UK Spending Review 2025 delivers 'mixed bag'
'Much to welcome, but long-term sustainability remains unresolved for many public services,' Mapley said in response to the UK government's Spending Review announced on 11 June 2025.
Mapley noted that while additional funding for the NHS and defence was confirmed, many unprotected areas received little relief.
'For frontline services, significant pressures and concerns around long-term stability are likely to endure,' he said.
Local government was highlighted as a sector set to benefit from a longer-term funding settlement.
However, Mapley expressed reservations, stating: 'Serious concerns remain about the sector's overall sustainability.'
He said that key challenges including funding gap for social care remain unaddressed.
On the NHS, Mapley acknowledged the positive impact of increased investment but cautioned that 'the demands on these resources will be immense.'
He emphasised that delivering transformation through technology and modernisation would be crucial for the NHS to achieve sustainability and support the forthcoming ten-year health plan.
Mapley concluded by noting the complexity of the review, saying, 'Crunching the Spending Review numbers, and considering the multiple documents released alongside the review, may reveal a clearer picture. CIPFA looks forward to considering the details over the coming days and weeks.'
Chancellor Rachel Reeves announced an additional £29bn per year for the NHS in England, alongside increased funding for defence and housing, as part of the government's spending plans extending to the end of the decade.
Reeves also pledged further investment in artificial intelligence and transport projects. However, the review brought tighter budgets for some departments, with the Foreign Office and environment department facing constraints on day-to-day spending.
"UK Spending Review 2025 delivers 'mixed bag'" was originally created and published by The Accountant, a GlobalData owned brand.
The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
Watch: Labour's ‘total clusterf**k'
Play Video It wasn't supposed to be like this. Exactly a year ago the Labour government swept into office promising stability, competence and economic growth. So why, on the one year anniversary of their victory, does it feel like their dying days? This has been a pretty extraordinary week in British politics and it's a week that will leave its mark on the UK economy. Downing Street will hope to move on – that's how it works – their message calendar has had NHS written on today's date for months and it's the NHS they'll want to talk about – but none of us will forget what happened this week and no amount of government spin will gloss over it. The sight of the Chancellor, Rachel Reeves, sobbing in the House of Commons while the Prime Minister – just inches away from her – was on his feet defending their policies while pointedly failing to defend her – will endure in our political memory. I take no pleasure in the obvious distress of Rachel Reeves, whether the cause was 'personal' as No 10 insists or related to her job and the wider crisis facing the government. I won't join in any effort to mock or criticise the fact that she cried – but the strain she's under and the impossibly contradictory political and economic agendas pulling at her cannot be ignored. The government's week from hell began with a humiliating u-turn on their plans for welfare reform. Now, criticising governments for u-turning or abandoning unpopular policies can be overblown but there's no exaggerating the absurdity of what happened in the House of Commons on Tuesday night. Ministers held up their welfare reform plans as vital for the public finances but in fact the savings planned were tiny – a mere £5bn off a welfare bill touching £300bn a year. But it was a signal – to the markets and the rest of us – that they would and could take tough decisions to make their spending plans add up. When it came down to it, they couldn't get it over the line. Just 90 minutes before the vote ministers announced they were slicing out the money-saving elements. Rebel Labour MPs had demonstrated that they hold enormous power over the Prime Minister. It was a humiliation for Starmer up there with all those bruising Brexit defeats inflicted on Theresa May. So much for stability and competence. It was, in the words of one Labour MP, 'a total clusterfuck.' And that's one of the softer reactions. And of course, it leaves the Chancellor with a £5bn headache – money she will now have to find in spending cuts or tax rises – or borrowing. A has just been proven, spending cuts are not getting through this crop of Labour MPs and borrowing isn't an option if the government wants to maintain any fiscal credibility and so – as we at have been warning since the end of last year – tax rises are coming. No wonder the Chancellor was apparently overheard in the Commons – moments before she was seen crying – saying 'I'm just under so much pressure.' She is indeed. Because her plan – Starmer's plan – in as much as they had one – has not worked. The tax burden is at a record high and the growth rate is barely registering. Employment is down. Job vacancies are down. Business confidence is down. There's a reason why I've been banging this drum pretty much week in, week out – it's not just sport. It all points to what one top asset manager described yesterday as a 'hell slide' where the economy doesn't grow so the government's spending plans don't add up so they hike taxes to fill the hole and so the economy suffers yet more pain. And watching all of