WhatsApp defends 'optional' AI tool that cannot be turned off
It comes the same week Meta announced an update to its teen accounts feature on Instagram.The firm revealed it was testing AI technology in the US designed to find accounts belonging to teenagers who have lied about their age on the platform.
Where is the new blue circle?
If you can't see it, you may not be able to use it yet.Meta says the feature is only being rolled out to some countries at the moment and advises it "might not be available to you yet, even if other users in your country have access". As well as the blue circle, there is a search bar at the top inviting users to 'Ask Meta AI or Search'. This is also a feature on Facebook Messenger and Instagram, with both platforms owned by Meta.Its AI chatbot is powered by Llama 4, one of the large language models operated by Meta.Before you ask it anything, there is a long message from Meta explaining what Meta AI is - stating it is "optional".On its website, WhatsApp says Meta AI "can answer your questions, teach you something, or help come up with new ideas".I tried out the feature by asking the AI what the weather was like in Glasgow, and it responded in seconds with a detailed report on temperature, the chance of rain, wind and humidity.It also gave me two links for further information, but this is where it ran into problems.One of the links was relevant, but the other tried to give me additional weather details for Charing Cross - not the location in Glasgow, but the railway station in London.
What do people think of it?
So far in Europe people aren't very pleased, with users on X, Bluesky, and Reddit outlining their frustrations - and Guardian columnist Polly Hudson was among those venting their anger at not being able to turn it off.Dr Kris Shrishak, an adviser on AI and privacy, was also highly critical, and accused Meta of "exploiting its existing market" and "using people as test subjects for AI"."No one should be forced to use AI," he told the BBC. "Its AI models are a privacy violation by design - Meta, through web scraping, has used personal data of people and pirated books in training them."Now that the legality of their approach has been challenged in courts, Meta is looking for other sources to collect data from people, and this feature could be one such source."An investigation by The Atlantic revealed Meta may have accessed millions of pirated books and research papers through LibGen - Library Genesis - to train its Llama AI.Author groups across the UK and around the world are organising campaigns to encourage governments to intervene, and Meta is currently defending a court case brought by multiple authors over the use of their work.A spokesperson for Meta declined to comment on The Atlantic investigation.
What are the concerns?
When you first use Meta AI in WhatsApp, it states the chatbot "can only read messages people share with it"."Meta can't read any other messages in your personal chats, as your personal messages remain end to end encrypted," it says.Meanwhile the Information Commissioner's Office told the BBC it would "continue to monitor the adoption of Meta AI's technology and use of personal data within WhatsApp"."Personal information fuels much of AI innovation so people need to trust that organisations are using their information responsibly," it said."Organisations who want to use people's personal details to train or use generative AI models need to comply with all their data protection obligations, and take the necessary extra steps when it comes to processing the data of children."And Dr Shrishak says users should be wary. "When you send messages to your friend, end to end encryption will not be affected," he said."Every time you use this feature and communicate with Meta AI, you need to remember that one of the ends is Meta, not your friend."The tech giant also highlights users should only share what they are happy with being used by others."Don't share information, including sensitive topics, about others or yourself that you don't want the AI to retain and use," it says.
