Map reveals UK's pothole hellscape with thousands fed up with state of roads in major city – is your area in the top 10?
Motoring experts have unveiled the cities where frustration with potholes and congestion is at its peak - revealing that these issues are playing a significant role in one in three Brits losing their passion for driving.
3
3
3
As it's the summer, many motorists are preparing to pack up their cars and head off on their family holidays.
But according to a new report from car finance giant Carmoola, millions are simply dreading getting behind the wheel - due to the country's worsening roads and traffic.
A particular issue is the UK's so-called 'pothole plague', contributing to a third of drivers (32%) saying they no longer enjoy driving.
Hot-headed road users - described as 'aggressive or impatient drivers' - are the main reason half (49%) of Brits have become disillusioned, while 46% claim the stress of driving has taken all the joy out of it.
Aidan Rushby, chief executive of Carmoola, said: 'We have uncovered a very human truth.
'That driving, once a symbol of freedom and adventure, has become something many people now dread.'
Belfast drivers are the most ticked off when it comes to the conditions of their roads, with 26% saying they're overly frustrated with the state of potholes.
Meanwhile, when it comes to congestion, 38% of Glaswegians say bumper-to-bumper congestion is what riles them up the most.
These statistics highlight why only a quarter of road users view driving as a source of escape, while 34% see it merely as a practical means to get from A to B.
Indeed, many say they simply find driving boring and would choose almost anything else above getting behind the wheel.
To that end, 20% would rather organise their sock drawer and 15% say they would sit through a three-hour meeting instead.
13% would prefer to watch paint dry and 9% would opt to do a tax return.
UK'S WORST AREAS FOR POTHOLE FRUSTRATION REVEALED
Belfast – 26%
Nottingham – 22%
Plymouth – 22%
Birmingham – 20%
Manchester – 19%
Newcastle – 18%
Cardiff – 17%
Southampton – 17%
London – 17%
Bristol – 16%
Edinburgh – 15%
Glasgow – 15%
Brighton – 13%
Norwich – 12%
Liverpool – 11%
Leeds – 9%
Sheffield – 9%
POTHOLE PLAGUE
Back in March, it was found that our pothole-plagued roads will take 12 years and nearly £17billion to fix, according to a report.
More than half of local streets have less than 15 years of life left, says a survey by the Asphalt Industry Alliance.
But, on average, they are re-surfaced only once every 93 years.
AIA boss David Giles laid bare the scale of the problem, explaining how, despite £20billion being thrown at road maintenance in the past decade, the short-term approach has failed.
He said: 'There have been no significant improvements in structural road conditions.'
The AIA claims getting roads back to ideal condition would take 12 years and cost a corking £16.81 billion.
Its survey also found 94 per cent of local authority highway teams believe there has been no improvement to their roads over the past year, with two thirds saying they have got worse.
And despite councils spending £137.4million filling 1.9million potholes last year, the repair backlog continues to balloon.
The Department for Transport said: 'We're investing £1.6billion to help councils resurface local roads and fix the equivalent of up to seven million extra potholes over the next financial year.'
JOY-RIDING
With 60% of lapsed drivers saying they wish they could rediscover the joy of driving, Carmoola has launched its 'Joy Ride' service – an initiative designed to inject some much-needed cheer back into everyday journeys.
A series of Joys – women joyful by name and nature (pic attached) – took over one of Britain's dullest-sounding streets: Mundania Road in East Dulwich (pic of them there attached), London, joining real drivers for their daily routes, dancing, chatting and singing along the way, transforming routine trips into unexpectedly uplifting experiences.
'We believe driving can and should be something people look forward to – not something that adds stress to their day,' adds Carmoola's Rushby.
'That's why we created Joy Rides: to remind people what driving can feel like when it's filled with laughter, company, and a bit of unexpected delight. Sometimes, a little joy is all it takes to make driving feel fun again.
