logo
AOC, Sanders tell supporters to mask up for West Coast town halls

AOC, Sanders tell supporters to mask up for West Coast town halls

Yahoo14-03-2025
Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., are taking the "Fighting Oligarchy" rallies out West next week – and advising supporters to mask up to participate.
Five years after the COVID-19 pandemic, Fox News Digital can confirm that the RSVP for the events in Denver and Las Vegas includes guidance that "masks are advised for all attendees of this event."
A post shared by conservative podcaster Stephen L. Miller on Friday about the Denver event had many wondering why masks would be advised for an outdoor event in 2025.
Sanders did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital's inquiry about the mask guidance.
Dem Leader Swings Through Gop-held Districts After 'Clown Show Protests' Halted Town Halls
"Sent from a friend. Bernie's speaking tour is advising everyone in attendance to wear masks. This is an outdoor event," the X post said, accompanied by a screenshot of the RSVP.
Read On The Fox News App
'He Cannot Buy An Election Here In Wisconsin': Sanders Slams Musk In State Trump Won By Less Than 1%
"Still trying the Covid panic politics," the top comment said.
"Was this from the year 2020?" a content creator asked.
But another reply countered: "They don't want the paid attendees found out."
The reactions to the post are split, with many people online dumbfounded by the need for masks exactly five years after the COVID-19 pandemic forced shutdowns and social distancing.
Others speculated that the masks are a way to protect attendees' identities. Masks are a common practice to protect protesters' identities at large demonstrations, like the pro-Palestine protests at Columbia University this past year.
However, Sanders' "Fighting Oligarchy" events are not protests. Events in the Blue Wall states of Michigan and Wisconsin last weekend operated like a traditional campaign rally, with thousands of supporters lining up to earn a spot inside to hear the headline speaker.
Sanders announced the West Coast leg of his "Fighting Oligarchy" tour with Ocasio-Cortez in a social media video on Friday. The progressives will make stops in Nevada, Arizona and Colorado "to hold town meetings with working people who are profoundly disgusted with what is going on in Washington, D.C."
"Nevada, Colorado, Arizona: You deserve public servants who show up for you. The time is now to protect the public good, advance healthcare and living wages for all, and fight against corruption. See you next week," Ocasio-Cortez said on Friday.
The National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC), the political campaign committee tasked with electing more Republicans to the U.S. House of Representatives, advised against town halls following a series of protest disruptions fueled by Democrats' discontent with President Donald Trump's second term.
Gov. Tim Walz, D-Minn., began his own slew of town hall events in Republican-held congressional districts on Friday, saying if a Republican representative refused to meet with their constituents, then he would "lend a megaphone" to them.
The Democratic National Committee (DNC) announced on Friday a revised organized effort alongside the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC), Association of State Democratic Committees (ASDC) and Democrat state parties to host town halls in Republican-held districts. "Republicans in Congress know they sold out their voters by backing the Trump-Musk agenda – and now they're terrified to be in the same room as the people who sent them to Washington," DNC Chair Ken Martin said in a statement on Friday.
"Instead of facing their constituents, they're running scared and hiding from the people they were elected to represent. If they won't talk to their own voters, then Democrats will. That's why we'll be hosting People's Town Halls in all 50 states across the country, starting now with vulnerable GOP-held target districts. Working families deserve to have their voices heard, even if Republicans want to ignore them," Martin added.
The NRCC said the protests that shut down Republicans' town hall meetings were "manufactured productions." Fox News Digital reported last month about the coordinated effort by progressive groups protesting the Department of Government Efficiency.
Meet The Far-left Groups Funding Anti-doge Protests At Gop Offices Across The Country
MoveOn.org, which has accepted millions of dollars from billionaire George Soros and his Open Society Policy Center, announced in a press release last month that it was mobilizing resources as part of a "Congress Works for Us, Not Musk" initiative "aimed at pressuring lawmakers to fight back against the Trump-Musk agenda" at Republican town halls and offices.
Speaker of the House Mike Johnson and Trump called the protesters who shut down Republican town halls "professionals" and "paid troublemakers."
"Paid 'troublemakers' are attending Republican Town Hall Meetings. It is all part of the game for the Democrats, but just like our big LANDSLIDE ELECTION, it's not going to work for them!" Trump wrote on Truth Social.
In addition to the mask guidance, the flier for next Friday's event with Sanders and Ocasio-Cortez includes typical safety precautions for large public events, including a request for anyone not feeling well to stay home.
"Please note: no bags, signs, or firearms are allowed. Masks are advised for all attendees of this event. Anyone experiencing a fever or other symptoms of COVID-19 is asked to stay home and not attend," it says on the RSVP.
The Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) ended their travel mask mandate on April 18, 2022.
According to the CDC's website, masks are still "recommended in indoor public transportation settings" and "people may choose to mask at any time."
The website advises people who are at medium to high risk of getting very sick to wear a mask or "consider avoiding non-essential indoor activities in public where you could be exposed."
While the CDC has maintained that masking can reduce the spread of respiratory illnesses, including COVID-19, other studies since the pandemic have brought into question the efficacy of wearing a mask.Original article source: AOC, Sanders tell supporters to mask up for West Coast town halls
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Gaza Paradox: How Can We Activate The Global Compassion Algorithm?
The Gaza Paradox: How Can We Activate The Global Compassion Algorithm?

