‘Very nervous': Radio star Jase Hawkins admits fears after conceiving son via Melbourne's error-plagued Monash IVF clinic
The fertility clinic in the Melbourne suburb of Clayton on Tuesday revealed it mistakenly transferred the wrong embryo into a patient.
It comes just months after the company admitted one of its patients gave birth to a stranger's child in a shocking embryo mix-up in April.
Hawkins, 42, on Wednesday revealed he and his wife Lou conceived their youngest son Archie via the fertility clinic.
One-half of Nova 100's Jase & Lauren said the couple still has embryos stored there in case they decide to have more children.
However, he said he now doesn't 'trust' the clinic after the blunder and will have a 'conversation' with Lou about taking them off the ice.
'I'm not trying to be dramatic, but I'm like, I don't trust them sitting in that freezer at the moment,' Hawkins told his co-host Lauren Phillips.
'It just made me think last night, well, I think we need to speed up that conversation about what we want to do with them.
'Because, at the moment, I don't trust the current situation.'
Hawkins reassured listeners the couple are sure they aren't the victims of an embryo mix-up with Archie, who they said looks a lot like his older brother, Felix.
'He's a dead set ringer for his brother...so we're pretty sure we're good there,' the radio star said
Nevertheless, he said there was an 'icky feeling in his guts' after hearing about Monash IVF's latest muddle-up.
"As someone who's gone through it (IVF), like it was such a, such a personal experience," he said.
"And whatever company you go through for something like, there's that trust that you have."
Last Thursday, the Melbourne clinic accidentally put a patient's own embryo into a patient rather than an embryo from their partner as planned.
'Monash IVF has extended its sincere apologies to the affected couple, and we continue to support them,' a spokesperson said.
'Commencing immediately, Monash IVF will implement interim additional verification processes and patient confirmation safeguards over and above normal practice and electronic witness systems to ensure patients and clinicians have every confidence in its processes.
'Whilst industry-leading electronic witness systems have and are being rolled out across Monash IVF, there remains instances and circumstances whereby manual witnessing is required.'
'Monash IVF has disclosed the incident to the relevant assisted reproductive technology (ART) regulators, namely the Reproductive Technology Accreditation Committee certifying body and Victorian Health Regulator.'
The company's previous incident, reported in April, occurred at its Brisbane facility in 2023.
Monash IVF blamed a 'human error' as the reason for the embryo mix-up which led to a birth.
'Instead of finding the expected number of embryos, an additional embryo remained in storage for the birth parents,' a Monash IVF spokesperson said.
'(An) investigation confirmed that an embryo from a different patient had previously been incorrectly thawed and transferred to the birth parents, which resulted in the birth of a child.'
It was not until February, months after the mother gave birth, that Monash IVF realised the mistake.
Chief Michael Knapp, at the time, said he was "truly sorry" for what had happened and was "confident that this is an isolated incident".
A Victoria government spokesperson said the government requested Monash IVF explain what happened in Brisbane to reassure all families.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
09-07-2025
- ABC News
Queensland laws which would force IVF providers to notify authorities of 'serious adverse events' delayed six months
Queensland laws that would force IVF companies to notify authorities about "serious adverse events" — such as embryo mix-ups — will be delayed by six months to allow time for "consultation". Earlier this year, Monash IVF "voluntarily" told Queensland Health about a bungle at its Brisbane clinic, where a patient gave birth to a baby that was not genetically related to her. That case and another more recent embryo mix-up in Melbourne have put the national spotlight on IVF regulation. The next stage of Queensland's Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) Act was meant to come into effect in September, however the Crisafulli government on Wednesday confirmed it will be deferred until March so it could "undertake proper consultation with stakeholders'. As well as mandatory "serious adverse event" notifications for providers, the laws would give Queensland Health the power to issue an improvement notice to ART providers to minimise health and safety risks. It would also allow authorities to place conditions on, as well as suspend or cancel, a provider's licence. Serious adverse events could involve "significant medical or surgical conditions" resulting from assisted reproductive treatment, breaches of law, or gamete or embryo identification mix-up, according to the bill's explanatory notes. The government said the decision to defer stage two of the laws from September to March was based on the advice from the chief health officer. "The six-month deferral will provide Queensland Health with sufficient time to consult on the draft ART Regulation 2025 that is required to operationalise the next stage of the Act," Health Minister Tim Nicholls said in a statement. His office foreshadowed likely amendments to the laws. The