Additional reporting by Joe Tidy
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
an hour ago
- Sky News
Microsoft is now worth over $4 trn, becoming only second firm ever to pass milestone
Microsoft has become only the second publicly traded company after Nvidia to surpass $4 trn (£3.03trn) in market valuation, after registering huge earnings. On Thursday, shares rose on Wall Street with the S&P 500 and Nasdaq climbing to new record highs. Stocks in Microsoft jumped after posting better-than-expected results, helped by its Azure cloud computing platform, which is a centrepiece of the company's artificial intelligence (AI) efforts. Shares in Facebook and Instagram's parent company, Meta, also surged after beating sales and profit targets. 2:08 Technology giants Apple and Amazon will report their results after Wall Street's close. Microsoft first cracked the $1trn (£760bn) mark in April 2019, but its move to $3trn (£2.27trn) took longer than technology giants Nvidia and Apple. Nvidia tripled its value in just about a year and clinched the $4trn milestone before any other company on 9 July. Apple was last valued at $3.12trn. In comparison, the biggest UK company by market value is drug manufacturer AstraZeneca, worth $235.97bn (£178.55bn). Companies ranked by market value (USD), according to 1. Nvidia (US) $4.43trn 2. Microsoft (US) $4trn 3. Apple (US) $3.12trn 4. Amazon (US) $2.47trn 5. Alphabet (US) $2.35trn 6. Meta (US) $1.95trn 7. Saudi Arabian Oil (Saudi Arabia) $1.56trn 8. Broadcom (US) $1.42trn 9. Berkshire Hathaway (US) $1.03trn 10. Tesla (US) $1.02trn 11. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (Taiwan) $1trn 29. Samsung Electronics (South Korea) $338.06bn 36. Alibaba (China) $284.62bn 52. AstraZeneca (UK) $235.97bn While sweeping US tariffs had investors worried about tighter business spending, Microsoft's strong earnings have shown that the company's books are yet to take a hit. Microsoft's multibillion-dollar bet on OpenAI is proving to be a game changer, powering its Office Suite and Azure offerings with cutting-edge AI and fueling the stock to more than double its value since ChatGPT's late-2022 debut. On Wednesday, the firm announced Azure sales surpassed $75bn (£56bn) on an annual basis, while Azure revenue jumped 39% in the April-June quarter. Overall revenue rose 18% to $76.4bn (£57.81bn) over the same period. It is also forecasting a record $30bn (£22.7bn) in capital spending over the first quarter to meet soaring AI demand..
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
'Watershed moment for AI revolution': Microsoft blows past $4tn valuation
US tech giants Meta and Microsoft have smashed market expectations with performance analysts are hailing as a 'watershed moment' in the artificial intelligence revolution. Microsoft became the third company to surpass $4trillion in market capitalisation as its shares soared in response to a fourth-quarter profit of $34.3billion, up 24 per cent year-on-year, driven by growth in its Azure cloud business. Azure revenues soared 34 per cent to surpass $75billion over one year, Microsoft said, as it forecast double-digit growth for the next 12 months. And Microsoft forecast its largest ever planned capital expenditure at $30billion for the first quarter to meet soaring AI demand. It follows the group's multibillion-dollar bet on OpenAI, which powers its Office Suite and Azure offerings with cutting-edge AI, and has helped fuel the the stock to more than double its value since ChatGPT's late-2022 debut. Microsoft shares jumped more than 9 per cent overnight in response to a peak of $561.28 per share. They have added almost 30 per cent over the last year. Gerrit Smit, lead portfolio manager of the Stonehage Fleming Global Best Ideas Equity fund, said: 'Microsoft has proven with its results that it is the preferred technology stock to own to sustainably participate in the high growth of the global fourth industrial revolution. 'It is in the process of becoming more of a cloud infrastructure business and a leader in enterprise AI, doing so very profitably and cash generatively, despite the heavy AI capital expenditures.' Meanwhile shares in Facebook's parent company Meta soared 12.2 per cent to trade at $781.14 per share by mid-afternoon on Thursday. It came as the social media giant crushed analysts' sales and profit targets, even as it poured billions of dollars into AI. Higher advertising and a growing user base on its social media platforms drove profits 36 per cent higher to $18.34billion for its second quarter as revenues soared 22 per cent. Meta also doubled down on its AI ambitions, forecasting third-quarter revenue that blew past Wall Street estimates the technology supercharges its core advertising business. The social media giant upped the lower end of its annual capital spending guidance by $2billion, shortly following a similar move from Google owner Alphabet. Meta has now achieved back-to-back record revenues since September 2022. Ben Barringer, head of technology research at Quilter Cheviot, said Meta has also 'kept a lid on operating costs' by hiring 'fewer yet better people for its AI push'. Watershed moment for AI stocks? Analysts at Wedbush described Microsoft and Meta's 'eye-popping' results as a 'washed moment for the AI revolution' that will be 'remembered in the market for many years'. Three of the 'Magnificent 7' tech companies – Nvidia, Apple and now Microsoft – have surpassed a $4trillion market cap. But not all of the companies have been riding the AI wave higher this year, with Apple, Amazon and Alphabet shares underperforming peers, and Tesla shareholders suffering a particularly tough year. But Wedbush thinks investors are underestimating the 'underlying AI driven growth ahead from Mag 7 tech stalwarts'. They wrote in a note: 'Our bullish view is that investors are still not fully appreciating the tidal wave of growth on the horizon from the $2trillion of spending over the next three years coming from enterprise and government spending around AI technology and use cases. 'We have barely scratched the surface of this fourth industrial revolution now playing out around the world led by the big tech stalwarts such as Nvidia, Microsoft, Palantir, Meta, Alphabet, and Amazon.'