Forbes

time12 minutes ago

  • Forbes

The Gaza Paradox: How Can We Activate The Global Compassion Algorithm?

Gaza Strip map .Source: "World reference atlas" ... More [url=/search/lightbox/5890567][IMG] The stark reality of Gaza on July 26th, 2025, presents a chilling paradox. While humanity celebrates advancements in Artificial Intelligence, capable of solving complex problems and optimizing vast systems, millions of children, women, and men endure unimaginable suffering. They face starvation, displacement, and death from man-made violence, even as the global capacity for food production and the pathways to peace exist. This disconnect — suffering on a mass scale amidst technological excitement — forces us to confront an uncomfortable question: Are we losing sight of our essential humanity? It is a troubling imbalance. Our collective gaze is often captivated by the promise of ever more sophisticated technology, computing power, political absurdity and financial might. Yet, this fascination has begun to obscure the fundamental truth that suffering will not cease simply because our algorithms become more elegant or our wealth accumulates. Unless human minds return to the timeless wisdom of the Golden Rule — treating others as we wish to be treated, and refraining from actions we would not endure ourselves — we risk losing our way. This universal principle, woven into the fabric of every major religion and ethical tradition, suggests that perhaps, instead of more compute, we need more compassion. Otherwise – would we not be better off if AI-powered agents, unburdened by human frailties, acted on our behalf? Gaza: A Mirror Reflecting Our Paradox Today, in Gaza, the humanitarian crisis is at a peak. Reports from aid agencies and the media detail a catastrophic situation: widespread food insecurity, a decimated healthcare system and a population grappling with the psychological scars of prolonged conflict and displacement. Despite global efforts, the scale of need far outstrips the aid reaching those in despair. This is not a natural disaster; it is a man-made catastrophe, a stark reminder that human decisions, or the lack thereof, perpetuate immense suffering. The images emerging from Gaza — of families scavenging for food, of children succumbing to preventable diseases, of lives shattered by conflict — stand in stark contrast to the narratives of progress dominating our technological discourse. We marvel at AI generating art, composing music, and driving autonomous vehicles, while basic human dignity is denied to millions. This dissonance highlights a systemic blind spot: our collective ability to innovate technologically often outpaces our capacity for collective empathy and ethical governance. The Allure Of Progress Vs. The Ache Of Reality The psychological allure of technological progress is undeniable. AI promises efficiency, predictive power, and solutions to complex challenges. It offers a sense of control, a belief that with enough data and processing power, any problem can be solved. This narrative is powerful, driving investment, research, and public imagination. However, it can also create a dangerous diversion, drawing our attention away from the messy, deeply human problems that resist purely technical fixes. From a psychological perspective, our brains are wired to seek solutions and avoid discomfort. AI offers seemingly clean, scalable solutions, allowing us to intellectualize problems rather than confronting their raw, emotional weight. This cognitive offloading, while efficient for certain tasks, can inadvertently diminish our direct engagement with human suffering. We become excited about AI's potential to map refugee movements or optimize aid logistics, yet the fundamental blockades to aid delivery or the root causes of conflict remain unaddressed by human will. Systemic Blind Spots: The Overlooked Human Element Our focus on quantifiable outputs and technological solutions often leads us to overlook the essential humanistic component — the very fabric of a thriving society. In a world obsessed with metrics, how do we measure the value of a child's laughter, the dignity of a family unit, or the profound peace of a community free from fear? These are the immeasurable currencies of human flourishing, often relegated to the sidelines in strategic planning. Micro, meso, macro and meta - everything is connected. The Gaza crisis is not an isolated incident but an outcome of interconnected political, economic, and psychological systems. When these systems prioritize power, resource control, or ideological purity over human well-being, suffering becomes an inevitable byproduct. The paradox is that we possess the collective intelligence and resources to alleviate much of this suffering, yet our current systemic