EU summit: ‘Like-minded' states should take action against Israel over Gaza, says Slovenian prime minister
Israel
if the
European Union
fails to agree to take action as a bloc, the prime minister of Slovenia has said.
Moves to get the EU to exert political leverage on Israel to end to its military campaign in Gaza are to be blocked during a summit of the EU's 27 leaders in Brussels.
Renewed focus has come on Europe's response to Israel's invasion of
Gaza
, which has levelled much of the besieged Palestinian territory and killed more than 55,000 Palestinians.
'It is high time that we do not show just solidarity, but we put some real pressure on the Israeli government,' Slovenian prime minister Robert Golob said.
READ MORE
The EU could no longer 'preach' about the rule of law, 'due to our inadequate response to the atrocities happening in Gaza,' he said.
Spain
, Ireland,
Belgium
,
Slovenia
and others have been pushing for firmer action from the EU to pressure Israel to stop blocking humanitarian aid from getting into Gaza.
Some of the EU leaders in that camp have called for the suspension of an EU-Israel 'association agreement', which includes a free trade deal and access to research funding, or hardline Israeli ministers to be sanctioned.
Germany, Italy, Austria and others advocate for the EU to instead raise its concerns through diplomatic channels with Israel.
Speaking on Thursday, Mr Golob said Slovenia and other 'link-minded' countries should move forward on their own, if the EU failed to agree to take action as a bloc in the next two weeks.
Spain's left-wing prime minister Pedro Sánchez said the EU had put together 18 packages of economic sanctions targeting Russia, since its full-scale invasion of Ukraine.
The fact the bloc's trade deal with Israel had not been suspended pointed to 'double standards' in Europe, he said.
Suspending the EU-Israel agreement would not improve the situation for Palestinians in Gaza, said Austrian chancellor Christian Stocker, who spoke with Israeli prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu before the summit.
'The civilian population must not pay the price for Hamas' terror. Netanyahu has pledged to step up all efforts in this direction so that humanitarian aid can be delivered,' he said.
The debate about Gaza is expected to be one of the most contentious parts of the EU summit, which will also cover the war in Ukraine, ongoing tariff negotiations involving the United States, the ceasefire between Iran and Israel and European defence spending.
A joint statement set to be signed off by all EU leaders criticises the 'dire humanitarian situation' in Gaza. A draft of the text hits out at the number of civilian casualties and the levels of starvation in the war-torn Palestinian territory.
Separately, Hungary's far right prime minister Viktor Orban has said he will continue to block Ukraine moving forward in its bid to join the EU.
Brussels started what will be years-long negotiations with Kyiv last June, to consider accepting Ukraine into the 27-state bloc. However Hungary has since vetoed the process moving any further forward.
Speaking before the summit, Mr Orban said he did not want Ukraine to advance into more detailed accession talks, while it remained at war with Russia.
'If we integrate [Ukraine] into the European Union, we would integrate the war and we would not like to be together in a community with one country who is at war and represents an imminent danger,' the populist leader said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
18 minutes ago
- Irish Examiner
TP O'Mahony: Pope Leo's words on Gaza have gone unheeded in the Knesset and the White House
With Gaza haunted by the spectre of mass starvation, Pope Leo XIV's call for respect for humanitarian law has gone unheeded in the two places on Earth where it requires compliance if peace in the Middle East is ever to be achieved - the White House in Washington DC and the Knesset in Jerusalem. The phrase 'the globalisation of indifference' has for too long accurately described the inaction of the international community to Israel's genocidal war in Gaza, and its collective punishment of the Palestinian people. When I learned just over a month ago that nine out of 10 members of one family had been killed in Gaza during an Israeli raid, I thought - in my naivety - that if one incident could stir the conscience of the international community this was surely it. Never, it seemed to me, were the lessons of Pope John XXIII's great encyclical Pacem in Terris ('Peace on Earth') more apposite. But in today's troubled world it is the absence of peace - the peace of which John XXIII spoke so eloquently and movingly back in 1963 - that is one of its most worrying features. Gaza is a shocking example, but it is by no means the only example of the world's lawlessness. In 2024 there were 61 'state-based conflicts' in the world, the most since 1946, according to the Peace Research Institute in Oslo. And that was before the Israel-Iran conflict. We may well ask: why are there so many wars? That lawlessness - fostered by President Donald's Trump's disregard for international law, conventions and norms - is tragically evident on a daily basis in