A top Green Beret influencer says he exaggerated his war story. The US military is investigating, and vets see a deeper problem.
The award in question, a Bronze Star, was instead bestowed for commendable work performance, and not specifically courage during combat, a seemingly minor yet significant distinction for service members.
The revelation has sparked backlash among veterans amid concerns that the damage of such exaggerations potentially goes beyond an overstated military service record. Kennedy has legions of online followers, and his ties to leading political circles have made him an increasingly influential figure.
As veterans increasingly build personal brands on combat credibility, Kennedy's controversy highlights a deeper cultural rift, with tension between the trust society puts in vets, especially elite special operators, and the gray areas of self-promotion.
While outright stolen valor has become much rarer than it once was, embellishments and inflated service claims have become more common in the influencer era, raising questions about accountability, authenticity, and the public's willingness to scrutinize military figures.
Kennedy, a senior Green Beret with the Maryland National Guard, released a statement on social media Tuesday night in which he said that he "unintentionally misstated aspects" of his military service, that he "implied directly or indirectly" that he was awarded a Bronze Star with Valor.
"I never received that honor, and I deeply regret ever suggesting otherwise," he said.
"I will no longer speak about my service in a way that elevates me beyond what I actually did," the statement continued. "From now on, my words will be guided by truth, humility, and respect."
A Bronze Star can be bestowed upon US troops for "merit" during wartime operations, not only battlefield "valor." Such merit could, for example, also be provided to support personnel or combat troops for noteworthy service absent heroics. The award with "valor" is usually considered much weightier than the meritorious version, which was commonly bestowed to troops throughout the wars.
I want to take full and unequivocal responsibility for a serious mistake.
Over the years, I made public statements and gave interviews in which I unintentionally misstated aspects of my military service. Most notably, I implied directly or indirectly that I had been awarded the…
— Tim Kennedy (@TimKennedyMMA) July 9, 2025
Kennedy has previously pushed back against other veterans' pointed criticisms regarding his service record, saying "it's totally hypocritical and intellectually dishonest to be pretending that you're on the moral high ground and then misrepresenting facts, lying, paraphrasing, and then taking things out of context." Kennedy said that such scrutiny of his record likely generated lucrative traffic for podcasts critical of him.
A copy of Kennedy's Bronze Star award citation provided to Business Insider Wednesday morning, weeks after BI submitted a public records request seeking Kennedy's award documents, reflects that the award was bestowed for "unmatched competence and sound judgement" for planning and executing combat operations in Iraq in 2006.
"The Maryland National Guard takes these matters seriously," said unit spokesman Maj. Benjamin Hughes in a statement to BI Thursday morning. "Integrity is a core value of our organization, so an investigation is currently underway to review the facts surrounding these public misstatements."
BI reached out to three companies associated with Kennedy, as well as his emails and social media accounts, seeking comment but did not receive a response. A personal phone number for Kennedy was not immediately available.
"Vet Bro" influence
Kennedy's statement on his service record comes as he has experienced a seemingly meteoric rise within the inner circles of Washington's elite. Over the past few months, he has appeared in the Oval Office and been seen hobnobbing with political leaders, including VA Secretary Dan Driscoll, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, FBI Director Kash Patel, and other Beltway heavyweights.
He is a top figure in today's "Vet Bro" culture, a post- Global War on Terror network of veterans, predominantly white, male special operators, which emerged around a decade ago. As the wars started to wind down and social media took over, many vets found the platforms to be a profitable way to promote businesses, memoirs, and podcasts.
Some Vet Bros, a term which some veterans find unfair, often see the world through the lens of their experiences in the military and promote things like gun culture, the protective "sheepdog" mentality, and immature or raunchy humor. That sometimes comes with service-related embellishment.
"A big problem right now is that the average veteran doesn't feel heard," said Chris Jachimiec, a veteran suicide prevention consultant and retired Air Force veteran who hopes to see service more normalized to the point where people don't feel compelled to embellish it.
Some veterans are "reluctant to tell their normal story," he said. "It's like, 'Yeah, I fixed aircraft for 20 years.'" It's a mundane but critical job, even if it lacks the appeal of special operations.
Such misrepresentations can fuel the widening civil-military divide, the physical and experiential chasm between troops and regular Americans whose understanding of the armed forces is on the decline. Hollywood depictions of military service are often confined to the actions of special operators, ignoring other forms of service. Embellishment from high-profile vets may reinforce unrealistic narratives of service.
Kennedy's proclamations of battlefield heroism have embroiled the online veteran community for months. As wars abroad have wound down, blatant stolen valor, in which someone may fabricate a career or misrepresent their own heroism, as Kennedy indicated he did, is less commonly seen, compared to more common discreet embellishments that would only be easily apparent to a trained eye. But for both, the impact of such misstatements can run deep, leading many veterans to fight them aggressively.
