
EXCLUSIVE Agonizing final moments of factory worker crushed to death in tire press revealed in report
Marshall Hunt was sucked into a McNeil Akron Bag-o-Matic tire curing press at the Hoosier Racing Tire factory in Plymouth, a small town in northern Indiana, on February 7.
'Mr. Hunt's head was caught in the closed press, trapped between the heat shields of the tire curing press at the neck, and employees could not open it,' according to a nearly 800-page report from the Indiana Occupational Safety and Health Administration (IOSHA).
He died from blunt force trauma to the head and neck, according to the Marshall County Coroner.
The 30-year-old left behind his two young sons, his longtime partner and a family whose grief has been compounded by the fact his death was avoidable, according to IOSHA.
The state agency, which is responsible for enforcing OSHA rules in Indiana, uncovered a litany of failures at the plant, including an inadequate safety bar around the tire press which Hunt died on.
'This was waiting to happen to somebody,' Harmony Mahler, Marshall's sister, told Daily Mail.
'They were fined $7,000 for my brother's death. That's it. What motivation is there for them to have a safe environment? Everyone in that company's life is in danger, and they don't care because there's no recourse,' she said.
GRAPHIC: In a police photo provided to IOSHA, Marshall is seen slumped over next to the tire press after employees lifted the machine up off him
'This is unlike any other experience I've gone through,' Marshall's brother Alexander added.
'This is universe shattering. Everything I've ever known in my entire life feels inside out and flipped upside down now. And yes, it does still feel like that.'
Alexander, 35, said he was staying at his father's house when he got the call at 'three or four in the morning' on the day Marshall died.
'I pretty much collapsed to the floor,' he said. 'I was choking on my own words.'
A Hoosier employee named Ethan Paul Keller was the first to notice that Marshall was caught in the machine, according to a police report obtained by Daily Mail.
Keller told police he was working on a tire press in the same line as Marshall and saw him 'slumped over the press'.
At first, Keller thought Marshall was looking at a pressure gauge, but he looked again a little while later and saw that his coworker was in the same position, according to the police report.
That's when he went over and saw that Marshall's head was stuck in the press, police said.
The tire press that Marshall got stuck in is pictured in the upright position hours after his death
Managers were alerted and they rushed to the area with a manual override key that can immediately lift the press in an emergency situation.
Officer Jesse Witkowski arrived on the scene shortly after the press was lifted and saw Marshall lying on the ground next to the press. He and another officer determined that he was not breathing and did not have a pulse.
Before leaving the scene, Officer Witkowski entered a break room at the factory and asked two employees who knew Marshall if he had suicidal ideation. Both employees said he did not.
The specific tire press that Marshall died on is capable of exerting pressures of 2000 pounds per square inch (PSI), according to workers interviewed by police.
The human skull can only withstand 520 pounds of force before cracking, according to a bike-helmet study published in the Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics.
The tire presses at Hoosier all have a metal safety bar that automatically stops the downward close of the press when it is touched or bumped into.
However, IOSHA inspectors said it was inadequate because it didn't fully surround the press, as multiple pictures included in the report show.
The safety bar, 'did not prevent employees from being caught between mold halves as the top mold closed,' the report claimed.
Pictured: A nearly identical tire press machine to the one that killed Marshall is shown to have a safety bar that can easily be bypassed on the left or the right
Marshall's death did not have to happen, according to IOSHA inspectors, who said that the tire press he was operating 'was inadequately guarded to the left and right sides of the safety bar'.
Mike Hammond, who's been the safety manager at the Hoosier factory in Plymouth since 2013, told inspectors that Marshall was found to the left of the machine 'where the safety bar wouldn't have been activated,' per the report.
Had it been activated while Marshall was operating the machine, the tire press would have stopped coming down.
This problem wasn't unique to Marshall's machine. IOSHA investigators concluded that 28 other tire press machines in the factory had the same fault with their safety bars.
Additionally, 30 of the factory's post cure inflators were deemed to be unsafe due to high risks of employees getting caught in them.
Post cure inflators, typically known as PCIs, are the second step in the tire manufacturing process.
A Hoosier employee at the Plymouth factory had their thumbs crushed in one of the PCIs on October 31, 2024, according to the IOSHA report.
