy Department has already used emergency authority to keep two-power plants that were slated to close online, and has signaled additional federal intervention may be forthcoming. By hosting the event in Pennsylvania, Trump and McCormick are elevating the political importance of accelerating AI development. The Keystone state is a so-called battleground that former President Joe Biden won in 2020 and Trump took 2024. The event follows the closing of the $14.1 billion acquisition of Pittsburgh-based US Steel Corp. by Nippon Steel Corp., an agreement that ended a bruising takeover battle that was embroiled in American politics for months until finally gaining support from Trump. That deal is expected to domestic steel production and protect thousands of jobs. Both Trump and Biden also jockeyed for the support of union workers, and the deal is opposed by the United Steelworkers union.


The Print
37 minutes ago
- The Print
A look at the diplomatic dance over Taiwan, as US presses allies for clarity amid China flex
Following recent developments, Colby said on X that the Pentagon is committed to following President Donald Trump's strategy of 'restoring deterrence and achieving peace through strength.' Part of this vision involves encouraging allies to increase their defence budgets and enhance collective security measures. The report quotes sources as saying that Elbridge Colby, the US under-secretary of defence for policy, has been actively addressing the topic in discussions with defence officials from Japan and Australia in recent months. New Delhi: The Pentagon is urging Japan and Australia to clarify their position in case there is a conflict between the US and China over Taiwan. According to a report in the Financial Times on 12 July, the move has led to frustration among key American allies in the Indo-Pacific region. Efforts are also being made to persuade allies to increase their defence spending in light of growing concerns regarding China's ambitions toward Taiwan. However, the request for commitments related to a potential conflict over the island has taken Tokyo and Canberra by surprise, considering that the US itself has historically been ambiguous about its support for Taiwan. The US has long had a policy of 'strategic ambiguity' under which it does not say if it would defend the island. Former president Joe Biden on four occasions deviated from that, saying the US would intervene. And Donald Trump has echoed other presidents in refusing to say what he would do. President Donald Trump had just been elected when NBC asked him if the United States was committed to defending Taiwan if it was invaded by China on his watch. 'I never say.' he answered. 'I never say, because I have to negotiate things, right?' Since then, Trump's position on Taiwan has been fairly consistent: He hasn't decided yet. This isn't unusual by any means. It's mostly an extension of the United States' policy that has existed since 1979 under the Taiwan Relations Act. Under this Act, the US rejects any use of force to settle the dispute, maintains cultural and commercial ties with Taiwan and commits to selling arms to Taiwan for self-defence. It also maintains the ability to come to Taiwan's defence while not actually committing to doing so. Simply speaking, the US response to Taiwan's invasion will depend on the occupant of the Oval Office. With growing concerns over China's military activities on the Strait, Trump's Taiwan policy will be critical in determining the island country's future. China's 'threats', growing concerns On 11 June, Taiwan's Ministry of National Defence stated in a post on X, '43 sorties of PLA aircraft and 6 PLAN vessels operating around Taiwan were detected up until 6 a.m. (local time) today. 25 out of the 43 sorties entered Taiwan's northern, central and southwestern ADIZ. We have monitored the situation and responded accordingly.' 17 PLA aircraft, 8 PLAN vessels and 1 official ship operating around Taiwan were detected up until 6 a.m. (UTC+8) today. 7 out of 17 sorties crossed the median line and entered Taiwan's northern, southwestern and eastern ADIZ. We have monitored the situation and responded. — 國防部 Ministry of National Defense, ROC(Taiwan) 🇹🇼 (@MoNDefense) July 14, 2025 This hadn't gone unnoticed. The last few months signal the United States' growing concern. Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth's recent statement at the Shangri La Dialogues referenced China posing an 'imminent' threat to Taiwan. 'Earlier US assessments were that an invasion was neither imminent nor inevitable. This suggests that there is concern among certain US officials about China's military posture,' Sriparna Pathak, Professor of China Studies and Senior Fellow at Jindal India Institute, told ThePrint. But clearly in this case, concern doesn't quite equal commitment. It's difficult to say exactly how cooperative the United States will be. All we really know is that Trump has adopted an 'America First' approach and is increasingly less keen on spending money to defend foreign countries. 