Judge rules Trump's order to curtail birthright citizenship
A federal judge struck down one of President Donald Trump's most controversial executive orders - and punctuated his fiery 73-page ruling with over two dozen exclamation points. The president issued a series of executive orders in March suspending major law firms' security clearances and restricting their access to government buildings, officials and federal contracting work. In each case, Trump cited the firms' past work for his political or legal opponents.
But on Tuesday US District Judge Richard Leon (pictured) torpedoed Trump's executive order against New York-based WilmerHale. His ruling marked the third time this month that a federal judge deemed the orders targeting the law firms unconstitutional and permanently barred their enforcement. Leon's opinion included over two dozen exclamation points - a rare form of punctuation in court filings - as he scolded the Trump administration for its actions, according to Mediaite.
'The cornerstone of the American system of justice is an independent judiciary and an independent bar willing to tackle unpopular cases, however daunting. The Founding Fathers knew this!' wrote Leon, who was appointed to the federal bench by former Republican President George W. Bush. 'Accordingly, they took pains to enshrine in the Constitution certain rights that would serve as the foundation for that independence. 'I have concluded that this Order must be struck down in its entirety as unconstitutional,' Leon continued. 'Indeed, to rule otherwise would be unfaithful to the judgment and vision of the Founding Fathers!'
His fiery tone did not end there, as Leon repeatedly shared his exasperation with the Trump administration in his ruling. In rejecting the government's argument that any injury claimed by WilmerHale was conjecture because the law firm had not argued it was a federal contractor or intended to bid for such a contract, Leon wrote: 'Please - that dog won't hunt!' He then noted that he agreed with the law firms' argument that Trump's executive order 'discourages clients from retaining or maintaining WilmerHale as their counsel' by threatening to cancel the contracts of any entity associated with the group.
Leon also called other Trump administration arguments 'absurd!' and responded with an exasperated 'Please!' to the government's request to delay relief for the law firm until federal agency heads could issue guidance on its lawyers' revoked security clearances. In the end, the judge characterized the executive order as 'impos[ing] a kitchen sink or severe sanctions on WilmerHale' for its Constitutionally-protected conduct. 'Any one of those sanctions would cause clients to strongly reconsider their engagements with WilmerHale,' Leon said of the restrictions the executive order imposed. 'Taken together, the provisions constitute a staggering punishment for the firm's protected free speech! 'This Order is intended to and does, in fact, impede the firm's ability to effectively represent its clients!'
Leon then went on to highlight what he called the 'retaliatory' nature of the executive order - which explicitly cited the fact that the firm employed former Justice Department special counsel Robert Mueller (pictured), who led the investigation into alleged collusion between Trump's 2016 campaign and Russian authorities. 'The Order shouts through a bullhorn: If you take on causes disfavored by President Trump, you will be punished!' he concluded, arguing that the executive order's 'viewpoint discrimination' violates the First Amendment. He also argued that the Trump administration failed to show how WilmerHale threatened national security or demonstrate how the order would address those concerns. Additionally, he ruled the Trump administration violated the Fifth Amendment because the executive order was vague and infringed upon the right to counsel.
WilmerHale applauded the ruling Tuesday afternoon 'The Court´s decision to permanently block the unlawful executive order in its entirety strongly affirms our foundational constitutional rights and those of our clients,' it said in a statement. 'We remain proud to defend our firm, our people, and our clients.' Leon's ruling had echoes of other federal judge's opinions striking down similar edicts. On Friday, US District Judge John Bates ruled that Trump's executive order against Jenner & Block was unconstitutional - sayin it 'seeks to chill legal representation the administration doesn't like,' according to The Hill.
