logo
How will Trump's immigration crackdown in California impact the economy?

How will Trump's immigration crackdown in California impact the economy?

Yahooa day ago

President Donald Trump's administration is stepping up deportation efforts in California with immigration raids at restaurants, traffic stops and routine legal check-ins.
The immigration crackdown, while popular with voters in polls, has sparked protests in Los Angeles. Long term, economists warn that fewer immigrants could take a hit to the economy, prompting labor shortages and slowing economic growth.
"Immigrants play a huge role in the California economy,' said Giovanni Peri, an economics professor at the University of California, Davis. Without immigrants, 'there will be less economic growth. Less opportunity, also, for local companies and American workers.'
'Wave of panic': Businesses are in crosshairs of Trump immigration crackdown
The country's economy has become 'very immigrant dependent,' according to Christopher Thornberg, founding partner at Beacon Economics, a Los Angeles research and consulting firm.
About 479,000 U.S.-born workers were added to the labor force over the past five years compared with 3.6 million foreign-born workers, according to an October report from the National Foundation for American Policy, a nonpartisan research organization. The report pointed to a spike in immigration and retirements, coupled with a slowdown in U.S.-born working-age population growth.
In California, immigrants make up roughly one-third of workers and comprise an outsize share of the workforce in physically intensive sectors like construction and agriculture.
Critics say these workers are lowering wages for U.S.-born citizens or taking away jobs. But Peri said that doesn't pan out in the data.
Immigrants may reduce wages for native-born Americans with competing skills, according to Harvard economics professor George Borjas, but it slightly increases the income of native-born citizens overall. A separate 2024 working paper co-authored by Peri found immigrants had no significant effect on wages for those born in the United States who are college educated and a positive effect on wages for their American-born peers who are less educated.
Instead, Peri said immigrants are filling the holes in industries struggling to hire.
Immigrants account for 28% of care workers in long-term care settings, according to the nonprofit health policy organization KFF. In California, immigrants make up 44% of manufacturing jobs and 40% of construction jobs, according to the Economic Policy Institute, a left-leaning think tank based in Washington, DC.
Some of those jobs are held by undocumented workers. About 1.8 million people, or 17% of immigrants in California, were undocumented as of 2022, according to Pew. The vast majority – 1.4 million – had no legal protections through programs like Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or active asylum claims.
"It would be lovely to deal with this with an expansion of the legal immigration system,' Peri said. 'But lacking that, undocumented immigrants are doing a lot of these jobs. And losing some of them would make the situation worse.'
Pushing away immigrants, Peri argues, prevents companies from growing and creating more jobs that would benefit U.S.-born workers. One 2024 analysis from Jamshid Damooei, executive director of the Center for Economics of Social Issues at California Lutheran University, found work from undocumented employees created an additional 1.25 million jobs in California.
And because the vast majority of undocumented immigrants are not criminals, but people who have been part of their local communities for years if not decades, 'in the majority of cases, the effects of just indiscriminately deporting these people is going to have very little benefit for the American people,' Peri said.
It's true that immigrants add costs for the government; they benefit from public education, health services and other state-specific policies.
But research generally finds immigration tends to raise the federal government's revenue more than its costs, with immigrants adding an estimated $1.2 trillion in federal revenues between 2024 and 2034, according to the Congressional Budget Office. State and local governments' costs tend to increase more than their revenues from a surge in immigration, but Peri said the rise in immigration is a net benefit overall.
Even undocumented workers, Peri argued, boost the government's coffers because they pay a considerable amount of taxes. At the same time, they are ineligible for most federal benefits like Social Security and food stamps.
Undocumented immigrants contributed $8.5 billion in state and local taxes in 2022, according to a 2024 study from the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, a nonpartisan think tank.
Trump and Newsom: Trump's battle with Newsom, California expands beyond immigration
Thornberg doesn't expect Trump to deport every undocumented worker in the country, and views the crackdown in California as 'more of a blown-up spectacle' that 'may get tied up in the courts.'
Already, Trump has said he would back off certain deportation efforts to avoid labor shortages in areas like agriculture and hospitality.
'Our great Farmers and people in the Hotel and Leisure business have been stating that our very aggressive policy on immigration is taking very good, long time workers away from them, with those jobs being almost impossible to replace,' Trump said in a June 12 post on Truth Social. 'Changes are coming!'
While an immediate labor shortage is unlikely, Thornberg believes we're more likely to see people discouraged from coming to the United States in the years to come, resulting in a tighter labor market.
That could mean higher wages for workers as companies step up recruitment efforts, but it would slow economic growth overall.
Trump's efforts to constrain immigration during his first term played out in a similar fashion; by 2019, the unemployment rate had dropped to 3.5%, its lowest level since 1969, with earnings up 3.5% from 2018. Meanwhile, economic growth slowed to 2.3%, down from 2.9% the year prior, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis.
Peri said a tight labor market could have ripple effects across the economy, such as driving up the cost to produce certain items. Companies may be more inclined to import cheaper goods at a time when the Trump administration is pushing for more U.S. manufacturing through tariffs.
'This could have a cascade of effects,' he said. 'There is no doubt at all that immigration and immigrants who do those simple, manual jobs are very important at making the economy go.'
This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Why the immigration crackdown could hurt California's economy

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Congress Won't Act on the Iran Strikes. That Doesn't Make Them Legal.
Congress Won't Act on the Iran Strikes. That Doesn't Make Them Legal.