'There is a certain impulse of prioritisation that the US is leaning towards which is trying to find a balance between engaging deeply with the world, but not doing everything.' Manoj Kewalramani, a senior fellow at the Takshashila Institution, told ThePrint. US Vice President J.D. Vance recently declared in a commencement address at the US Naval Academy that US under President Donald Trump will 'choose carefully when to use military force' and 'will avoid involvement in open-ended conflicts' in what he called a break from recent US policies. Not exactly encouraging for Taiwan if they are depending on the US joining a potential fray. 'There's certainly a weariness of getting involved in direct conflict because the US has been engaged in direct conflict for more than 25 years now,' Kewalramani acknowledges, but cautions that Vance is probably referring to conflicts like Iraq and Afghanistan carried out with certain nation-building agendas, not necessarily to Taiwan, where US strategic interests lie. Moreover, there are definite signs that the Pentagon has been working on strategies to make it as difficult as possible for China to invade Taiwan. Though, this doesn't necessarily mean military involvement. 'Donald Trump's second term is characterised by heightened transactionalism from the US,' says Pathak, arguing that the focal point of the US' current Taiwan policy is its economic interests. Taiwan's balancing act Taiwan is well aware that its own precarious position is highly dependent on an unpredictable US policy. Indeed, a 2023 RAND report found that without US support, Taiwan is vulnerable to defeat by China within 90 days. For the past couple of years, they have raced to overhaul their defence equipment, intensified military exercises and reinstated a one-year compulsory army conscription. In March, Taiwan's Ministry of National Defence (MND) published its 2025 Quadrennial Defence Review, which has a section dedicated to 'deepening military exchanges between Taiwan and the US'. The report described the United States as Taiwan's 'most important international backer' and outlined Taiwan's intent to boost military exchanges, intelligence sharing, high- level strategic dialogues, among other types of cooperation with the United States. 'Taiwan is quite smart,' Kewalramani noted. 'The moment Trump was elected, they were talking about a massive arms package that they wanted to buy. They've also been talking about further expanding their defence spending.' Pathak notes that officials from the US have indicated that arms sales to Taiwan could exceed the USD 18.3 billion approved under Trump 1.0, double Biden's USD 8.4 billion, to counter China. According to Kewalramani, this move appears to be a double pronged strategy, partly satisfying whatever trade hunger Trump might have as well as helping Taiwan acquire the defence capabilities it needs. Trump has repeatedly called for Taiwan to raise its defence budget to 10 percent, a near impossible ask. Nevertheless, Taiwan's President Lai Ching-te announced that he would seek legislative approval to increase defence spending to over 3 percent of GDP in 2025 and continue to increase it in subsequent years. 'Elbridge Colby has been quite complimentary of this increase in defence spending.' Kewalramani pointed out. Pathak raises a valid concern: Taiwan being used as a bargaining chip by the US in its negotiations with China. 'What is starkly irresponsible of the US are Trump's comments on how defence support for Taiwan could be contingent on economic concessions or increased burden-sharing,' Pathak points out. However, it is important to note that reluctance to defend Taiwan militarily has not been uniform even in the Trump cabinet. Some have advocated for a robust US support system in the past. 'If you look at people like Elbridge Colby and Dan Blumenthal, there is a sense that the US will be militarily supportive of Taiwan. If you look at the US administration today, different individuals have different impulses.' Kewalramani says. Pathak agrees that this aligns with a hawkish stance from Rubio and Waltz, both of whom have advocated for rapidly arming Taiwan. A top military commander in the Indo-Pacific warned in 2021 that 'Taiwan may represent the most dangerous flashpoint for war' and that a threat to it will manifest in the 'next six years'. The recently released 2025 Worldwide Threat Assessment by the United States Defence Intelligence Agency confirmed that China is likely to continue to advance its long-term objective of unification with Taiwan, deter any move by Taiwan towards independence, and test the United States' commitment to Taiwan's defence. A clear shift from the normal All recent moves by China have pointed towards a shift from the normal. Almost every day in the month of May, a tweet by the Ministry of National Defence of Taiwan documented the PLA military crossing the median line of Taiwan, in total crossing it more than 400 times last month alone and obliterating the once unofficial boundary. A certain level of preparation seems to have begun on both sides across the strait. An invasion might seem imminent, but in reality, things are more complicated. These intimidation tactics just short of armed conflict are commonly known as 'grey zone' coercion. 