Delhi HC unhappy over state's delay in filing appeals
Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma on July 4 warned against any prejudice to the administration of criminal justice by avoidable procedural lapses or lack of diligence on the part of those entrusted with ensuring timely legal action.
"Victims, particularly those belonging to marginalised or economically weaker sections of society, often lack the means or resources to pursue independent legal remedies and instead rely on the State machinery to seek justice on their behalf.
"When the State delays in challenging orders which may adversely affect the victim's case, such as an order of discharge, it is not merely a procedural lapse but a setback to the victim's pursuit of justice," the order said.
Such delays jeopardise victims' right to a fair and complete adjudication of allegations, eroding their faith in the system meant to protect them, it added.
The high court hearing the state's plea for condonation of 325 days' delay in filing a revision petition against a trial court order.
The trial court discharged a man in a case of culpable homicide not amounting to murder under IPC and provisions of the SC/ST Act.
The prosecutor argued that due to administrative formalities and movement of the file from one table to another, the prescribed limitation period expired, resulting in a delay in filing the revision petition.
He claimed the delay was neither deliberate nor intentional and deserved to be condoned in the interest of justice.
The accused, however, opposed the state's contention.
While the court condoned the delay, it cautioned the state against the "repeated instances" of delay in filing appeals or revision petitions which were "a matter of serious concern".
The order continued, "While courts may, in appropriate cases, adopt a liberal approach while condoning such delays, this cannot become a shield for systemic apathy or bureaucratic inefficiency."
A copy of the order was directed to be shared with the director of prosecution of Delhi government who would examine the circumstances surrounding such delays and adopt appropriate steps mitigate future instances.
The step is expected to ensure every stakeholder – from the investigating officer to the prosecutor to the administrative departments – discharges their role with a sense of responsibility and within a clearly defined time frame.
"The state shall form an appropriate policy in this regard, and the same shall be placed before this court within a period of one month from date of the receipt of this order," it said.
This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
an hour ago
- News18
Kerala HC Orders Arrest Of Sunk Vessel's Sister Ship After State Seeks Rs 9,531 Crore In Damages
Last Updated: On May 25, MSC Elsa, carrying over 643 containers, including hazardous cargo and plastic pellets, capsized about 13 nautical miles from Thottapally spillway off Kerala coast The Kerala High Court has ordered the conditional arrest of MSC Akiteta-II, a sister vessel of the Liberian vessel MSC Elsa, which sank off the state's coast. The government has filed an admiralty suit and sought Rs 9,531 crore as compensation, including for pollution damage, remedial action taken by the state and the loss of livelihood of fishermen. The ship is currently at the Vizhinjam port in Trivandrum and according to the order, the vessel can leave the port only if the company gives a security for the amount. Advocate General K Gopalakrishna Kurup and advocate Parvathy kottol, government pleader, appeared for the state. In its plaint, the State invoked Section 4 of the Admiralty (Jurisdiction and Settlement of Maritime Claims) Act, 2017, to seek compensation, including Rs 8,626.12 crore for pollution damage, Rs 378.48 crore for environmental restoration, and Rs 526.51 crore for economic losses suffered by fishermen and coastal communities, amounting to a total maritime claim of Rs 9,531.11 crore. The State also asked that interest at the rate of 6 per cent per annum be awarded from the date of suit till judgment and thereafter at 12 per cent till realisation. It was on May 25 that MSC Elsa capsized approximately 13 nautical miles from the Thottapally spillway off the Kerala coast. According to the admiralty suit, the vessel was carrying over 643 containers, including hazardous cargo and plastic pellets known as 'nurdles'. According to the suit, 'The incident has resulted in massive pollution of Kerala's marine ecosystem, with oil slicks and floating cargo causing serious detriment to the environment, coastal fisheries, and public health." As on June 30, over 61 containers have washed ashore along the districts of Thiruvananthapuram, Kollam, Alappuzha, and Ernakulam, and approximately 59.6 metric tons of plastic nurdles have been collected and transported from Veli Beach to Kollam Port. Manual and mechanical clean-up continues with the aid of 600 government personnel and 300 volunteers under the supervision of the Marine Emergency Response Centre. The Kerala State Disaster Management Authority (KSDMA) declared the incident a 'state disaster". Financial relief has been sanctioned to 78,498 fishermen families and 27,020 allied families at Rs 21,000 per person, along with free ration of 6kg rice per head. The fish market has also suffered a severe crash due to contamination fears. The admiralty suit also stated that six cetacean carcasses, including dolphins and a whale, have been found ashore, suspected to have died due to exposure to microplastics and toxic substances released from the vessel. First Published: July 08, 2025, 10:03 IST
