Here's all you need to know about director Denis Villeneuve's new Bond film – from who could play 007 to leading actress
AFTER years of speculation, it has been revealed that Dune director Denis Villeneuve will take the helm for the 26th James Bond movie.
Yesterday's announcement by Amazon, new owners of the 007 franchise, now offers fans a tantalising glimpse into what might be in store for the suave spy.
20
20
Villeneuve, 57, has worked closely with some of the most handsome leading men in Hollywood — so will that influence who will step into Daniel Craig 's tuxedo as the Martini-loving leading man?
In one sense, the franchise will be in safe hands with the Canadian director, who said: 'I'm a die-hard Bond fan. To me, he's sacred territory. I grew up watching James Bond films with my father.'
And Villeneuve has been hailed as a 'cinematic master' by Mike Hopkins, head of Amazon MGM Studios, which paid billions to take creative control of the films from Barbara Broccoli 's Eon Productions earlier this year.
Barbara took over as Bond producer from her father Albert 'Cubby' Broccoli in 1995. And she even tried to hire Villeneuve for the spy's last outing in 2021's No Time To Die.
But fans fear the new film might lack Bond's famous wit and saucy humour. Movies orchestrated by Villeneuve tend to be somewhat serious and sombre.
His leading men are often emotionally isolated loners wrestling with difficult moral dilemmas.
So whoever is cast next is more likely to resemble Daniel Craig's brooding Bond than Roger Moore's eyebrow-raising playboy.
Oscars, five Baftas and two Golden Globes.
His big break came when his fourth film, Incendies, was shown at the Venice and Toronto Film Festivals in 2010.
Hollywood took notice and his movies have gone on to make a billion pounds worldwide, largely thanks to the two Dune movies.
Daniel Craig says goodbye to James Bond as gives an emotional speech to cast and crew on the set of No Time To Die
Villeneuve is married to journalist Tanya Lapointe and has three children from his previous relationship with actress Macha Grenon.
His daughter Salome is also a filmmaker and her debut short film III premiered at the 2022 Venice Film Festival.
Villeneuve will be the first director to also executive produce a Bond film, meaning he will have final say over the edit.
Ajay Chowdhury, from the James Bond International Fan Club, said: 'This is testimony to his position in the cinematic landscape as one the top practitioners of the craft.'
But with no cast confirmed, it could still be years before the box office opens for business.
In the meantime, we take a look at what might happen . . .
WHO WILL BE THE NEW 007?
20
20
20
20
There are plenty of Brits still in the running, too.
20
20
20
20
20
WHO WILL BE A BOND GIRL?
20
20
20
20
20
THE CONSPIRACY THEORIES
SOME Bond buffs are making a bizarre (and incorrect) connection between the filmmaker and 007.
Villeneuve once said his favourite place is The Magdalen Islands, in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean.
20
20
The claim is that ornithologist James Bond – who author Ian Fleming named his hero after – is known for his work on the birds of those Islands.
But he was actually miles away in the West Indies.
It could be the first black and white Bond. Villeneuve shot the first major scenes for Dune: Part Two in black and white, leading to frantic calls from studio bosses.
It could take years to shoot as Villeneuve is still tied up with Dune: Messiah, Nuclear War: A Scenario, a new version of Cleopatra and Rendezvous With Rama.
THE LOCATIONS
MANY of Villeneuve's most iconic movie locations will also be familiar to Bond fans. They include:
20
20
Norway: The dramatic cliffs and fjords were used for the ancestral home of the Atreides family in Dune, while the country's Lake Langvann was the setting for Madeleine Swann's childhood home in No Time To Die.
Hungary: Blade Runner 2049 might have been a box office flop, but critics raved about its 'cold visual magnificence'. In part this was due to large amounts being shot in Budapest. The city's Memento Park was also the inspiration for Statue Park in 1995's GoldenEye.
