Chhattisgarh HC terms exclusion of engineering graduates from Sub-Engineer posts 'arbitrary and discriminatory'

Time of India

4 hours ago

The Chhattisgarh High Court has struck down a rule barring engineering graduates from applying for Sub-Engineer positions in the Public Health Engineering Department, deeming it discriminatory and unconstitutional.
The Chhattisgarh High Court has struck down a rule barring engineering graduates from applying for Sub-Engineer positions in the Public Health Engineering Department, deeming it discriminatory and unconstitutional.
The Chhattisgarh High Court has struck down a rule barring engineering graduates from applying for Sub-Engineer positions in the Public Health Engineering Department, deeming it discriminatory and unconstitutional.
The Chhattisgarh High Court has struck down a rule barring engineering graduates from applying for Sub-Engineer positions in the Public Health Engineering Department, deeming it discriminatory and unconstitutional.
The Chhattisgarh High Court has struck down a rule barring engineering graduates from applying for Sub-Engineer positions in the Public Health Engineering Department, deeming it discriminatory and unconstitutional.
1
2
RAIPUR: The Chhattisgarh High Court declared as "ultra vires" a rule that restricted engineering graduates from applying for Sub-Engineer posts in the Public Health Engineering (PHE) Department.
The court stated that Rule 8 (II) Column (5) of Schedule-III, Serial No. 1, of the Chhattisgarh Public Health Engineering Department (Non-Gazetted) (Recruitment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 2016, is "illegal and without jurisdiction." Chief Justice Ramesh Sinha and Justice Bibhu Datta Guru delivered a common order on two writ petitions, filed by over two dozen individuals.
The petitioners, holding graduate degrees in engineering, sought to participate in the direct recruitment examination for Sub-Engineer (Civil/Mechanical/Electrical) posts.
The examination was scheduled for 27 April 2025, following an advertisement issued on 7 March 2025.
The petitioners argued that the 2016 rules, which prescribed a three-year diploma as the only educational qualification for direct recruitment to Sub-Engineer posts, were discriminatory. They pointed out that for promotional quotas (5 per cent), both diploma and degree holders were eligible. They further highlighted that other state departments, such as the Public Works Department and CSPDCL, permitted both diploma and degree holders to apply for Sub-Engineer positions.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Providers are furious: Internet access without a subscription!
Techno Mag
Learn More
Undo
The petitioners' counsels Ajay Shrivastava, G P Mathur and Pratibha Sahu contended that an engineering degree is a higher qualification than a diploma, and thus, degree holders should not be barred from applying. They cited the Supreme Court's judgement in the Puneet Sharma & Others v. Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board Limited & Another case, which directed states to allow degree holders to participate in recruitment processes.
The State, represented by the Deputy Advocate General, argued that the 2016 rules maintained the same qualification criteria as the earlier 1979 and 2012 rules. The State also submitted that the 5% promotion quota for in-service candidates, which includes diploma and degree holders, was a separate provision for existing employees who may have acquired higher qualifications during their service.
The Chhattisgarh Professional Examination Board (CGPEB), the recruiting agency, stated that it acts based on existing rules and departmental requisitions.
The intervenors supported the State's contentions.
The High Court observed that excluding degree holders, who possess superior knowledge and technical skills, was unreasonable and counterproductive to recruiting competent individuals. The court noted that this restriction undermined principles of fairness and equal opportunity, violating Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India.
'The exclusion of degree holders, who possess the necessary knowledge and technical skills, from eligibility for the post is arbitrary, unreasonable, and counterproductive to the goal of recruiting competent individuals.
It violates the principles of fairness, equal opportunity, and the fundamental rights under Articles 14, 16, and 21 of the Constitution. Notably, other state departments like Public Works and CSPDCL allow both Diploma and Degree holders for similar posts, making the exclusion in the Public Health and Engineering Department discriminatory,' the court stated.
An interim order was issued on 25 March 2025, allowing degree holders to provisionally apply for the posts, subject to the final outcome of the petitions.
The court clarified that this order would apply to all similarly situated candidates.
Following the declaration of the rule as "ultra vires," the High Court has directed the respondent authorities to proceed with the selection process, ensuring that engineering degree holders are allowed to participate, provided they meet other prescribed criteria in the advertisement.