The incident didn't result in the worker being hospitalized, but on a February 10 walkthrough — three days after Marshall's death — inspectors pointed out several problems with the PCIs at the factory.
'The PCIs have no guarding at their pinch points and no barrier guards for their rotation,' said the report.
And according to interviews conducted by the inspectors, no modifications were made to the PCIs in months after the worker injured their thumbs in the machine.
As Marshall's family tries to pick up the pieces, Harmony decried Indiana laws that largely put a damper on negligence lawsuits against companies.
The Indiana Workers' Compensation Act, for example, makes it so that employees are heavily restricted from suing their employer for injuries sustained while on the job, even if it can be proven that the employer was negligent.
Instead, employees are required to go through the workers' compensation system to get payouts. Families trying to get death benefits for a worker's dependents are bound by the same constraints.
Every other US state has these restrictions, which exist to streamline the process for compensating employees by preventing protracted lawsuits.
In Indiana, there's a chance you can sue your employer if they intentionally hurt you or if provably committed a criminal act.
'If I cannot get them in a court of law, I will get them in the court of public opinion,' Harmony said, referring to Hoosier.
Even before an employee's thumbs were injured, Hoosier was the subject of two IOSHA investigations, one that began in December 2021 and another in April 2022.
Both probes found 'serious' safety violations, with IOSHA fining Hoosier $4,500 for each transgression.
The agency said Hoosier was not in compliance with a federal standard called 'general requirements for all machines' in both instances.
This rule stipulates that all machines in American workplaces need to be guarded by 'one or more methods' to protect 'the operator and other employees in the machine area.'
The machines Marshall worked on lacked multiple safety measures, according to the IOSHA report.
In the case of Marshall's death, IOSHA fined Hoosier $7,000 on May 6. The company decided to contest this on May 14, according to public records.
Daily Mail approached Hoosier for comment about the nearly 60 machines at the Plymouth factory that were deemed to be severely lacking in proper guarding.
Daily Mail also asked about the factory's prior lapses in safety that have been documented by IOSHA inquiries and whether any changes have been made since Marshall's death. The company has not responded.
Marshall's brother, Alexander, recalled the shattering moment he was informed of his death. He was working the night shift as a delivery driver for Pizza Hut, so he happened to still be awake.
'I don't recall when exactly I got the call, but it was his girlfriend, Lexi,' he said, recalling his unease at being contacted so early in the morning.
'It was Lexi's mom actually on her phone, and she broke the news to me. She just told me, "Your brother had an accident working. He's not with us anymore." And I heard a bunch of first responders in the background,' he said.
Eventually, one of the first responders got on the phone with him so they could begin making funeral arrangements. All of this being thrown at Alexander so suddenly was too much for him, he said.
'I kind of went into shock and just told them, I'll give you his details. Just give me a little bit. And I got off the phone and went from there. I woke my dad up and I told him Marshall's dead,' he said.
His father was able to remain level headed but Alexander admitted that he 'did not take it well at all.'
Marshall also had big plans with girlfriend Lexi that were tragically cut short, according to Alexander.
'He was going to marry Lexi in a few more months,' Alexander said. 'He was actually going to move into a home that I own in Arkansas.'
'He and Lexi were planning to move there as soon as he was able to,' he added. 'And once he got there, got a job, and got settled in back in that town, that's when he was gonna ask her to marry him.'
Alexander only recently told Lexi this, since in the immediate aftermath, he didn't feel it was the right time to share it with her.
'She had a hard time coming with words,' he said of her reaction. She sat there quietly for a minute or two, he said, which prompted him to lighten the tension.
'I was like, "would it have been a yes or a no?" And I did get her to laugh. She said, "of course it would have been a yes."'
Alexander said he and his brother had a strong bond. One of the things he'll miss the most about him are the talks they used to have.
'One of the things that really got to me the most when he was gone was — he and I, when we were together, just two of us, and just talking on long drives or whatever — I could have conversations with him that I just cannot have with anybody else in this world,' he explained.
