ICC hits Afghanistan Taliban leaders with arrest warrants over treatment of women
The ICC said there were reasonable grounds to believe that Akhundzada and Abdul Hakim Haqqani, chief justice of the Taliban, had committed the crime against humanity of persecution on gender grounds against girls, women and other persons non-conforming with the Taliban's policy on gender, gender identity or expression.
Since the Islamist Taliban returned to power in 2021 it has clamped down on women's rights, including limits to schooling, work and general independence in daily life.
The Taliban condemned the warrants as an example of hostility toward Islam.
'We neither recognise anything by the name of an international court nor do we consider ourselves bound by it,' the Taliban government's spokesperson, Zabihullah Mujahid, added in a statement.
It is the first time judges of the ICC have issued a warrant on charges of gender persecution.
'While the Taliban have imposed certain rules and prohibitions on the population as a whole, they have specifically targeted girls and women by reason of their gender, depriving them of fundamental rights and freedoms,' the court said.
The International Criminal Court (ICC) Pre-Trial Chamber has issued arrest warrants against the Taliban Supreme Leader, Haibatullah Akhundzada, and the Taliban Chief Justice, Abdul Hakim Haqqani for the crime against humanity of gender persecution in Afghanistan and their alleged… pic.twitter.com/klDGWBbFuX
— Amnesty International (@amnesty) July 8, 2025
The full warrants and details on the specific incidents they are based on remain under seal to protect witnesses and victims, the court said.
NGOs hailed the warrants and called on the international community to back the ICC's work.
'The international community should fully back the ICC in its critical work in Afghanistan and globally, including through concerted efforts to enforce the court's warrants,' Human Rights Watch International Justice director Liz Evenson, said in a statement.
The ICC has been under increased criticism from non-member states such as the US, Israel and Russia.
In 2024, the court issued an arrest warrant for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity during the Gaza conflict.
Wakil Kohsar/AFP
The ICC also issued an arrest warrant for Russian President Vladimir Putin in 2023 on suspicion of deporting children from Ukraine.
Neither Russia nor Israel is a member of the court and both deny the accusations and reject ICC jurisdiction.
In June, the US imposed sanctions on four ICC judges including two who were involved in a ruling that allowed prosecutors to open a formal investigation into war crimes and crimes against humanity in Afghanistan, including alleged crimes committed by American troops.
The ICC said it was an attempt to undermine the independence of an international judicial institution that provides hope and justice to millions of victims.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Posts criticising Australian migration policy misuse decade-old picture
A photo of women in sky-blue burqas -- typically associated with the Taliban's strict dress code in Afghanistan -- has been edited and misleadingly featured in an article criticising Australia's immigration policy. Social media users believed the picture depicted "recent refugees" in Australia but it was shot in Afghanistan more than a decade ago, the photographer told AFP. "Half of all recent refugees in Australia are on welfare and 44% can't speak English," reads a headline emblazoned on an image of women in burqas published on Facebook by The Noticer -- an online news site that Australian-based ABC News says "promotes white supremacist ideologies" (archived link). The post has been shared over 2,500 times since its publication on July 4, 2025. It links to an article highlighting statistics the government released in late June about various types of permanent migrants who moved to Australia between 2012 and 2021. Among those surveyed are those classified as "humanitarian migrants", more commonly known as refugees and asylum seekers (archived link). According to the Australian Bureau of Statistics, 44 percent of humanitarian migrants who were in the country for less than five years do not speak English very well, though the survey noted that proficiency "was higher for permanent migrants who had lived in Australia for longer". The image also spread on Facebook, X and Instagram by users criticising Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and his Labor government's migration policies. Some social media users appeared to think the women in burqas were in Australia. One commented: "Their country has a rule that women's heads must be fully covered at all times, and usually their bodies too. Why aren't they told that that rule does not apply here and the law states that your face and head must be fully visible when entering any businesses?" Another user said: "Just look around the shops or your neighbourhood, these in Islamic and Indian garments walking and enjoying the streets whilst you are on the way to work. Yes, we are carrying them so wake up!" But the photo has been cropped and shared in a misleading context. A reverse image search found a larger photo on the Flickr page for The Institute for Money, Technology & Financial Inclusion (IMTFI), which is part of University of California Irvine School of Social Sciences (archived here and here). That picture reveals more clues that the women were not in Australia, as it shows the faces of the people around them and their attire, as well as a red shelter being held up with wooden poles. The Peace Research Institute Oslo published the same photo credited to researcher Jan Chipchase (archived link). He told AFP that he took it "a long time ago" in Afghanistan, and confirmed IMTFI's Flickr page information, which dated it as being shot on August 22, 2010. "That would be correct. I did a project for the IMTFI at that point," he said in an email on July 11. Since their return to power in Afghanistan in 2021, the Taliban have imposed an ultra-strict vision of Islamic law, modelled on their previous rule from 1996 to 2001. Women are required to have their bodies and faces covered (archived link).