Mexico: Sicario is set in the central American country, which also featured prominently in the opening sequence of 2015 Bond film Spectre.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
19 minutes ago
- The Sun
Lizzo shows off her amazing Ozempic weight loss as she poses in swimsuit after finally revealing truth
LIZZO flashed her figure in a plunging bodysuit after revealing she used Ozempic to help achieve her 60lb weight loss. The About Damn Time star last week came clean about using fat jabs for her changing shape, which she has proudly showed off on social media. 6 6 And in her latest Instagram upload Lizzo, 37, chose a skintight neon pink and purple one-piece with ruffle detail at the centre. She donned a platinum blonde wig, with her long locks flowing over her shoulders, as she posed for a video taken in the reflection of a mirror. The Michigan-born songstress donned a full face of make-up and gold hoop earrings, and was seen flicking her locks over her shoulders as an assistant massaged moisturiser onto her thighs. She writhed around showing off her moves before posing for a series of front and rear selfies. In her caption she announced her upcoming show and put: "Pull up to @blackmarketflea tomorrow!!! "I'm performing some songs off MY FACE HURTS FROM SMILING AND WE'RE LIVE STREAMING ON @twitch." Fans were quick to appreciate her latest post and one wrote: "A QUEEN. A second put: "Sooooo I hope you know you really just dropped the music of the summer." A third posted: "My queen you make me proud of my body," before one added: "I'm really loving this blonde on you!!" MASSIVE BODY TRANSFORMATION The singing sensation, whose real name is Mellissa Viviane Jefferson, has recently undergone a significant body transformation. Seemingly proud of her weight loss, Lizzo is continuing to showcase her figure after she revealed a massive milestone earlier this year. At the start of 2025, the Grammy Award-winner revealed that she had lost around 16 per cent of her body fat from dieting and intense workouts. Lizzo previously revealed that she had also reduced her body mass by 10.5. In January, she said on social media: "Today when I stepped on my scale, I reached my weight release goal. "I haven't seen this number since 2014! Let this be a reminder you can do anything you put your mind to. Time for new goals!" Meanwhile, a source exclusively told Life & Style in September, 2024 that the the singer had dropped more than 60 pounds since her weight loss journey began. Lizzo - who recently also stripped to a black bikini - then told how it was "time for new goals" after succeeding in her slimming mission. Yet fans then urged the chart star to not "get too skinny." It came after she donned a red bikini in another sizzling social media snap. REAL DEAL Last year, she told The New York Times: "I've been methodical, losing weight very slowly." She added to the publication: "I don't really see it because if anyone who's on a natural weight-loss journey knows, losing weight is actually the slowest thing in the world and you don't really notice it until you notice it. "Also the scale's not really moving. "But anyway, that doesn't matter. I'm super proud of my current lifestyle." Yet earlier this month, she confessed to having used fat loss jabs - despite previously denying opting for the drug. In a chat onTrisha Paytas' Just Trish podcast, she said she had "tried everything" in her slimming mission. She admitted she tried the medication in 2023 but decided against continuing it. Yet Lizzo said counting calories then proved to be the bets approach for her. She told the podcast: "It's just the science for me, calories in versus calories out. "Ozempic works because you eat less food. That's it. "It makes you feel full, so if you can just do that on your own and get mind over matter, it's the same s–t." It came after she doubled down on not using the drug on her Instagram page - leaving fans confused. Last year, she uploaded a caption which read: "When you finally get Ozempic allegations after 5 months of weight training and calorie deficit." 6 6 6
Daily Mail
43 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Real life mafia boss reveals which gangster movie is the most accurate
A former mafia boss has discussed 10 of the lines described as the best ever from gangster films. Michael Franzese, who is originally from New York and served as a caporegime in the Colombo crime family, is now a motivational speaker, TV personality and content creator. He has a YouTube channel where he regularly speaks candidly about the crime organisation and life afterwards. In a recent video, the father-of-seven read an article titled The 10 Best Quotes in Gangster Movies, Ranked published by Collider, and offered his thoughts on the lines presented in the piece. Speaking about the piece, Mr Franzese said: 'There are so many great quotes from so many of the mob movies that most of you are familiar with. 'I came across an article, and I want to talk about 10 of the greatest quotes according to this article, from all the different mob movies. 'Some of you are going to disagree with that. Some of you are going to agree. I have my own opinion, but it's a good article. 'I think you're going to enjoy it. Let's go through it. Let's face it, you know, many of these mob movies, they're just iconic, and some of the lines that come out of them and the way they're delivered are just great. They stick with you.' 10. 