Investigation reports ‘shocking' increase in private jet flights in Scotland
A total of 12,143 private jet flights took off or landed at Scottish airports in 2024, according to Oxfam Scotland.
Scotland's busiest airports for private jet use last year were Edinburgh, Glasgow Prestwick, and Inverness. Scottish Government-owned Prestwick Airport saw a 32% increase in those flights.
Private flights to and from Prestwick jumped from 1,845 in 2023 to 2,437 in 2024.
The investigation revealed a 123% surge in flights at Glasgow Prestwick in July 2024 when The Open was held at the nearby Royal Troon Golf Club.
Oxfam said 453 private jets took off or landed that month — nearly 15 a day — compared to the average 203 monthly flights in 2024.
The report highlighted that some private jets can emit 20 or even 30 times more carbon emissions than flying economy class.
Campaigners say this 'example of excess' happening at an airport owned by the Scottish Government 'risks further undermining Scotland's climate credentials'.
'Scotland is rightly proud to be the home of golf, but it shouldn't be a playground for the world's wealthiest polluters,' Jamie Livingstone, head of Oxfam Scotland, said.
'The fact that Glasgow Prestwick Airport, which is publicly owned, is a destination of choice for those choosing to use private jets should embarrass the Scottish Government.
'The First Minister says he backs landing a fair tax on pollution-spewing private jets, but so far, it's all talk, no take-off. It's time he stopped circling the issue and finally land this fair tax on those polluting Scotland's skies.'
Scottish Greens MSP Ross Greer said the increase in private jet traffic was 'a sign that we urgently need to tax the super-rich'.
The Greens have long campaigned for a private jet tax in Scotland.
However, an ongoing stalemate between the Scottish Government and the UK Government over the introduction of an Air Departure Tax (ADT) on non-commercial jets has delayed progress.
'Delays to the devolution of ADT aren't a get out of jail free card for the Scottish Government,' Greer said.
'They can introduce a charge on private jets at the dozen airports they own right now, raising cash for public services and taking action to tackle the climate emergency.'
The Scottish Government has been contacted for comment.
Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News
Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
8 minutes ago
- The Independent
Ministers want to overhaul rules to make it easier to open pubs and music venues
Ministers have pledged to make it easier to open new bars, music venues and cafes as part of plans to rejuvenate the high street. Chancellor Rachel Reeves has said she wants to 'protect pavement pints' as a new licensing framework will also fast-track permissions for al fresco dining in dedicated areas as the Government looks to modernise planning rules. The Government wants to make it easier to convert disused shops into venues, and dedicated 'hospitality zones' will be brought forward that could see permissions for outside dining, street parties and extended opening hours pushed through quickly. Developers will also be made responsible for soundproofing buildings they construct near pubs or clubs, to protect existing venues from noise complaints. The Government has said the plans will be subject to a call for evidence. The Business Secretary has said that 'red tape has stood in the way of people's business ideas for too long'. Jonathan Reynolds said: 'This Government has a plan to replace shuttered up shops with vibrant places to socialise, turning them into thriving cafes or busy bars, which support local jobs and give people a place to get together and catch up over a beer or a coffee. 'Red tape has stood in the way of people's business ideas for too long. Today we're slashing those barriers to giving small business owners the freedom to flourish.' Ms Reeves said that 'pubs and bars are at the heart of British life'. 'For too long, they've been stifled by clunky, outdated rules. We're binning them, to protect pavement pints, al fresco dining and street parties – not just for the summer, but all year round,' she added. An industry body warned earlier in July that the equivalent of more than one pub per day will close across Great Britain this year, pointing to high bills and taxes. The British Beer and Pub Association (BBPA) estimated that 378 pubs will close this year across England, Wales and Scotland, which it said would amount to more than 5,600 direct job losses. The projected 2025 figures compare with 350 closures in 2024. Bar chain Brewdog announced this week that it would close 10 of its venues, as chief executive James Taylor told staff it is partly in response to 'rising costs, increased regulation, and economic pressures'. Representatives of the hospitality industry welcomed the changes but said they should go hand in hand with a cut to business rates as cost pressures threaten to 'tax out of existence' some businesses. Kate Nicholls, chairwoman of UKHospitality, said: 'We strongly welcome these proposals to cut red tape and make it easier to open and operate hospitality venues, create jobs and grow the economy. 'But positive and encouraging as these measures certainly are, they can't on their own offset the immediate and mounting cost pressures facing hospitality businesses which threaten to tax out of existence the businesses and jobs that today's announcement seeks to support.' Emma McClarkin, chief executive of the British Beer and Pub Association, said: 'After bringing together key voices in the pubs and the wider hospitality sector, it's great news that many of the industry's recommendations on how best to cut red-tape and support growth will be acted on. 'These changes must go hand in hand with meaningful business rates reform, mitigating staggering employment costs, and a cut in beer duty so that pubs can thrive at the heart of the community.' Andrew Griffith MP, shadow business secretary, said: 'Though any cutting of red tape for hospitality businesses is welcome, this is pure hypocrisy and inconsistency from Labour.' He said the Government was 'crippling the hospitality industry by doubling business rates, imposing a jobs tax and a full-on strangulation of employment red tape'. 'As the result, shorter opening hours, shedding jobs and expensive pints are becoming the norm.'
