Stanley Nelson, Journalist Who Probed Klan Murders, Dies at 69
His death was confirmed by his daughter, Tessa Nelson Granger. She did not specify a cause but said he had recently had surgery.
Mr. Nelson's efforts to solve a particularly vicious Klan murder — the arson death of the Black owner of a shoe-repair shop in Ferriday, La., in 1964 — made him a Pulitzer Prize finalist in 2011; earned him the esteem of the small but ardent band of journalists dedicated to civil-rights-era cold cases; and were the inspiration for a central figure in the Mississippi writer Greg Iles's best-selling novel 'Natchez Burning' (2014).
'In his quest for truth, Stanley led me through the secret pasts of our home states — Mississippi and Louisiana — among men who lived in the shadow of crimes that had no statute of limitations,' Mr. Iles wrote in The Natchez Democrat last week.
Natchez, Miss., is just across the river from Ferriday, where Mr. Nelson was the editor of The Concordia Sentinel, a weekly with a three-person newsroom and a circulation of 5,000. The Louisiana town, around 200 miles northwest of New Orleans with a population of about 3,000, is best known as the hometown of the rock 'n' roll pioneer Jerry Lee Lewis and his preacher cousin, Jimmy Swaggart.
During the 1960s, Ferriday was also known for its virulent Klan presence and for being a rough sawmill town — 'the meanest' in Louisiana, the New Orleans civil rights attorney Jack Martzell once said. It was a place civil rights workers feared.
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Black America Web
an hour ago
- Black America Web
Chicago Nightclub Shooting Kills Four, 14 Wounded
Anadolu Independence Day weekend got off to a rough start before it even began in Chicago last night (7/2) when a shooting outside of Artis Lounge nightclub resulted in at least four deaths and an additional 14 being wounded. The tragic scene in River North coincided with an album release party for rising rapper Mello Buckzz. RELATED: Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson Proposes Task Force To Address Crime On Black Women The official report from Chicago police puts the incident starting at around 11PM, when a dark SUV drove past Artis Lounge and three people from inside the car fired many shots at those standing outside. More information on the victims in this senseless shooting below, via CBS News: 'The victims injured in the shooting range in age from 21 to 32 years old. Of the injured, two were taken to Illinois Masonic Hospital, two were taken to Mt. Sinai Hospital, three were taken to Stroger Hospital and six were taken to Northwestern Memorial Hospital in conditions ranging from good to critical. Four of the injured are in serious to critical condition, according to Chicago police. A 24-year-old man was shot in the chest and taken to Stroger Hospital, where he died. A 25-year-old man was shot in the head and taken to Stroger Hospital, where he died. A 26-year-old woman and a 27-year-old woman were both shot in the chest and taken to Northwestern Memorial Hospital where they died, Chicago police said.' Mello Buckzzz herself appears to be taking the situation quite hard, as multiple posts in her recent Instagram Stories (seen below) reveal she was connected to all four of the deceased including a boyfriend, brother and two best friends. The owners of Artis Lounge addressed the tragedy with a statement that reads, 'Last night, an act of violence occurred within the vicinity of our restaurant and it deeply shook us. Artis was created as a safe space. A Space where Black, Brown, Queer, and allied communities could gather, be celebrated, and feel at home in River north. We've always led with that mission. And what happened last night disrupted it in the most painful way. Our hearts are with the victims and their loved ones.' No arrests have been made so far, but we'll do our best to give updates as an investigation into the shooting and search for the three shooters remains ongoing. We send prayers to all those who lost a loved one. SEE ALSO
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
What is the Mann Act? Here's what to know about the law used to convict Sean 'Diddy' Combs
Sean 'Diddy' Combs was convicted Wednesday of prostitution-related offenses under the federal Mann Act, an anti-sex trafficking law with a century-old history. Though he was acquitted of more serious charges, Combs was still convicted of flying people around the country, including his girlfriends and male sex workers, to engage in paid sexual encounters. Over the years, the law has been applied to prominent convictions, including R&B superstar R. Kelly, British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell, musician Chuck Berry and more than a century ago, boxer Jack Johnson. Its broad wording and a subsequent Supreme Court interpretation once allowed prosecutors to bring cases against interracial couples, and eventually many others in consensual relationships, according to Cornell Law School's Legal Information Institute. The law was amended in the 1980s and today it is