Earlier this month, US District Judge Beryl Howll also eviscerated Trump's order against Perkins Coie, which he said 'draws from a playbook as old as Shakespeare, who penned the phrase: "The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers."' A fourth suit brought by Susman Godfrey challenging the legality of the executive order against it is still pending. But many other prominent law firms have sought to avert the orders against them by preemptively reaching settlements that require them to collectively dedicate hundreds of millions of dollars in free legal services in support of causes the Trump administration says it supports. Those areas include assisting veterans and public servants, members of the military, Gold Star families, law enforcement and first responders, and 'ensuring fairness in our justice system' as well as combatting antisemitism, the president previously wrote on his Truth Social platform.
He also suggested he may use the law firms to help the coal industry in leasing and negotiate trade deals. All together, the deal cut by five law firms brings Trump's legal kitty close to $1 billion. The settlement money, Trump claimed, were 'for damages that they've done. But they give you $100 million and then they announce but we have done nothing wrong. And I agree they've done nothing wrong.' 'But what the hell – they give me a lot of money considering they've done nothing wrong.' The president has not yet commented on Leon's ruling, and DailyMail.com has reached out to the Department of Justice for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
19 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Trump FINALLY gets a question he respects as president grins from ear-to-ear after big week on Wall Street
Donald Trump gushed over a reporter's question about whether he 'outsmarted' the financial markets with his industry-shaking tariffs. The president grinned from ear-to-ear as a reporter asked him for his reaction to Apollo Global Management chief economist Torsten Sløk saying Trump may have 'outsmarted everyone' with his tariffs. 'Mr. President, a leading global economist just did a one-eighty and says your tariff plan, you may have outsmarted everybody with it. What is your message?' the reporter asked. Trump smiled as he responded: 'I love this. I love this question. This is the favorite. This is the best question I've ever been asked because I've been going through abuse for years on this. 'Because, as you know, we're taking in hundreds of billions of dollars, no inflation whatsoever.' The reporter added in a follow-up question for Trump's 'message to critics who think your tariff plan caused a recession?' 'I think they should go back to business school,' Trump responded. 'It's so obvious. It's so obvious. I mean, we're taking in billions and billions of dollars from China and a lot of other countries.' It came as Wall Street continued its recent rally this week, with the S&P500 and Nasdaq hitting all-time closing highs on Friday. In Sløk's report that Trump appeared to enjoy, the economist speculated that Trump would keep tariffs below his most aggressive rates to ease market uncertainty while using them as leverage to get better trade deals. 'Maybe the strategy is to maintain 30% tariffs on China and 10% tariffs on all other countries and then give all countries 12 months to lower nontariff barriers and open up their economies to trade,' he wrote. The report came as Trump's 90-day pause on 'reciprocal tariffs' is set to come to an end early next month. Sløk said that Trump should consider extending the deadline to a whole year, which he said would give the global markets time to adjust to a 'new world with permanently higher tariffs.' 'This would seem like a victory for the world and yet would produce $400 billion of annual revenue for US taxpayers,' he said. 'Trade partners will be happy with only 10% tariffs and U.S. tax revenue will go up. 'Maybe the administration has outsmarted all of us.' Trump shocked the global markets in April as he introduced a raft of 'Liberation Day' tariffs, but the gamble may have paid off as markets soared in recent weeks and the US signed a number of trade deals with foreign nations The soaring stock market numbers came as trade deal hopes fueled investor risk appetite and economic data helped solidify expectations for rate cuts from the U.S. Federal Reserve. The rise came even after Trump terminated trade negotiations with Canada in response to its digital tax on technology companies. 'This market's been pretty resilient,' said Chuck Carlson, chief executive officer at Horizon Investment Services in Hammond, Indiana. 'Investors are riding momentum and looking for breakouts.' 'They don't want to get caught on the wrong side of this thing,' Carlson added. 'Many investors already have missed out. And now you have the S&P flirting with an all-time high.' While tariffs have yet to affect price growth, inflation continues to hover above the Fed's 2% annual inflation target. A separate report from the University of Michigan confirmed consumer sentiment has improved this month, but remains well below December's post-election bounce. Financial markets have priced in a 72% likelihood that the Fed will implement its first rate cut of the year in September, with a smaller, 21% probability of a rate cut coming as soon as July, according to CME's FedWatch tool. Washington and Beijing reached an agreement to expedite rare-earth shipments to the U.S., a White House official said, well ahead of the July 9 expiration of the 90-day postponement of U.S. President Donald Trump's "reciprocal" tariffs. Additionally, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the Trump administration's trade deals with 18 of the main U.S. trading partners could be done by the September 1 Labor Day holiday.
