Maine Democrats want to beat Susan Collins. Step one? Finding a challenger.
. If you'd like the newsletter sent to your inbox,
.
TODAY'S STARTING POINT
In 2020, Susan Collins looked like an endangered species.
Collins, Maine's senior senator, was the last Republican member of Congress from New England. Donald Trump was in the White House. Collins, a moderate, had broken with him on major legislation. She faced a well-funded Democratic challenger. And polls suggested that after decades in office,
Yet Collins ended up winning by nearly 9 points — even as Trump lost Maine to Joe Biden by a similar margin.
Advertisement
Many of the same dynamics still pertain ahead of Collins's expected run for a sixth term next year. Her staying power seems to have made prominent Maine Democrats wary of challenging her and Maine Republicans content with a senator who sometimes defies Trump. Today's newsletter explains Collins's strengths and potential weaknesses.
The politics of fear
Collins, first elected in 1996, has survived all kinds of political environments. She's won in good years for Democrats, like 2008, and in good years for Republicans, like 2014. She's won after outspending her opponent (2002) and after her opponent outspent her (2020). She's won under presidents of both parties (Clinton, Bush, Obama, Trump), in midterm and presidential elections alike.
That's an intimidating record. It may help explain why, even as several high-profile Maine Democrats angle to run for governor next year, no major challenger has yet announced against Collins. (
Advertisement
Senator and governor are different jobs, and seeking an open seat — Governor Janet Mills, a Democrat, is term-limited — is easier. But at least one Maine Democrat who wanted to be a senator in the past — Secretary of State Shenna Bellows, who lost to Collins by 37 points in 2014 — is running for governor instead.
Charlie Dingman, chair of the Maine Democratic Party, argues that it's still early and that challengers will emerge. 'I'm aware of and have been talking with a number of folks in the Democratic Party in Maine who are very interested in the opportunity and are exploring it,' he said, declining to name names. 'I expect we'll have a very strong field.'
The most eagerly anticipated entrant may be Mills, 77, who easily won re-election in 2022 and gained national attention when she clashed with Trump earlier this year over transgender athletes. Chuck Schumer, the Senate Democratic leader, has reportedly
Chellie Pingree, a US representative who lost to Collins in 2002,
Advertisement
Strengths
Even if Democrats do field a strong challenger, Collins has at least three advantages going for her this year.
One is experience. Nearly 30 years in office have bred a deep connection to voters in a small state where personal touch can transcend partisanship. 'It's the most successful political machine the state of Maine has ever seen,' said Lance Dutson, a strategist who worked on Collins's past three campaigns.
Another, ironically, is Maine's blue lean. In 2020, despite having voted to block Trump's repeal of the Affordable Care Act, Collins faced only token primary opposition — an acknowledgment that she may be the best Maine Republicans can get.
'Collins is somebody that votes with Republicans more than she doesn't vote with Republicans, supports the Trump administration more than she doesn't support the Trump administration,' said Nicholas Jacobs, a political scientist at Colby College in Waterville. As other GOP senators face serious threats from more Trump-aligned challengers, no similar movement has yet emerged against Collins.
Collins's third advantage may be plausible deniability. She chairs the Senate appropriations committee, giving her a powerful perch to break from Trump and other Republicans over tax policy and government funding if she chooses. 'It's a chance to prove her independence,' Jacobs said.
Vulnerabilities
Still, Collins may yet end up with a real race on her hands.
Past polls have underestimated her, but
Advertisement
Next year's electorate may also complicate her path. Split-ticket voters who backed a Democrat for president and Collins for Senate helped her win in 2008 and 2020. But voters who increasingly support Democrats — whiter, older, and more educated — have been more likely to turn out in recent midterms. That means Collins may face a substantially bluer electorate than in prior cycles.
Her record also offers Democrats plenty to criticize. Collins voted to confirm four of the six Supreme Court justices who struck down Roe v. Wade and controversial Trump nominees like Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Russell Vought, an architect of Project 2025.
For now, Maine Democrats' best recruiting pitch may be that past isn't necessarily prologue. 'We are seeing such an extraordinary eagerness on the part of the president to dismantle our government wholesale and to do so in a lawless fashion,' Dingman, the state party chair, said. 'I just don't believe that the results of an election in a past cycle are going to discourage people from taking on that challenge.'
🧩 4 Across:
| 🌤️ 59°
POINTS OF INTEREST
Mar, left, and Lee Beard are among the graffiti artists who will be part of a residency at the Lynch Family Skatepark this summer.
Suzanne Kreiter/Globe Staff
Boston and Massachusetts
Karen Read trial:
A police investigator faced sharp questioning about his colleague's offensive texts about Read.