'And for 3.26 million Brits, the thing that's reduced their enjoyment of driving is not owning the car they really want. We've seen first hand the joy that a dream car can bring – which is exactly why we're on a mission to make car ownership simpler, more empowering, and more joyful for everyone.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Hulkenberg's first podium 'emotional rollercoaster'
Nico Hulkenberg started his day at Silverstone as far back as a driver can get in Formula 1 - the last row of the grid. Fast forward 52 laps of chaotic wet-weather racing and the 37-year-old came through the field, aided by a perfectly executed Sauber strategy, to achieve his very first F1 podium on his 239th attempt. Hulkenberg's sensational third place at the British Grand Prix on Sunday - which set a new record for the longest time before finishing on the podium at 5,593 days - has been 15 years in the making. The German's debut was at the 2010 Bahrain Grand Prix with Williams and after 10 seasons in F1, he found himself without a seat in 2020. He made a return with Haas three years later. Hulkenberg said that while he was "relieved" to claim the longed-for podium, he was also feeling "pretty empty". "It's been an emotional rollercoaster this weekend, being virtually last [on Saturday], so a pretty bad day to one of the best days of my career - it's obviously a lot to take in," said Hulkenberg. His climb from 19th to third on what was a truly miserable summer's day in the UK, plus the points he had scored in the previous three races, means Hulkenberg moves up to ninth in the drivers' world championship. "That race was intense, with all the changes of conditions, it was sketchy," he added. "A high-speed track with changeable conditions is never easy. "While I'm happy and relived, I'm mostly tired, and looking forward to getting home, to be honest." Hulkenberg's rookie Sauber team-mate, Gabriel Bortoleto - who is 17 years his junior - was one of the first to congratulate him, saying over the radio: "Man, you don't know how happy I am for you. You are a legend. Absolutely insane what you did today." Race was 'survival fight' for Hulkenberg During the early stages of his career, Hulkenberg was close to the champagne celebrations on three occasions, finishing fourth twice with Force India and once in his first stint with Sauber in 2013. A year earlier, in 2012, he looked set to take his maiden F1 victory when he was leading the Brazilian Grand Prix after starting sixth on the grid. Fate intervened, however, when a collision with Lewis Hamilton when he tried to pass the then McLaren man to regain the lead resulted in a drive-through penalty, and he eventually ended the race in fifth. It was Hamilton - now in a Ferrari - who Hulkenberg had to keep at arm's length in the final laps at Silverstone in order to fulfil his dream. "It was a survival fight for a lot of the race," he said, before adding: "It's going to sink in more over the next few hours and the next few days, and I think I'll feel the enjoyment even more in the week to come." The magnitude of Hulkenberg's accomplishment was even celebrated by drivers whose day at Siverstone had not gone to plan. A downcast Oscar Piastri, who saw the race win slip away when he was given a 10-second time penalty for a safety-car infringement, handing his team-mate Lando Norris victory on home soil, found solace in that fact that: "At least Hulkenberg got a podium here."
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Why Max Verstappen was not guilty of dirty tricks in Oscar Piastri's race-deciding penalty
Oscar Piastri cut a dejected figure after a 10-second time penalty lost him the British Grand Prix to McLaren team-mate and championship rival Lando Norris. The Australian was adjudged to have braked 'erratically' under the safety car on lap 22, which forced the chasing Red Bull of Max Verstappen to take evasive action on Silverstone's Hangar Straight, overtaking Piastri in the process. Championship leader Piastri was as downbeat as we have ever seen him in his three seasons in Formula One, having ceded more ground to Norris. McLaren, meanwhile, believe the penalty to be 'very harsh', even after viewing the incident in further depth. Indeed, team principal Andrea Stella even suggested that there could have been an element of Verstappen trying to effectively buy Piastri a penalty. Stella was nearly 20 minutes late to his scheduled post-race press conference, he said, because he wanted to examine the incident further. He defended his driver's actions and questioned the penalty. 'I just wanted to take another look after the initial look that we took live, during the race. I have to say that the penalty still looks very harsh,' Stella said. 'There's a few factors that we would have liked the stewards to take into account. 'First of all, the safety car was called in very late, not leaving much time for the leader to actually restart in conditions that you lose tyre temperature, you lose brake temperature – and the same was for everyone.' 'We'll have to see also if other competitors kind of made the situation look worse than what it is. Because we know that as part of the racecraft of some competitors, there's also the ability to make others look like they are causing a severe infringement when they are not.' The previous What happened on Sunday was vaguely reminiscent of an incident in the Canadian Grand Prix in June. Under the safety car in Montreal, leader George Russell was accused of braking erratically with Verstappen behind, just like Piastri did. Red Bull were unhappy, claiming that Russell slammed on the brakes to try to get Verstappen penalised for overtaking under the safety car. The FIA dismissed this protest and Russell kept his victory. It appeared to be this that Verstappen was referring to when he said he was surprised that Piastri had been punished. 