configurations, driven by fragmented human intentions, prevent it. This calls for a re-evaluation of our priorities and the ethical frameworks guiding our actions. The Golden Rule: Ancient Compass For A Modern World Perhaps the most potent instrument at our disposal is not a new algorithm or a larger budget, but a return to an ancient, universal principle: the Golden Rule. "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." This simple ethical compass is found in virtually every major spiritual and philosophical tradition, from Confucianism to Christianity, Islam to Hinduism. It is a testament to a universal human understanding of reciprocity and empathy. In the context of Gaza, applying the Golden Rule means asking: Would I want my family to starve? Would I want my home destroyed? Would I want to live in constant fear? The answer is unequivocally no. This principle bypasses complex geopolitical narratives and cuts straight to the heart of shared humanity. It suggests that compassion, a deeply human trait, must precede and guide any technological or financial intervention. Without this ethical grounding, even the most advanced AI could be weaponized or simply fail to address the core human needs it purports to serve. It's a call for "more compassion, less compute" in our fundamental approach to global challenges. ProSocial AI – AI-systems that are tailored, trained, tested and targeted to bring out the best in and for people and planet, is possible – but it starts with natural intelligence, human minds and hearts. Harnessing Our Treasures For Humanity: AI Guided By NI This is not to say that technology has no role. Far from it. Our unique range of technological assets, including AI, can be powerful instruments for good, if guided by a truly human and humane mindset. If our natural intelligence remains shackled by self-interest and division, then the logical, compassionate actions of AI, unburdened by human interests, political agendas and personal flaws, might be preferable. This is a desperate thought, a challenge to humanity to rise to its ethical potential before ceding moral agency to machines. Healing Humanity: A Holistic Imperative To truly help humans, hinder future harm and heal humanity, we need a holistic understanding of ourselves, the societies we inhabit and the planet we are part of. This means recognizing the interconnectedness of conflict, poverty, environmental degradation and psychological well-being. It requires moving beyond siloed solutions to embrace a systemic approach where technological innovation is always subservient to human values. Healing humanity demands more than just patching wounds; it requires addressing the root causes of suffering. This involves fostering empathy, promoting dialogue, challenging dehumanizing narratives, and building resilient communities. It necessitates a mindset that is both human (acknowledging our complexities and vulnerabilities) and humane (driven by compassion and a commitment to dignity for all). Our technological treasures, particularly AI, must be harnessed as extensions of this humane intent, amplifying our capacity for good, rather than becoming instruments of further division or indifference. Practical Takeaway: Cultivating Compassionate Algorithms The practical takeaway is not to reject technology, but to infuse it with conscious ethical intent. We must cultivate "compassionate algorithms" within ourselves and our organizations: Awareness: Regularly engage in self-reflection. How do your actions, even small ones, align with the Golden Rule? How can you consciously cultivate empathy for those suffering, even if geographically distant? Appreciation: Demand and support the ethical development and deployment of AI. Question the algorithms: Are they designed to promote well-being, reduce bias, and foster equitable access? Advocate for transparency and accountability in AI systems, especially those impacting vulnerable populations. Acceptance: Actively seek out diverse perspectives and challenge your own echo chambers. Use technology to connect with, rather than isolate from, those with different experiences. Support initiatives that use AI for peacebuilding, intergroup dialogue, and humanitarian aid. Accountability: When faced with complex problems, prioritize solutions that place human dignity, well-being, and agency at their core. Technology should serve humanity, not the other way around. The situation in Gaza today, July 26th, 2025, is a painful reminder of our collective responsibility. We possess the intelligence, the tools and the ancient wisdom to create a world where peace and food are possible for all. The ultimate test of our technological prowess will be whether it helps us reclaim our deepest human values, or merely accelerates our detachment from them.

