Hindi protests, and why DMK support for Sena (UBT) is a leap
Just over six decades ago, the then undivided Shiv Sena was among the first political parties to weaponise regional identity in post-Independence India when it targeted South Indians, especially Tamils, in Mumbai, for 'stealing' jobs of locals and 'refusing to assimilate into Marathi culture'. Sena founder Bal Thackeray was vituperative in his attacks on 'Madrasis', as he dubbed all migrants to the city from South India, fuelling violence against them in Maharashtra in the 1960s and 1970s.
Now, in a moment of political and historical significance, the Shiv Sena (UBT)'s protests against the Centre's language policy, seen as promoting Hindi, have earned it the praise of none other than Tamil Nadu Chief Minister and DMK chief M K Stalin.
'The language rights struggle waged by the DMK and the people of Tamil Nadu across generations is now spiralling beyond state borders,' Stalin said on Saturday, hailing the 'protest storm' in Maharashtra, particularly in the wake of a joint 'victory rally' held by Uddhav Thackeray and estranged cousin Raj Thackeray after the Maharashtra government withdrew a government order that seen as promoting Hindi.
Given the Sena's history, Stalin's remarks seem little more than transactional in nature. However, it could be built by the Opposition into a resistance to the BJP's 'majoritarian language policy', cutting across the North-South axis.
Pointing out that 'Hindi imposition' was not new to Tamil Nadu, DMK organisation secretary R S Bharathi said, 'Our leader (DMK founder and former CM) C N Annadurai said this six decades ago that Hindi imposition is a crucial threat. It's just that every other state is realising it. We implemented the two-language formula many decades ago, realising this threat of Hindi imposition.'
Tamil Nadu had earlier taken the lead in opposing the Modi government's New Education Policy (NEP) for its three-language formula, which sees such moves as both unconstitutional and culturally invasive. In Tamil Nadu, the opposition to Hindi goes deeper, to the legacy of the Self-Respect Movement and anti-Hindi agitations dating back to the 1930s. Stalin has been raising the fact that Tamil Nadu has been denied over Rs 2,000 crore in funds for refusing to implement the Centre's Samagra Shiksha Abhiyan.
Ramu Manivannan, a political scholar who taught Politics at the University of Madras, and is currently working on a book on India's language debates from the 1940s, termed the alignment politically potent but ideologically awkward. 'If Stalin sees this as just another anti-Hindi protest, it is inadequate,' he said. 'For Tamil Nadu, language politics is cultural and civilisational. Marathi pride, on the other hand, often flirts with exclusionary populism.'
Manivannan's reference is to the fact that unlike in Dravidian parties, where Hindi opposition is linked to cultural identity, the Sena's renewed protests originate as much from Maratha pride as political survival. After a string of electoral defeats, and the looming threat of irrelevance in the coming municipal polls, the Sena (UBT) is looking to consolidate its traditional Marathi vote behind it.
'The language plank offers a way to reconnect with its base, putting a distance between itself and its Maha Vikas Aghadi (MVA) allies,' Manivannan said.
Incidentally, after Stalin's remarks backing the Sena (UBT), the latter clarified that there was a difference between their stands. Sena (UBT) Rajya Sabha MP Sanjay Raut said Sunday that while the party opposes the Centre's efforts to make Hindi mandatory in primary education, it does not support a complete rejection of the language.
'The southern states have been fighting for this issue for years. Their stand is against the imposition of Hindi, which means they will not speak Hindi and neither let anyone speak the language. But that is not our stand in Maharashtra. We speak Hindi… Our stand is that the strictness for Hindi in primary schools will not be tolerated,' Raut said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
7 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Express View: For India, is BRICS worth it?
The 2025 BRICS Summit in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil ended over the weekend with a wide-ranging declaration on global and regional issues. But few outside the hapless desk officers in various foreign offices around the world and policy wonks in think tanks would want to pore over the 126-paragraph, 47-page, over-16,000-word declaration. With such familiar phrases as 'multipolar world', 'Global South', 'inclusive', 'sustainable' and 'global governance', it will certainly impress the enthusiasts who see BRICS as a powerful instrument to upend the global order. Many in the West do fear BRICS for the same reason. There is no reason to believe that US President Donald Trump would have had the time to read the long declaration, but he has repeated his earlier claim that BRICS is 'anti-American' and threatened to impose additional tariffs on members of the forum. But the hopes and fears of BRICS engineering a global transformation are misplaced. For, the forum is riddled with several contradictions of its own and its grasp has always been larger than its reach. As irony would have it, if anyone is trying to build a 'post-American order', it is Trump. In less than six months, he has overturned many traditional assumptions about US global policies and is seeking to radically overhaul the international system that Washington built after World War II and that was modified by it at the turn of the 1990s. Consider, for example, the BRICS talk about reforming the Bretton Woods system; Trump is doing precisely that by pressing for change at the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund. The BRICS call to save the World Trade Organisation is a sad (and hypocritical) cry in the wilderness with Trump well on his way to demolishing the rule-maker for world commerce. Even more damaging is that leading members of BRICS have been queuing up in Washington to negotiate bilateral deals with Trump holding a gun to their heads. They are not saving the WTO but protecting their own national trade with America by looking for bilateral deals. China has cut a limited deal. Vietnam, another communist country, announced a trade deal of its own. India hopes that its intensive trade negotiations with Trump's Washington in the past few months will bear fruit this week. Equally far-fetched is the idea that members of BRICS can submerge their bilateral differences to collectively blunt American dominance. For India, the economic and security challenges presented by China are much bigger than those posed by American hegemony. Two BRICS states — Saudi Arabia and the UAE — are as worried as Israel and the US about the nuclear weapons programme of a third member, Iran. But here is the rub. Trump's actions to overhaul the global economic, financial, and security order have produced great global churn. The Rio declaration has no answers, only hot air, in response to the Trump challenge. The circumstances that persuaded India to found BRICS and promote it for three decades are no longer present. Yet the political groupthink in Delhi is so entrenched that no questions are asked about the virtue of India investing so much political and diplomatic capital in a forum that does little to serve the country's current interests. With India taking over the chair of BRICS, the time to ask those questions is now.