The Guardian
26 minutes ago
- The Guardian
US sees spate of arrests of civilians impersonating Ice officers
Police in southern California arrested a man suspected of posing as a federal immigration officer this week, the latest in a series of such arrests, as masked, plainclothes immigration agents are deployed nationwide to meet the Trump administration's mass deportation targets. The man, Fernando Diaz, was arrested by Huntington Park police after officers said they found a loaded gun and official-looking documents with Department of Homeland Security headings in his SUV, according to NBC Los Angeles. Officers were impounding his vehicle for parking in a handicapped zone when Diaz asked to retrieve items inside, the police said. Among the items seen by officers in the car were 'multiple copies of passports not registered under the individual's name', NBC reports. Diaz was arrested for possession of the allegedly unregistered firearm and released on bail. The Huntington Park police chief and mayor accused Diaz of impersonating an immigration agent at a news conference, a move Diaz later told the NBC News affiliate he was surprised by. Diaz also denied to the outlet that he had posed as an officer with border patrol or Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice). At the news conference, police showed reporters paper they found inside his car with an official-looking US Customs and Border Protection header. The arrest is one of several cases involving people allegedly impersonating immigration officials, as the nationwide crackdown on undocumented immigrants intensifies. Experts have warned that federal agents' increased practice of masking while carrying out immigration raids and arrests makes it easier for imposters to pose as federal officers. Around the country, the sight of Ice officers emerging from unmarked cars in plainclothes to make arrests has become increasingly common. In March, for instance, a Tufts University student was seen on video being arrested by masked Ice officials outside her apartment, after her visa had been revoked for writing an opinion article in her university newspaper advocating for Palestinian rights. And many federal agents operating in the Los Angeles region in recent weeks have been masked. In late January, a week after Trump took office, a man in South Carolina was arrested and charged with kidnapping and impersonating an officer, after allegedly presenting himself as an Ice officer and detaining a group of Latino men. In February, two people impersonating Ice officers attempted to enter a Temple University residence hall. CNN reported that Philadelphia police later arrested one of them, a 22-year-old student, who was charged with impersonating an officer. In North Carolina the same week, another man, Carl Thomas Bennett, was arrested after allegedly impersonating an Ice officer and sexually assaulting a woman. Bennett reportedly threatened to deport the woman if she did not comply. In April, a man in Indiantown, Florida, was arrested for impersonating an Ice officer and targeting immigrants. Two men reported to the police that the man had performed a fake traffic stop, and then asked for their documents and immigration status. Mike German, a former FBI agent and fellow at the Brennan Center for Justice, told the Guardian last week that the shootings of two Democratic lawmakers in Minnesota, by a suspect who allegedly impersonated a police officer, highlights the danger of police not looking like police. 'Federal agents wearing masks and casual clothing significantly increases this risk of any citizen dressing up in a way that fools the public into believing they are law enforcement so they can engage in illegal activity. It is a public safety threat, and it's also a threat to the agents and officers themselves, because people will not immediately be able to distinguish between who is engaged in legitimate activity or illegitimate activity when violence is occurring in public,' he said.