'He belongs in The Hague': Keir Starmer fiercely criticised over Gaza speech
'He belongs in The Hague': Keir Starmer fiercely criticised over Gaza speech

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

'He belongs in The Hague': Keir Starmer fiercely criticised over Gaza speech

KEIR Starmer has been warned he 'belongs in The Hague' for failing to call out and act on the genocide being committed in Gaza by Israel. The Prime Minister has faced fierce criticism following a speech where he said the 'appalling scenes in Gaza are unrelenting' and called for the need for a regional 'lasting peace'. However, despite his comments where he claims his 'ultimate goal' is to improve the lives of Palestinian's he has been told his government are "complicit" in the suffering of tens of thousands of people in Gaza due to his inaction against Israel. Starmer is under increasing pressure to recognise a Palestinian state, as 221 MPs signed a cross-party letter, organised by the Labour backbencher Sarah Champion, demanding he take the step. READ MORE: I love standing on the soil of Scotland, Donald Trump says after landing in country It comes as French President Emmanuel Macron declared France would recognise a Palestinian state in September at a UN conference earlier this week. On Friday, Starmer set out his pathway where a Palestinian state could be recognised in a speech. He said: 'The appalling scenes in Gaza are unrelenting. The continued captivity of hostages, the starvation and denial of humanitarian aid to the Palestinian people, the increasing violence from extremist settler groups, and Israel's disproportionate military escalation in Gaza are all indefensible. 'Alongside our closest allies, I am working on a pathway to peace in the region, focused on the practical solutions that will make a real difference to the lives of those that are suffering in this war. 'That pathway will set out the concrete steps needed to turn the ceasefire so desperately needed, into a lasting peace. Starmer added: 'Recognition of a Palestinian state has to be one of those steps. I am unequivocal about that. But it must be part of a wider plan which ultimately results in a two-state solution and lasting security for Palestinians and Israelis. This is the way to ensure it is a tool of maximum utility to improve the lives of those who are suffering – which of course, will always be our ultimate goal.' Former Labour MP Zarah Sultana was one of many people who has criticised the Prime Minister for failing to call out the ongoing genocide in [[Gaza]] and highlighted the UK Government's complicity in the ongoing war on the region. She wrote on Twitter/X: 'The 'appalling scenes in [[Gaza]]' have been enabled by the arms, surveillance & diplomatic cover Keir Starmer's Labour government have provided to a genocidal apartheid state. (Image: Jeff Moore) 'He still refuses to call it a genocide because he is complicit in it. 'Keir Starmer belongs in The Hague.' Journalist Matt Kennard also shared Sultana's calls for Starmer to stand in The Hague to answer for the UK Government's complicity in Gaza as he said: 'Another British spy plane literally in the sky over Gaza collecting intelligence for Israel as he posted this statement. 'Starmer belongs in the Hague. We must make sure he ends up there.' The charity Save the Children also shared Starmer's speech, where they edited the text to remove passive language like 'unfolding' and 'situation' and replaced it with words like 'deliberate' and 'assault' as well as attributing the horrific starvation of Palestinians to Israel. Along with the graphic, the charity replied: 'Fixed it for you, Keir Starmer. 'The UK is an ally to Israel's atrocities in Gaza and the West Bank. 'Now is the time to make our voices heard: Call on the UK Government to end its complicity.' Meanwhile, sharing a picture of Starmer during his speech, prominent trade unionist Howard Beckett, said: 'A picture that will chime through history. 'Starmer's GB is damned. He should answer in The Hague.'

