&w=3840&q=100)
Trump quells revolt among House Republicans over crypto bills, manages vote for Genius Act
In a dramatic turn of events on Capitol Hill, President Donald Trump reportedly brokered a last-minute deal with hardline House Republicans late Tuesday, clearing a procedural roadblock that had earlier derailed the scheduled legislative push for three major cryptocurrency bills and the Genius Act.
The intervention, which unfolded during a private meeting in the Oval Office and included a phone-in appearance by House Speaker Mike Johnson, appeared to unify a divided GOP caucus ahead of a crucial vote.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Crypto week almost derailed
The week had been touted by GOP leadership as 'Crypto Week,' a symbolic effort to highlight the party's commitment to digital asset regulation. However, internal divisions flared when a bloc of 13 Republicans sided with Democrats to vote down the procedural rule needed to advance the legislation.
As reported by The Hill, the opposition included prominent figures such as Reps. Chip Roy, Marjorie Taylor Greene and Andy Biggs, among others. Their chief concern centred on the absence of language in the Genius Act prohibiting the creation of a central bank digital currency (CBDC), a sticking point that has become emblematic of broader GOP mistrust of centralised financial oversight.
The Genius Act, which aims to establish a federal framework for stablecoins — digital tokens pegged to the US dollar — had already passed the Senate, making it the most viable piece of crypto legislation currently in motion. Yet its path in the House was blocked when dissident Republicans argued that it did not go far enough to rein in federal authority over digital finance.
Trump steps in
Trump's decision to engage directly with the rebellious lawmakers signalled the high stakes of the moment. In a post on Truth Social, he claimed that after a brief meeting with 11 of the 12 holdout Republicans, all had agreed to support the procedural rule required to advance the bills. The president said Speaker Johnson had participated via phone and that the vote would be held Wednesday morning.
While Trump did not specify what, if any, concessions were made to secure this agreement, the statement appeared to quell the immediate legislative crisis. Speaker Johnson has confirmed the arrangement, expressing gratitude for Trump's intervention, calling it crucial in getting the chamber back on track. Johnson also pledged that the House would continue pushing forward on additional cryptocurrency legislation.
Legislative package under review
The agreement clears the way for the House to consider not only the Genius Act but also two other key crypto bills — the Digital Asset Market Structure Bill and the Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act. The former seeks to delineate regulatory responsibilities between the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), clarifying jurisdiction over digital assets. The latter is a symbolic rejection of a government-issued digital currency reflecting conservative fears about state overreach in personal financial data.
The procedural impasse stemmed partly from demands by some GOP lawmakers to bundle all three bills into a single package. Speaker Johnson explained that such a move would require re-approval by the Senate, potentially delaying the process indefinitely. The Senate has so far only passed the Genius Act after months of deliberation.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Tactical or strategic?
The unusual move to block a rules vote — a typically pro forma step in the House — represented both a tactical manoeuvre and a broader ideological statement by GOP hardliners. By disrupting floor proceedings, they sought to signal dissatisfaction with leadership and the perceived softness of the legislation, especially regarding federal surveillance potential in a digital currency future.
Votes on procedural rules are usually routine, divided along party lines. However, the House Republican majority has increasingly seen internal factions use these votes to assert influence or air grievances. Majority Leader Steve Scalise notably changed his vote to 'no' as a procedural manoeuvre allowing the issue to be revisited — an indication that leadership was anticipating a second attempt.
A crypto ally in Trump
Trump's growing alignment with the cryptocurrency industry has been one of the notable developments of his second term as president. He has repeatedly voiced support for a 'clean' stablecoin bill and has cautioned against entangling it with other measures or regulatory additions. His endorsement appears to carry significant weight among House Republicans, many of whom are treading through a new territory in the rapidly evolving digital finance space.
His position stands in contrast to more cautious lawmakers who prefer comprehensive regulation that addresses both investor protection and federal control. Nonetheless, Trump's decisive involvement in this legislative episode suggests he is positioning himself as a champion of crypto innovation, an emerging issue with increasing political resonance.
What comes next
If the agreement holds, the House is expected to vote on the procedural rule and begin debate on the three bills as early as Wednesday, potentially delivering a significant win for the crypto sector. However, the final passage remains uncertain, especially as the Senate has shown limited enthusiasm for comprehensive crypto legislation beyond the stablecoin framework.
