More than 23m Britons think they may be due compensation for mis-sold car loans, UK poll finds
Borrowers, banks and the government are anxiously awaiting the ruling, which could trigger one of the biggest redress schemes since the £50bn payment protection insurance (PPI). The PPI saga forced UK banks to compensate people who had bought often worthless insurance cover.
The survey, conducted for the consumer law firm Slater and Gordon, found that 45% of people think they might be entitled to a payout over a car finance plan taken out between 2007 and 2021.
The car loans scandal has been rumbling on for more than a year, but ballooned in October when a court of appeal judgment vastly expanded a Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) investigation into potentially harmful commission arrangements.
It determined that paying a secret commission to car dealers, which had arranged the loans without disclosing the sum and terms of the commission to borrowers, was unlawful.
Lenders including Santander UK, Close Brothers, Barclays and Lloyds are potentially on the hook for up to £44bn, according to some analysts.
The FCA is working on a potential compensation scheme under which lenders that mis-sold loans would check their records and decide who gets compensation.
The public's expectations of compensation are high, according to the survey.
Of the 4,000 people surveyed, 45% believed they were likely to be eligible for money back, which equates to more than 23 million adults across the UK. Forty per cent said they would consider a legal challenge if dissatisfied with the outcome of their claim. Consumers also showed little trust in the ability of banks and lenders to check records and distribute compensation.
There are also concerns that some consumers could miss out because most banks purge customer data after six years. The FCA ordered lenders to cease doing so in January 2024, when it launched the investigation, but files relating to customers with contracts that ended more than six years earlier may have already been lost.
Sign up to Business Today
Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning
after newsletter promotion
The chief operating officer of Slater and Gordon, Elizabeth Comley, said the public rightly expected to be compensated for their losses.
'The FCA is trying put things right, but there's a risk that a redress scheme leaves many people disappointed and keen to challenge the process,' she said.
'That sort of backlash would be bad for everyone – the scandal would drag on for years, the courts would be inundated with challenges and the public would be denied the clear resolution they want.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
27 minutes ago
- Reuters
Shell trims second-quarter gas, LNG output outlook
LONDON, July 7 (Reuters) - Shell (SHEL.L), opens new tab trimmed the second-quarter outlook for its integrated gas division output and liquefied natural gas production in a quarterly trading update published on Monday. For its integrated gas division, Shell gave production guidance of 900,000 to 940,000 barrels of oil equivalent per day(boed), compared to a 890,000 to 950,000 boed range given as part of its first-quarter results. LNG production is set to come in at 6.4 to 6.8 million metric tons in the second quarter compared to a previous range of 6.3 to 6.9 million tons.
BBC News
40 minutes ago
- BBC News
Spalding business owners refuse BID payment amid dispute
A group of businesses in Spalding say they are determined not to pay towards the town's Business Improvement District (BID) despite the threat of legal BID was established after a ballot of local businesses which was won by a single vote in July 2024. However, a number of traders have refused to pay the compulsory charge, saying the vote was invalid because some businesses had not received a ballot Holland District Council said it was confident the ballot was carried out in a correct and proper manner. The cost of the levy to each business is calculated as a percentage of its rateable value, meaning the larger the business, the more it pays. The BID plans to use the money to fund projects to improve the town centre and attract more shoppers to the town. Photographer Julian Wheeler is one of a group of small business owners opposed to the levy. He, along with 45 others who did not pay, was found liable for the charge in a hearing at Boston Magistrates' Court on 30 June. Mr Wheeler said he would continue to refuse to pay the charge and hoped to challenge the legality of the vote which established the BID."We have identified at least two infractions of the BID regulations, on the part of South Holland District Council, and that brings into question the legality of the BID being enacted."Beautician Macie Harman, who owns Macie's Boo-tique was also summoned to appear in court for non-payment. She said she would now pay the levy to avoid incurring further costs, but would continue to fight to have to the BID scrapped."I didn't receive a ballot so I don't think it's fair that I should have to pay for something I didn't have a choice about," she said. A South Holland District Council spokesperson said: "We have every confidence that the BID ballot and levy collection have been carried out in the correct and proper manner, working in line with national guidelines to ensure a fair and transparent process, with clear and documented communication throughout."The ballot was managed to the same high level as any other election, with verified data being provided to a recognised electoral services provider, and the council's returning officer overseeing the process with the usual checks, proofing and sign-off taking place."The collection of the levy on behalf of the BID has been carried out in the same manner as it would be with council tax and all other council managed collection processes, and all recovery actions undertaken have been done in line with the relevant national regulations." Listen to highlights from Lincolnshire on BBC Sounds, watch the latest episode of Look North or tell us about a story you think we should be covering here. Click here, to download the BBC News app from the App Store for iPhone and here, to download the BBC News app from Google Play for Android devices.