Scottish Sun
9 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
Eye-watering sum Scottish Government spent on empty rooms for refugees revealed
More than 28,000 people with a Scottish sponsor have arrived in the UK so far EMPTY ROOM BILL Eye-watering sum Scottish Government spent on empty rooms for refugees revealed THE Scottish Government has spent up to £75million on empty hotel rooms for Ukrainian refugees, we can reveal. Figures show £294million of taxpayers' cash has been used to reserve shelter for those fleeing Russia's invasion since 2022. Advertisement 1 Scottish Tory shadow housing minister Meghan Gallacher called the bill 'eye-watering' Credit: Alamy But between 10 and 25 per cent of rooms were unoccupied at any given time, suggesting £30million to £75million has been wasted. Scottish Tory shadow housing minister Meghan Gallacher called the bill 'eye-watering'. She added: 'Like thousands of Scots, vulnerable Ukrainians are being forced to live in temporary accommodation because of SNP ministers' failure to build enough homes. 'That's unfair on them and unfair on taxpayers.' Advertisement The Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 has sparked a major humanitarian crisis. And more than 28,000 people with a Scottish sponsor have arrived in the UK so far. The administration refused to name the hotel companies over 'potential risks' if the information became 'public knowledge'. But the 'vast majority of this money' was paid to a firm called Corporate Travel Management which organises accommodation and contracts. Advertisement A whopping £144million was paid out 2022-23, more than £108million in 2023-24, and almost £40million in 2024-25. Equalities Minister Kaukab Stewart said: 'Providing support and sanctuary to people fleeing Russia's illegal war against Ukraine continues to be a priority.' The Sun tracks down Ukrainian mother and child pictured fleeing Putin's war on our front page A Government spokesman said: 'Welcome accommodation occupancy rates were inevitably subject to daily fluctuations as some individuals left while others entered accommodation.'
Telegraph
9 minutes ago
- Telegraph
The Online Safety Act is an assault on freedom
They told us it was about protecting children. That's how they always do it. Wrap tyranny in the warm fuzz of 'safety', and hope nobody reads the fine print. But let me be clear: the Online Safety Act is not about protecting children. It is a Trojan horse for the biggest assault on free speech in modern British history. And unless we act, it will drag our country into a digital surveillance state worthy of Communist China. This is not hyperbole. This is a blunt reality. Section 179 of the act makes it a criminal offence to say something false that causes 'non-trivial psychological harm'. That's not protecting kids from predators. That's criminalising humour, satire, political dissent and angry tweets. Under this definition, a cutting meme, a sarcastic TikTok or a joke about a government minister could land you in court. This is not a safety law. It's a censorship law. Even George Orwell couldn't scarcely have imagined something so sweeping, so vague and so open to abuse. But it gets worse. Section 44 gives a single government minister the power to rewrite the censorship rules without Parliament. Let that sink in. A single person can direct Ofcom to impose new censorship obligations on the internet, and platforms will be legally forced to comply. No vote. No debate. Just diktat. This is the death knell of democracy. It's already happening. Content critical of government immigration policy – including videos of public protests outside migrant hotels – is quietly being censored from social media. Who can blame them? The act threatens them with fines of up to 10 per cent of global turnover and even criminal liability for their staff if they don't suppress content the Government deems 'harmful'. Faced with that, who wouldn't over-block? That's precisely the perverse incentive the act aims to create. This is not just an attack on public discourse, it's an attack on private conversations too. The act includes your private messages. WhatsApp and Signal have warned that the UK Government is demanding access to encrypted chats. That's right: the Government wants to read your DMs. And if tech companies don't build a back door, they face the full weight of the law. The Government claims it will hold off on this part, 'for now'. Don't be fooled. The Tories put this power on the books for a reason – they intend to use it. Today, they say it's for child safety. Tomorrow, it'll be about 'disinformation' or 'extremism' – code for anyone who challenges the failed policies of the political elite. Even more chilling is the mandatory ID scanning this law introduces. Not just for porn, but for regular social media too. If you're under 18, you'll be blocked from seeing 'harmful' content – which, in practice, means anything critical of the Government. This is especially sinister when you realise that 16- and 17-year-olds are being given the vote. They are being sent to the polls, but not allowed to see a political message the Government dislikes. And here's the final irony: this act won't even protect children. Anyone remotely tech-savvy – and let's be honest, most teenagers are – will use VPNs to get around the filters. Some will end up in the depths of the dark web, where the greatest dangers lie. So we get a censored internet, less privacy and no improvement in safety. This dystopian mess didn't come from Labour – though don't expect Starmer to repeal it. No, it was cooked up by the Tories. The same Tories who pretend to champion free speech and civil liberties when it suits them. Robert Jenrick and Suella Braverman – both now trying to reinvent themselves as defenders of British values – voted for this authoritarian legislation without question. No objections. No concern. In many ways this is the most insidious form of politician. One that says what we want to hear, and then sells us all out when it counts. The truth is this: the Online Safety Act is a disgrace to our democracy. It turns Britain into a state where truth is whatever the Government says it is. Where protest is suppressed, dissent is squashed, and your private thoughts are no longer private. Reform UK is the only political force willing to speak out against this. We believe in free speech, even when it's uncomfortable. We believe the role of government is to protect citizens – not to police their opinions. And we believe in repealing this dangerous act in full. Britain must remain a country where people can speak their minds without fear. Where satire thrives. Where criticism of the powerful is not just allowed, but encouraged. Clamping down on the free speech of British people will not succeed. Reform and Nigel Farage will see to that.