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Delhi HC issues notice to police on Gopal Ansal's plea to quash FIR
NEW DELHI: The Delhi High Court on Monday issued a notice to police on a plea moved by real estate baron Gopal Ansal , convicted in the Uphaar fire tragedy case, for quashing an FIR lodged against him in a cheating case. The FIR has been lodged on a complaint filed by a buyer of land in a project developed by Ansal Buildwell Limited. Justice Amit Mahajan issued notice to Delhi Police and sought a status report. The matter has been listed for hearing on September 10. The High Court has also directed the state not to take coercive steps against the petitioner till the next date of hearing. The bench has also issued a notice to the complainant in the matter upon the filing of the amended memos of the parties. Gopal Ansal has filed a petition seeking quashing of the FIR registered on February 11, 2025, at Police Station Barakhamba Road for the offences under Sections 420, 406, 120B of the Indian Penal Code. The said FIR was registered on a complaint given by Manoj Anand, alleging that he had paid a sum of Rs 3,56,000 regarding the purchase of certain land in a project being developed by the accused's company, Ansal Buildwell Limited. Gopal Ansal is stated to be the director of the accused company at the relevant time. It is alleged that no property was ever handed over to the complainant, Anand, the High Court noted. Advocate Sushil Kumar Gupta, counsel for Gopal Ansal, submitted that the project could not see the light of day since the Jaipur Development Authority did not give permission to convert the status of the land. He submitted that various letters were written to the complainant for a refund of money. However, no response was received, and the complaint has now belatedly been made after almost two decades. Upon learning this fact, the High Court also stated, "Prima facie, this Court has been unable to figure out why such an FIR after two decades was registered by the police authorities." It was also submitted that the accused company, even otherwise, had always been willing to refund the entire money with reasonable interest to the complainant. Ansal's counsel further submitted that to show his bona fide, a sum of Rs 10,00,000 shall be deposited by Anand with the Registrar General of this court within a period of four weeks. Gopal Ansal to a seven-year jail term for tampering with evidence in the 1997 case of Uphaar cinema fire which claimed 59 lives. Earlier in November 2021, a Delhi court had sentenced real estate barons Sushil and Gopal Ansal to a seven-year jail term for tampering with evidence in the 1997 case of the Uphaar cinema fire, which claimed 59 lives. The fire broke out at the Uphaar cinema during the screening of the Hindi film Border on June 13, 1997.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Espionage case: YouTuber Jyoti Malhotra's custody extended by another 14 days
A local court on Monday extended the judicial custody of social media influencer Jyoti Malhotra, arrested in an espionage case on May 16, by another 14 days. The next hearing in the matter is scheduled for July 21. Jyoti Malhotra The 33-year-old was produced before the court via video conferencing. Earlier, her bail plea was rejected on June 12 after police raised objections, arguing that her release could hinder the ongoing investigation. This is the fourth extension of her judicial custody. Previously, the court had extended her remand on June 9 and June 23, each time by 14 days. She was first sent to judicial custody on May 26. Her lawyer, Kumar Mukesh, has contested the charges listed in the first information report (FIR). He argued that while the alleged incident took place in 2023—when the Indian Penal Code (IPC) was in force—the Hisar police booked her under Section 152 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), which replaced Section 124-A (sedition) of the IPC. Mukesh pointed out that Section 124-A had been kept in abeyance by the Supreme Court and therefore could not be used for prosecution. He further claimed that the FIR was based on her statements during questioning on May 15, which he says violates the legal principle that no individual can be compelled to be a witness against themselves.
