New Zealand Air Force to set up space squadron as it grows in importance
New Zealand Air Force to establish space squadron for defence
Squadron Number 62 to have 15 personnel once created on July 1
New Zealand joins U.S.-led Operation Olympic Defender for space security
WELLINGTON, April 30 (Reuters) - The New Zealand Air Force will establish a small space squadron to signal its growing commitment to space-based defence and international security, a senior military official said on Wednesday.
Air Vice-Marshal Darryn Webb said the Air Force had a team already focused on space, but creating a squadron symbolized its growing significance.
'A space squadron essentially just formalises the fact that space is here with us now. It's going to be more and more important into the future so let's perhaps put a little bit of bricks and mortar around that and provide a mechanism to enhance that growth,' Webb, who is chief of the Air Force, told Reuters in an interview.
The space squadron will sit within the Air Force, but Webb said he would love to see Navy and Army involvement. It will be Squadron Number 62 - a nod to a radar squadron that served during World War Two and will have just 15 personnel when it is created on July 1.
New Zealand has just released a defence capability plan which outlines plans to boost defence spending to 2% of GDP over the next eight years, after decades of reduced funding.
The Air Force is expected to replace its aging Boeing 757 and Seasprite helicopters but there are no plans to reinstate a fighter jet programme, which was cut in 2001.
The squadron emerges as tensions rise over space infrastructure, with increasing concerns around risks to satellite security and potential disruptions to global communication networks.
New Zealand recently joined the U.S.-led Operation Olympic Defender, a seven-nation multinational space defence initiative. Webb said joining gave New Zealand a voice and view in the grouping about responsible space behaviour.
'Primarily, it is about ensuring the continued, free, safe and assured access to space-based services… through deterring any likely action that might occur,' Webb said.
He said part of the military's role was to protect and defend strategic assets and 'space is definitely one of those.' He did not specify which countries' action were of concern.
Webb said what New Zealand could contribute to the operation was at an 'evolving stage.'
'We clearly don't have an enormous range of space-based capabilities. We rely on access of others. So that's an important point. But we are unique in our location in the world,' Webb said, and wouldn't rule out the use of New Zealand's ground-based space infrastructure by foreign militaries in the future.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
3 days ago
- Reuters
Ukraine arrests air force officer for spying on Western-supplied fighter jets
KYIV, July 30 (Reuters) - Ukraine's domestic security agency has detained an air force officer on charges of having spied for Russia by leaking the location of prized F-16 and Mirage 2000 fighter jets, officials said on Wednesday. The unidentified officer, a flight instructor holding the rank of major, stands accused of helping Russia carry out air strikes by providing coordinates and suggesting strike tactics, the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) said in a statement. "In particular, the enemy's priority targets were airfields where F-16s, Mirage 2000s and Su-24s were based," it said. F-16s are U.S.-made and Mirages are French while the Su-24 is an older, Soviet-manufactured jet bomber. "The agent collected the coordinates of the location of these aircraft, schedules and ...the order of their departure." The SBU said the suspect had also passed data on Ukrainian air force personnel and combat tactics to Russian military intelligence. Moscow regularly targets airfields and military bases across Ukraine, especially areas it believes are home to Western-provided weapons like the F-16 or Mirage jets. The two aircraft have been critical to bolstering Ukraine's defences against mounting Russian air strikes and grinding battlefield advances in Moscow's three-and-a-half-year-old, full-scale invasion. This month, the SBU detained two Chinese nationals on suspicion of spying on Ukraine's Neptune anti-ship missile programme, a key part of Kyiv's growing domestic arms industry.
