Black pantyhose helped NZ police nail French spies – Rainbow Warrior: A Forgotten History
Although the air was let out, the bottles still washed up.
Maurice Whitham, who was second in command of the investigation, says that gave police a lead to follow. They contacted France's Nato allies, the British Navy, who gave them a dive bottle supplied only to the French military.
'Our scientists went through this whole thing of checking the bottles found in Auckland Harbour with the one given to us from the British. The construction of the thing was identical.'
The second part of the match, involving the pantyhose, fell to young Constable Nick Hall, who spoke French and had been sent to Paris as part of a small police team.
Whitham recalls that Hall was tasked with buying 'some black pantyhose like grandma would wear with the seam down the back. And so he was going around all these shops. We suspected he was being followed wherever he went.'
Whitham laughs about it now.
'They must have been thinking 'he's pretty kinky this fella''.
Ultimately, after Hall brought home about a dozen samples, scientists discovered one pair was an identical match to the pantyhose on the oxygen bottle.
They were made on a very old 1945 machine and never exported from France.
As Whitham put it, 'Suddenly we were getting there...'
Kister and the other diver had escaped, so linking the bottles and the pantyhose back to France was important for the police case against DGSE officers Alain Mafart and Dominique Prieur, who still denied involvement in the bombing.
The oxygen bottle wrapped in black pantyhose used by the French spies who bombed the Rainbow Warrior. Photo / Maurice Whitham
Meanwhile, the police team in Paris found the early co-operation from their French counterparts had mysteriously dried up, apparently because of orders from higher up.
They were getting most of their useful information from the French newspapers, which Hall translated for his colleagues each day.
They did not know at the time that behind the scenes, Pierre Verbrugghe, a high-ranking French police officer was pushing French journalist Edwy Plenel towards the truth.
Plenel, who explained Verbrugghe's crucial role to the Rainbow Warrior: A Forgotten History series, says he met several times with his police source, but the most important meeting was in a Paris restaurant.
Plenel said they had 'a very long conversation with good cooking and many, many alcohols, very long in the night and you don't take notes, you must remember what he said'.
The story about a previously unknown third team in the Rainbow Warrior operation – published by Le Monde the week after that boozy restaurant meeting – would break open the case and lead to the French Government admitting guilt.
Rainbow Warrior: A Forgotten History is a six-episode true crime series. Follow the series on iHeartRadio, Apple Podcasts, Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. New episodes are released on Thursdays.
The series is hosted and produced by John Daniell and Noelle McCarthy of Bird of Paradise Productions in co-production with the NZ Herald.
Rainbow Warrior: A Forgotten History is supported by NZ on Air.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
a day ago
- Scoop
Misusing The Children: The UK Online Safety Act, Privacy And Censorship
The United Kingdom can always be relied upon to supply us with the eccentric, the admirably dotty, and the odd extreme bit of adventure in policy. Lately, those mad protectors and censors with their shields of false virtue and hollow intellect have decided to launch an assault on the users of the Internet. In this, they are joining the platoons of hysteria from such countries as Australia, where age verification restrictions on platforms are all the rage. It's all about the children, and when adults start meddling with children, all sorts of trouble arise. Much in line with the foolish, and potentially dangerous efforts being made by the eCommissioner (not a misspelling) in Australia to impose 'industry codes' of child safety, the UK Online Safety Act (OSA) is being used to blanket social media, search engines and virtually any other site of service with age verification restrictions. The OSA lists three categories that are said to be harmful to children: primary priority content, priority content and non-designated content. Primary priority content is a British favourite of the repressed classes: pornography, and content that supposedly encourages suicide, self-harm, or various behaviours and disorders with eating. (If only there was a form of pornography that might encourage good eating habits.) Priority harmful content covers abuse relevant to race, religion, sex, sexual orientation, disability or gender reassignment and any content that incites hatred against such people. To this, among others, can be added bullying, the promotion of 'serious violence, and depiction of serious violence' whether authentic or fictional. To make things even more expansively ludicrous, the regulations cover content that is non-designated (NDC), which might as well be the entire body of knowledge and existence on this planet and beyond seen by the regulators of the day as dangerous. Examples are skimpy, and do not mention the enriching apple in the Garden of Eden offered to Eve by the opportunistic serpent. Something, however, is 'NDC if it presents a material risk of significant harm to an appreciable number of children in the UK'. What a triumph of insufferable vagueness. The onus is placed on the online service providers to ascertain whether the hosted content is harmful to children. 