'You don't keep a man waiting. The only time you do is when you want to say something. When you want to say f*** you.' (The Irishman, 2019) Speaking about this quote in his video, Mr Franzese said: 'How many of you right now can guess where that line came from? I could because I love the scene.' The line is from the 2019 movie The Irishman directed by Martin Scorsese. Describing the scene the line is in, Mr Franzese said: 'Al Pacino played Jimmy Hoffa [...] I thought he was brilliant.' The scene shows mobster Anthony Provenzano (Stephen Graham) meeting with Hoffa and his employee Frank Sheeran (Robert De Niro). Provenzano is late - something Hoffa despises. As the two men wait for his arrival, Hoffa says to Sheeran: 'You don't keep a man waiting. The only time you do is when you want to say something. When you want to say f*** you.' 9. 'You slap me in a dream, you better wake up and apologize.' (Angels with Dirty Faces, 1938) Many contemporary film fans may remember a very similar line from Tarantino's Reservoir Dogs, but the original came from 1938 classic Angels with Dirty Faces. 'You slap me in a dream, you better wake up and apologize,' said Mr Franzese of the line. 'Think about that [...] What a gangster, gangster quote that is [...] if you haven't seen [the film, it's]. It's in black and white, but Cagney was brilliant back then. Different kind of way they carried themselves. 'It wasn't really mob mafia type. It was just a gangster [...] an old school gangster movie that still holds up well, benefiting from the fact that it stars the likes of James Cagney and Humphrey Bogart, of course.' 8. Policeman: 'What's in the car?' Turkish: 'Seats and a steering wheel.' (Snatch, 2000) Describing Guy Ritchie as a 'brilliant' director, Mr Franzese said his style is defined by 'fast paced editing, bursts of shocking violence, numerous characters, all interacting in unpredictable ways, and lots of dark humor, all qualities that are apparent in the movie snatch, great movie'. Describing the exchange between a policeman and the character Turkish (played by Jason Statham), in which the policeman asks what is in the car, and Statham's character replies that there is a steering wheel and seats, Franzese saiid: 'It's [Statham's] unique style and voice and overall bluntness that really sells it. So go see Snatch.' 7. 'One of us had to die. With me, it tends to be the other guy'. (The Departed, 2006) Martin Scorsese's 2006 remake of the Hong Kong film Infernal Affairs marks the only time the celebrated director and top actor Jack Nicholson worked together - a partnership which yielded on screen gold. In the movie, Nicholson's character Frank Costello was based on the real life notorious gangster James 'Whitey' Bulger. Speaking about Costello's line: 'One of us had to die. With me, it tends to be the other guy,' Mr Franzese said many gangsters are funny in real life. He said: 'They don't even know they're funny [...]Guys on the street are funny, I got to tell you.' 6. 'I'm gonna make him an offer he can't refuse.' (The Godfather, 1972) Speaking about this cinematic classic, the former mobster said: 'Everybody and their brother knows this line. And of course, it was brilliant [...] Obviously we know who that was brilliant, brilliant film. 'You can't really talk about iconic gangster movies without at least briefly bringing up the Godfather.' He added: 'Corleone is obviously a character for the ages, no doubt, demonstrating charisma, loyalty, empathy and ruthlessness, sometimes all within one scene. How do you pull that off, all those emotions in one scene? And [actor Marlon Brando] pulled it off brilliantly.' 5. 'Made it, Ma! Top of the world!' (White Heat, 1949) Describing White Heat as a 'final and explosive last hurrah for the Golden Age of Hollywood gangster movie', Mr Franzese described the film as 'arguably James Cagney's best gangster movie', adding that is 'really saying something'. The line, which comes at the climax of the film, marks the final words of Cagney's character, before he is killed. Simply summing up the picture, Mr Franzese said: 'Gangster film, brilliant movie.' 4. 'From now on, I want you to put an equal amount of blueberries in each muffin.' (Casino, 1995) Casino is another picture helmed by American Italian auteur Martin Scorsese - often considered the greatest living director. Robert De Niro plays Sam 'Ace' Rothstein in the picture, which tells the story of the mob's involvement in the development of Las Vegas. While overseeing the daily operations of a major casino, Rothstein gets angry with a chef because one muffin is full of blueberries and another only has a few. He orders the chef to ensure there is an 'equal amount of blueberries in each muffin' - a task the chef says will take hours. The line represents the controlling nature and perfectionism of De Niro's character. Mr Franzese said of the film: 'As a consumer, and a guy that loves blueberry muffins, I'd be a little upset if there wasn't enough blueberries in my muffin. 'So I think that was a good line. It made sense, but it was delivered like a true gangster. Love it.' 3. 'So say good night to the bad guy! Come on. The last time you gonna see a bad guy like this again, let me tell you.' (Scarface, 1983) 'Everybody knows this,' Mr Franzese said of this line from Scarface. The picture stars Al Pacino as a Cuban refugee who comes to America and becomes a major player in the criminal world. Speaking about the quote, which takes place when Montana causes a scene in a restaurant, Mr Franzese describes the performance as his best. He also noted another very famous line from the talkie: 'Say hello to my little friend.' 