&w=3840&q=100)
India.com
an hour ago
- India.com
Trump Slaps Tariffs On 12 New Nations – Bangladesh, Myanmar Hit Hard
United States President Donald Trump has announced tariffs for 14 nations, including Japan and South Korea. He shared the letters sent by his administration to the countries, informing them of the reciprocal tariffs that will take effect from August 1, 2025. This also comes following his announcement that an additional 10 percent tariff will be imposed on nations that 'align themselves with the anti-American policies of BRICS'. Before announcing tariffs on 12 countries, Trump, on his Truth Social handle, shared the letters sent to Japan's Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba and South Korea's President Lee Jae-myung. Later, the US President also shared similar letters that were sent to Bangladesh, Myanmar, Malaysia, Kazakhstan, and Laos. Trump's Tariff List The letters sent to various global authorities mentioned the tariffs that would be imposed on the respective nations. 1- Thailand and Cambodia each will face a tariff of 36 percent. 2- 25 percent tariffs will be imposed on Malaysia and Kazakhstan. 3- Myanmar and Laos will have to pay a 40 percent tariff on their goods exported to America. 4- Indonesia will face a tariff rate of 32 percent. 5- Imports from South Africa, Bosnia and Herzegovina will be subject to 30 per cent tariffs. 6- According to the letters, Tunisia will face a tariff of 25 percent. 7- Lastly, Bangladesh and Serbia will each be hit with a tariff of 35 percent. South Korea, Japan As per the letters addressed to the South Korean President and the Japanese Prime Minister, Trump clarified that Japan and South Korea would face a 25 percent tariff from August 1. In addition, the US President, in the letters, also threatened to increase the tariff rate by the same amount if the countries decided to raise their tariffs on imported American products. However, Trump has indicated his willingness to reduce the tariffs if these countries revise their trade policies. Trump's Tariff Plan Earlier, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, while addressing a press briefing on Monday (local time), announced that Trump will sign an executive order delaying his July 9 tariff deadline to August 1. According to ANI, she recalled how she had announced that the US President was going to create tailor-made trade plans for each nation and added that the Trump administration wants to have the best deals for the American people.
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Brics are making people uncomfortable, says Lula on Trump's tariff threat
Brazil's President Luiz Incio Lula da Silva pushed back US President Donald Trump's threat to impose extra tariffs on Brics nations. At the end of Brics summit in Rio de Janeiro on Monday, Lula told reporters, "The world has changed. We don't want an emperor."He described Brics as a group of countries looking for new ways to organise the global economy. "I think that's why the Brics are making people uncomfortable," he da Silva's statement came as Donald Trump imposed higher tariffs on 14 countries, marking a new phase in the trade war he launched earlier this year. According to letters posted by Trump on Truth Social, the new tariffs include 25% on South Korea and Japan, 40% on Myanmar and Laos, 30% on South Africa and Bosnia and Herzegovina, 25% on Kazakhstan, Malaysia, and Tunisia, 32% on Indonesia, 35% on Bangladesh and Serbia, and 36% on Cambodia and Thailand. However, the news agency Reuters reported that the US administration does not plan to immediately impose a 10% tariff on all BRICS countries. However, the US could act if any of the countries take steps it sees as "anti-American."Earlier in the year, Trump had warned the Brics group they could face "100% tariffs" if they challenged the US dollar's role in global said on Monday that the world needs other trade options besides the US dollar. "The world needs to find a way that our trade relations don't have to pass through the dollar," he said. "Obviously, we have to be responsible about doing that carefully. Our central banks have to discuss it with central banks from other countries. That's something that happens gradually until it's consolidated."BRICS MEMBERS RESPOND TO US' THREATOther Brics leaders responded carefully to Trump's warnings. South African President Cyril Ramaphosa said the group does not want to compete with any other power and expressed hope for a future trade deal with the foreign ministry spokesperson Mao Ning told reporters, "Tariffs should not be used as a tool for coercion and pressuring." She added that Brics stands for "win-win cooperation" and "does not target any country." A Kremlin spokesperson said Russia's cooperation in BRICS is based on a "common world view" and "will never be directed against third countries."India has not yet officially responded to the US TIES WITH USMany Brics nations rely heavily on trade with the US. New BRICS member Indonesia's senior economic minister, Airlangga Hartarto, who was attending the summit, was scheduled to visit the US on Monday for tariff groups like the G7 and G20 facing divisions and US policies focused on "America First," Brics has positioned itself as a space for multilateral diplomacy amid global conflicts and trade Brics group began in 2009 with Brazil, Russia, India, and China, adding South Africa later. Last year, Egypt, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Iran, and the United Arab Emirates joined as members. Saudi Arabia has not formally joined but participates as a partner. Over 30 countries have shown interest in joining BRICS as members or partners.- EndsWith inputs from ReutersMust Watch