this, taking it all in, are the bond markets. Ten year gilt yields are at the same level now as they were at the height of the Liz Truss crisis. In fact, they've climbed steadily since Labour were elected. Now there are a variety of reasons for this and it's not unique to the UK but our political and economic conditions are contributing to a nervousness among investors – a nervousness that the UK might not be quite as politically stable as it appeared this time last year. A nervousness that this government will not be able to pass tough spending decisions. And that nervousness tipped over into panic yesterday – briefly – when it looked as if the government was about to lose its Chancellor. Now there are plenty of voices calling for a new Chancellor, but I'm not one of them. Indeed I said in an episode two months ago that we had better hope Reeves remains in office because – and this is what spooked markets yesterday – the only reason for getting rid of her would be to scrap or rewrite the fiscal rules on borrowing and spending – the only thing currently keeping bond markets at bay. Bond traders yesterday feared for a post-Reeves world. I don't like what this government – what this Chancellor – has done to our economy but we are stuck with her, at least – perversely – we'd better hope we're stuck with her because if she goes Starmer will be saying that his economic agenda has failed and, as this week shows, it's his MPs that are calling the shots and they are calling for tax rises and no further cuts to public spending. If they win that argument, it won't just be the bond markets that panic. So, happy birthday to the government. One year old today. At the dawn of the last era of Labour rule, in 1997, the party's anthem was Things Can Only Get Better. Today, all we can hope for is that they don't get any worse. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
5 days ago
- Yahoo
You can't fix the NHS without fixing social care, Streeting warned
MPs have warned the Health Secretary that 'you can't fix the NHS without fixing social care' following the launch of the Government's 10-year health plan. Social care was described as a 'very significant question' hanging over the blueprint by the shadow health secretary. Speaking in Commons on Thursday, Edward Argar warned Wes Streeting he risks failing to 'seize the genuine opportunity' presented by the plan if social care is not also reformed. There were also calls to bring forward the end date of the Casey Commission, which aims to set out a plan to implement a national care service, in order to go 'further and faster' on social care. Mr Argar said: 'Unless we move faster to adjust the challenges of social care and put it on a sustainable footing, these reforms risk failing to seize the genuine opportunity presented.' Mr Streeting said: 'We're not waiting for Casey. The Spending Review gave an additional £4 billion to social care, and we're delivering the biggest expansion of carers allowance since the 1970s, significant increase in the disabled facilities grant. 'And the deputy prime minister and I will shortly be setting out how we will deliver the first ever fair pay agreements for the care workforce, building a real social care progression.' The Casey Commission launched earlier this year, with the first phase expected to report in 2026, although recommendations from the initial probe will be implemented in phases over the course of 10 years. Social care leaders have raised concerns over the potential timeline of 2036 for some reforms to be introduced. The second phase of the commission, setting out longer-term reforms, is due to report by 2028. Mr Streeting said social care 'has to be part' of neighbourhood health, adding: 'In the context of this plan, social care features because it has a role to play on admission avoidance and speeding up delayed discharges.' Helen Morgan, Liberal Democrat MP for North Shropshire, said a plan for the future of the NHS is 'welcome' but sought reassurance on social care. 'In 143 pages of the 10-year plan, there is only a passing reference to social care,' she said. 'Everyone knows that you can't fix the NHS without fixing social care. 'With so many people unable to return home from hospital to get the care they need, solving the crisis in social care is a huge part of moving care out of hospital and into the community.' Mr Streeting said: 'I hope the house is reassured by the action we've already taken on social care, that's greater funding, the expansion of carers allowance, increasing the disabled facilities grant, the Fair Pay agreements, and the role and the partnership that we will see with social care to deliver better neighbourhood health services. 'And I should also say, especially in the context of what we've been describing about the importance of data and digital connections and better systems, in some parts of the country the social care system is actually ahead of the NHS, making better use of data, joining up systems in a more effective and efficient way. 'And there's lots that the NHS can learn from social care as well as the other way around.' The chief executive of Care England, Professor Martin Green, also warned that the NHS 'cannot deliver this vision alone'. 'If adult social care is not put at the centre of delivery – not just as a partner, but as a leader – this plan will falter,' he added. 'The plan speaks to a future we've already been building. But vision alone isn't enough. Providers need clarity, investment, and status. 'Without a clear role for adult social care, this plan will leave a gap between policy and reality.'