Accountability
"If veterans don't hold veterans accountable, then we absolutely will lose the respect that honestly we've fought really hard to earn," Brent Tucker, a former Army Delta Force soldier and podcast host, told Business Insider. Tucker's podcast has previously come under fire by other vets for criticizing Kennedy's claims.
Ideally, vets, especially special operators, would never need to be questioned, Tucker said. But with thousands, sometimes millions, of followers and money from influencing and entrepreneurship at stake, skepticism is warranted.
Kennedy is affiliated with multiple companies, including one that offers Tim Kennedy action figures for $50. Another, "Apogee Strong," appears to be a franchise of homeschooling operations currently caught up in a lawsuit for intellectual property theft.
Attempts to reach the attorney defending Kennedy's school program were unsuccessful.
The instant credibility often afforded to famous vets of the "all-volunteer force" has become a thorny topic, leading to a problematic pedestal and sometimes not-entirely-merited access to levers of influence and power.
Relying on military service isn't just routine for influencers, but also for prospective lawmakers running for office, said Katherine Kuzminski, director of studies at the Center for a New American Security. Touting a service record shows voters that a candidate has a service-oriented mindset.
Political news outlet NOTUS investigated the Bronze Star paperwork for Florida Rep. Cory Mills, citing soldiers named in his documents who did not recall him being part of the "extraordinary heroism" that earned him the award. Former vice presidential candidate Tim Walz, Democratic senator Richard Blumenthal, and other veteran politicians have also faced other criticisms related to misleading statements.
"It says, like, 'Hey, I know what it means to serve, I have a skill set, I've done something rare, and you should trust me," said Kuzminski, an expert on US military veterans and society. She added that such sentiments often have plenty of truth.
But in an era of dwindling pools of people with any military affiliation, there's often an incorrect assumption among Americans that veterans, perhaps particularly those with numerous social media followers, are qualified for everything. Such assumptions, she said, may include dissuading civilians from questioning vets at all.
"It shouldn't mask the responsibility to dig a level deeper," she said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
Michael Bloomberg urges Republicans to oust RFK Jr, ‘peddler of junk science'
Billionaire, former New York City mayor and philanthropist Michael Bloomberg is calling on Senate Republicans to oust Robert F Kennedy Jr from his post as Trump's health secretary. Kennedy was arguably the nation's most prominent conspiracy theorist and vaccine skeptic when he was confirmed by the Senate, and he has spent much of his tenure throwing vaccine policy into upheaval amid an historic measles outbreak. 'Kennedy, who has no training in medicine or health, has long been the nation's foremost peddler of junk science and the crackpot conspiracy theories that flow from it,' wrote Bloomberg in an opinion piece for his eponymous news outlet. Kennedy became health secretary after joining the Trump campaign in August 2024, and helping coin the term 'make America healthy again'. Although Kennedy has spent most of his public appearances campaigning for healthier foods, often with a flimsy basis in nutrition science, most of his policy changes have focused on vaccines. He fired all 17 members of a key vaccine advisory panel to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and reformulated the panel with ideological allies – including advocates directly from the anti-vaccine movement. He also made Covid-19 shots more difficult to access; oversaw the cancellation of research into vaccines and vaccine hesitancy; spread inflammatory information about vaccines and equivocated about their benefits. 'The greatest danger in elevating him to [Health and Human Services] (HHS) secretary was always that he would use his position to undermine public confidence in vaccines, which would lead to needless suffering and even death,' Bloomberg argued. 'And so it has come to pass.' Bloomberg said that Kennedy's actions were predictable, but that Senate Republicans either 'deceived themselves' or 'buckled to political pressure' to confirm Kennedy. He urged Republicans to pressure the White House to constrain Kennedy 'or fire him'. If Americans die unnecessarily, Bloomberg said, Senate Republicans will pay at the ballot box. The upheaval in vaccine policy comes as the CDC is tracking an historic measles outbreak that began in an under-vaccinated community in Texas. More than 1,300 confirmed measles cases have been reported since mid-July – though experts believe the true tally is far higher. That is the worst case count since 1992 at only halfway through the year. Measles is one of the most contagious diseases known to medicine. A supremely effective vaccine, preventing 97% of cases with two doses, meant it was nevertheless eliminated in 2000. Experts now believe the US may be entering a 'post-herd immunity' era. Three people have died in the 2025 outbreak, including two healthy children and an adult. All were unvaccinated. Measles kills between one-three children per 1,000 due to respiratory or neurological complications, according to the CDC. The disease can also cause permanent disability due to brain swelling, and weaken the immune system against future infections. 'In the aftermath of the deaths, he did not use his position to urge parents to vaccinate their children, or warn of the dangers of failing to do so, or declare vaccines safe, or allay misplaced concerns about them,' wrote Bloomberg. 'Instead, he did what he has been doing for decades: He presented the safety and efficacy of vaccines as an open question for individuals to decide. Not surprisingly, the outbreak continued – and has worsened,' he wrote. The Guardian has contacted HHS for comment.