Reuters
25-07-2025
- Reuters
Papering over strains, US and allies prep for Taiwan war
WASHINGTON, July 25 (Reuters) - As they kicked off the largest joint military exercises in Australia's history with a press conference in Sydney earlier this month, U.S. commanders gave a simple explanation for why 35,000 troops from 19 nations were simulating high-tech warfare. In the words of U.S. Lieutenant General Joel Vowell, deputy commander of the U.S. Army in the Pacific, exercise TALISMAN SABRE was intended to build the ability of the U.S. and its allies to respond to any crisis in the Pacific – and in doing so, act as a 'deterrent mechanism' to prevent a future conflict. Already, 2025 has witnessed a series of the largest and most sophisticated military drills held in the Pacific since the end of World War Two, a sign of growing nervousness over a rising China. But along with other U.S.-led activity around the region, the drills also have a much more focused goal. They are to persuade Beijing that if it goes ahead with what are now believed to be increasingly advanced plans for an invasion of Taiwan, it risks finding itself at war not just with the U.S. but a powerful and well-armed de facto alliance. Behind the scenes, however, sits clear diplomatic awkwardness, caused both by Pacific frustrations over U.S. President Donald Trump's tariff salvoes and trade war as well as strategic uncertainty over the U.S. and its future global role. Unlike with its NATO allies in Europe or its main Pacific partners such as Australia, the U.S. has no binding treaty obligations to defend Taiwan if it is attacked. Nor do Australia, the Philippines and other major players in the region. This month, the Financial Times reported that U.S. officials were exerting mounting pressure on Australia and Japan to agree to intervene militarily if China moved against Taiwan. That raised eyebrows in both nations – as well as an unusually public refusal to make any such commitment. That should not have been surprising. Under terms of the Taiwan Relations Act of 1979, successive U.S. administrations have been committed to ensuring plans and military resources are in place to protect the island against whatever Chinese menace it faces. But that does not extend to a commitment to use that force in the event of an attack. Indeed, there is a clear division of views within the Trump administration and its supporters on the wisdom of such action, as well as over how much support Washington should offer to the government in Taipei. That means America's regional allies find themselves taking a similar position, frequently happy to work with the U.S. on contingency planning and deepening military cooperation – but unwilling to commit much further. The result is a situation rather different from what the Trump administration expected to find when it entered office in January complaining loudly about a European failure to invest properly in defending their own continent and pledging to switch America's focus to confronting China. But while European NATO nations have now committed to significant spending increases – 3.5 percent of gross domestic product on defense with an additional 1.5 percent on defense related infrastructure, America's Pacific allies have held back. Under hefty U.S. pressure, Taiwan itself is working to get its defense budget to 2.5 percent of GDP, motivated by U.S. warnings that it might be abandoned if it does not step up its efforts. Japan spent only 1.8 percent of GDP on defense in 2025, rising to 2 percent by 2027 – and its prime minister Shigeru Ishida was widely suspected of skipping the NATO summit in The Hague last month to avoid pressure to do more. Japan, New Zealand, Australia and South Korea are not NATO members, but often attend large alliance meetings to discuss global and Pacific security matters. 'It's hard to believe, a little bit ..., but thanks to President Trump, Asian allies should look to countries in Europe as a new-found example,' U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said at the Shangri-La Security Dialogue in Singapore in May. Hegseth also warned that the Chinese threat to Taiwan was 'imminent' and that Beijing viewed its capture as a key step on the road to regional domination. Few in Japan, Australia or the Philippines would question that analysis. All have long concluded that a Chinese takeover of Taiwan would magnify the future threat to them, and have weighed behind closed doors what actions they might take. Since Trump took office in January, however, America's Asian allies have found themselves profoundly uncertain by the administration's cool treatment of Ukrainein the country's battle against Russian invasion. They are suddenly worried that they might similarly find themselves deprived of U.S. arms and forced towards a deal by a future U.S. government. Trump's tariffs and trade war rhetoric have only made such matters worse. Since taking office, Hegseth and his team have been forced to exert considerable effort reassuring Asian partners, meeting with Philippines President Ferdinand Marcos Junior this week and reasserting a U.S. commitment to a mutual defense pact. Marcos also met with Trump, who agreed to ease U.S. tariffs on the Philippines from 20 to 19 percent. Japan also struck a trade deal with Washington this week, bringing its tariffs down to 15 percent. Senior U.S. officials have visited South Korea and Japan to discuss both using their enormous shipyards to support the U.S. military as well as discussing how U.S. forces based there might support a battle for Taiwan. That also appears to point to the broader Pentagon position: ignore the messy politics as much as possible, particularly when it comes to trade, in favor of building up real military capabilities including amongst allies, thereby maximizing potential options in the event of a future crisis. China considers democratic Taiwan as part of its own territory and calls its president a "separatist". Taiwan's government disputes China's claim. Taiwan itself has been conducting its own annual Han Kuang military drills in recent weeks, by far the largest and most realistic the island has ever held. Taiwanese media reported that the onlookers included the largest serving U.S. military delegation at any point in recent history, with U.S. troops visible in TV footage with their faces obscured digitally. According to the Washington Post, Taiwanese personnel were also invited to June's 'Kamandag' exercise that brought together U.S., Japanese and Filipino forces around the northern Philippines' Batanes island, among the closest points from which U.S. forces and any allies could strike at any Chinese warships attempting a blockade or invasion of Taiwan. At