Yahoo
5 days ago
- Yahoo
Reeves appears in public day after PMQs tears
Rachel Reeves has appeared in public with Sir Keir Starmer a day after breaking down in tears alongside the Prime Minister in the Commons. The public show of unity came after Sir Keir gave her his full backing and said he did not appreciate how upset she was in the Commons because he was focused on answering Prime Minister's Questions. The pair were both at the launch of the Government's 10-year plan for the NHS in London. Ms Reeves was seen smiling and laughing with Sir Keir and Health Secretary Wes Streeting. Setting out the Government's decision to pump cash into the NHS she said: 'We fixed the foundations and we've put our economy back on a strong footing.' Earlier, the Prime Minister said all people could be caught 'off guard' by their emotions, but the Chancellor had to deal with it while on camera in Parliament. He said she was doing an 'excellent' job, would remain in place beyond the next general election, and that they were both absolutely committed to the Chancellor's 'fiscal rules' to maintain discipline over the public finances. UK Government bonds rallied and the pound steadied on Thursday, after reassurances from the Prime Minister about the Chancellor's future. The sight of her in tears on Wednesday, and the £5 billion black hole in her public spending plans as a result of the welfare U-turn, had spooked the markets, triggering a sharp sell-off of bonds, with the yield seeing the sharpest increase since US president Donald Trump's tariff plans shook up financial markets in April. Sir Keir told Virgin Radio he had spoken to the Chancellor on Wednesday evening and she was 'fine', and her tears were as a result of a 'purely personal' matter rather than the 'ups and downs of this week'. Ms Reeves was visibly upset as she sat beside Sir Keir in the Commons on Wednesday, but he said: 'I actually personally didn't appreciate it was happening in the Chamber, because I came in, I've got questions being fired at me in PMQs, so I'm constantly up at the despatch box and down. 'I think we just need to be clear, it's a personal matter, and I'm not going to breach Rachel's privacy by going into what's a personal matter for her.' He said that 'in politics, you're on show the whole time, there's no hiding place'. Ms Reeves was a 'great colleague, she's a friend of mine and I'll be working with her for a very long time to come'. 'But like all human beings, we're also personal. 'There are moments that catch us off guard and if you're in front of a camera for large periods of your life, unfortunately, that could be caught on camera in a way, if it had been anybody else at work, it would have not really been noticed.' The sight of the Chancellor in tears on the front bench and Sir Keir's initial lack of public support for her caused jitters about the Government's borrowing plans, as Ms Reeves' commitment to her rules to control spending are a key reassuring factor for the bond markets. Sir Keir said: 'She is an excellent Chancellor, she will be Chancellor for a very long time to come, into the next election and beyond it. 'She and I are absolutely committed to our fiscal rules and the economic stability that is so important to this country, and that is the rock on which we build everything else. 'On that issue, Rachel and I are in lockstep, and have been for years.'