'Unbelievable movie,' said the former mafioso. 'That was the way it ended, when he's fighting [...] Just a brilliant movie.' 2. 'I'm funny how, I mean funny like I'm a clown, I amuse you? I make you laugh, I'm here to f****** amuse you?' (Goodfellas, 1990) Another exceptional film directed by Martin Scorsese is Goodfellas, based on the memoire of real-life character Henry Hill. In fact, Michael Franzese is himself name checked in the movie. During an early scene in a bar, where the camera pans past a number of characters, narrator Henry Hill (played by the late Ray Liotta) names them. One of the characters, referred to as 'Michael Francesi' is, in fact, representative of Michael Franzese. While the movie is packed full of quotable lines, one of the most popular scenes features the volatile and unpredictable character Tommy DeVito (played by Joe Pesci). In it, Henry laughs when Tommy says something amusing. This becomes a terse interchange in which Tommy asks Henry if he sees him as a clown, there simply to amuse him, before finally laughing and revealing he was just teasing. Because of Tommy's mercurial and violent nature, the characters around him grow increasingly tense, unsure of whether he is being serious. Mr Franzese said of the line: 'It is legendary, unbelievable. Come on, think about that line. Funny how think about and [...] it was a joke, but look at how everybody got scared because they knew what kind of a maniac he was. Was he going to get up and shoot Henry Hill at that point? What was he going to do? Was he going to knock the table over, throw the glasses over? It was all. Nobody knew what he was going to do. 'And all of a sudden, the way, he broke [...] into that line [...] And then, of course, they break out in laughter.' He added: 'Brilliant line. There were other brilliant lines in that film, but Joe Pesci, he is the typical gangster without a doubt.' 1. 'I don't feel I have to wipe everybody out, Tom. Just my enemies.' (The Godfather: Part II, 1974) The second instalment in the Godfather saga saw the further corruption of Michael Corleone (Al Pacino) as he inherited his father Vito's empire. Speaking about the line, which Corleone said to his consigliere Tom, Mr Franzese noted how it highlighted how Corleone ended up alienated from everyone because of his own lifestyle. He also spoke about how the line resonated with his own life experience, describing how his father's commitment to the lifestyle affected his family. He said: 'You know the reason people, I say the mob life is an evil lifestyle - and I'm not calling the men evil, I'm calling the mob life bad and evil - is because families get destroyed. 'The families have made members get destroyed, and at the end of the day, guys end up in prison with nobody you know, or they end up dead, or they end up broke, or they end up everybody being alienated from them. It happens very often. Any lifestyle [...] that causes that to a family, is a bad lifestyle. 'It's something that I realized. I experienced it with my own family that was destroyed because of my father's involvement in that life. So I get it. I really get what was being said there.'
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Look familiar? Scientists reveal what Neanderthals and Denisovans would look like TODAY if they hadn't gone extinct
For the last 40,000 years, Homo sapiens have been the only human species walking the Earth. Our ancient ancestors died out thousands of years ago, leaving behind nothing but fossils, a few scattered artefacts, and lingering traces in our DNA. But what if things had turned out differently? MailOnline has asked the experts to find out what the world might look like if the Neanderthals and Denisovans hadn't gone extinct. Surprisingly, they say that our distant evolutionary cousins might not be all that different to modern humans today. However, they might have had a hard time fitting in with our fast-paced, highly social societies. Dr April Noel, a palaeolithic archaeologist from the University of Victoria, told MailOnline: 'The idea that Neanderthals were hunched over, dim-witted individuals with no thought beyond their next meal is no longer tenable. 'At the same time, the idea that you could just slap a hat on a Neanderthal and you would not think twice about sitting next to him on the tube is also out the window.' What would they look like? Neanderthals and Denisovans are our closest ancient human relatives. The Neanderthals emerged around 400,000 years ago when they branched off from our common ancestors. Denisovans, meanwhile, are a far more elusive species of ancient humans who split from the Neanderthal evolutionary line around 430,000 years ago. If they had remained as separate species rather than going extinct, Neanderthals and Denisovans might look much the same as they did in the distant past. From the abundant fossil records, we know that Neanderthals were a little shorter than us on average, with shorter legs and wider hips. Neanderthals were very muscular and rugged, with large bodies and even larger heads. Their skulls show that they have room for a bigger brain than modern humans and would have been distinguished by a massive brow ridge and small foreheads. Neanderthals are our closest living relatives and share all our features to some degree. However, neanderthals have a stronger brow and a smaller forehead. Their skin tone would have depended on