'Like very deep conversations where no one else can really understand what we're talking about. He and I could. Only with each other.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
7 minutes ago
- The Independent
Appeals court keeps order blocking Trump administration from indiscriminate immigration sweeps
A federal appeals court ruled Friday night to uphold a lower court's temporary order blocking the Trump administration from conducting indiscriminate immigration stops and arrests in Southern California. A three-judge panel of the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals held a hearing Monday afternoon at which the federal government asked the court to overturn a temporary restraining order issued July 12 by Judge Maame E. Frimpong, arguing it hindered their enforcement of immigration law. Immigrant advocacy groups filed suit last month accusing President Donald Trump's administration of systematically targeting brown-skinned people in Southern California during the administration's crackdown on illegal immigration. The lawsuit included three detained immigrants and two U.S. citizens as plaintiffs. In her order, Frimpong said there was a 'mountain of evidence' that federal immigration enforcement tactics were violating the Constitution. She wrote the government cannot use factors such as apparent race or ethnicity, speaking Spanish or English with an accent, presence at a location such as a tow yard or car wash, or someone's occupation as the only basis for reasonable suspicion to detain someone. The appeals court panel agreed and questioned the government's need to oppose an order preventing them from violating the constitution. 'If, as Defendants suggest, they are not conducting stops that lack reasonable suspicion, they can hardly claim to be irreparably harmed by an injunction aimed at preventing a subset of stops not supported by reasonable suspicion,' the judges wrote. A hearing for a preliminary injunction, which would be a more substantial court order as the lawsuit proceeds, is scheduled for September. The Los Angeles region has been a battleground with the Trump administration over its aggressive immigration strategy that spurred protests and the deployment of the National Guards and Marines for several weeks. Federal agents have rounded up immigrants without legal status to be in the U.S. from Home Depots, car washes, bus stops, and farms, many who have lived in the country for decades. Among the plaintiffs is Los Angeles resident Brian Gavidia, who was shown in a video taken by a friend June 13 being seized by federal agents as he yells, 'I was born here in the states, East LA bro!' They want to 'send us back to a world where a U.S. citizen ... can be grabbed, slammed against a fence and have his phone and ID taken from him just because he was working at a tow yard in a Latino neighborhood,' American Civil Liberties Union attorney Mohammad Tajsar told the court Monday. The federal government argued that it hadn't been given enough time to collect and present evidence in the lawsuit, given that it was filed shortly before the July 4 holiday and a hearing was held the following week. 'It's a very serious thing to say that multiple federal government agencies have a policy of violating the Constitution,' attorney Jacob Roth said. He also argued that the lower court's order was too broad, and that immigrant advocates did not present enough evidence to prove that the government had an official policy of stopping people without reasonable suspicion. He referred to the four factors of race, language, presence at a location, and occupation that were listed in the temporary restraining order, saying the court should not be able to ban the government from using them at all. He also argued that the order was unclear on what exactly is permissible under law. 'Legally, I think it's appropriate to use the factors for reasonable suspicion,' Roth said The judges sharply questioned the government over their arguments. 'No one has suggested that you cannot consider these factors at all,' Judge Jennifer Sung said. However, those factors alone only form a 'broad profile' and don't satisfy the reasonable suspicion standard to stop someone, she said. Sung, a Biden appointee, said that in an area like Los Angeles, where Latinos make up as much as half the population, those factors 'cannot possibly weed out those who have undocumented status and those who have documented legal status.' She also asked: 'What is the harm to being told not to do something that you claim you're already not doing?' Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass called the Friday night decision a 'victory for the rule of law' and said the city will protect residents from the 'racial profiling and other illegal tactics' used by federal agents.


