PMX gets ‘grilled-to-perfection' after claiming his overseas travel is to represent Malaysia, ain't for leisure
Brickbats – some funny, others derogatory – were seemingly hurled at him from all corners in these two related NST Online Facebook posts aptly headlined 'Anwar: I Travel Abroad to Represent Malaysia, Not for Leisure'.
Speaking about his recent 24-hour journey from Brazil at the launch of the Madani Rakyat Terengganu 2025 Programme in Kuala Terengganu yesterday (July 13), PMX claimed that he often faces gruelling schedules but remains committed to his duties.
'You think I enjoy flying abroad? I represent Malaysia whenever I travel — it's not for leisure,' he replied to the amusement of learned and very much informed Malaysians who have seemingly lost faith in him.
Instead of silencing his critics, little did PMX realise that 'silence is golden' would be the best policy for someone who is now living in a glass house.
One stinging comment would be that his only son (from six children) Mohammad Ihsan Anwar being spotted during his recent three-nation tour, particularly during his official trip to Rome.
'In couple of his trips, there were claims that his son tag along,' one witty commenter hit out. 'Can he (PMX) explain on what capacity? If it's personal, can he show the supporting payments, it. air ticket, hotels, meals, etc?
The commenter who is also a law practitioner further quantified that working 24×7 'doesn't make PMX a great guy or someone that we should appreciate'.
Elaborating on the participation of PMX's son on his overseas trips, former Barisan Nasional (BN) strategic communication deputy director Datuk Eric See-To had on July 3 exposed that third child of PMX had also been spotted in PROTON's visit to Kazakhstan and even met with the country's PM.
'Before this, his face had appeared in several official visits of PMX or programmes involving Malaysian government delegations,' the opposition-slant (pro-Datuk Seri Najib Razak) influencer who also goes by the pseudonym Lim Sian See penned on his FB page.
'So, it's time for PMX to explain publicly what exactly is his son's official position? Does he work with PMX? Or with MITI (Investment, Trade ad Industry Ministry)? Or where?
'If PMX can twice announced the appointment of his daughter, Nurul Izzah, as an advisor to the PM and then advisor to Finance Minister (ie himself), why not be transparent about his son as well?'
By the way, some teasing comments on PMX defending his overseas travels to rid Monday blues: – July 14, 2025
Main image credit: Che GuBard/Facebook
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
Semiconductor sector holds steady for now
PETALING JAYA: While Malaysia's semiconductor sector is unlikely to be sidelined anytime soon, analysts caution that the risk of gradually losing market share is real if cost pressures persist and regional competition intensifies. Tradeview Capital fund manager Neoh Jia Man said demand for local semiconductor products and services is expected to remain inelastic over the next few years, as customers struggle to find alternative suppliers quickly. However, in the long run, they will still look to diversify. 'Customers will almost certainly seek to renegotiate prices, expecting local suppliers to help share the cost burden from tariffs. 'In the end, it depends on how big the local semiconductor companies' profit margins are and how much cost they can absorb,' Neoh told StarBiz. 'I wouldn't say there's no impact on demand, but for now, US customers don't have much choice – at least for the next few years. It would take time for them to fully establish alternative supply chains.' The United States recently announced a 25% tariff on Malaysia, up from 24% previously, effective Aug 1, 2025. By comparison, Vietnam will face a lower 20% rate. It was also reported that the US is working on an interim trade deal with India that could reduce its proposed tariffs to below 20%. For sectors like semiconductors, the Trump administration has signalled since April that a special tariff rate would be applied. While some semiconductor products are exempted from the tariffs announced in April, it remains to be seen if this will continue beyond Aug 1. Earlier this month, US President Donald Trump said he will 'soon' announce the tariff rate for the chip industry. Vietnam's success in negotiating a lower tariff, along with India's push into higher-value semiconductor activities, may increase competitive pressure on Malaysia. This may also accelerate the Malaysia+1 trend, where companies shift some operations out of Malaysia. Neoh said Vietnam and India 'could pose serious threats' to Malaysian semiconductor companies over the long run, as both countries have the advantage in terms of labour costs and market size. 'Hence, if Malaysia is unable to negotiate a better tariff rate with the United States compared with these countries, then we will definitely lose more business to them over the next decade,' he said. Phillip Nova senior analyst Danish Lim noted a silver lining: Malaysia's overall tariff rate remains lower than some neighbours such as Thailand, Indonesia and Cambodia. 'The tariff saga could also accelerate the China + 1 shift, with US fabless companies that still run test and packaging facilities in China likely to fast-track (moving) their facilities to Penang or Kulim. 'This would also apply to other countries that have higher tariff rates than Malaysia,' Lim added. Neoh opined that the China+1 trend may still outweigh the Malaysia+1 phenomenon, as players continue relocating from China to Malaysia. 'As such, we are still a net beneficiary amid the ongoing tariff developments.' While the risk of gradually losing market share is real, Neoh said the rate at which Malaysian chip companies gain market share from Chinese players might still outpace the rate at which India and Vietnam erode theirs, at least for the next few years. Between India and Vietnam, Phillip Nova's Lim said the latter poses a bigger risk given its lower tariff rate of 20%, more competitive labour costs and proximity to China. Crucially, Vietnam also has one of the world's largest rare earth deposits, he added. Nevertheless, he noted that both Vietnam and India have less mature ecosystems than Malaysia, particularly in the outsourced semiconductor assembly and test (Osat) space. 'Both still face challenges such as talent availability and infrastructure development. Hence, as the semiconductor space becomes more globally competitive, we believe market share erosion will be gradual, not abrupt. 'Volume relocations by US companies are very unlikely in the near term,' Lim said. Lim is of the view that if the 25% tariff remains post Aug 1, Malaysia's electrical and electronics exports, and consequently semiconductor players, could take a hit, as supporting industries like raw materials, industrial components and machinery remain subject to tariff. He added that the structural drivers for artificial intelligence or AI remains intact, and demand for Osat is likely to grow as more advanced chips hit the market. 'Provided the exemptions for semiconductors remain, Malaysia's key role in the global semiconductor supply chain is unlikely to take much of a hit, even with rising competition from neighbours like Vietnam,' he said.