Telegraph
41 minutes ago
- Telegraph
How to stop your CV getting screened out by bots
As many frustrated job-hunters will testify, searching for a new role can, at times, be pretty soul-destroying. Filling out countless applications is often time-consuming, and rejection is hard to handle – especially if you know you've got the requisite skills and qualifications. The problem is, you may be going up against a horde of applicants, and there's a risk the person who picks up your CV gives it just a few seconds of their attention before relegating it to the 'reject' pile. Worse still, there is evidence to suggest companies are increasingly using AI bots as an initial phase to screen out applicants when hiring. As a result, some people are finding it impossible to make it through to interviews, despite being qualified for the job. Suzie Berry, director of talent acquisition at training business, Flourish said: 'We are hearing from so many of our candidates that applying for jobs in 2025 can feel like shouting into the void. This isn't new but what has changed is who is making the initial decisions.' While this may make for worrying reading, there are steps you can take to ensure your CV and cover letter satisfy what the bots are looking for. Here Telegraph Money takes a closer look at how these tools work – and how to ensure you make it through the initial 'sift': So how do these bots work? The aim of a CV is to give employers a quick way to sort through applicants. But to speed things up, many firms now use what are known as ' applicant tracking systems' (ATS). According to LinkedIn's 2025 Work Change report, a huge 88pc of businesses are now using AI in one way or another to manage the volume of applications they receive – and to improve efficiency within their recruitment processes. Peter Wood, chief technology officer at recruitment agency, Spectrum Search, said: 'Most CVs today are filtered by software before a person ever sees them. If you're applying to a large company or a tech-focused startup, your application is likely scanned by an automated system that checks for keywords and matches against the job description.' Crucially, these tools aren't reading for style or personality. Mr Wood added: 'They focus on things like skills, job titles, qualifications and dates.' These AI bots typically use large language models and are commonly integrated into ATS. James Neave, head of data science at job matching platform Adzuna, said: 'They are able to assess CVs in the context of specific job requirements – typically assigning each candidate a score, where the higher scores are shortlisted for hiring managers to review.' Worryingly, this can mean that if your CV doesn't contain the right keywords – or enough of them – your application could be cast aside before a human being even sets eyes on it. Ms Berry said: 'AI bots will often parse candidates' CVs breaking down the information from this into structured data.' While this approach isn't new, it has evolved significantly in recent years. Ms Berry added: 'What used to involve simply pulling out job titles and dates is now about interpreting tone, inferred skills, and even cultural fit.' Equally, with the rise of AI, some ATS tools are not only screening candidates, but also taking on tasks such as scheduling interviews, and predicting which applicants will be the best fit. Mr Neave said 'Recruiters typically spend seven seconds on average eyeballing a CV to determine whether it's a good fit, while AI bots can review hundreds to thousands of CVs in the same timeframe. With thousands of applications landing in a recruiter's inbox every day, AI bots are able to do the heavy lifting.' So what's the problem? For the genuine candidate trying to prove their suitability, the application process has changed dramatically. Dr Clare Walsh, Director of Education at the Institute of Analytics (IoA), said: 'They may find their value is judged by random criteria that have nothing to do with their suitability. AI parsing tools may also struggle with things such as PDF formats, or with use of column text and other formatting choices.' This could mean that, for example, as a result of you using graphics, or non-standard formatting, some details included on your CV may get skipped altogether. At the same time, many systems find it hard to