Clashing rights:
A Roxbury judge said she'd have to remove her niqab, a religious headscarf, to testify in a case that
Artists in residence:
A Cambridge skatepark
Tragedy:
A Bentley University senior died after
Trump administration
Three-country tour:
Trump defended his administration's plan
Israel-Hamas war:
After speaking with Trump, Israel's prime minister will send negotiators to ceasefire talks with Hamas. As promised, Hamas released an Israeli-American hostage. (
Drug costs:
Trump signed an executive order meant to lower pharmaceutical prices. But big questions, like whether the order is legal and how it would work, remain unanswered. (
Justice delayed:
Black students who say classmates called them racial slurs and others who lodged civil rights complaints with the Education Department fear Trump's cuts to the agency
Come one, come some:
The US welcomed 59 white South Africans as refugees. Trump, who has shut down refugee admissions from Afghanistan, Sudan, and other countries, claims the South Africans face racial discrimination. (
What's that spell?
Republicans' tax bill contains a provision that would put $1,000 for newborn babies into a 'money account for growth and advancement,' or MAGA. (
The Nation and the World
NBA on NBC:
Michael Jordan is joining the network as a special contributor. (
Diddy trial:
Witnesses began testifying in Sean Combs' federal sex-trafficking trial in New York City. (
BESIDE THE POINT
By Teresa Hanafin
🤧
Pollen power:
It's not bad enough that allergy season is starting about 20 days earlier than it used to. It's also lasting longer and is more intense.
Advertisement
🦭
Seal the deal:
The state is trying once again to redesign the Massachusetts state seal. I vote for a Norman Rockwell-style painting of a Boston terrier sitting on Plymouth Rock eating a Tollhouse cookie while a chickadee perches on its head. (
📺
Summer TV:
'The Better Sister,' 'The Waterfront,' 'Long Story Short,' and
🍃
From beer to bud:
Lots of Americans are drinking less alcohol. 'Oh, really?' said THC beverage makers. (
💦
You(th) decide:
Mayor Michelle Wu wants Boston youths to pick which one of seven projects will get $1 million from the city. Community theater? Water bubblahs everywhere? Better crosswalks? (
📫
Miss Conduct:
How to get your summer cottage guests to
💿
Kendrick kicked it:
Kendrick Lamar and SZA performed at a sold-out Gillette stadium last night.
🎞️
Frenzy in France:
The Cannes Film Festival begins today, with movie premieres and directorial debuts and suspense over who and what will take home awards. (
🍞
Worldly fare:
In honor of
🗺️
Gone but not forgotten:
The Leventhal Map Center at the BPL is dipping into its vault Friday for a two-hour display of maps of cities, countries, and empires that no longer exist. Spooky. (
Advertisement
Thanks for reading Starting Point.
This newsletter was edited by
❓ Have a question for the team? Email us at
✍🏼 If someone sent you this newsletter, you can
📬 Delivered Monday through Friday.
Ian Prasad Philbrick can be reached at
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Bizarrely Claims He Wants Elon Musk To ‘Thrive' After Threatening Him
President Donald Trump says he wants Elon Musk to 'thrive' just weeks after threatening to end the tech billionaire's government contracts. 'Everyone is stating that I will destroy Elon's companies by taking away some, if not all, of the large scale subsidies he receives from the U.S. Government. This is not so!' Trump wrote Thursday on Truth Social. He continued, 'I want Elon, and all businesses within our Country, to THRIVE, in fact, THRIVE like never before! The better they do, the better the USA does, and that's good for all of us. We are setting records every day, and I want to keep it that way!' The POTUS' comments appear to be a total 180 from his recent statements from both himself and White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt amid the ongoing drama with Musk, the former head of Trump's Department of Government Efficiency. On Wednesday, Leavitt said that she does not think Trump supports federal agencies contracting with Musk's artificial intelligence company, xAI. After Leavitt was questioned about whether she thinks Trump would seek to have the government cancel the contract with the corporation, which was announced last week, Leavitt said she would discuss it with the president. Musk scored the contract for up to $200 million with the Department of Defense alongside three other major tech firms — Anthropic, Google and OpenAI. In June, Trump also threatened to axe federal contracts with Musk-run businesses, such as SpaceX. 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts,' the president wrote in a June 5 Truth Social post. Musk quickly fired back on X, formerly Twitter, writing, 'Go ahead, make my day …' Trump and Musk have been at odds since May after the businessman's temporary advisory role in the Trump administration's Department of Government Efficiency ended. Following Musk's exit, the pair have taken several digs at each other. Trump announced in June that he would 'look' into Musk's deportation (Musk was born in South Africa). Meanwhile, the Tesla head has publicly slammed Trump's controversial spending and tax bill, also known as the 'Big Beautiful Bill.' Related... Tesla Shares Sink As Elon Musk Predicts 'Rough Quarters' Ahead Looming Over Two Cases Threatening Musk's Car Company Is A Single Question: Can He Be Trusted? Elon Musk Soft Launches 'NSFW' AI Companion A Week After Chatbot Goes On Antisemitic Tirade
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's order to block 'woke' AI in government encourages tech giants to censor their chatbots