'The PLA's exercises around Taiwan continue becoming increasingly routine, rather than in response to specific provocations. The routineness from China is to ensure sustained pressure, rather than immediate escalation to invasion.' says Pathak. She also notes Chinese actions like cutting undersea cables, increasing coastguard patrols, etc., align with 'grey zone' warfare, aiming to exhaust Taiwan psychologically and economically while avoiding full-scale war. Kewalramani agrees and acknowledges that there has been a shift, from regular testing of deployments to air sorties. Significantly, one of the objectives of this is not just operational exercises, but to also test Taiwan's reaction. 'These exercises do tell you that preparatory work is being done for an invasion,' Kewalramani suggests. An imminent invasion, however, would require large-scale troop and equipment movement, none of which have yet been reported. The US has not remained idle as China openly tests Taiwan's redlines. In February, the US State department removed a statement on its website that it does not support Taiwan independence instead emphasising that differences must be resolved by peaceful means, free from coercion, in a manner acceptable to the people on both sides of the Strait. The page also added that the US will support Taiwan's membership in international organisations 'where applicable'. This did not go down well with the PRC, which released a statement arguing that this change sent the wrong signal to Taiwan's independence movement. It also urged the US to 'stop helping Taiwan expand its international space' as well as to 'stop escalating the substantive relationship between the US and Taiwan'. The United States clearly did not take note of Beijing's urgings. Instead, developments in the past few months point only to intensification of US relations with Taiwan. In May, a new bill was introduced in Congress that seeks to designate Taiwan as a 'NATO Plus' partner of the United States to facilitate faster and easier arms sales. Even the recent public disclosure of retired US Navy Rear Admiral Mark Montgomery that around 500 US military personnel are stationed in Taiwan signals a more open and substantial military support for the island. 'The fact that this is being published is public signaling that the US is supportive and engaged in the region,' Kewalramani acknowledges, pointing out that 500 soldiers on US soil would not exactly be substantive as deterrents. Indeed, behind all recent US developments lies a game of signalling. As tensions rise between countries, all parties maintain their strategic non-alignment while exchanging ominous signals. 'It is a negotiating tactic aimed at China. The ambiguity is being kept precisely so it can be used for persuading China, while extracting economic concessions from Taiwan; as well as keep the hope alive that the US will act decisively if there is a full scale conflict,' says Pathak. US policy may not have fundamentally shifted, but Beijing is fuming over recent developments, bargaining chips or not. The United States' active efforts to arm Taiwan may constitute all the support the latter needs in Beijing's eyes. Reunification remains Beijing's goal, but invading Taiwan in the near future remains tricky. Is China ready for war? 'China is facing its own economic challenges today,' Kewalramani points out. 'I doubt it is confident enough to carry out an invasion successfully and achieve the objectives with minimum damage.' At present, all sides are mostly engaged in testing boundaries. 'The Chinese would prefer peaceful reunification but they are realising that the window is shrinking,' Kewalramani observes, pointing towards changing Taiwanese domestic politics spurred by growing nationalism. The Taiwanese in turn understand that US policy is unpredictable, but are currently seeking military equipment and trade agreements to hedge their bets. The Americans, meanwhile, know that they must remain engaged without stumbling into conflict. The world order is shifting, and the situation is complicated. As the Indo-Pacific enters a period of increased friction, Taiwan remains at the center of a complex diplomatic triangle. Strategic ambiguity may have worked for decades, but now its limits are being tested. And for now, Taiwan's fate remains uncertain. (Pragya Sharma is an intern with ThePrint) (Edited by Viny Mishra) Also read: 'Will not bow to totalitarianism': President Lai Ching-te calls Taiwan & US 'brothers'