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Congress Won't Act on the Iran Strikes. That Doesn't Make Them Legal.

President Donald Trump has insisted that the sites in Iran targeted by American airstrikes last week have been 'obliterated,' decimating its nuclear program—a claim that has been backed up by key administration officials despite an initial intelligence report finding that the damage was more moderate. But alongside the question of whether significant damage has been done to Iran's nuclear ambitions, there is another thorny issue that lawmakers must now address: the legality of Trump's decision to authorize the strikes in the first place. 'It's not just a matter of statutory interpretation, it's a matter of [the] Constitution requiring that Congress be the one to play a critical role in making a decision and using force,' said Oona Hathaway, professor of international law at Yale Law School. 'For the president to make that decision unilaterally, without going to the Security Council, without going to Congress, and putting U.S. troops and allies at risk is really extraordinary and clearly unlawful.' The president's power to use military force is constrained by the U.S. Constitution, the United Nations Charter, and the War Powers Resolution of 1973. According to Article 1 of the Constitution, only Congress has the authority to declare war, although it has not done so since World War II. The War Powers Resolution was enacted in response to the Vietnam War as an attempt to counter presidents' approval of military action without the consent of Congress. It was pushed through over President Richard Nixon's veto. The law requires that a president consult with Congress before engaging military forces, and report within 48 hours why the action was taken, under what authority, and 'the estimated scope and duration of the hostilities or involvement.' It also says a president must terminate the use of military force within 60 days if he has not sought approval from Congress. Despite its intention to ensure a conflict such as the Vietnam War never occurred without congressional consent again, the War Powers Resolution has often been ignored by the White House. For decades, presidents have pushed the limits of their power to engage in conflicts, while Congress has continued to take the back seat in enforcing its constitutional authority to declare war. Several presidents have taken military action without following the letter of the War Powers Resolution, including President Bill Clinton ordering airstrikes in Kosovo and President Barack Obama authorizing intervention in Libya. But Michael Glennon, professor of constitutional and international law at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University, argued Trump's actions were unique in that 'the risks entailed in this particular action are orders of magnitude greater than any of the supposed recent precedents.' He cited the threat of retaliation to the tens of thousands of U.S. troops posted around the Middle East, as well as 'stoking long-term regional animosities' and 'degrading the American reputation in diplomatic dealings with other countries.' 'In none of these recent cases was the context the same—the context being the exposure of the United States to a level of risk and cost that has not occurred before,' Glennon said. Trump's actions do follow a pattern of presidential engagement in conflict being followed by congressional dithering. Over several decades, presidents have learned that there will be little consequence for ignoring the War Powers Resolution. Hathaway said that cases challenging a president's actions do not typically go to court due to lack of legal standing. 'I don't think that that should lead us to think that there is no relevant law here, that this is a law-free zone where the president can do whatever he wants because he knows no one can actually enforce the rules,' said Hathaway. 'If the fact that there may not be consequences means that there's no law, then we've really got a problem on our hands.' Any pushback to unilateral presidential action may come from public disapproval of extended conflict rather than direct congressional action. A new Quinnipiac poll shows that the public is largely reacting to Trump's strikes in Iran with disapproval, although Republicans remain on board with the president's actions. 'Ultimately, Congress has not, in a significant way, constrained presidents from acting in these cases,' said Jordan Tama, professor in the Department of Foreign Policy and Global Security at American University's School of International Service. 'The members of Congress who have been most concerned about violations of the War Powers Resolution, or presidential actions that are not authorized by Congress … have not been able to muster the majority you need in Congress to pass new binding legislation that explicitly prohibits the president from pursuing military action.' Trump's actions in Iran have been met with some pushback from lawmakers, particularly after a scheduled briefing by administration officials for lawmakers was postponed this week. Axios further reported that the White House is limiting the sharing of classified information with Congress. Democratic Senator Tim Kaine is leading a resolution that would require Trump to seek congressional approval before engaging in further military hostilities in Iran, with an added amendment intended to alleviate concerns that it might hamper American support for Israel's activities in the region. Although the Senate is set to vote on the measure on Friday evening, it's unclear whether it would garner any Republican support in the upper chamber. Moreover, GOP Representative Thomas Massie, the Republican co-sponsor of a parallel measure in the House, said that a vote on his bipartisan resolution might be made moot if the ceasefire between Iran and Israel holds. Even if either of these measures makes it to the floor, however, it's unclear how much bipartisan support they would receive. Indeed, there is little political will to repudiate the president, and even if there was, lawmakers would need to marshal a veto-proof majority to take concrete action. Overturning a presidential veto would require support from two-thirds of members, which is unlikely in a Republican-majority Congress. In 2019, Congress approved a measure that would have pulled American support for Saudi Arabia's conflict in Yemen, but that resolution was vetoed by Trump. This puts Congress in a 'terrible fix,' said Hathaway: Rather than the president going to Congress to authorize military action, Congress must take the initiative to repudiate it. 'We end up with this learned helplessness in the sense that Congress chooses to stop trying, because what's the point?' said Hathaway. 'The president has learned that [he] can use military force without seeking authorities from Congress without consequence.' Aside from a seeming unwillingness to counter smaller-scale military engagements by presidents, Congress has similarly struggled to repeal or update authorizations for the use of military force in Iraq and Afghanistan approved ahead of the Gulf War and after the 9/11 terrorist attacks. The 2001 authorization, which applied to perpetrators of the 9/11 attacks, has been treated by presidents as an umbrella approval to strike at other organizations affiliated with Al Qaeda. Efforts to overturn or narrow these authorizations have floundered in recent years, even decades after they were approved. Countering the president invites risk for members of Congress. For Republicans, resistance to the president's aims will only court Trump's retaliation. More generally, however, lawmakers take the view that authorizing the commencement of military engagements—or ordering them to cease—comes with unintended political consequences. Voting in favor of the 2003 authorization of military force in Iraq became a major political albatross for Democratic primary candidates in the 2008 presidential election. That said, repealing such an authorization invites blowback, as well, if, for example, the move to do away with such a law was followed by a terrorist attack on American soil, or U.S. interests getting threatened abroad. The status quo has a latent appeal to lawmakers, who get to offset the political risk of military intervention while maintaining the ability to criticize it—or take credit. 'Casting a dangerous vote on an issue of war and peace is a perilous political act, and they would prefer to avoid that, because they would prefer their careers be extended and not hindered,' said Glennon.