Gaza. Each day Palestinians continue to be killed while attempting to collect food for their families. Medicins Sans Frontieres has accurately described the system as 'slaughter masquerading as humanitarian aid'. The Belfast rap trio Kneecap - who have drawn a lot of criticism, especially in the British media - have been unflinching in their support for the Palestinian people. JJ O Dochartaigh, one of the group, said in a pre-Glastonbury interview: Everyone knows what's happening is wrong. You can't even try to deny it now - Israel's government is just acting with impunity and getting away with it. Gaza's health ministry says that over 58,000 people (mostly civilians) have died in Israeli attacks since the war began. And that number grows daily. Studies at Yale and other universities suggest the official tolls are being underestimated. Meanwhile, the two-state solution - backed by Ireland and other countries - is looking more and more remote. The political situation is not helped by the fact that the Trump White House does not see an independent Palestinian state as a goal. Matters are also not helped by the fact that the EU is divided on support for a Palestinian state, or how to respond to the systematic destruction of Palestinian life in Gaza, beyond mere words. Kaja Kallas, the foreign policy chief of the EU - Israel's biggest trading partner - has said that 'all options are on the table'. But so far there is no agreement on a plan of action. Ireland has played its part, at least in terms of recognition, much to the chagrin of the Israelis. On May 22, 2024, it was officially announced by the then Taoiseach Simon Harris that 'Ireland will recognise the State of Palestine, effective 28 May'. Ireland made the announcement on the same day as Spain and Norway. 'Ireland today recognises Palestine as a nation among nations with all the rights and responsibilities that entails,' said the Taoiseach. Ireland has for many decades recognised the State of Israel and its right to exist in pace and security. We had hoped to recognise Palestine as part of a two-state peace deal but instead we recognise Palestine to keep the hope of that two-state solution alive. The formal recognition of the State of Israel was an altogether different story. The new state of Israel declared its independence on May 14, 1948, and it immediately sought diplomatic recognition from countries around the world. The United States, under President Truman, was the first to grant recognition. On May 28, 1948, Ireland received a telegram from the Israeli foreign secretary asking that 'Eire may grant official recognition to the state of Israel and its provisional government'. On June 4, the Irish government discussed the telegram, and it was decided that 'no action be taken on the telegram apart from the appropriate acknowledgement'. 'For Ireland the issues of Israeli statehood, protection of the Holy Places, the status of Jerusalem and diplomatic recognition remained unresolved. It could have chosen any tack concerning Israel, including the Arab position that the partition of Palestine was illegitimate . . . Instead, Ireland chose the position of the Holy See as a basis for its policy towards Israel. "Not only did the Holy Places argument win prestige for Ireland from the Holy See, but placing such a condition on recognition meant that Ireland would not be entering into diplomatic relations with Israel in the immediate future,' according to Paula Wylie, lecturer in international relations at the University of North Carolina (she studied at UCC). A charity organization distributed food to Palestinians facing severe difficulties accessing basic necessities due to Israel's ongoing blockade and military operations in the Gaza Strip on Thursday. Photo: Ali Jadallah/Anadolu via Getty Images The Holy See's policy was that there would be no recognition of Israel until it guaranteed the internationalisation of Jerusalem and the protection of, and free access to, the Holy Places throughout Palestine. 'Ireland's policy of non-recognition towards Israel was maintained by the Department of External Affairs from 1949 to 1963 as a unilateral foreign policy. To date, historians have accepted the thesis that Ireland refused de jure recognition to protest Israel's lack of regard for the Holy Places in and around Jerusalem,' wrote Ms Wylie. On February 11, 1949, the Irish Government had granted de facto recognition to the state of Israel, an acceptance of the situation on the ground. The New York Times reported Ireland's de jure recognition of Israel in January 1964, just after Pope Paul VI's historic visit to Israel and the Holy Places. Recognising the State of Palestine On June 29, 2025 - 10 years after the Holy See formally recognised the State of Palestine - the new minister of state for foreign affairs of the Palestinian Authority, Varsen Aghabekian, said the 2015 agreement offered a 'vision of hope for the future of the Holy Land'. The historic agreement between the Holy See and Palestine was signed on June 26, 2015, making the Holy See one of the first states in Europe to recognise the statehood of Palestine. The question now is who will follow the example of the Holy See and Ireland? The 'vision of hope' to which the Palestinian foreign minister referred will remain dormant until Israel's ends its collective punishment of the Palestinian people in Gaza. The Trump White House is the key to that. Only Washington can persuade Benjamin Netanyahu to abandon his genocidal war. Meanwhile, the peace for which Pope John XXIII so fervently pleaded and prayed still seems in this troubled world a distant prospect. But without it, at least in the Middle East, the dialogue that could prepare the way for a solution in which two states, Israel and Palestine, can co-exist side-by-side with equal dignity, respect and security, cannot even begin. Read More Israeli official says Gaza ceasefire proposal from Hamas is 'workable'