Daily Mail
39 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Stunning reason why mother gave marijuana edibles to 6-year-old daughter
An Arkansas mother allegedly confessed to giving her children - including her youngest daughter - marijuana, claiming it was a method to discourage them from smoking it themselves. Deanna Sue Woods, 36, was sentenced to prison on Wednesday after allegedly admitting to allowing her three children - ages 6, 10, and 15 - to consume marijuana in various forms, including honey and chocolate edibles, as well as drags from her own vape pen, according to a probable cause affidavit obtained by People. She will now serve 120 days in jail, with 60 days of credit, followed by 60 months of supervised probation and a no-contact order with her children. In January, a Department of Human Services (DHS) employee spoke with Woods' six-year-old daughter, through whom they learned that the mother had been allowing three out of four of her children to ingest marijuana and THC-infused edibles, the doc alleges. The young girl was quickly taken for a drug test, which confirmed traces of THC in her system. Armed with this information, the agency swiftly contacted a detective with the Brookland Police Department, who arrested Woods the following day, according to the affidavit. Once in custody, Woods - who has a valid medical marijuana card, according to KBTX News - allegedly agreed to speak with the arresting detective after being read her Miranda rights, during which she confessed to additional drug-related offenses. According to court documents, Woods allegedly told Detective Dustin Norwood that she had given three out of four of her children both honey and chocolate edibles laced with marijuana. She also allegedly confessed to allowing both her six-year-old daughter and her 10-year-old child to take hits from her personal vape pen. While speaking with Norwood, Woods allegedly admitted to smoking marijuana herself - often around her one-year-old toddler, even claiming she had used the drug while breastfeeding, according to court documents. She also allegedly confessed to either giving marijuana to or smoking it around her four children at least 12 times over the past year, as reported by KBTX. However, Woods allegedly claimed that she did this in an attempt to 'deter' her children from using the drug, the docs claim. Following her confessions, according to the affidavit, the 36-year-old mother agreed to write down her statement. On Wednesday, Woods pleaded guilty and was charged with 12 counts each of endangering the welfare of a minor in the first degree and introduction of a controlled substance into the body of another person, as reported by People. She is only allowed contact with her children under the conditions set by the DHS and at the discretion of their guardian, according to KBTX. A judge also ordered Woods to complete parenting classes, undergo a substance abuse assessment, and attend a rehabilitation program as part of her sentence. Additionally, she was ordered to pay all court costs and fees. Woods' arrest comes less than a month after a Texas woman was taken into custody after her one-year-old nephew inhaled from her marijuana vape pen. Vianney Alyssa Acosta, 20, was arrested and booked into the El Paso County Jail last month on charges of child endangerment and possession of a controlled substance. She was released the same day after posting $6,000 bail. The incident occurred on May 16 when emergency responders were called to a home on Walker Post Avenue in east El Paso for a toddler who was having difficulty breathing. A criminal complaint later stated the child had been 'smoking a THC vape,' according to the El Paso Times. When deputies arrived the boy was inconsolable, they said. He 'had droopy eyes and was trying to go to sleep,' the affidavit states. The child's father, grandmother, and Acosta were home at the time, while his mother was at work. According to the affidavit, the grandmother said she had stepped into the bathroom when Acosta heard the child coughing and found him in her bedroom holding the vape. The grandmother told deputies the device contained 'weed' and belonged to Acosta. When asked if she knew her daughter used THC vapes, she allegedly responded: 'Well she's 20.' Acosta told deputies she had left the vape in her room and believed it was out of reach. She 'right away stated that she had her THC vape somewhere in her room where she thought the victim couldn't reach it,' a deputy noted in the report. Acosta then brought deputies into her bedroom and pointed out the spot where she had left her vape - on top of a nightstand she believed was out of the toddler's reach. The nightstand stood about two feet tall, investigators noted. She acknowledged that her nephew 'has ways to get on the bed to reach out for things' and admitted the vape 'was out in the open with just miscellaneous items on top covering it,' according to the affidavit. Although she didn't see the child actually use the pen, Acosta told deputies she assumed he had because 'he was red; coughing and observed a little bit of smoke,' which she identified as typical 'side effects of using THC vapes.' She also claimed she believed the vape was not working at the time, telling deputies it was likely not charged and had already run out of THC. Deputies then transported the boy and his father - who told officers he had no idea what had happened - to The Hospitals of Providence East, where a urine test confirmed the presence of THC, authorities said.
