New Racing Bulls F1 team boss ‘shocked' after ‘amazing' promotion
The domino effect of Horner being relieved of his duties saw Laurent Mekies – formerly RB team principal – promoted to Red Bull F1 CEO. Permane, who was previously racing director at RB, is now the team boss.
The 58-year-old was previously with Alpine, in all its previous guises including championship-winning seasons with Benetton and Renault, for 34 years before being let go in July 2023. The engineer joined Racing Bulls at the start of last season.
'I had many reactions to the news, some shock, some pride,' Permane told Motorsport.com.
'It's amazing that they feel I'm capable and have the potential to lead this team.
'I deeply thank the Red Bull Austria senior management, Oliver Mintzlaff and Helmut Marko, and of course Laurent for recommending me, pushing me forward, his belief in me as well. It's been a great week.'
Racing Bulls are currently seventh in the constructors' championship and have two young talents in Liam Lawson and Isack Hadjar in the cockpit.
Alan Permane is Racing Bulls's new team principal (Getty Images)
Yuki Tsunoda was previously with the team for four years before being promoted in March to replace Lawson, dropped by Red Bull after just two races.
'It's a great team and I know that the senior Red Bull guys are extremely happy with the way the team is being run,' Permane added. 'They're very happy with our competitiveness.
'The target is to be top of the midfield, and we are certainly in a battle for that and we'll continue that fight throughout this year.'
The next race of the 2025 season is the Belgian Grand Prix at Spa-Francorchamps this weekend (25-27 July).
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
3 hours ago
- New York Times
Austria Prepares to Give Up ‘Dream' of Disarmament
Austria's government will make good on pledges to double its military budget over the next seven years, its chancellor has affirmed, in the latest example of a newly unsettled global outlook driving a boom in defense spending in Europe. The chancellor, Christian Stocker, who took office in March and is a member of the center-right Austrian People's Party, told The New York Times in an interview in Vienna on Monday that the historically neutral Alpine nation must respond to growing threats and uncertainties. That means reversing a decades-long trend of shrinking military budgets as a share of the economy. 'After the fall of the Iron Curtain, after a peace effort that evolved from the 1970s under Jimmy Carter, disarmament was a dream that was dreamed but is now over,' Mr. Stocker said. His comments are the latest response from European leaders to a rapidly changing security situation on the continent, which has wiped out the so-called 'peace dividend' many countries enjoyed after the Cold War. Countries across Europe have pledged to ramp up military spending in the face of Russia's three-year invasion of Ukraine and fears that the United States will pull back some or all of the troops, weapons and other support that have for decades helped guarantee European security. Austria's neighbor Germany has pledged to spend 5 percent of its annual economic output on military and strategic infrastructure, an increase financed in part by additional borrowing. Its fellow NATO members committed to the same target last month, under prodding from President Trump. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
New York Times
3 hours ago
- New York Times
Want Max Verstappen, Toto? Then make a blockbuster George Russell partnership work for F1
Sitting in the sole shaded area on the roof of Mercedes' hospitality unit in Abu Dhabi, George Russell was agitated. Not sobbing or crying. Frustrated. Angry, even. The media roundtable, seemingly a routine recap of Russell's 2024 season, had taken a turn. The Max Verstappen topic had come up. 'People have been bullied by Max for years now,' Russell said. 'You can't question his driving abilities. But he cannot deal with adversity.' Advertisement Speaking a few days after a tense Qatar Grand Prix weekend, Russell claimed Verstappen had threatened to 'put me on my f***ing head in the wall' after receiving a one-place grid penalty, costing the Red Bull driver pole. Verstappen thought Russell had screwed him over by making a scene to the stewards. Russell felt he had to take a stand against Verstappen in Abu Dhabi the following week. Given how passionately Russell had spoken — and, more tellingly, his body language — this appeared to be a relationship fractured beyond repair. They already had a lengthy history of clashing, then Verstappen's collision with Russell in Spain this year only seemed to confirm this status. But how about a future Mercedes driver line-up comprising Russell and Verstappen? Implausible, right? Well, so much is in F1. Verstappen's future will be the story in F1 over the next six weeks, the height of the driver market 'silly season.' He is under contract at Red Bull through to 2028, but the Dutchman has dodged opportunities to confirm he will be racing there next season. Christian Horner's sudden departure eases the tension that lingered with Verstappen's father, Jos, but considering hopes of defending his championship faded months ago, and Red Bull has failed to improve its car, it would be understandable if Max was considering a move. Over at Mercedes, Russell is yet to receive a new contract despite putting in some of his best career performances, including