their climate, much like modern humans today (AI-generated impression) What would Neanderthals look like today? If Neanderthals survived until today, they might keep many of their original traits. This means they would be stockier and more heavily built than modern humans, with shorter legs and larger heads. Their faces would be distinguished by heavy brows and small foreheads. However, experts say that humans and Neanderthals would probably keep interbreeding. This means that these traits would become mixed with those of Homo sapiens. However, experts say they still would be clearly recognisable as fellow humans. Professor John Hawks, an anthropologist from the University of Wisconsin-Madison, told MailOnline: 'We don't know of any physiological traits that make Neanderthals distinct, that is, traits that don't overlap. 'Almost every physical trait in Neanderthals overlaps in its variation with ours today, at least to some extent.' That means they wouldn't look like lumbering cavemen or women, but rather like a slightly different variation of humans. Denisovans, meanwhile, are a little more of a mystery. It was only this month that scientists identified the first Denisovan skull, and besides this, there are only small fragments of bone to go on. Based on the newly identified skull, experts believe that Denisovans would have had a wide face with heavy, flat cheeks, a wide mouth, and a large nose. These bones also show that Denisovans would have been exceptionally large and muscular people, much stronger than more slender Homo sapiens. Not all that different However, experts say that Homo sapiens, Denisovans, and Neanderthals might not have remained that distinct for long. These human species interbred widely during the periods they overlapped, and many modern humans carry at least some Neanderthal and Denisovan DNA. If these species hadn't vanished, they might have continued to interbreed and further intermix our genes. Dr Hugo Zeberg, an expert on gene flow from Neanderthals and Denisovans into modern humans from the Karolinska Institutet in Sweden, told MailOnline: 'In a way they never went extinct. We merged!' 'Probably the relatively low amount of Neanderthal and Denisovan DNA in present humans reflects the fact that modern humans [Homo sapiens] were more numerous. 'But with more chances of encounters, we might have more archaic DNA present in the gene pool of modern humans.' We're still learning about how ancient genes influence modern humans, so it's hard to say what effects this mixing might produce. Neanderthals and modern humans interbred when we overlapped and would likely continue to into the future. Scientists say that male Neanderthal and Homo sapiens female couples would have had the highest likelihood of producing fertile hybrid offspring (AI-generated impression) Could modern and ancient populations merge? Scientists say it is extremely likely that Homo sapiens, Neanderthals, and Denisovans would eventually merge if no species went extinct. The resulting species would have genetic traits from all three groups. Since modern humans reproduce faster and build larger communities, they would likely represent more of the genetic material. This is essentially what happened to these species in the past. Our modern genome contains traits passed on from breeding with these ancient species before they disappeared. But Dr Zeberg points out that Denisovan genes are responsible for 'high altitude adaptation for Tibetans and some influence on lip shape in Latin American populations.' Similarly, Neanderthal and Homo Sapiens hybrids would likely have a mixture of the traits of both species such as larger heads, longer limbs, and narrower hips. Over time, some scientists believe Denisovans, Neanderthals and Homo Sapiens might have merged into a single human species with a mixture of all the traits. Dr Bence Viola, a paleoanthropologist at the University of Toronto, told MailOnline: 'I think it would have been impossible for Denisovans and Neanderthals to retain sufficient genetic isolation to remain a separate population. 'We know that they interbred with modern humans whenever they came into contact, and so the more contact there is, the more mixing happens – so they would have become a part of us.' Would they fit in? We don't currently know very much about how Denisovans lived, but research now shows Neanderthals might have struggled to fit in with modern society. One of the leading theories for why Homo sapiens survived while other species dropped off is that modern humans essentially 'tamed' ourselves. Unlike modern humans, Neanderthals and Denisovans didn't evolve to be so sociable. Scientists say they would find it difficult to integrate into our hyper-social society (AI-generated impression) Could Neanderthals and modern humans coexist? Scientists aren't sure whether Homo sapiens and Neanderthals could have cohabited permanently. There is no evidence of violence between the two species and we know that groups met and interbred frequently. However, Neanderthals are not as pro-social as modern humans and lived in much smaller groups. Homo sapiens also have a long history of violence and discrimination targeted against other human groups. In large, connected modern cities this could lead to conflict between the two species. Modern humans developed genes that allowed us to become more sociable, develop larger social networks, and work with our fellow humans. Dr Noel says: 'Unlike their modern human contemporaries, Neanderthals lived in small, fairly isolated groups. 