understand context, which means they may miss transferable skills, career changes – or anything that doesn't fit a strict pattern. And then there's the issue of bias. Ms Gall said: 'These systems aren't perfect. They can disadvantage and overlook talented candidates, especially those who don't speak English as a first language, are neurodiverse, or simply present their experience in a non-traditional way.' Alongside this, there are also real ethical concerns, even if some argue that it reduces human prejudice. University of Washington research found that racial and gender biases in the way AI tools screened applicants. How can you get past the bots? So what can you do to make sure your CV and cover letter navigate these automated gatekeepers? Be sure to mirror keywords from the job ad To improve your chances, you need to tailor your application with the AI algorithm in mind. Ms Gall said: 'Mirror keywords from the job description in your CV and use AI 'CV checkers' or tools such as LinkedIn Premium to see how well you match the role before hitting send.' This is a view shared by Peter Duris, co-founder of Kickresume, a platform for building CVs and covering letters. He said: 'Make sure you include keywords that you have seen in the job description. But take care to do so in a natural-sounding way so that it still makes sense to human readers.' Understanding how 'Applicant Tracking Systems' work Be prepared to roll up your sleeves and do the research to see what will please the bots. Ms Walsh said: 'Practising key word optimisation may well determine your success in, say, applying for a role. It's a new world.' Keep the language clear As these tools often favour familiar phrases and predictable patterns, make sure your skills are clearly spelt out. Mr Wood said: 'It helps to be as direct as possible. Use the same wording you see in the job description where it applies, avoid unexplained acronyms, and make sure key information stands out.' Write out your qualifications in full to help the CV scanner understand exactly which you have, and the level you achieved. Keep job titles and dates simple and consistent. Avoid 'fluff' Don't use AI, as recruiters will see straight through this. Ms Gall said: 'You can't rely on AI to do the work for you. Always make sure your CV truly reflects your skills. If not, any AI-generated 'fluff' that you include will quickly fall apart in an interview or once you're in the role.' Anything that lacks specifics may also be flagged up quickly as suspicious. Remember this: AI excels at creating persuasive but generic content. Always double check for accuracy With technology evolving in this way, it's imperative that every detail of your CV is spot on. Ms Walsh said: 'Overemphasising and embellishing may well be a more dangerous game to play in 2025. Bots are often trained to spot unrealistic achievements and inconsistencies in your story better than a human.' Keep your CV clean If there's one thing to focus on, it's making your CV easy to process. Do this by using simple layouts and standard headings. Ms Berry said: 'It is vital that CVs are easy to read. Clear formatting can mean candidates have more success.' If your CV is a PDF, make sure the text is 'searchable' by a computer using 'optical character recognition' (OCR). There are plenty of online tools available to help with this. Ms Walsh goes a stage further, suggesting that simple word text format may actually be the best option. She said: 'Your CV needs to be machine readable above all else. The visually-creative CVs that would get a human's attention only a few years ago may never get past the robot.' Take care with graphics While your CV can contain visual elements, all the text must be readable so that the ATS or AI tool can scan it. Mr Duris said: 'If your CV contains a visual element, like a chart listing some of your skills, be sure to mention those skills in writing in the body of the PDF.' Make yourself memorable Take steps such as asking for referrals, connecting with the hiring manager, and reaching out on LinkedIn to people who work there. Ms Berry said: 'Outreach has never been more vital. Think about sending something personal. It is this human connection that can overcome the challenges faced by AI screening.' Thinking and acting differently is key to cutting through the noise.