a win in Canada last month. He is set to become a free agent in 2025 and, by his own account, the reason for the hold-up is the possibility of Mercedes signing Verstappen. Mercedes team principal Toto Wolff was coy when he faced a media grilling two races ago about his interest in Verstappen, having maintained he wouldn't 'flirt' outside the team without his existing drivers knowing the score. He acknowledged that 'people talk' and 'explore,' and noted 'you can flirt, or you (can) have conversations.' The following day, when speaking to Sky Sports, Wolff said there is 'very little probability' Verstappen will race for Mercedes in 2026. Advertisement As long as there is some probability, though, it's worth exploring. Verstappen is the greatest driver of his generation. Some of his performances this year, especially at Suzuka and Imola, have been stunning. It would be folly not to know at least the lay of the land as Wolff looks to the future. If Verstappen and Mercedes pushed ahead with a deal, Wolff would then have some tough decisions to make. The working assumption is Russell would be the one to pay the price, not least because of their quarrel — but what if, sensationally, Wolff tried to make it work with Verstappen and Russell? It's difficult to understand why Russell hasn't already received an extension at Mercedes. He is performing better than ever and is deeply underrated as one of F1's top performers. Russell defeated Hamilton in two of their three seasons as teammates (and pretty comprehensively last year) and has made the most of a Mercedes car package that is a far cry from its dominant best of past seasons. As Russell noted when speaking to The Athletic in April, had his time come a few years earlier, he might already have a couple of championships. Russell is also the first success story of Mercedes' modern young driver program and has delivered consistently, with so much time, money and effort invested into his career by Mercedes. A lot of the spotlight has shifted to Mercedes' latest junior product, Kimi Antonelli. At 18 and only just possessing a road license, Antonelli faced a lot of pressure as Hamilton's replacement for 2025. It was a gamble by Wolff, but a show of faith in a talent he believes could become F1's next great. The next Verstappen, even. Antonelli has made a good start to his F1 career, becoming the third-youngest podium finisher in the sport's history in Canada, but that has been the only recent bright spot from a tricky run, which includes a big mistake when he took out Verstappen on the first lap in Austria. Advertisement The head-to-head stats fall overwhelmingly in Russell's favor, too. He has scored 147 points to Antonelli's 63, has nine top-five finishes to Antonelli's two, and five podiums to Antonelli's one. Their qualifying head-to-head reads 9-1 in Russell's favor, with an average gap of 0.345 seconds. Other rookies, such as Ollie Bearman at Haas and Sauber's Gabriel Bortoleto, are already on a par with their more experienced teammates. Antonelli is not only a rookie, but an 18-year-old rookie in just his fourth full season of car racing, so leeway is needed. And Mercedes' faith in him remains strong. 'He's a great driver,' Wolff said after the race at Silverstone. 'There's a reason we took him.' A Verstappen/Antonelli line-up would be exceptionally exciting, no doubt, but the 'best' on-paper Mercedes line-up would surely be Verstappen and Russell. The real question is whether it could work in reality. Both Verstappen and Russell feel they can take on any teammate and win. The likelihood is that margins between them would be extremely fine, giving Wolff a possible headache to manage should Mercedes regain its status as F1's leading team. The current McLaren model of a friendly fight for the drivers' championship is rare, something Wolff discovered in his experience dealing with Hamilton and Nico Rosberg's explosive rivalry from 2014 to 2016. Wolff has always been reluctant to point the finger at Verstappen, be it after Qatar last year (he instead took aim at Horner, calling him a 'yapping little terrier') or in Spain this year, saying he couldn't fathom the Dutchman's move being deliberate. There's a clear respect for Verstappen and a private belief that with better management, incidents could have been avoided. But what about Antonelli? He has the label of F1's next big thing, but even that status means there would be no shortage of teams showing an interest in taking him on loan. He could keep his Mercedes ties, just as Russell did while at Williams, and hone his racecraft down the grid. Advertisement There have been many examples of such loans in F1 history and it would also clarify the Mercedes succession plan. This is all hypothetical. Wolff has been clear that the chances of a move for Verstappen are low, and the ramifications of Horner's exit from Red Bull will only be known in the coming weeks, starting soon at Spa. Mercedes also remains in a very strong place for the future if the existing lineup of Russell and Antonelli continues beyond this year, with the former getting a short-term extension still the most likely scenario. 'The likelihood I'm not at Mercedes next year is exceptionally low,' Russell said at Silverstone. But if everything adds up — Verstappen available for 2026 and Mercedes serious about a swoop — then Wolff should double down and go for a true blockbuster line-up. Whatever the consequences.