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
In South Korea's 'apple county', farmers beg not to be sacrificed for US trade deal
By Hyunjoo Jin CHEONGSONG, South Korea (Reuters) -The apples grown in the South Korean county of Cheongsong in the country's southeast are so renowned for their flavour that they are often given out in neatly-packaged gift boxes during national holidays. But apple farmers, who account for about a third of the roughly 14,000 households in the sleepy rural area, worry that their way of life could be under threat from an influx of cheap U.S. imports. Fanning concerns, South Korea's trade minister suggested last week that Seoul could make concessions on some agricultural imports, although he said sensitive items should be protected, as part of any deal to eliminate or reduce punishing U.S. tariffs on cars, steel and other key exports. "U.S. apples are very cheap. We can't compete with them," said Shim Chun-taek, a third-generation farmer who has been growing apples for two decades. He now fears South Korean farmers risk being sacrificed to appease the U.S. and support the country's manufacturing sector. The United States has long called for better market access for its farm products from beef to apples and potatoes. U.S. President Donald Trump in April slammed steep tariffs on rice in South Korea and Japan. South Korea has taken steps to open its market and is now the top buyer of U.S. beef and the sixth-biggest destination for U.S. agricultural exports overall. Still, Washington has complained about persistent non-tariff barriers. South Korea's quarantine agency is still reviewing U.S. market access requests for apples more than 30 years after they were filed, sparking calls by Washington to expedite the approval process for a range of fruits and potatoes. SURGING PRICES Any opening up of the sector would increase pressure on apple farmers already wrestling with a host of problems, from climate change to an ageing population and wildfires, which have led to rising costs, smaller harvests, and higher prices. Bank of Korea governor Rhee Chang-yong last year said runaway prices of apples and other farm goods were contributing to inflation and that there was a need to consider more imports. The central bank noted South Korea's grocery prices were higher than the average for OECD countries, with apple prices nearly three times higher than the OECD average. "I think it is difficult to justify absolute protection to certain agriculture sectors simply because of its high sensitivity," said Choi Seok-young, a former chief negotiator for the Korea-U.S. free trade deal. It was hard to view the delayed quarantine process as "rational based on science and international norms," added Choi, who is now a senior adviser for law firm Lee & Ko. Agriculture has emerged as one of the sticking points in U.S. trade talks with South Korea and Japan, after countries such as Indonesia and Britain agreed to allow more agricultural imports from the U.S. in recent trade deals. Seoul has long restricted shipments of U.S. beef from cattle older than 30 months. Massive protests from South Koreans worried about safety due to mad cow disease followed a 2008 agreement with the United States to lift the restrictions. Shim, 48, who wakes at 3 a.m. every morning to work on his orchards, said it would be impossible to find alternative crops to grow in the mountainous area. The tariff talks have already fuelled protests from farmers' groups. There could be more to come. "We oppose the imports of apples no matter what," Youn Kyung-hee, mayor of Cheongsong county, told Reuters, adding that people will not "sit still" if Seoul opens up the market. ($1 = 1,391.1000 won) Sign in to access your portfolio
Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
Japan's Stocks Cling to Gains After Election, Nuclear Tailwinds
Japanese shares rose but pared some of their initial gains in Tokyo as investors digested Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba's loss in Sunday's upper house election. While the vote's outcome was in line with most investors' expectations, worries about future policy direction, particularly around government spending and trade, are weighing on sentiment.