New Straits Times
an hour ago
- New Straits Times
Zuckerberg squaring off against Meta investors
MARK Zuckerberg is expected to appear as a star witness in an unusual US$8 billion trial that kicks off this week at which the Meta chief executive officer is accused of operating Facebook as an illegal enterprise that allowed users' data to be harvested without their consent. > Shareholders of Meta Platforms, the parent company of Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp, sued Zuckerberg and other current and former company leaders, saying they continually violated a 2012 agreement between Facebook and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to protect users' data. The case dates back to 2018, after it emerged that data from millions of Facebook users was accessed by Cambridge Analytica, a now-defunct political consulting firm that worked for Donald Trump's successful campaign for United States president in 2016. Shareholders want Zuckerberg and the other defendants to reimburse the company for more than US$8 billion in fines and other costs paid by Meta after the Cambridge Analytica scandal came to light, including a record US$5 billion fine imposed on Facebook by the FTC in 2019 for violating the 2012 agreement. Defendants in the case include former chief operating officer Sheryl Sandberg, venture capitalist and board member Marc Andreessen, as well as former board members Peter Thiel, the Palantir Technologies co-founder, and Reed Hastings, the co-founder of Netflix. Zuckerberg and the other defendants, who declined to comment, have dismissed the allegations in court filings as "extreme claims". Meta, which is not a defendant, also declined to comment. The non-jury trial in Wilmington, Delaware, is scheduled to last eight days. It will mostly focus on decade-old events and board meetings to determine how Facebook leaders implemented the 2012 agreement. While the trial will cover long-ago policies, it comes as privacy concerns continue to dog Meta, which is under scrutiny for its training of artificial intelligence (AI) models. The company says it has invested billions of dollars since 2019 in its programme to safeguard users' privacy. Jason Kint, the head of Digital Content Next, a trade group for content providers, said the case would fill in details about what the board knew — and when — regarding the data of users, who now total more than three billion daily across Meta's platforms. "There's an argument we can't avoid Facebook and Instagram in our lives," he said. "Can we trust Mark Zuckerberg?" Two years ago, the defendants sought to dismiss the case before trial, which the judge declined. "This is a case involving alleged wrongdoing on a truly colossal scale," said Travis Laster, the judge handling the case at the time. The trial in the Court of Chancery will be overseen by Kathaleen McCormick. Now the plaintiffs, individual investors and union pension funds, including California's State Teachers' Retirement System, must prove what is often described as the most difficult claim in corporate law — showing that directors utterly failed in their duty of oversight. Legal experts said it appeared to be the first trial on such a claim. Zuckerberg and Sandberg are alleged to have knowingly caused the company to violate the law. While Delaware law protects directors and officers for bad business decisions, it does not protect them from illegal ones, even if they are profitable. Defendants said in court filings that plaintiffs could not deliver the evidence. The shareholders in pre-trial court papers said they could prove that after the 2012 agreement, Facebook continued deceptive privacy practices, at the direction of Zuckerberg. The defendants said the evidence would show that the company built a team to oversee privacy and hired an outside compliance firm and that Facebook was a victim of Cambridge Analytica's "studied deceit". In addition to the central privacy claims, plaintiffs also allege that when Zuckerberg could see that the Cambridge Analytica scandal was about to break and send company stock lower, he was motivated to offload his stock and reaped at least US$1 billion in profit. Defendants said evidence would show he used a stock-trading plan that could protect against insider-trading allegations. They also said the motivation was to benefit his charitable pursuits.
Malaysian Reserve
2 hours ago
- Malaysian Reserve
MAMBA: Avoid politicising e-commerce fee hikes, focus on MSME sustainability
THE Malaysian Micro Business Association (MAMBA) has urged for a balanced and constructive conversation around recent fee changes by e-commerce platforms, warning against scare tactics and politicisation. 'We must avoid scare tactics and politicising important conversations that directly affect thousands of Malaysian sellers,' said MAMBA secretary-general Alvin Low Wei Yan. 'There needs to be room for discussion—so that everyone, from sellers to shoppers to platforms—can win,' he said. Low said the influx of cheap imports, especially from China amid the ongoing trade war, is already threatening local MSMEs, adding that fee adjustments may be necessary to ensure platforms can continue investing in infrastructure and services. 'Good customer experience is not just a buyer issue – it's a seller issue too,' he said. 'Sellers benefit when platforms are seen as trustworthy and efficient.' MAMBA stressed the importance of collaboration between government, platforms, and seller groups to protect MSMEs, warning that blanket criticism and punitive calls could harm the broader digital economy. 'Calling for authorities to threaten or punish platforms simply for raising fees is counter-productive and risks undermining the very ecosystem we are trying to strengthen,' said Low. –TMR