'As the regulator, we won't be accessing individual pieces of content, or telling online services to remove legal material,' states the UK Office of Communications, Ofcom. They are, in effect, being enlisted by the government as moral, vigilant guardians, never the wisest thing when it comes to technology companies. If the providers in question determine the material to be harmful, they must implement various mitigation measures. Ofcom lists some of them: 'highly effective age assurance to protect children from [harmful content online]'; safer algorithms to limit access to such harmful content (goodbye much literature and culture); effective moderation; transparent reporting and complaints processes; supportive information for children and 'strong governance and accountability'. This constituted a true charter for docile imbecility. The platforms are told to implement an age verification process that is 'technically accurate, robust, reliable and fair.' These include, among a range of options, facial age estimation, granting the age-check service access to bank information, digital identity services, which include digital identity wallets, credit card age checks, mobile network operator age checks and uploaded photo-IDs. Social media platforms such as Reddit, Bluesky, Discord, and have already imposed age checks to comply with the July 25 deadline. Ditto Pornhub, the most visited pornographic online provider in the UK, Tube 8, YouPorn and RedTube. The well named Carl Dong, Obscura VPN founder, is not shy in calling the law a 'ticking time-bomb for the privacy of UK citizens.' The broader consequences of the OSA are snappily summed up by Paige Collings, senior speech and privacy activist at the Electronic Frontier Foundation: the OSA is nothing less than a 'threat to the privacy of users,' a restriction on free expression by arbitrating online speech, an imposition of 'algorithmic discrimination through face checks' and excludes 'millions of people without a personal device or form of ID […] from accessing the internet.' The cleverer users will simply make a mockery of the whole show by using other means of regulatory subversion, including installing a VPN (Virtual Private Network) and browsing the web as if the user was from another country where age-verification rules do not apply. 'The logistics,' explains Graeme Stewart, head of public sector at Check Point Software, 'are near impossible. You could, in theory, ban the sale of VPN equipment, or instruct ISPs not to accept VPN traffic. But even then, people will find workarounds. All you'd achieve is pushing VPN underground, creating a black market for VPN contractors.' A rush for the most appropriate VPNs has already been ushered in while a petition featuring over 481,000 signatures urging the repeal of the OSA has gathered steam. On July 28, the government responded in the customary tone deaf manner, admitting to having 'no plans to repeal the Online Safety Act'. Instead, it was 'working with Ofcom to implement the Act as quickly as possible to enable UK users to benefit from its protections.' Critics of these digital walls of restriction and exclusion face a body of manipulated public opinion. Gone are the days when everyone could post, mention and vent on any topic with merry impunity and noisy enthusiasm. Information superhighways have become potholes fought over by tribes and regulatory zealots inoculated against debate. Many members of the public seem to want censorship as a form of stand-in parenting, and a YouGov poll found a majority of Britons satisfied with the law (the latest figure as of July 31 comes in at 69%). Yet again, such an encroachment is being done in the name of the children, who are to be left permanently immature and unspoiled by the richer, more complicated life. Dr. Binoy Kampmark was a Commonwealth Scholar at Selwyn College, Cambridge. He currently lectures at RMIT University. Email: bkampmark@
NZ Herald
3 days ago
- NZ Herald
Eloi Rolland: Parents of missing French teen return to New Zealand
The parents of missing French teen Eloi Rolland have returned to New Zealand. Thierry and Catherine Rolland posted an ad in a Central Otago newspaper seeking sightings of their son, who hasn't been seen since he disappeared from West Auckland on March 7 2020. That morning the 18-year-old searched Google
NZ Herald
3 days ago
- NZ Herald
Robbery of royal family's items leads to $6.7 million insurance payment
The stolen boxes, one encrusted with diamonds, have not been recovered. Photo / Getty Images The two royal snuff boxes were found to be among the stolen artefacts, according to the museum. They were on loan from the Royal Collection Trust, which controls the royal family's art collection, and the trust's annual financial report revealed the resulting £3m insurance payout. 'During the year, an insurance settlement was received in respect of snuff boxes stolen whilst on loan to the Musée Cognacq-Jay,' the report said, adding that the money had been placed into a fund 'to be used for the enhancement of the collection'. Also taken in the robbery were two snuff boxes belonging to the Louvre Museum in Paris and three that were on loan to the Victoria and Albert Museum of London, according to the trust. The trust's website details how European jewellers began to make luxurious boxes in the 1600s as the practice of using snuff became increasingly fashionable, and the two stolen artefacts were part of a wider collection of such items held by British royals. One of the stolen boxes dates from the 1700s and was previously owned by Russia's ruling Romanov family but was confiscated by Soviet authorities after the revolution and was eventually purchased by Queen Mary, King Charles III's great-grandmother. The Royal Collection Trust describes it as a 'spectacular bloodstone box' and one of the finest German-made boxes of its kind. The other stolen box was given to King George V as a birthday present in 1920, and is made of gold and lapis lazuli, with an onyx cameo depicting the birth of Venus, according to the trust's website. The two boxes and the other artefacts stolen in the heist have not been recovered – and it is not the first time that thieves have targeted the Musée Cognacq-Jay. In March 1937, the New York Times reported that several 18th-century gold snuff boxes and items of jewellery had been taken by a gang who smashed their way into a glass display case. On that occasion, the suspects were described as a 'blond young woman and an elderly woman, and a bewhiskered, decorated man'. This article originally appeared in The New York Times. Written by: Lizzie Dearden ©2025 THE NEW YORK TIMES
