A ‘juxtaposition of the grim and the bling' - Laos casino city accused of cybercrime hub amid crackdown
Ostensibly an urban development project to attract tourists with casinos and resorts, away from official oversight international authorities and analysts say it quickly became a centre for money laundering and trafficking.
The city has now evolved, they say, into a cybercrime hub that can draw workers from around the world with better-paying jobs than back home.
Laundry hung out to dry on the balconies of one high-rise building supposed to be a tourist hotel, while the wide and palm-lined boulevards were eerily quiet.
It is a 'juxtaposition of the grim and the bling', according to Richard Horsey of the International Crisis Group.
It gives the 'impression of opulence, a sort of Las Vegas in Laos', he said, but it is underpinned by the 'grim reality' of a lucrative criminal ecosystem.
'Horrendous illicit activities'
In the daytime a few gamblers placed their bets at the blackjack tables in the city's centrepiece Kings Romans Casino, where a Rolls Royce was parked outside.
'There are people from many different countries here,' said one driver offering golf buggy tours of the city, who requested anonymity for security reasons. 'Indians, Filipinos, Russians and [people from] Africa.'
'The Chinese mostly own the businesses,' he added.
Cyber fraud compounds have proliferated in special economic zones across Southeast Asia, according to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime.
Kings Romans' importance as a 'storage, trafficking, deal-making, and laundering hub [is] likely to expand', it said in a report last year, despite crackdowns on illegal activities.
The founder of the Kings Romans Group and the Golden Triangle Special Economic Zone is Zhao Wei, a Chinese businessman with close links to the Laos Government, which has given him medals for his development projects.
He and three associates, with three of his companies, were sanctioned by the United States Treasury in 2018 over what it called 'an array of horrendous illicit activities' including human, drug and wildlife trafficking, and child prostitution.
Britain sanctioned him in 2023, saying he was responsible for trafficking people to the economic zone.
'They were forced to work as scammers targeting English-speaking individuals and subject to physical abuse and further cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment or punishment,' Britain's Treasury said.
The same year and again last August, authorities in China and Laos cracked down on cyberfraud operations in the zone, raiding offices and arresting hundreds of suspects.
'Violence doesn't always pay'
With public anger in China mounting, over both scamming itself and alleged kidnappings, Beijing instigated raids this year on centres in Myanmar and Cambodia.
The operations primarily targeted Chinese workers, thousands of whom were released and repatriated, with hundreds of other foreigners.
Some say they are trafficking victims or were tricked and forced to scam people online, but some authorities say they are there voluntarily.
Scammers have adapted by shifting their locations and targets, specialists say, and Horsey explained that trafficking and abuses have reduced as the business model has developed.
'If you're trying to scale and produce a huge business ... violence doesn't always pay,' he said.
'It's better to have motivated workers who aren't scared, who aren't looking over their shoulder, who are actually free to ... do their job.'
Beijing realises it cannot completely stop criminality in the region, so prefers to manage it, he added.
Chinese authorities can 'pick up the phone' to Zhao and tell him: 'Don't do this, limit this, don't target Chinese people', he said.
That 'is actually more valuable for China than trying to eradicate it everywhere and just lose all influence over it'.
The United States Institute for Peace estimated in 2024 that Mekong-based criminal syndicates were probably stealing more than US$43.8 billion annually.
Representatives of both the zone and Kings Romans did not respond to AFP's repeated requests for comment, while Zhao could not be reached.
The Laos Government could not be reached for comment, but the official Lao News Agency said after last year's busts that the country was 'committed to decisively addressing and eliminating cyber-scam' activity.
– Agence France-Presse
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
42 minutes ago
- NZ Herald
Towards a system that respects property rights: tidy tweaks or real change?