Forbes
a day ago
- Forbes
Dana White Won't Risk Jon Jones Headlining UFC White House Event
MIAMI, FLORIDA - APRIL 12: U.S. President Donald Trump attends the UFC 314 event alongside UFC ... More President and CEO Dana White at Kaseya Center on April 12, 2025 in Miami, Florida. (Photo by Jeff Bottari/Zuffa LLC) Jon Jones's brief retirement from the UFC ended when he learned that the UFC might hold a fight card on the grounds of the White House. Jones's hopes of competing on that card were dashed on Saturday at the UFC 318 post-fight press conference when UFC Dana White told Jones, thanks, but no thanks. "I can't risk putting him in big positions in a big spot and have something go wrong," White said after Saturday's UFC 318. "Especially the White House card." Not long after hearing White's comments, Jones expressed disappointment on social media, but said he was going to continue to train for a UFC fight. "I heard the comments made at last night's press conference. While I was a little disappointed, I'm still in the UFC's drug testing pool, staying sharp, and continuing to train like a professional. I'll be ready for whatever comes next. "In a recent interview, I shared that the opportunity to fight at the White House gave me something deeper to fight for, a 'why' that goes beyond paychecks or belts. Fighting for my country gives me a greater purpose! "The silver lining in all this is knowing the fans see my heart. They see, I am ready and willing to take on anyone, to represent my country on a historic stage. For me, it's never been just about the opponent. I'm chasing legacy, something timeless, something bigger than the moment. 'So for now, I'll keep grinding, stay patient, and stay faithful. I'm ready to fight on July 4th. #IndependenceDay' Jones announced his retirement in June. "Jon Jones called us last night and retired. Jon Jones is officially retired. Tom Aspinall is the heavyweight champion of the UFC," White said during the post-fight press conference following the June 21 2025 UFC Baku fight card. "I obviously feel bad for Tom that he lost all that time and money, but we'll make it up to him," White added. "Tom Aspinall is a good guy. He's been incredible through this whole process that we've gone through. He's been willing to do anything – fight him anywhere at any time and do this. Now he's like, 'I'll fight anybody. Tell me who and I'll fight him.' Aspinall has been great. He's going to be a great heavyweight champion for us and I'm excited to work with him." On that same night, news broke that Jones had been charged in Albuquerque on a misdemeanor charge of leaving the scene of an accident in February. In July, authorities added the charge of 'Use of Telephone to Terrify, Intimidate, Threaten, Harass, Annoy or Offend,' related to that incident. This is not the first time White has expressed reluctance in using Jones in a UFC main event. 'I don't (trust him), no. I don't. In my opinion, I would never take the risk of headlining a show with Jon Jones again," White said in 2016. "I'd put him on the card, but I wouldn't headline with him until he consistently gets back on track. Millions of dollars are spent on this. For a card to fall apart, and how many cards have fallen apart because Jon Jones gets in trouble for something? So no, I'm not at that place with him.' The UFC booked Jones in seven main events after White made those claims.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Dana White 'can't risk' Jon Jones being involved in UFC's potential White House event
UFC's White House event concept has been the talk of MMA since U.S. president Donald Trump and UFC CEO Dana White revealed intentions to make it a reality in 2026. Several big-named fighters have proclaimed their desires to be part of the event, including the recently retired all-time great Jon Jones. The ongoing saga between Jones and the previously hostaged heavyweight title ended with Jones' surprise retirement two weeks ago at UFC Baku's post-fight press conference. However, Jones has since claimed he's already enrolled back in the UFC's drug-testing pool and is ready and willing to fight at the White House event. Thanks to his checkered past outside the Octagon — Jones is currently facing a new criminal charge among a long line of many — the former two-division champion has proven to be unreliable at times on the UFC's biggest platforms. That's why White isn't sold on the idea of Jones being a part of the action. "I can't risk putting him in big positions in a big spot and have something go wrong, especially the White House," White said of Jones at UFC 318's post-fight press conference. UFC's potential White House trip has remained a fixture of any public conversation White is a part of since the news broke. While it may be too soon to imagine what the fight lineup could actually look like, White knows he'll have to make preparations far earlier than usual because of the event's unique challenge. That being said, he's adamant the Las Vegas Sphere is still more difficult to set up for a fight night, as the UFC did with its Emmy award-winning show this past October at UFC 306. "That fight's a year away, so I'm not even thinking about anything right now," White said. "The landscape will change so much by next Fourth of July. Who knows what's going to happen? Who knows what's going to be on the card or what the main event will be, or who holds all the titles? Everything could be completely different. It's not even worth thinking about right now. "I have other problems. I'm dealing with the logistics and all the things on figuring out how to make this thing happen. How do we want to do it? I'm going to fly out there in about 10 days, and we'll have all the renderings done, sit down with [Trump] and go through the renderings, and see what he wants to do and doesn't want to do. "The difference with the White House is I don't think they've ever had anything very heavy out on the lawn, and the Octagon alone weighs 20,000 pounds."