The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
Can Mark Zuckerberg really be trusted to oversee the AI revolution?
Mark Zuckerberg's Meta was the belle of the ball on Wall Street after its latest results revealed a windfall driven by investments into AI. Leaning into artificial intelligence is one of the social media king's best bets – it is paying off handsomely, and it will likely do so for years to come. Revenue for the three months to the end of June leapt by 22 per cent to $47.5bn when compared with a year earlier. Profits surged by more than a third (36 per cent) to $18.3bn. If the price of Zuckerberg's AI ambitions is similarly dizzying – overall costs rose by 12 per cent to $27.5bn, with more spending promised – who cares? It's a smart investment and a good business move. Meta's vast resources mean that it will inevitably be at the forefront of this exciting, but potentially dangerous, new tech for years to come. That's more than a little troubling, especially if you've read the former Facebook executive Sarah Wynn-Williams ' bestselling tell-all book Careless People: A Cautionary Tale of Power, Greed, and Lost Idealism about her time at the company. If you only read one business book this year – if you only read one business book in your lifetime – this is the one. Wynn-Williams hasn't been shy about including gory allegations about the behaviour of the company's top staff. Her book is an exposé, and it does that job well. It is also a great, if sometimes horrifying read. But the important part is what she has to say about the thoughtless way Meta was prepared to use its groundbreaking tech. For example, Wynn-Williams alleges that the company actively targeted teenagers with ads based on their emotional state, including when they were depressed. Now add AI into that algorithmic mix. The implications are enough to make you shudder. The company's attempts to court China, and what was offered to the regime there, have also raised eyebrows. Wynn-Williams made the same allegations before US senators, when she was, remember, under oath. Now let's put this in context. The world is in the midst of a hell-for-leather AI race. Donald Trump claims the US has already won it. He might be right. Keir Starmer is determined that Britain should at least find a place on the podium, although government communications bods would probably prefer I use phrases like 'leading role' or 'pioneering', or some such. His latest wheeze is bigging it up with influencers (am I alone in hating the word 'influencer'?). On Thursday, the prime minister held a half-day session for around a 100 of them in Downing Street about how they can work more closely with the government – and vice versa, given the stratospheric rise of news intake on social media. AI has ministers drooling, and with good reason. The British state is in a mess, hamstrung by sparse resources and poor leadership, which often seems more interested in pet projects than it is in solving problems. AI could change that. Justice secretary Shabana Mahmood thinks it will be able to 'predict the risk an offender could pose' and inform 'decisions to put dangerous prisoners under tighter supervision', thus cutting prison violence. The struggling probation service could also benefit, with AI pilots showing 'a 50 per cent reduction in note-taking time, allowing officers to focus on risk management, monitoring and face-to-face meetings with offenders'. Over to the NHS, where we are told that an app using AI to provide physio for people with back pain has cut treatment waiting lists by 55 per cent. I don't know if I particularly want my back problems handled by a bot, but maybe that's a consequence of my reading too many dystopian books. We're already seeing some of the tech's negative effects through the elimination of junior positions in the tech industry and the City, exacerbating an already weak UK jobs market. But the government isn't so keen on talking about that. All this begs the question: is this the sort of tech we want to be controlled by Wynn-Williams' 'careless people', who are so obsessed with the bottom line that they never stop to think about what they're doing? This is not just a criticism of Meta. Britain's politicians are currently falling over each other to worship at the altar of the tech bros. They think it's the future. They might be right. Perhaps this tech fixes the NHS and gets a sclerotic state that is very visibly failing the British people working again. Lives would be improved as a result. The trouble is, if you mix careless people, they could just as easily combine to create a toxic brew.