government said since the first stage of the act had come into force, some providers had paused IVF treatment for certain patients over concerns about meeting the new requirements. The ABC has previously reported on the case of one Queensland IVF patient who had to cancel her embryo transfer because it did not comply with the new laws, only to be later told she could go ahead with her treatment. The government also cited concerns about a lack of consultation before the laws passed. "When it comes to helping families experience the miracle of life, we must ensure the IVF industry is well-regulated while also resolving the major issues created by Labor rushing through laws," Mr Nicholls said. "This is a sensible pause while government works to get the regulation right. Families deserve clarity and care and that starts with proper consultation." Shadow Health Minister Mark Bailey was critical of the delay. He said the legislation followed what had already been "exhaustive" consultation over several months as well as an investigation by the Health Ombudsman. But a Queensland Health spokeswoman said delaying the implementation would give the department more time to consult with the donor-conceived community and fertility providers. "It is critical Queenslanders have confidence in assisted reproductive services and that [the] industry understands its obligations, which is why we must get the legislative reforms right," she said. "The revised implementation date does not change our commitment to prioritising the health and wellbeing of people accessing ART services. "We will continue to work closely with ART providers to ensure they have rigorous safeguards in place to identify and mitigate potential risks." Family creation lawyer Sarah Jefford said it was "not the time to be holding back on these reforms given there's already a lack of trust in the community towards fertility providers". She also said there should be an independent national framework for fertility providers. In June, the nation's health ministers agreed to a three-month rapid review of the IVF sector following the second Monash IVF bungle. Queensland Health said delaying the next stage of the laws would allow the department time to consider the outcomes of that national review.
ABC News
07-07-2025
- ABC News
Calls for 'wild west' of online sperm donation to be regulated due to 'lifelong consequences'
A leading Australian fertility lawyer is urging governments to regulate the "wild west" of online semen donation, accusing them of being "asleep at the wheel" as women continue to turn to websites and apps to seek donors. Stephen Page is calling on health ministers to look at regulating the space as part of the three-month rapid review of the nation's fertility sector that was sparked by the second Monash IVF mix-up. "There's no regulation, you can set up a website, you can set up an app and bang the drum and get men coming along saying that they will be donors, either by AI (artificial insemination), or NI (natural insemination, or what we used to call sex)," he said. One sperm donation Facebook group, which has more than 21,000 members, asks questions around insemination methods people are comfortable to use, including NI. Last year, ABC's Background Briefing investigated Facebook group sperm exchanges and the "known donor" movement as "wait times and costs see more Australians turn away from traditional sperm banks". The sites are used by some single women and lesbian couples seeking to start a family without the big expense and delays of going to fertility companies, which can involve long wait times to access donor sperm. But Mr Page, who is also on the Fertility Society of Australia and New Zealand (FSANZ) board, cited risks including the lack of a cap on the number of families a donor can donate to through social media and concerns women could be exploited. He said the need for reform was urgent. "It worries me greatly. There's been all this attention about IVF clinics and let's be clear, I think much of that is warranted, but what really worries me is these sites and apps being unregulated," he said. Mr Page said donors should have to provide the site or group's administrator with ID verification, such as a driver's licence or passport. It should then be passed on to a regulatory authority, and if the donor has surpassed the limit on how many families he can create, "remove him from the site", Mr Page said. Donors should also have to declare sexually transmitted infection status, he added. The Brisbane-based lawyer, who made it clear he was not speaking on behalf of FSANZ, believes if social media groups or sites failed to adhere to a proposed code of practice, then they should be shut down. "You can't control people on the phone, you can't control if they meet in the pub or the corner store, but you can certainly control how they communicate through an app or website, which is how most people communicate," he said. "We can't have children waking up in the morning discovering that they've got 57 siblings because there's been a failure of political will to regulate these apps and websites. Asked if any other country regulated this area, he replied: "No, not as far as I'm aware." Adam Hooper, who started Sperm Donation Australia on social media in 2015 because he believed in "known donation", said regulations would "put people in danger". "If regulations are brought in (it) will turn into the