Irish Examiner
an hour ago
- Irish Examiner
Consumer sentiment slips in July amid concern over cost pressures and tariff threats, survey shows
Irish consumer sentiment has slipped backwards during July, amid renewed concerns over cost pressures and the threat of higher tariffs being implemented by the US, the latest Credit Union Consumer Sentiment Survey shows. The survey showed after a slight improvement across May and June, Irish consumer confidence slipped back this month towards the level seen in April, when tariffs announcement by US president Donald Trump prompted a deterioration. During July, the consumer sentiment index recorded a reading of 59.1, down from the 62.5 figure reported for June. The reading of 58.7 in April represented a two-year low. The July reading is well below the 70.5 recorded during the same month last year, and the long term average of 83.9. The Credit Union Irish Consumer Sentiment Survey is a monthly survey of a nationally representative sample of 1,000 adults conducted by Core Research. The analysis for the sentiment was written by economist Austin Hughes. Earlier this month, Mr Trump threatened to impose 30% tariffs on imports from the EU from August 1 if a deal is not reached. This is higher than the 20% he initially proposed on April 2, before he backtracked and lowered it to 10%. On Thursday morning, EU member states voted to approve counter-tariffs on €93bn on US goods in case a deal is not reached, potentially increasing prices here in Ireland. 'At current levels, the tone of consumer sentiment on the Irish economy is altogether more negative than that implicit in a range of recent forecasts for the Irish economy,' Mr Hughes said. 'While this doesn't mean Irish consumers envisage an imminent economic collapse, it does suggest very elevated fear and uncertainty, coupled with a strong sense that economic conditions could deteriorate markedly through the next 12 months.' 'It could also suggest that many consumers don't feel their own financial circumstances are as robust as the economy as a whole.'
Irish Independent
4 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Tax group points out inconsistency in greenhouse gas taxes as farms escape cost
The group defends the carbon tax, which will rise again in the autumn budget, noting that revenues from it have been used to boost welfare payments and provide energy-efficiency supports for low-income households. It also notes that the tax – intended to discourage use of fossil fuels as the primary sources of greenhouse gas emissions – is not applied to the other primary source, methane. 'It should be noted that the vast majority of greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture (ie methane) are not subject to any environmental tax,' the group says in analysis presented to ministers. Farmers did have to pay carbon tax on fuel for agricultural vehicles but it was at a reduced rate, it said. 'Marked gas oil' - as agricultural diesel is categorised – currently costs 48 cents less per litre than regular diesel, it said. 'Farmers continue to be eligible for a double income tax relief,' the group said. 'A farmer may take an income tax or corporation tax deduction for farm diesel and then a further deduction for farm diesel which is equal to the difference between the carbon tax charged and the carbon tax that would have been charged had it been calculated at 2012 levels.' The tax paper also highlights different environmental taxes in other EU countries, including a new tax on livestock emissions announced in Denmark. Danish farmers will pay a tax of €40 per tonne of livestock methane emissions from 2030 which will increase to €100 by 2035. Revenues will help finance what the Danish parliament has described as the 'reorganisation' of the landscape with more focus on forestry and natural spaces. The Tax Strategy Group make no recommendations based on the proposal but flag research recently undertaken in Ireland around similar ideas. 'The Pathways project, funded by the European Climate Foundation, in partnership with the Institute of International & European Affairs, has published a series of papers on the future of the Irish Agri-food sector,' it says. 'Their paper on 'Agricultural Climate Policy in Ireland from 2030 to Net Zero' recommends Ireland establish an independent Emissions Pricing Design Commission, modelled on Denmark's expert group, to assess the feasibility and design of emissions pricing in Ireland's agricultural sector.'