Tech companies looking to sell their artificial intelligence technology to the federal government must now contend with a new regulatory hurdle: prove their chatbots aren't 'woke.' President Donald Trump's sweeping new plan to counter China in achieving 'global dominance' in AI promises to cut regulations and cement American values into the AI tools increasingly used at work and home. But one of Trump's three AI executive orders signed Wednesday — the one "preventing woke AI in the federal government' — also mimics China's state-driven approach to mold the behavior of AI systems to fit its ruling party's core values. Several leading providers of the AI language models targeted by the order — products like Google's Gemini, Microsoft's Copilot — have so far been silent on Trump's anti-woke directive, which still faces a study period before it gets into official procurement rules. While the tech industry has largely welcomed Trump's broader AI plans, the anti-woke order forces the industry to leap into a culture war battle — or try their best to quietly avoid it. 'It will have massive influence in the industry right now,' especially as tech companies 'are already capitulating' to other Trump administration directives, said civil rights advocate Alejandra Montoya-Boyer, senior director of The Leadership Conference's Center for Civil Rights and Technology. The move also pushes the tech industry to abandon years of work to combat the pervasive forms of racial and gender bias that studies and real-world examples have shown to be baked into AI systems. 'First off, there's no such thing as woke AI,' she said. 'There's AI technology that discriminates and then there's AI technology that actually works for all people.' Molding the behaviors of AI large language models is challenging because of the way they're built. They've been trained on most of what's on the internet, reflecting the biases of all the people who've posted commentary, edited a Wikipedia entry or shared images online. 'This will be extremely difficult for tech companies to comply with,' said former Biden official Jim Secreto, who was deputy chief of staff to U.S. Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo, an architect of many of Biden's AI industry initiatives. 'Large language models reflect the data they're trained on, including all the contradictions and biases in human language.' Tech workers also have a say in how they're designed, from the global workforce of annotators who check their responses to the Silicon Valley engineers who craft the instructions for how they interact with people. Trump's order targets those 'top-down' efforts at tech companies to incorporate what it calls the 'destructive' ideology of diversity, equity and inclusion into AI models, including 'concepts like critical race theory, transgenderism, unconscious bias, intersectionality, and systemic racism.' For Secreto, the order resembles China's playbook in 'using the power of the state to stamp out what it sees as disfavored viewpoints." The method is different, with China relying on direct regulation through its Cyberspace Administration, which audits AI models, approves them before they are deployed and requires them to filter out banned content such as the bloody Tiananmen Square crackdown on pro-democracy protests in 1989. Trump's order doesn't call for any such filters, relying on tech companies to instead show that their technology is ideologically neutral by disclosing some of the internal policies that guide the chatbots. 'The Trump administration is taking a softer but still coercive route by using federal contracts as leverage,' Secreto said. 'That creates strong pressure for companies to self-censor in order to stay in the government's good graces and keep the money flowing.' The order's call for 'truth-seeking' AI echoes the language of the president's one-time ally and adviser Elon Musk, who frequently uses that phrase as the mission for the Grok chatbot made by his company xAI. But whether Grok or its rivals will be favored under the new policy remains to be seen. Despite a 'rhetorically pointed' introduction laying out the Trump administration's problems with DEI, the actual language of the order's directives shouldn't be hard for tech companies to comply with, said Neil Chilson, a Republican former chief technologist for the Federal Trade Commission. 'It doesn't even prohibit an ideological agenda,' just that any intentional methods to guide the model be disclosed, said Chilson, who is now head of AI policy at the nonprofit Abundance Institute. 'Which is pretty light touch, frankly.' Chilson disputes comparisons to China's cruder modes of AI censorship. 'There is nothing in this order that says that companies have to produce or cannot produce certain types of output,' he said. 'It says developers shall not intentionally encode partisan or ideological judgments. That's the exact opposite of the Chinese requirement.' So far, tech companies that have praised Trump's broader AI plans haven't said much about the order. OpenAI on Thursday said it is awaiting more detailed guidance but believes its work to make ChatGPT objective already makes the technology consistent with what the order requires. Microsoft, a major supplier of email, cloud computing and other online services to the federal government, declined to comment Thursday. Musk's xAI, through spokesperson Katie Miller, a former Trump official, pointed to a company comment praising Trump's AI announcements as a 'positive step' but didn't respond to a follow-up question about how Grok would be affected. Anthropic, Google, Meta, and Palantir didn't immediately respond to emailed requests for comment Thursday. AI tools are already widely used in the federal government, according to an inventory created at the end of Biden's term. In just one agency, U.S. Health and Human Services, the inventory found more than 270 use cases, including the use of commercial generative AI platforms such as ChatGPT and Google Gemini for internal agency support to summarize the key points of a lengthy report. The ideas behind the order have bubbled up for more than a year on the podcasts and social media feeds of Sacks and other influential Silicon Valley venture capitalists, many of whom endorsed Trump's presidential campaign last year. Much of their ire centered on Google's February 2024 release of an AI image-generating tool that produced historically inaccurate images before the tech giant took down and fixed the product. Google later explained that the errors — including one user's request for American Founding Fathers that generated portraits of Black, Asian and Native American men — was the result of an overcompensation for technology that, left to its own devices, was prone to favoring lighter-skinned people because of pervasive bias in the systems. Trump allies alleged that Google engineers were hard-coding their own social agenda into the product, and made it a priority to do something about it. 