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
Why F1 may benefit from Mohammed Ben Sulayem's V8 push
It was on the morning of the glitzy season launch at London's O2 Arena in February when Formula 1 lost its collective head. There, it's said, during an F1 Commission meeting, Christian Horner – Red Bull's then team principal – set his smartphone in the middle of the table. 'Bring back V10s' hissed the voice at the other end of the line: former F1 'ringmaster' Bernie Ecclestone. And, lo, the herd began its charge in that direction, only to crash upon the indifference of F1's engine manufacturers during a crunch meeting ahead of the Bahrain GP. But FIA president Mohammed Ben Sulayem, one of those who got rather ahead of themselves on that chilly February day in London, still believes in the principle of a return to natural aspiration and set out his stall during a media briefing ahead of the British GP in July. The new plan accommodates reservations expressed by the majority of the engine manufacturers during the Bahrain summit: that V10s were unsuitable on many levels, not least the road-relevance front; and some form of electrification would have to be included to provide synergies with road car technologies. It's a debate which has been raging between paddock insiders for many years: should F1 slavishly mirror road car trends or should it adopt a so-called 'set controls for the heart of the sun' policy, focusing completely on noise and power even if it alienates the manufacturers? Many purists espouse the latter but acknowledge the many practical problems, such as what would happen to the manufacturer-based teams and who would actually build the engines. V8s, as now espoused by Ben Sulayem, are more acceptable to the manufacturers since many of them still have engines of that configuration somewhere in the range. At the same time the idea of internal combustion is undergoing something of a renaissance, owing to new technologies and developments in the global trading picture. A Ford DFV V8 engine in the back of a Brabham BT49 For a long time the direction of travel in the car industry has been towards full electrification, pushed by government legislation. But a significant proportion of consumers remain resistant, viewing electric cars as too expensive (and, of course, there are those who fear their genitals may fall off if they are seen driving anything other than a car with a loud, noisy and powerful internal combustion engine). Faced with this and an influx of cheaper, state-subsidised vehicles exported from China, the western car industry is beginning to panic. Former Renault Group boss Luca de Meo admitted as much before he quit. So there is still room for the internal combustion engine, provided the new generation of synthetic fuels can be produced at scale for a reasonable cost. Assuming F1 did return to a V8 engine format, there would be details to work out regarding size and the proportion of electrification. Next year the split will be 50:50 but this has proved controversial, and the technical formula has had to be adapted to embrace adaptive aerodynamic devices to mitigate potential power shortfalls on the straights. It's understood that the solution envisioned by the FIA is to move to an 80:20 ratio in favour of the ICU, or even 90:10. The new format would be introduced when the 2026 technical package has run its course, most likely 2030, though the president has suggested it could be earlier. "We need to do it soon,' he said at Silverstone. 'You need three years, so hopefully by 2029 we have something there.' 2026 Formula 1 rules Ben Sulayem has also talked about achieving radical cost savings by standardising components including the gearbox and the hybrid system. Former president Max Mosley tried to drive through something along these lines at the end of 2008, during the global financial crisis, running a tender process for a homologated drivetrain (ultimately won by Cosworth and Hewland). An additional wrinkle of the plan was to open up new grid spots and have those teams using the standard powertrain effectively running in a championship tier of their own, with a budget cap. But that idea was ultimately too complicated and lost impetus when Mosley