the Shangri-La conference in May, Hegseth echoed his Democratic predecessor Lloyd Austin in stressing that the U.S. believed European allies should focus on their own defense before sending forces repeatedly to Asia - but once again, that warning seemed to go unheeded. That appears at least partly a consequence of the recent signals and actions of the Trump administration. Now much more nervous that U.S. support might one day fall away, Asian powers especially Japan and Australia but also a host of smaller nations have made clear they would like to lock in deeper links to Europe, including through defense purchases. So far this year, both Britain and France have sent an aircraft carrier to the Pacific – while TALISMAN SABRE in Australia has also included forces from Canada, the Netherlands, Germany and Norway. Their presence – as well as the much larger U.S. military commitment including the aircraft carrier George Washington – will have come as a relief to many in Australia. Earlier this year, Chinese warships conducted live firing exercises without warning in international waters off Australia before circumnavigating the country completely in a show of force, with Australian complaints that the U.S. appeared to offer neither comment nor reaction. There is also ongoing speculation that the Trump administration might overturn the AUKUS defense deal to deliver nuclear submarines. In the meantime, TALISMAN SABRE has seen Australia showing off how it can help the U.S. military – with bases, weapons storage facilities and enormous training areas where long-range rockets and other weapons can be tested, while the U.S. and partners engage in the kind of aggressive training that might be seen as escalatory if conducted closer to the Chinese coast. That, of course, points to the debate within the U.S. itself, including in the Pentagon, over whether Washington is making matters safer or more dangerous through its actions to counter China – something that will be examined in a major review posture already underway. Those who think the U.S. is already overstretched – the so-called 'restrainers' – say it should look to pull back its forces nearest China's mainland, including the 500-odd trainers, contractors and military personnel reported to be on Taiwan itself, warning that their presence fuels unintended escalation. Any pullback could include personnel from South Korea and exposed areas of Japan including the island of Okinawa. Critics of that approach say such a withdrawal might be seen as a green light from Beijing to launch its Taiwan invasion. In June, as the U.S. sent Pacific-based aircraft carriers and Patriot air defense systems to the Middle East, China's two working aircraft carriers carried out their own high-profile training further into the Western Pacific than ever before, another sign of growing Chinese confidence. For now, the Pentagon looks set to keep stepping up its activity in Asia unless directly ordered otherwise. Whether that is enough to give those in power in Beijing second thoughts on launching an invasion of Taiwan, only time will tell, but the stakes look likely to keep on getting higher.
Reuters
24-07-2025
- Reuters
Deported Venezuelan imprisoned in El Salvador files formal complaint against US
WASHINGTON, July 24 (Reuters) - A Venezuelan man filed a formal complaint on Thursday against the U.S. government for sending him to El Salvador's most notorious prison, a new legal strategy that could be duplicated by others who have said they were falsely accused of gang membership by President Donald Trump's administration. Neiyerver Adrián Leon Rengel, 27, filed what it called an administrative complaint with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, contending that federal employees wrongfully removed him from the United States without cause or due process. Rengel's complaint, which seeks $1.3 million in monetary damages, is not a lawsuit brought in a court but rather an action filed with the government alleging a violation of law. It is the first of its kind brought by one of the 252 Venezuelan men who were deported by the Trump administration to El Salvador in March. He invoked the Federal Tort Claims Act, a U.S. law that allows people to sue the U.S. government for wrongful acts committed by federal employees acting within the scope of their employment. Under that law, a complaint must be filed with the appropriate agency before a lawsuit can be brought. The government now has six months to investigate and respond to Rengel's complaint. If it denies his claim or fails to respond in that time period, Rengel could then sue in federal court. The Republican president, who campaigned in last year's election on a pledge of mass deportations, in March invoked a 1798 statute called the Alien Enemies Act as part of an effort to quickly deport alleged Venezuelan gang members to El Salvador. The law authorizes the president to deport, detain or place restrictions on individuals whose primary allegiance is to a foreign power and who might pose a national security risk in wartime. The U.S. government last invoked the Alien Enemies Act, which historically has been employed only during wartime, during World War Two to intern and deport people of Japanese, German and Italian descent. The Venezuelan deportees were held incommunicado in El Salvador's maximum security CECOT prison until they were returned to Venezuela last week as part of a prisoner swap between the United States and Venezuela. Family and friends of some of them said the deportees were not gang members and were wrongly accused based on tattoos, hand gestures and clothing. Venezuelan government officials and deportees have said they were tortured in prison. Rengel's lawyers said in the complaint that, because of his tattoos, DHS employees detained him in the parking lot of his apartment in Irving, Texas, and falsely accused him of membership in the Venezuelan Tren de Aragua gang. Department of Homeland Security spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin in a statement on Thursday reiterated the U.S. government's claim that Rengel was associated with Tren de Aragua and said he was "deemed a public safety threat." McLaughlin said Trump and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem "will not allow foreign terrorist enemies to operate in our country and endanger Americans." Rengel alleged that, after moving him to a detention center, DHS employees lied to him, telling him he was being sent to Venezuela. "Instead, for more than four months, Rengel languished in El Salvador – which is not his country of origin and a place where he has no ties – where he suffered physical, verbal and psychological abuse," the complaint said.