primarily used for prosecuting interstate prostitution crimes or people accused of taking underage children across state lines for sexual purposes. Here's what to know about the law. Why is it called the Mann Act? In 1910, Congress passed the bill, which was named after Republican U.S. Rep. James Robert Mann of Illinois. It's also known as the 'White-Slave Traffic Act' of 1910. How does it apply to Combs' case? Combs was convicted of counts involving two former girlfriends: the R&B singer Cassie and a woman who testified under the pseudonym Jane. Both women said at trial that Combs had pressured them into degrading sex marathons with strangers, who were paid for the sexual performances. Jane said she was once beaten by Combs for declining to participate. Cassie said that when she tried to walk out of one such event, Combs beat her and dragged her down a hotel hallway. Combs was acquitted of sex trafficking and racketeering charges but convicted of transporting people to engage in prostitution. What's the history behind it? The 1910 law originally prohibited the interstate or foreign commerce transport of 'any woman or girl for the purpose of prostitution or debauchery, or for any other immoral purpose.' It followed a 1907 congressionally appointed commission to look into the issue of immigrant sex workers, with the view that a girl would only enter prostitution if drugged or held captive, according to Cornell's Legal Information Institute. The law was used to secure a conviction against Jack Johnson, who became the first Black boxer to win a world heavyweight title in 1910. Johnson was convicted in 1913 by an all-white jury for traveling with his white girlfriend, who worked as a sex worker, in violation of the Mann Act. (President Donald Trump posthumously pardoned Johnson in 2018, saying Johnson had served 10 months in prison 'for what many view as a racially motivated injustice.') How has the law changed since 1910? In a 1917 Supreme Court case, the justices ruled that 'illicit fornication,' even when consensual, amounted to an "immoral purpose,' according to Cornell's Legal Information Institute. A 1986 update made the law gender-neutral and effectively ended the act's role in trying to legislate morality by changing 'debauchery' and 'immoral purpose' to 'any sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense.' The act received additional amendments in 1978 and 1994 to address issues of sexual exploitation of children. Nevertheless, Combs ' legal team made a motion last February to dismiss a Mann Act charge, writing that the law 'has a long and troubling history as a statute with racist origins." Prosecutors said there was nothing racist about pursuing charges under the act. Most of Combs' accusers are people of color.
![Why Sean Combs Was Never Going To Be Fully Held Accountable [Op-Ed]](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fnewsone.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2Fsites%2F22%2F2017%2F12%2F15127414166521.jpg%3Fquality%3D80%26strip%3Dall&w=3840&q=100)
Black America Web
4 hours ago
- Black America Web
Why Sean Combs Was Never Going To Be Fully Held Accountable [Op-Ed]
Source: Neilson Barnard / Getty Over the coming days, there will be no shortage of commentary and debate about the split verdict in the Sean 'Diddy' Combs case. Cable news panels will argue over whether justice was served. Pundits will parse the difference between prostitution charges and sex trafficking. And social media will fill with memes, outrage, and hot takes about celebrity privilege, race, and misogyny. Some will call the partial conviction a victory for survivors. Others will say he got off easy. And some folks will invoke Bill Cosby and R. Kelly to say that rich Black men are always singled out for sexual crimes while white predators walk free. But there's a much bigger ideological and cultural backdrop here that shapes how a case like this gets prosecuted, adjudicated, and received. We are living through an era of reaction against women's rights and bodily autonomy. The last decade has seen the rolling back of Roe v. Wade , a fierce assault on contraception and gender-affirming care, and a mainstreaming of violent misogyny, from incel forums to the halls of government. Recall that Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh was confirmed despite credible allegations of sexual assault aired in nationally televised hearings. Our twice-impeached president, Donald Trump, was found liable for sexual abuse and defamation in civil court, yet pays almost no political cost. Harvey Weinstein may be in prison, but countless other high-profile sexual assault cases have ended in acquittals or hung juries, from Bill Cosby's initial mistrial to Danny Masterson's first trial, to the repeated failures to secure convictions against powerful men. Cosby was freed on a technicality despite dozens of women accusing him of assault, highlighting how even convictions can be undone for powerful men. Even Jeffrey Epstein died before facing a full trial, while Ghislaine Maxwell's sentencing is treated as