stood down. Jean Todt, the next president, let it die entirely. There is an argument to say gearboxes are expensive to design, develop and build, and are no longer performance differentiators, so having a standardised component isn't necessarily a negative. There may be grumblings about whoever wins the putative tender but F1 has been here before, when McLaren Applied Technologies won the contract to supply the whole grid with homologated Engine Control Units. Fears of inequality and skulduggery proved unfounded. Standardised hybrid components may be more difficult for the engine manufacturers to digest – but, equally, this is also an 'invisible' system so far as the audience is concerned and if it can be made less expensive, it will find support. The FIA's position is that cost saving remains one of the most important factors even at a time when F1 is thriving commercially – because that situation could change at any time based on geopolitics and the global economy. 'As the FIA we are the moderators during the discussion of the regulations, mindful to contain costs and create a level playing field for all,' FIA single-seater director Nikolas Tombazis told earlier this year. 'There is some strong resistance at times, as you would expect, from teams or PU manufacturers protecting their interests or investment. Cost-cutting and level of technological freedom are at loggerheads with each other. It is not easy to have both. 'The PU manufacturers came [to discussion regarding the 2026 regulations] with many proposals for cost-cutting on a number of items relating to the engine. They centred on simplification, eliminating certain materials, processes and technologies. 'The amount of cost-cutting we've achieved is not as much as we would all have liked. While we are in a very healthy position as a sport, financially and in terms of popularity, we should never be complacent about that: cost-cutting should always have a high priority.' The Formula One Championship-winning Power Units: Mercedes-AMG F1 M09 EQ Power+ (2018), Mercedes-AMG F1 M08 EQ Power+ (2017), Mercedes-Benz PU106C Hybrid (2016), Mercedes-Benz PU106B Hybrid (2015), Mercedes-Benz PU106A Hybrid (2014) 'Many of the manufacturers produce V8s in their cars, so commercially it's correct,' said Ben Sulayem at Silverstone. 'How much is it? The target is more than 50 percent [cheaper] in everything.' This could be achieved not just through standardising parts but also mandating cheaper materials. It's known, for instance, that the FIA wanted to move to aluminium pistons but the engine manufacturers, having initially supported the idea, U-turned en masse. Another issue F1 faces in its drive towards 'net zero' is the cost of the fully sustainable fuel which will be mandatory next year, said to be in the region of $275-$300 per litre. This reflects both the R&D investment which has had to go into developing these fuels and the energy-intensive means of production. As yet there is no solution to the problem of producing at scale and to a reasonable cost. Since all the teams have commercial fuel-and-lubes supply deals, the question of who actually absorbs those costs is tricky to unpick – and likely to differ depending on how individual deals are structured. Which is why another of Ben Sulayem's proposals is likely to face resistance: a single fuel supplier. What goes in the tank is less of a performance differentiator than it used to be – a chemical composition close to pump fuel is now prescribed, as is a sustainable element – but fuel brands still rely on performance for their storytelling. Shell, for instance, has built the identity of its VPower blend around its partnership with Ferrari. Would the story survive if the Ferrari were to become a mere mobile billboard for the likes of Shell, while the go-juice sloshing around inside had a rather different provenance? Perhaps – after all, we live in an age of profound superficiality. Ultimately if costs can be reduced as much as the president would like, the grid as a whole will benefit – and few will care whether you have a tiger in your tank or not. Read Also: Why F1 drivers don't like Pirelli's wet tyres, and how it plans to fix them To read more articles visit our website.