'The thing is that it's happened to me now a few times, this kind of scenario,' he said. 'I just find it strange that suddenly now Oscar is the first one to receive 10 seconds for it.' What happened According to Piastri, what happened was that he did the same as he had on previous laps under the safety car – braking in order to generate tyre and brake temperature. Either way, it seemed that the Australian slowed down sharply on the straight, with Verstappen having to dive to the right to avoid a potential collision. In doing so he went ahead of Piastri, but immediately slowed to slot back into second. Piastri's justification In his immediate post-race interview Piastri refused to give any explanation on his feelings other than that he profoundly disagreed with the decision. 'Apparently you can't brake behind the safety car any more. I did it for five laps before. Thanks to the crowd for a great event. Thanks for sticking through the weather. I still like Silverstone even if I don't like it today.' When asked to compare the incident to Russell and Verstappen's in Canada, he said the claimed lack of consistency made him 'confused'. Stella meanwhile, stopped short of criticising the stewarding at Silverstone, but said that McLaren would 'keep the dialogue going' with the FIA, who he said did a 'difficult job'. Telegraph Sport's verdict: Piastri crossed the line and should blame only himself The FIA stewards were clear in their verdict in awarding Piastri a 10-second penalty. Indeed, the incident looked clear cut on initial viewing. The information in the FIA's statement does little to undermine that, in fact reinforcing it. 'When the clerk of the course had declared that the safety car was coming in that lap and the lights were extinguished, Car 81 suddenly braked hard (59.2 PSI of brake pressure) and reduced speed in the middle of the straight between T14 and T15, from 218kph to 52kph, resulting in Car 1 having to take evasive action to avoid a collision,' their judgment read. 'This momentarily resulted in Car 1 unavoidably overtaking Car 81, a position which he gave back immediately.' What appears to be at the root of the actions of both Piastri and Verstappen is the safety car's lights being extinguished suddenly and, clearly, unexpectedly. It meant Piastri did one thing – slowed down suddenly on the Hangar Straight – and Verstappen did not follow. It is fair that the lead driver sets the pace once the safety car comes in, but there are limits to this. Piastri went too far, beyond what should be expected and accepted in this situation. It is worse when you consider the damp conditions with the pack bunched up and spray cascading from the front to the back. Was Piastri trying to buy a penalty for Verstappen? Unlikely. Was Verstappen trying to do the same for his rival? He is not averse to pushing the limits, but again, this was not the case here. The blame should be placed firmly with the Australian. He has a right to be disappointed, but that feeling should be turned inwards rather than outwards.
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Hamilton's car 'unbelievably tricky to drive' in wet
Lewis Hamilton said the Ferrari he drove in the wet-dry British Grand Prix "was the most difficult car I've driven in these conditions".The seven-time champion finished fourth at Silverstone behind the McLarens of Lando Norris and Oscar Piastri and Sauber's Nico race started on a damp track which dried a little before a heavy rain shower and then dried again. "The car was unbelievably tricky to drive. I think ultimately I learned a lot today, there's lots to take from the day," said Hamilton, who has won a record nine British Grands Prix."It's only my second time driving in the wet in this car. I can't even express to you how hard it is. It's not a car that likes those conditions."For me, (it's important) to sit down with the people that are designing the car for next year. Because there's elements of this car that cannot go into the following year." Hamilton said Ferrari had upgrades coming to the car in forthcoming races - these would follow a new floor that was introduced at the previous race in 40-year-old said he wanted "a consistent balance, a car that turns at a low speed, just a more stable car".He added: "We were looking great through this weekend. In practice. we were always right up there. Still weren't able to fully extract everything in qualifying. And then the race is a little bit harder. So that's where I want to get stronger."Hamilton's third fourth place of the season means he is still to finish on the podium since joining Ferrari at the start of this Charles Leclerc finished second-last in 14th after making the wrong call to come in for slick tyres on a damp track after the formation lap. His race spiralled downhill from said: "We were kind of nowhere the whole race, and when I say nowhere it's like really nowhere, I was a second off (the pace) and on top of that I was doing lots of mistakes."I was really struggling to keep the car on track so it was an incredibly difficult day."Team principal Frederic Vasseur said: "The main issue we had today was that we struggled a lot when we were in the dirty air to overtake."We spent our lives overtaking sometimes 10 laps and then we were much faster. I think it was a difficult weekend, difficult for the strategy."