Yet beneath these improvements lies a fundamental question. Are they stepping stones toward the Government's promised property-rights-based system, or just necessary patches stuck on a fundamentally flawed framework? The infrastructure and development package demonstrates coherent reform. It recognises that efficient infrastructure and housing supply are prerequisites for a functioning society. New national standards for electricity networks, telecommunications, and renewable energy would sweep away inconsistent local rules that add significant time and cost for infrastructure projects – $1.3 billion a year in consenting costs alone, according to the Infrastructure Commission. New standards could cut $1.3 billion in annual infrastructure consenting costs. The proposed standards for granny flats could unlock thousands of affordable housing options. The freshwater reforms show promise by abandoning a rigid environmental hierarchy that has paralysed decision-making. The current approach of 'environment-first' (and arguably second, third and fourth) prevents councils from properly weighing economic and social benefits against environmental costs. It has created regulatory straitjackets that are not working, pleasing no one. Replacing this with objectives that treat environmental, social, and economic factors equally represents a crucial shift toward a balanced approach. Proposals to rebalance Te Mana o te Wai would reduce layers of assessment that add uncertainty, time and cost to freshwater management. Removing its rigid hierarchy of obligations and principles and its extra layers of policy and decision-making processes would mean freshwater would revert to being managed like any other natural resource under the RMA. Resource management changes promise infrastructure, freshwater balance. Photo / Tania Whyte It would let councils better balance economic development with environmental protection. Crucially, it would restore the regulatory certainty businesses and farms need to invest, expand, and create jobs. An alternative to heavy-handed regulation would allow market-based instruments to align private incentives with public objectives. Rather than mandating specific outcomes through complex rules and stifling processes, pricing mechanisms and tradeable permits could achieve superior environmental results while preserving choice and encouraging innovation. Making more use of them would revolutionise not only freshwater management but also biodiversity protection and urban development. Other elements of the packages reveal some contradictions. The continuation of the National Policy Statement for Highly Productive Land, even with modest changes, exemplifies how good intentions are inconsistent with broader policy goals. While food production is of course important, the policy artificially constrains land use on urban fringes where housing growth naturally occurs. The irony is stark. A Government committed to property rights as the foundation of resource management simultaneously maintains regulations that prevent landowners from responding to market signals or pursuing their highest-value land use. The restrictions not only inflate housing costs but also demonstrate an assumption that politicians and bureaucrats can better determine land use than property owners themselves. Balancing reform goals with property rights in NZ. These policy choices matter. Property rights create incentive structures that drive innovation, investment, and responsible stewardship. When regulations unduly constrain these rights, particularly without compensation, they generate perverse outcomes that can harm both economic efficiency and environmental quality. The current consultation is also silent on compensation for regulatory takings. When national direction significantly constrains landowners' development rights, affected parties should not bear the full cost of delivering public benefits. International experience offers various models for addressing this fundamental fairness issue, from statutory compensation triggers to targeted buyout schemes. Chances to tweak a bad system should of course be taken, but they will remain patches on a bad system. Comprehensive reform in the form of RMA replacement remains crucially important. Minister Chris Bishop's speech to Local Government New Zealand's conference yesterday shows the Government is still committed, which is reassuring. In the meantime, the test of any interim tweaks should be simple: do they enhance or erode the principles that will govern the replacement system? On this measure, the specific proposals largely point in the right direction, but some could be better. After many attempts to fix the RMA, New Zealand once again stands at a resource management crossroads. The path toward property rights, market mechanisms, and genuine choice remains open. Taking it would unlock decades of suppressed growth and innovative ways to improve the environment. Taking the other path would condemn New Zealand to more of the same dysfunction that has plagued us for a generation. It is a path we simply cannot afford to take.
Newsroom
4 hours ago
- Newsroom
Govt winds up council reform storm
Analysis: It's a sentiment likely to set pulses racing among the current crop of Government ministers. In 2010, four-term councillor Bryan Cadogan aimed to unseat sitting Clutha mayor Juno Hayes by running on a platform of tying rates to inflation and focusing on core services. Cadogan won by 354 votes, turning around the previous election result in the district hemmed in by Dunedin, Central Otago, and Southland. Now, the Clutha mayor, who isn't running for re-election in October's elections, finds himself, and his sector, in the firing line of an interventionist Government considering rates caps, and introducing legislation to ensure councils focus on – that's right – core services. The Local Government NZ conference in Ōtautahi/Christchurch was formally launched on Wednesday with a video address, of less than two minutes, by Prime Minister Christopher Luxon. Councils need to get back to basics, he said, spending wisely and delivering value. What does that mean? 'Prioritising pipes over vanity projects,' explained the prime minister, flanked by national flags. 'It means roads over reports, and it means real outcomes.' When the address finished, conference MC Miriama Kamo started clapping loudly, joined somewhat unenthusiastically by a smattering of conference attendees. 'I'm the only one clapping, I see,' Kamo quipped. Cadogan says the Government's message landed 'pretty flatly' with him. 'It's getting a wee bit tedious getting asked time and time again to do the impossible.' Chris Bishop, the minister overseeing resource management reforms, took a more fire and brimstone approach than his leader, saying there was shrinking evidence councils were cutting their cloth and enabling growth. 'You cry out for more financing and funding tools. We're giving them to you. You ask for a better, simpler planning system. We're giving this to you, too. 'We are getting our house in order. It's time you sorted yours out.' (Some would have thought that line a bit rich, given analysis of May's Budget suggests Luxon's coalition will increase gross debt by more in five years than the Covid-affected previous government did in six.) Bishop announced a 'plan stop', warning councils not to waste money and time reviewing city and district plans, and regional policy statements – with narrow exceptions – ahead of an overhaul of resource management laws due to land in 2027. 