I lost my 16-year-old son to suicide from addictive AI algorithms. We can't let Big Tech destroy our children
Print Close
By Jennie DeSerio
Published June 30, 2025
When my 16-year-old son Mason was going through a painful breakup, he did what many kids of his generation do: He turned to TikTok.
Mason used the social media site to search for positive affirmations and inspirational quotes. Instead, TikTok's algorithm sent him the most horrific content urging suicide and self-harm. In November 2022, Mason took his own life.
What I found on his phone haunts me to this day, and TikTok – and all social media platforms – should be held accountable when their algorithms and design lead to significant harm.
Imagine my dismay when I learned that Congress, without public debate and under the radar, is now quietly pushing a sweeping federal moratorium that would block states from protecting kids from addictive algorithms that push pro-suicide and other harmful content and prevent acting on the next generation of online threats, even as tragic stories are already piling up.
FEDERAL AI POWER GRAB COULD END STATE PROTECTIONS FOR KIDS AND WORKERS
The moratorium is buried in a massive tech package, moving fast and with little scrutiny, before most Americans even realize what's at stake. This moratorium would prohibit states from enforcing nearly any law related to AI – including laws that "regulate automated decision making."
That means blocking bills designed to empower parents, require safe default settings, require age verification and curb addictive design features.
It would halt laws like Florida's Online Protections for Minors Act relating to online access to materials harmful to minors (HB 3).
It would limit New York's Stop Addictive Feeds Exploitation (SAFE) for Kids Act (S7694A), which prevents companies from providing kids and teens addictive, data-driven algorithmic feeds without parental consent.
META REPEATEDLY ENDANGERS CHILDREN WHILE PARENTS REMAIN SIDELINED
It would stop Utah's Minor Protection in Social Media Act (S.B. 194), which requires companies not to recommend or share minors' social media accounts and data to users they are not connected with.
The harms aren't hypothetical. Just ask Megan Garcia, whose teenage son died after being targeted by AI-generated content. Or the countless families grappling with deepfakes used in sextortion, or with children drawn into relationships with AI "companions" that encourage isolation and self-harm. AI is already being used to manipulate, addict and deceive kids, and there are no guardrails.
Advocates may argue a federal AI framework is "right around the corner." We've heard similar arguments before – on privacy, on data, on content moderation – for 20 years. Two decades of saying "just wait," while kids suffer, is no excuse to strip states' rights.
Congress has not passed a single law to protect kids online in over 25 years. Now it wants to take away the rights of states that have taken action, while framing AI as a global race to the finish line that overrides our children's safety.
'BIG, BEAUTIFUL' BILL COULD GIVE A FREE PASS FOR BIG TECH TO KILL JOBS
Big Tech argues that a patchwork of state laws will stifle innovation – but what's really at stake isn't innovation, it's accountability. These companies don't want 50 sets of rules because they don't want any rules. Plus, they've found allies in Congress willing to silence the states that have stepped up to protect families.
This moratorium is not just preemption of commonsense legislation to protect our young – it's a total giveaway to Big Tech, done in the name of "innovation" and massive profits while ignoring the cost in lives.
There is a bipartisan amendment to strip this moratorium that would halt this reckless overreach and keep the door open for states to act when federal lawmakers won't. All members of Congress should support this amendment before another child dies due to online harms. Saving kids' lives is not a political issue, it is a moral and human issue.
CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION
We know what happens when Congress lets Big Tech regulate itself. Nothing. Kids suffer, and families like mine are left to pick up the pieces.
We need real safeguards for kids, not backroom deals that silence the only people taking real action to protect kids: parents, advocates and state leaders. This moratorium is a smokescreen for Big Tech to do as it pleases, and it must be stopped from becoming law.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP Print Close
URL
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/i-lost-my-16-year-old-son-suicide-from-addictive-ai-algorithms-we-cant-let-big-tech-destroy-our-children
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
22 minutes ago
- CNN
‘Musk is right about this': Elizabeth Warren shocked to find agreement with Musk over megabill
CNN's Kaitlan Collins talks with Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) about finding surprising common cause with Elon Musk over their shared objections to President Trump's megabill.
CBS News
32 minutes ago
- CBS News
Colorado's gray wolf reintroduction plan costs $2.2 million more than expected, agency says
Colorado Parks and Wildlife told an interim legislative committee it's spent about $3 million to relocate 30 wolves to the state over the last two years. That's more than double what voters were told it would cost when they approved wolf reintroduction in 2020. CPW Director Jeff Davis speaks before state lawmakers regarding the total costs and progress of the Colorado gray wolf management plan Monday, June 30, 2025. The Blue Book estimated it would cost about $800,000. Ranchers say, not only is the cost of the program out of control, the management of it is off the rails. "A depredating pack was known to have depredated in Oregon before they put them in Middle Park," Tom Harrington, a cattle producer in Roaring Fork Valley, told lawmakers. "They had serious impact there. They packaged them up, put them away for awhile. And then, they put them back out -- right in my backyard." Harrington and other ranchers told state lawmakers they have lost trust in CPW after it relocated a pack of wolves to Pitkin County after it killed livestock in Copper Creek. The wolves continued to kill cattle in Pitkin, resulting in CPW euthanizing one of them. "I feel [Proposition] 114, the reintroduction, should be called 'the promises made and promises broken too,'" Garfield County Commissioner Perry Will said before lawmakers. "Promises broken. Total program failure and cruelty to wolves." CPW's own wolf reintroduction plan bars the relocation of depredating wolves. "That was my decision. I take full responsibility, and I question that decision ever day," CPW Director Jeff Davis told lawmakers. Davis says he doesn't know if wildlife officers warned anyone in Pitkin County about the pack's relocation. "That said, it led to a lot of really important things," Davis said. The CPW director says the state agency has deployed drones and range riders to monitor for wolf activity, hired wildlife damage specialists and depredation rapid response teams. Davis says they're hazing wolves that get near livestock. Davis admits -- even after removing one wolf -- he's seen concerning behavior in a video and says they will remove more wolves if necessary. Ranchers and some lawmakers want the entire program paused. "I believe the governor, by his actions, set up this plane to fail," Harrington asserted. "It was rushed. There was no timely alerts. We couldn't prepare. I believe that we need no more new releases until these plans are in place and the basics are working." CPW plans to relocate another pack of wolves from Canada in December, and Davis told lawmakers he will not pause the program. The office of Gov. Jared Polis released a statement that said, "Colorado voters approved the ballot measure to reintroduce wolves into Colorado and Colorado Parks and Wildlife and Governor Polis are following the law and upholding the will of the voters, while working to balance the needs and concerns of producers. Governor Polis did not advocate for or support the ballot measure, but always supports implementation of the will of the voters including the successful implementation of the Wolf Management Plan, which was approved unanimously by CPW commissioners, including the timeline, in response to voters' approval of the ballot measure." Ranchers say they are also concerned about inadequate compensation. The fund created by the legislature to compensate ranchers when a wolf kills their livestock is broke.
Fox News
33 minutes ago
- Fox News
Stephen Miller explains why he's waited all his life for Trump's 'big, beautiful bill'
All times eastern FOX News Radio Live Channel Coverage WATCH LIVE: 'Vote-a-rama' begins as senators offer amendments to Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill'