dark web where children will never know their donors (sic) identities," Mr Hooper told the ABC in response to a series of questions. "Sperm Donation Australia gives the best advice and goes above and beyond anywhere in the world for a free platform. "Recipients are told to visualise STD tests before commencing." Mr Hooper said regulations did not change human behaviour. "As adults, we all have sexual education," he said. "Their (sic) is people on dating apps right now have (sic) unprotected sex." In response to claims the online semen donation world was the "wild west", he said the "society we live in as a whole is the bigger issue and the real wild west". Mr Hooper said Sperm Donation Australia kicked people out of the group for "lots of reasons", including unreliability, being caught out lying, and having judgemental views on sexuality. "We have a very low tolerance for misbehaviour of any sort," he said. Rebecca Kerner, the chair of the Australia and New Zealand Infertility Counsellors Association (ANZICA), backed Mr Page's call for action. She wrote to Federal Health Minister Mark Butler on behalf of ANZICA several times in 2023, concerned about the lack of regulation and the need for a national donor conception register. ANZICA wrote to Mr Butler again recently, further advocating for reform. Ms Kerner said it was only by establishing a national register that family limits on sperm donors could be monitored and maintained. Without it, she said the risks of psychological distress among donor-conceived children were extreme. "We need to start listening and hearing from people who are conceived in this way," Ms Kerner said. "It is about the potential impact of having large donor sibling groups. For some donor-conceived people, they can certainly feel like they've been cloned. Emily Fae, a Perth-based donor-conceived person and a co-founder of Donor Conceived Australia, said the government has a "duty" to step in. "I absolutely agree that the online donor space is the wild west," she said, adding that donors can lie about themselves, how many children they have fathered, or conceal serious genetic conditions. "Unregulated donation creates lifelong consequences for the donor-conceived people involved. "We deserve accurate medical history, the right to know our genetic relatives, and safeguards against preventable harm." A federal health department spokeswoman said the three-month review agreed to by the nation's health ministers into the assisted reproductive technology (ART) sector would be led by the Victorian government. The spokeswoman said the government was aware of the concerns raised by ANZICA about semen donors advertising online. "Health ministers will consider the outcomes of the review in the coming months, as a matter of priority," she said.
Sydney Morning Herald
30-06-2025
- Sydney Morning Herald
Victoria has had a new IVF watchdog for six months. So far, it has not taken any action
Greens health spokesperson Sarah Mansfield said the Allan government had handed fertility clinic regulation to the Health Department claiming it would have greater enforcement options; however, there was no indication any action was taking place. 'You can have all the penalties available that you want, but unless there's proper regulation happening – like people actually going out and looking into these things and using those enforcement measures – they don't really mean a lot,' Mansfield said. Loading 'The Victorian government has responsibility now for regulation of the IVF industry. It is up to them to restore Victorians' trust in the system and in their ability to provide that regulation. What Victorians want to know is that everything will be done to avoid incidents like [the wrong embryos being implanted] happening again. 'Providing transparency around adverse incidents, and the consequence of those incidents, is a really important part of rebuilding that trust.' A Premier's Department spokesperson said that because the question on notice had been asked at a June 10 hearing of the parliamentary accounts and estimates committee, its response did not take into account Monash IVF's disclosure on the same day that it had mistakenly implanted the wrong embryo into a woman at its Clayton clinic. But the response does cover the April disclosure that a woman had given birth to a stranger's baby following an embryo mix-up at Monash IVF's Brisbane clinic. Following that bungle, Victoria's Health Department requested information from its Queensland counterpart before renewing licences for Monash IVF's Victorian clinics from April 30. Loading The Health Department spokesperson said an investigation had been launched into the Clayton embryo bungle, but neither the department nor Thomas' office would comment about actions being undertaken by the VHR. Australian Fertility Treatment Families founder Michelle Galea said she was extremely concerned, but not surprised, that the new regulator was yet to undertake any enforcement action. She said the government had been too quick to shut down the Victorian Assisted Reproductive Treatment Authority. 'They rushed this thing through by shutting VARTA down at the end of the year,' Galea said. 'It takes time to implement new strategies, new employees, new legislation. 'It was winding down and there was no transition period, so I'd be very surprised if there was any actual regulation getting done in the last six months of last year.'