'The time for excuses is over,' Chris Bishop told the Local Government NZ conference in Christchurch. Photo: David Williams Sam Broughton, mayor of Selwyn, just south of Christchurch, and president of Local Government NZ, says: 'It was really good to have that certainty.' Is that just common sense? Broughton says the progress on reforms is pleasing, but adds: 'It feels like councils have been in this reform storm for six or seven years, and has just been ongoing change without actually landing something.' Local Government Minister Simon Watts introduced the bill to focus councils on core services, which is expected to have its first reading on Thursday. ('It feels like the Government has a caricature of local government that isn't true,' Broughton says. He notes 80 percent of Selwyn council's capital spending is on pipes and roads.) Watts' explanation of why it was necessary to force councils to concentrate on core services, like roads, water and rubbish, sent offended ripples through the conference crowd. The minister used the analogy of setting boundaries for his children. Letting them do whatever they liked might lead to bad choices, he suggested. Instead, he might tell them, 'Hey, you've got these five things to do'. Among the crowd's murmurs, one conference-goer shouted: 'Just a bit patronising, mate!' From the conference stage, Watts appeared to pour cold water on the idea regional councils were about to be scrapped. 'We're thinking about it,' Watts said, adding ministers were cognisant 'there's already a huge amount of reform underway in your sector'. Bishop tried to mollify concerns about potential environmental consequences from the audience, saying a new Natural Environment Act would focus on biodiversity, ecology and human health. Later, the minister tells Newsroom: 'There will be environmental limits that will be set through the new regime.' (After a remit passed at Local Government NZ's annual general meeting on Wednesday, councils called for a review of local government's structure.) Christopher Luxon beamed in to the Local Government NZ conference in Christchurch. Photo: David Williams Government reforms for local government include the network-merging replacement for three waters, Local Water Done Well, waving city and regional deals under the noses of councils, and offering different funding and financing options for infrastructure to speed up house-building. Back to Cadogan, the Clutha mayor, who talks to Newsroom while walking to a negotiation with other councils on water services. He says despite Government rhetoric, councils can't be expected to achieve the triumvirate of lower rates, infrastructure upgrades and under-control debt. 'The Government know it, we know it, but we just keep on getting this.' Clutha council's experience puts those financial management challenges in stark relief. In 2019, its external borrowings were $5 million. Five years later, it had ballooned to $123m. To add salt to the financial wound, this year's average rates rise was an 'ungodly' 16.59 percent. How did this happen? 'Three waters, wholly and solely,' Cadogan says. (Last year, the mayor predicts the financial consequences of the 'three waters debacle' will hit. In the latest annual plan, he says 89.4 percent of this year's rates rise is attributable to roads, rubbish and three waters.) Clutha's unfortunate figures are: the third-longest water reticulation network in the country, with 27 sewage or water plants on 30-year consents, and, crucially, only 18,500 people to pay for it. Of the country's 565 drinking water quality breaches last year, 338 or 60 percent were in Clutha. 'We all want lower rates increases,' says Sam Broughton, the Selwyn district mayor and Local Government NZ president. Photo: David Williams Cadogan gives the example of a water upgrade for the tiny town of Waihola: running an 18.5km pipeline from Milton's water treatment plant oto the reservoir cost $6.3m. After years of problems with water quality and quantity, boil water notices were removed for all but 20 of the town's 247 houses. 'Then we go to Heriot, and then we go to Tapanui, then Owaka, then Clinton,' Cadogan says. 'It's a financial delusion that you can have rates cap, you can have debt ceilings, and you have to do this infrastructure update.' It would have been better for the National-led coalition to lift the hood on Labour's three waters policy and chuck out what they didn't like, Broughton says, instead of scrapping it and starting again. He thinks resolving water across the country might take seven or eight more steps. Policy lurches and delays cost millions of dollars and can, of course, increase council rates. Many councils might feel aggrieved by the ministerial attack given the National Party's pre-election commitment to devolution and localism. Luxon promised to reshape the relationship between central and local government. 'It does feel like every party in opposition is a localist,' Broughton says, 'and then as soon as they're in power, they become a creature that draws all the more power to themselves.' Broughton was applauded by conference attendees for his opening comments – made before Bishop's address. 'We all want lower rates increases. I want lower rates increases, I know you want lower rates increases, I hear from my community they want lower rates increases. But it can't be at the expense of our children picking up the tab because of our negligence today.' The Selwyn mayor tells Newsroom a key problem is councils have few alternatives to raise money. The best tool the Government could give councils, in his opinion, is to return GST spending on new houses locally. 'That would be a game-changer for us,' he says, noting between 1000 and 3000 houses have been built each year in Selwyn over the past five or six years. Broughton's also a fan of bed taxes, something Queenstown's council has, for years, been pushing for. Luxon said this week the Government's not actively considering a bed tax. 'It has just been an avalanche of unstoppable figures. Unstoppable.' Bryan Cadogan, Clutha mayor This is the second year ministers have used the Local Government NZ conference to berate councils for spending on 'nice-to-haves'. Last year, the venue, Wellington's $180m Tākina centre, was in the crosshairs. But Christchurch's half-billion-dollar monolithic convention centre, Te Pae, is of a different ilk – paid for by taxpayers as a post-quake anchor project. Luxon, Watts and Bishop did miss a trick in Christchurch, though. A 15-minute walk away from Te Pae is the new stadium, Te Kaha – a loss-making facility that will cost ratepayers $453m to build. The city's ratepayers face a three-year, cumulative rates rise of 24.66 percent that without the stadium, that would have been 19.43 percent. Using Luxon's words, the stadium isn't roads, rubbish or water, and tends, perhaps, more towards a vanity project. The last word goes to Cadogan, the outgoing Clutha mayor. He hopes a water services 'umbrella' with other councils will help his district save on infrastructure spending. 'We've been basically a stand-alone council for the last five years. Have a look what that did to our debt,' he says. 'I'm gutted as a mayor. I pride myself on really understanding figures. I understand them all right. It has just been an avalanche of unstoppable figures. Unstoppable.'