'If there was an accident that killed a number of their hunters or some other crisis occurred, they did not always have others to reach out to. As a result, their numbers would drop below what you need to be sustainable.' Dr Noel points out that research into Neanderthal genes suggests they were less cognitively flexible, had greater difficulties processing language, and lacked genes related to self-awareness, creativity, and behaviours intended to benefit others. 'In the highly connected world we all live in, I think Neanderthals would have been left behind, or at least, left out,' says Dr Noel. In a world where Neanderthals lived alongside other human species, this could really change the way society was structured. Professor Spikins says that while modern humans became 'tamer, more playful and more friendly to each other,' those changes came alongside 'being a bit easily led'. She adds: 'If Neanderthals were better at not "following the herd" and more of those tendencies were present, I bet much of our world would be different; they might not be easily swayed by social media!' How would the world be different? If Neanderthals and Denisovans hadn't gone extinct thousands of years ago, the world might be a very different place. From the evidence we have of these ancient species, we know that they lived in much smaller communities and had a far more limited impact on the land. In fact, Dr Zeberg points out that modern humans appear to be unique in the way that we modify the world around us through agriculture and large cities. One strange consequence of this is that a world where Homo sapiens are not dominant might mean a world without pets. There is no evidence that Neanderthals and Denisovans attempted to nurture relationships with animals through domestication - that means no horses, cats, dogs or even modern agricultural species like cattle and sheep. But with more of our relative anti-social genes, humanity may also have avoided some of its more destructive tendencies. Professor Spikins says: 'If Neanderthals had been the ones to survive, we might not have the problem we have with climate change, as their tendency to be more isolated within their separate groups might have limited how technology spread and got used, and how much the environment got exploited.' THE DENISOVANS EXPLAINED Who were they? The Denisovans are an extinct species of human that appear to have lived in Siberia and even down as far as southeast Asia. The individuals belonged to a genetically distinct group of humans that were distantly related to Neanderthals but even more distantly related to us. Although remains of these mysterious early humans have mostly been discovered at the Denisova Cave in the Altai Mountains in Siberia, DNA analysis has shown the ancient people were widespread across Asia. Scientists were able to analyse DNA from a tooth and from a finger bone excavated in the Denisova cave in southern Siberia. The discovery was described as 'nothing short of sensational.' In 2020, scientists reported Denisovan DNA in the Baishiya Karst Cave in Tibet. This discovery marked the first time Denisovan DNA had been recovered from a location that is outside Denisova Cave. How widespread were they? Researchers are now beginning to find out just how big a part they played in our history. DNA from these early humans has been found in the genomes of modern humans over a wide area of Asia, suggesting they once covered a vast range. They are thought to have been a sister species of the Neanderthals, who lived in western Asia and Europe at around the same time. The two species appear to have separated from a common ancestor around 200,000 years ago, while they split from the modern human Homo sapien lineage around 600,000 years ago. Last year researchers even claimed they could have been the first to reach Australia. Aboriginal people in Australia contain both Neanderthal DNA, as do most humans, and Denisovan DNA. This latter genetic trace is present in Aboriginal people at the present day in much greater quantities than any other people around the world. How advanced were they? Bone and ivory beads found in the Denisova Cave were discovered in the same sediment layers as the Denisovan fossils, leading to suggestions they had sophisticated tools and jewellery. Professor Chris Stringer, an anthropologist at the Natural History Museum in London, said: 'Layer 11 in the cave contained a Denisovan girl's fingerbone near the bottom but worked bone and ivory artefacts higher up, suggesting that the Denisovans could have made the kind of tools normally associated with modern humans. 'However, direct dating work by the Oxford Radiocarbon Unit reported at the ESHE meeting suggests the Denisovan fossil is more than 50,000 years old, while the oldest 'advanced' artefacts are about 45,000 years old, a date which matches the appearance of modern humans elsewhere in Siberia.' Did they breed with other species? Yes. Today, around 5 per cent of the DNA of some Australasians – particularly people from Papua New Guinea – is Denisovans. Now, researchers have found two distinct modern human genomes - one from Oceania and another from East Asia - both have distinct Denisovan ancestry. The genomes are also completely different, suggesting there were at least two separate waves of prehistoric intermingling between 200,000 and 50,000 years ago. But what they did not expect to find was individuals from East Asia carry a uniquely different type.