'It's 100% intentional,' said prominent venture capitalist and Trump adviser Marc Andreessen on a podcast in December. 'That's how you get Black George Washington at Google. There's override in the system that basically says, literally, 'Everybody has to be Black.' Boom. There's squads, large sets of people, at these companies who determine these policies and write them down and encode them into these systems.' Sacks credited a conservative strategist for helping to draft the order. 'When they asked me how to define 'woke,' I said there's only one person to call: Chris Rufo. And now it's law: the federal government will not be buying WokeAI,' Sacks wrote on X. Rufo responded that, in addition to helping define the phrase, he also helped 'identify DEI ideologies within the operating constitutions of these systems.' Matt O'brien, The Associated Press Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Associated Press
20 minutes ago
- Associated Press
A look at details of the settlement between Columbia University and the Trump administration
A deal between Columbia University and the Trump administration calls for the Ivy League school to pay more than $220 million to resolve multiple federal investigations into alleged violations of federal antidiscrimination laws. The agreement announced Wednesday clears the way for the school to keep billions of dollars in federal research money, including more than $400 million in grants canceled earlier this year. In return, the deal calls for a number of reforms in areas such as admissions, campus protests policies and its curriculum, including a number of changes the school agreed to previously in March. It is a document President Donald Trump's administration is calling a road map for settlements with other colleges accused of not doing enough to address campus antisemitism. Columbia University's acting president, Claire Shipman, said it protects the school's values and autonomy. Here's what's in the settlement: Financial payout The university will pay the federal government $200 million over three years. It will also pay $21 million to settle alleged civil rights violations against Jewish employees that occurred following the Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas attack on Israel. A pledge to end diversity programs The university agreed to end programs 'that promote unlawful efforts to achieve race-based outcomes, quotes, diversity targets or similar efforts.' Columbia, as part of the agreement, must also issue regular reports to an independent monitor assuring that its programs 'do not promote unlawful DEI goals.' The agreement pushes Columbia to limit the consideration of race even beyond the Supreme Court's 2023 decision ending affirmative action. That decision left open the possibility that universities could consider an applicant's discussion of how their race affected their life, including in college application essays. The agreement says: 'Columbia may not use personal statements, diversity narratives, or any applicant reference to racial identity as a means to introduce or justify discrimination.' Faculty and curriculum changes Columbia agreed to review its Middle East curriculum and appoint new faculty to its Institute for Israel and Jewish Studies who will 'contribute to a robust and intellectually diverse academic environment.' To further support Jewish students on campus, the agreement calls for a new administrator to serve as a liaison on antisemitism issues. Reporting on international students Columbia University agreed to new vetting for prospective international students. The agreement calls for introducing 'questions designed to elicit their reasons for wishing to study in the United States' and establishes processes to make sure all students are committed to 'civil discourse.' The university also promised to provide the government with information, upon request, of disciplinary actions involving student-visa holders resulting in expulsions or suspensions. 'In several instances, the agreement codifies other practices or policies already in existence, or reviews already underway. We must always comply with government regulations regarding the international student visa program, for example,' Shipman said. The agreement says Columbia also will 'examine its business model and take steps to decrease financial dependence on international student enrollment.' International students make up about 40% of the enrollment at Columbia. Abiding Trump's interpretation on sex discrimination The agreement requires full compliance with the administration's interpretation of Title IX, the federal law barring sex discrimination in education. Trump officials have used the law to force the removal of transgender athletes from women's sports. Campus protest policies The deal calls for Columbia to abide restrictions it agreed to on campus protests, including a ban on face coverings used to conceal demonstrators' identity. It says protests inside academic buildings are not acceptable under the university's code of conduct. ___ The Associated Press' education coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at