Reuters
8 minutes ago
- Reuters
US appeals court keeps bar on Los Angeles federal immigration arrests
Aug 2 (Reuters) - A federal appeals court late on Friday affirmed a lower court's decision temporarily barring U.S. government agents from making immigration-related arrests in Los Angeles without probable cause. Rejecting the Trump administration's request to pause the lower court's order, the three-judge appeals panel ruled that the plaintiffs would likely be able to prove that federal agents had carried out arrests based on peoples' appearance, language and where they lived or worked. President Donald Trump called National Guard troops and U.S. Marines into Los Angeles in June in response to protests against the immigration raids, marking an extraordinary use of military force to support civilian police operations within the United States. The city of Los Angeles and other Southern California municipalities joined a lawsuit filed in June by the American Civil Liberties Union accusing federal agents of using unlawful police tactics such as racial profiling to meet immigration arrest quotas set by the administration. A California judge last month blocked the Trump administration from racially profiling immigrants as it seeks deportation targets and from denying immigrants' right to access to lawyers during their detention. In Friday's unsigned decision, the judges of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit largely rejected the administration's appeal of the temporary restraining order. The judges agreed with the lower court in blocking federal officials from detaining people based solely on "apparent race or ethnicity," speaking Spanish or accented English, or being at locations such as a "bus stop, car wash, tow yard, day laborer pick up site, agricultural site, etc." The Department of Homeland Security and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement did not immediately respond to requests for comment outside business hours. Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass called the order a victory for the city. "The Temporary Restraining Order that has been protecting our communities from immigration agents using racial profiling and other illegal tactics when conducting their cruel and aggressive enforcement raids and sweeps will remain in place for now," she said in a statement. Mohammad Tajsar, senior staff attorney at the ACLU Foundation of Southern California, welcomed the ruling in statement: "This decision is further confirmation that the administration's paramilitary invasion of Los Angeles violated the Constitution and caused irreparable injury across the region."


Sky News
an hour ago
- Sky News
Trump says 'nobody has asked' him to pardon Ghislaine Maxwell - but he has 'right to do it'
Donald Trump has said "nobody has asked" him to pardon Ghislaine Maxwell, but insisted he has "the right to do it" as US president. Jeffrey Epstein's former girlfriend is currently serving a 20-year sentence after being convicted of helping paedophile financier Jeffrey Epstein traffic and sexually abuse underage girls in 2021. Prosecutors have said Epstein's sex crimes could not have been done without Maxwell, but her lawyers have maintained that she was wrongly prosecuted and denied a fair trial, and have floated the idea of a pardon from Mr Trump. Last week, they asked the US Supreme Court to take up her case. When pressed on the possibility of pardoning Maxwell, Mr Trump told reporters: "I'm allowed to do it, but nobody's asked me to do it." He continued: "I know nothing about it. I don't know anything about the case, but I know I have the right to do it. I have the right to give pardons, I've given pardons to people before, but nobody's even asked me to do it." Mr Trump also said he would not pardon Sean "Diddy" Combs, who was convicted in July on two charges of transportation to engage in prostitution. 4:28 His comments came shortly after the federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) said Maxwell has been moved to a minimum-security prison camp in Texas. She was being held at a low-security prison in Tallahassee, Florida, that housed men and women, but has now been transferred to a prison camp in Bryan, Texas. When asked why Maxwell was transferred, BOP spokesperson Donald Murphy said he could not comment on the specifics, but that the BOP determines where inmates are sent based on such factors as "the level of security and supervision the inmate requires". Maxwell's lawyer confirmed the move but also declined to discuss the specific reasons for it. The Texas camp houses solely female prisoners, the majority of whom are serving time for nonviolent offences and white-collar crimes, Sky's US partner NBC News reports. Minimum-security federal prison camps house inmates considered to be the lowest security risk and some facilities do not even have fences. A senior administration official told NBC: "Any false assertion this individual was given preferential treatment is absurd. "Prisoners are routinely moved in some instances due to significant safety and danger concerns." Maxwell has received renewed attention in recent weeks, after the US Justice Department said it would not be releasing the so-called 'Epstein files'. The department said a review of the Epstein case had found "no incriminating 'client list'" and "no credible evidence" the jailed financier - who killed himself in prison in 2019 - had blackmailed famous men. Officials from the Trump administration have since tried to cast themselves as promoting transparency in the case. Last month, they lodged a request to unseal grand jury transcripts - which was denied - and Maxwell was last week interviewed by Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche. Epstein survivor's family criticises move Maxwell's move to a lower security facility has been criticised by the family of Epstein abuse survivor Virginia Giuffre, who died in April, and accusers Annie and Maria Farmer. They said in a statement: "It is with horror and outrage that we object to the preferential treatment convicted sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell has received. "Ghislaine Maxwell is a sexual predator who physically assaulted minor children on multiple occasions, and she should never be shown any leniency. "Yet, without any notification to the Maxwell victims, the government overnight has moved Maxwell to a minimum security luxury prison in Texas."