Still, Tuesday's episode reflected the unpredictable dynamics of GOP politics in the post-Trump era. Trump's intervention appears to have not only salvaged the day's legislative agenda but also reaffirmed his role as a central figure in shaping the party's policy direction, even on complex issues like digital finance.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
25 minutes ago
- Mint
India rejects NATO chief's threat of secondary sanctions over ties with Russia, cautions against ‘double standards'
In a firm response to NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte's threat of secondary sanctions over New Delhi's ties with Moscow, India on Thursday cautioned against "double standards" on the matter and asserted that its energy procurement from Russia is based on national interests and market dynamics. data-vars-page-type="story" data-vars-link-type="Manual" data-vars-anchor-text="Rutt had warned India, China and Brazil">Rutt had warned India, China and Brazil that they could be hit hard by secondary sanctions if they continue to do business with Russia. "We have seen reports on the subject and are closely following the developments. Let me reiterate that securing energy needs of our people is understandably an overriding priority for us," external affairs ministry spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said at his weekly media briefing. "In this endeavour, we are guided by what is on offer in the markets, and by the prevailing global circumstances. We would particularly caution against any double standards on the matter," he said. Asked about US President Donald Trump threatening 100 per cent tariff on Russian exports and "secondary tariffs" on any country that has trade links with Moscow, Jaiswal said: "We are closely following developments that are in this regard, and the articulations that are being made." India, China and Brazil have been the major buyers of Russian crude oil notwithstanding the Western sanctions on Moscow for its invasion of Ukraine. "My encouragement to these three countries, particularly is, if you live now in Beijing, or in Delhi, or you are the president of Brazil, you might want to take a look into this, because this might hit you very hard," Rutte told reporters in Washington DC. "So please make the phone call to Vladimir Putin and tell him that he has to get serious about peace talks, because otherwise this will slam back on Brazil, on India and on China in a massive way," he said. The NATO chief's remarks coincided with Trump's warning to Russia of major significant trade restrictions if it does not reach a peace deal with Ukraine within 50 days. "We're going to be doing very severe tariffs (on Russia) if we don't have a deal in 50 days," Trump said on Tuesday. India, China and Brazil are members of the BRICS and Trump has been critical of the grouping as well. Earlier this month, Trump had threatened BRICS member nations of 10 per cent additional tariffs on exports to the US apart from reciprocal tariffs. Any country aligning themselves with the Anti-American policies of BRICS will face those duties, he said. On the proposed trade deal between India and the US, Jaiswal said negotiations between the two sides are underway. "Both sides are in touch with each other. They are trying to iron out issues," he said. On India's negotiations with the European Union for the long-pending free trade pact, Jaiswal said talks are "progressing very well". "The last round, that is the 12th round, happened in Brussels from July 7th to 11th. And the next round of talks are scheduled to be held in September in New Delhi. "It (talks) is progressing well. There is good momentum. And that is how, and we would like to see a positive outcome of it," he added.
Mint
25 minutes ago
- Mint
US strikes severely damaged just one Iranian nuclear site, new assessment finds: Report
One of the three Iranian nuclear enrichment facilities targeted by US airstrikes last month — the Fordo site — was "mostly destroyed," significantly delaying Iran's enrichment capabilities at that facility by up to two years, according to a recent US intelligence assessment, NBC News reported. The report, based on interviews with five current and former US officials familiar with the matter, also noted that two other sites — Natanz and Isfahan — suffered less damage and could be operational again within several months if Iran chooses to resume activity. 'Iran's key enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated,' President Donald Trump said in a post-strike comments, calling the operation a military success. While Fordo was heavily hit, the same assessment reveals that the Natanz and Isfahan facilities were only partially degraded. US officials said these two sites could resume uranium enrichment operations within months. The news outlet citing one current and two former US officials also stated it has learned that US Central Command had crafted a far more extensive strike plan against Iran, which included targeting three additional sites over a multi-week campaign, rather than the single-night operation that was ultimately carried out. 'We were willing to go all the way in our options, but the president did not want to,' one source familiar with internal planning told NBC News. The news outlet citing one of the current officials and one of the former officials said, Trump opted for a more limited strike due to concerns over potential casualties and a desire to avoid deeper US entanglement in foreign conflicts. Officials cautioned that the current assessment is only a snapshot and could change as intelligence collection continues.
Time of India
25 minutes ago
- Time of India
'I don't have time for all this': State Dept official & lawmaker clash over mass layoffs at heated House hearing
Tensions boiled during a heated House hearing as lawmakers clashed with State Department official Jose Cunningham about the Trump-era reorganisation plan that led to the firing of over 1,300 employees. Show more Show less