a kind of closing chapter, leaving the network of clients untouched. Meanwhile, states pass forced-birth laws that deny even child rape victims abortions, and online influencers monetize misogyny, normalizing harassment, coercion, and rape as male entitlement. Taken together, all this produces a numbing effect. Source: Al Pereira / Getty When sexual violence is so widespread, so normalized, and so often excused or minimized at the highest levels of power, juries and the public become conditioned to see these crimes as murky, negotiable, or even inevitable. Jurors may hesitate to impose the harshest possible penalties, reasoning that if presidents, judges, and billionaires can skate by with little consequence, why should this man be singled out for life in prison? The sheer scale of impunity can breed a weary cynicism, a reluctance to draw hard moral lines, and a tendency to downgrade even serious crimes to something more socially acceptable, like 'bad behavior,' 'transactional sex,' or 'poor judgment.' This is not an accident, but part of a broader cultural project to protect male sexual entitlement while eroding women's autonomy and credibility. In the courtroom, that cultural backdrop becomes an unspoken defense, making it harder to secure the kind of verdict that would meaningfully challenge the system itself. This is not an accident or a glitch, but part of a broader cultural project that protects male sexual entitlement while eroding women's autonomy, even becoming an unspoken defense in the courtroom. In this context, the era of MAGA, convicting a powerful media mogul on sex trafficking and sending him to prison for life would have been about more than punishing one celebrity. It would have been an unambiguous statement that women's sexual autonomy matters, that forced or coerced sex is not simply 'transactional,' and that the state will intervene to defend women from male sexual entitlement. But that's precisely the kind of moral stance that is under assault in this era and women's resistance is a threat to social order. In that world, handing down a life sentence for sex trafficking against an ultra-rich, connected, male celebrity, especially one who can also claim racial targeting, would be more than punishing Diddy. The racial dynamics here are complex. While Black men are disproportionately criminalized, that fact can also become a shield for wealthy Black celebrities facing sexual abuse claims. Source: Frederick M. Brown / Getty It would set a precedent. It would say: The state is willing to define this behavior as beyond the pale. It is willing to protect women's autonomy and dignity against male power, even the most elite male power, regardless of race. That is a dangerous precedent for a system moving in the other direction. Because the rise of a Gilead-like social order depends on blurring the lines around sexual coercion, on normalizing men's right to use women's bodies, on criminalizing women's control over their own reproduction, and on trivializing or excusing sexual violence as misunderstanding, regret, or 'transaction.' A life sentence for sex trafficking wouldn't just punish Diddy. It would be a declaration of values that the system currently refuses to make. So even if the jury isn't consciously thinking: We have to protect Gilead, they are steeped in a cultural logic that sees women's sexual victimization as negotiable, deniable, less important. Lost in the parsing of verdicts are the voices of the women who described coercion, fear, and degradation—whose experiences the system still struggles to name fully as trafficking. And the legal system reflects and enforces that culture. This is not just about one man. It's about a society that is deliberately keeping the door open for sexual exploitation, forced birth, and male sexual dominance. Diddy's conviction on the lesser charges was, in many ways, a political dodge. It allows the justice system to claim it held a powerful man accountable while sidestepping the far more disruptive verdict that a trafficking conspiracy conviction, and a potential life sentence, would have delivered. And beyond the courtroom, this compromise verdict teaches the public where the lines are drawn, and where they're carefully avoided. By convicting him only for transporting women for prostitution, the jury avoids making the bold moral and legal statement that his actions were organized, coercive exploitation deserving the label of trafficking. It's a compromise verdict that satisfies calls for some punishment without threatening the social order that depends on tolerating, excusing, and even monetizing men's sexual access to women's bodies. Dr. Stacey Patton is an award-winning journalist and author of 'Spare The Kids: Why Whupping Children Won't Save Black America' and the forthcoming 'Strung Up: The Lynching of Black Children In Jim Crow America.' Read her Substack here . SEE ALSO: Sean Combs Acquitted Of Most Serious Charges There Is No Defending Diddy SEE ALSO Why Sean Combs Was Never Going To Be Fully Held Accountable [Op-Ed] was originally published on