Why a 'mini Trump' is breaking through in Japan
Why a 'mini Trump' is breaking through in Japan

NBC News

timean hour ago

  • NBC News

Why a 'mini Trump' is breaking through in Japan

TOKYO — As President Donald Trump's tariffs add to a sense of uncertainty in Japan, more voters here are embracing an idea inspired by their longtime ally the United States: 'Japanese first.' The nationalist slogan helped the right-wing populist party Sanseito make big gains in Japan's parliamentary elections on Sunday, as it capitalized on economic malaise and concerns about immigration and overtourism. Party leader Sohei Kamiya, who since 2022 had held Sanseito's only seat in the upper house of Japan's parliament, will now be joined by 14 others in the 248-seat chamber. It's a far cry from the party's origin as a fringe anti-vaccination group on YouTube during the Covid-19 pandemic. Though Japan has long had a complex relationship with foreigners and its cultural identity, experts say Sanseito's rise is another indication of the global shift to the right embodied and partly fueled by Trump, with populist figures gaining ground in Europe, Britain, Latin America and elsewhere. Kamiya 'fancies himself a mini-Trump' and 'is one of those who Trump has put wind in his sails,' said Jeff Kingston, a professor of Asian studies and history at Temple University's Japan campus. Speaking at a rally on Saturday at Tokyo's Shiba Park, Kamiya said his calls for greater restrictions on foreign workers and investment were driven not by xenophobia but by 'the workings of globalization.' He criticized mainstream parties' support for boosting immigration in an effort to address the labor shortage facing Japan's aging and shrinking population. 'Japan is still the fourth-largest economy in the world. We have 120 million people. Why do we have to rely on foreign capital?' Kamiya told an enthusiastic crowd. The election results were disastrous for Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba, who is facing calls to resign now that his conservative Liberal Democratic Party — which has ruled almost uninterrupted since the end of World War II — has lost its majority in both houses of parliament. The Japanese leader had also been under pressure to reach a trade deal with the Trump administration, which said Tuesday that the two sides had agreed to a 15% U.S. tariff on Japanese goods. On Wednesday, Ishiba denied reports that he planned to step down by the end of August. The message from his party's string of election losses is that 'people are unhappy,' Kingston said. 'A lot of people feel that the status quo is biased against their interests and it advantages the elderly over the young, and the young feel sort of resentful that they're having to carry the heavy burden of the growing aging population on their back,' he said. Kamiya, 47, an energetic speaker with social media savvy, is also a strong contrast to leaders such as Ishiba and the Constitutional Democrats' Yoshihiko Noda, both 68, who 'look like yesterday's men' and the faces of the establishment, Kingston said. With voters concerned about stagnating wages, surging prices and bleak employment prospects, 'the change-makers got a lot of protest votes from people who feel disenfranchised,' he said. Sanseito's platform resonated with voters such as Yuta Kato. 'The number of [foreign immigrants] who don't obey rules is increasing. People don't voice it, but I think they feel that,' the 38-year-old hairdresser told Reuters in Tokyo. 'Also, the burden on citizens including taxes is getting bigger and bigger, so life is getting more difficult.' The biggest reason Sanseito did well in the election, he said, 'is that they are speaking on behalf of us.' Kamiya's party was not the only upstart to benefit from voter discontent, with the center-right Democratic Party for the People increasing its number of seats in the upper house from five to 16. Sanseito, whose name means 'Participate in Politics,' originated in 2020 amid the Covid-19 pandemic, attracting conservatives with YouTube videos promoting conspiracy theories about vaccines and pushing back against mask mandates. Its YouTube channel now has almost 480,000 subscribers. The party has also warned about a 'silent invasion' of foreigners in Japan, where the number of foreign residents rose more than 10% last year to a record of almost 3.8 million, according to the Immigration Services Agency. It remains far lower as a proportion of the population than in the U.S. or Europe, however. Critics say such rhetoric has fueled hate speech and growing hostility toward foreigners in Japan, citing a survey last month by Japanese broadcaster NHK and others in which almost two-thirds of respondents agreed that foreigners received 'preferential treatment.' At the Sanseito rally on Saturday, protesters held up signs that said 'No Hate' and 'Racists Go Home.' Kamiya denies that his party is hostile to foreigners in Japan. 'We have no intention of discriminating against foreigners, nor do we have any intention of inciting division,' he said Monday. 'We're just aiming to firmly rebuild the lives of Japanese people who are currently in trouble.' Despite its electoral advances, Sanseito doesn't have enough members in the upper house to make much impact on its own and has only three seats in the more powerful lower house. The challenge, Kingston said, is whether Kamiya can 'take this anger, the malaise, and bring his show nationwide.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store