Otago Daily Times
5 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
China's pleasant climate surprise
Chinese electric vehicle maker Xpeng displays its lineup of SUVs and sedans at an event in Hong Kong. PHOTO: REUTERS Start with China, the world's biggest emitter by far of greenhouse gases: 27% of the entire world's emissions, and more than twice that of the second-biggest emitter, the United States. In fact, it's more than all the emissions of all the other developed countries combined. Bad China. But wait. China is now installing wind and solar power at an unprecedented rate. It has just reached 1000 gigawatts of solar power, and the pace is still picking up: 93gW went on line in May alone. Beijing's official target was to reach peak emissions before 2030 and then start heading back down, but it may actually have peaked last year. China also leads the world in newly installed wind power, new nuclear plants under construction, electric vehicle production (half the vehicles made in China are EVs) and in the all-important field of battery storage, which is essential for stable, reliable power if your electrical grid is eventually going to be fossil-fuel-free. Not only that, but it's making a profit from it. Volume production and technical innovations have brought the price of solar panels down so low that it's exporting them in huge quantities even to developing countries. They simply beat all forms of fossil fuel on price: 90% of all new power capacity installed worldwide last year was renewable. Some countries are ahead of the game. Brazil, for example, already gets 88% of its energy from renewables (mostly hydro), but increasingly from solar as well. England, the first country to burn coal for industry and transport, closed down its last coal-fired plant last year. But for most countries, the great shift to clean energy only began in the past two years. There is, of course, the problem of the US, where Donald Trump is trying to go back to the 20th-century heyday of fossil fuels. (In May the Department of Energy even ordered a coal-fired plant in Michigan not to be retired as the owners had planned.) But the free market still more or less rules in the US, and fossil fuels just cost too much. Commercial enterprises have to make a profit, and they are often answerable to shareholders for their investment decisions. That is why solar power and battery storage alone are expected to make up over 80% of new energy capacity in the US this year. The US will lag further and further behind, but it will mostly follow the energy trend at a distance. Coal, gas and oil together account for about 75% of overall greenhouse gas emissions, so the fact that most other countries in the world are switching to cheaper renewable energy so fast is reason for rejoicing. We are being given a reprieve from the worst consequences of our carelessness with the planet, and we should use the time wisely. First, a few harsh realities. The average global temperature has been far higher than the models predicted for the past two years: well over 1.5°C above the pre-industrial average, compared with the predicted +1.2°C. If that continues, we will hit the "never exceed" level of +2.0°C within 10 years. If we're lucky, we won't get there until about 2040. But realistically, we will get there at some point. There's already too much carbon dioxide in the air, and too much more will be put there before our emissions fall steeply enough to make a real difference. That's a great deal more heat than is in the atmosphere now, which at the very least means bigger storms and forest fires, worse floods and droughts, more extreme temperatures both high and low. But it also means that we may cross one or several tipping points that will make things much worse. We are walking through a minefield, and the mines are the "tipping points" that will be activated when the planet reaches certain levels of heat. We don't know exactly what those levels are, but some could be just ahead, while most others would be tripped between +2.0°C and +3.0°C. And we do know that once we have set them going, we can't turn them off again. The tipping points can probably even cascade, one setting off another and delivering us rapidly to levels of heat that would be catastrophic, so our highest priority must be not to cross them. That means holding the heat down, even if we have to do it artificially. We can cut our emissions faster than we thought possible, but we also need to use that time to develop geoengineering techniques that will let us cool the planet directly. Those techniques seem feasible in theory and not even very expensive (as planetary interventions go), but there's a lot of work to do before they are ready. ■ Gwynne Dyer is an independent London journalist.