Trump Rages at Democratic Senator Who Exposed Reality of His Iran Plan
Trump Rages at Democratic Senator Who Exposed Reality of His Iran Plan

Yahoo

time32 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump Rages at Democratic Senator Who Exposed Reality of His Iran Plan

Early Monday morning, President Donald Trump lashed out against Democratic Senator Chris Coons for mentioning reports that the Trump administration is looking to negotiate a nuclear deal with Iran eerily similar to the Obama-era agreement Trump discarded during his first term. On Thursday, CNN, citing four sources familiar with the matter, reported that 'the Trump administration has discussed possibly helping Iran access as much as $30 billion to build a civilian-energy-producing nuclear program, easing sanctions, and freeing up billions of dollars in restricted Iranian funds.' Trump at the time called such reports a 'HOAX' propagated by a 'SleazeBag' within the 'Fake News Media.' Coons cited the reports in a Sunday appearance on Fox News, telling host Shannon Bream, 'I'll just note that President Trump, by press accounts, is now moving towards negotiation and offering Iran a deal that looks somewhat similar to the Iran deal that was offered by Obama: tens of billions of dollars of incentives and reduced sanctions in exchange for abandoning their nuclear program.' A piqued Trump took to Truth Social just before 3 a.m., posting, 'Tell phony Democrat Senator Chris Coons that I am not offering Iran ANYTHING, unlike Obama, who paid them $Billions under the stupid road to a Nuclear Weapon JCPOA (which would now be expired!), nor am I even talking to them since we totally OBLITERATED their Nuclear Facilities.' Trump set off the chain of events leading to his June 21 bombing of Iran by withdrawing from President Obama's Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action in 2018—a decision which prompted Iran to 'accelerate its nuclear program,' per Axios, which in turn led Trump, upon resuming office, to consider a renewed deal that geopolitics expert Jeffrey Lewis called 'a dollar-store' JCPOA. 'He's trying to put Humpty Dumpty back together again,' Lewis said earlier this month. This, of course, went up in smoke as the self-proclaimed dealmaker President Trump resorted to unlawful military action.

Sterilization Equipment Market to Reach $29.2 Billion by 2032, Growing at a CAGR of 8.2% from 2025, Says Meticulous Research®
Sterilization Equipment Market to Reach $29.2 Billion by 2032, Growing at a CAGR of 8.2% from 2025, Says Meticulous Research®

Yahoo

time33 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Sterilization Equipment Market to Reach $29.2 Billion by 2032, Growing at a CAGR of 8.2% from 2025, Says Meticulous Research®

Market Growth Driven by Rising Hospital-Acquired Infections, Increasing Surgical Procedures, Enhanced Food Industry Sterilization Focus, and Growing Pharmaceutical & Biotechnology Demand REDDING, Calif., June 30, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- According to a comprehensive market research report titled "Sterilization Equipment Market Size, Share, Forecast, & Trends Analysis by Offering (Equipment [Heat {Moist (Gravity, High-speed), Dry (Static Air, Forced Air)}, Low-temperature {ETO, Formaldehyde}, Radiation, Filtration] Services - Global Forecast to 2032", the Sterilization Equipment market is projected to reach $29.2 billion by 2032, up from an estimated $16.8 billion in 2025, growing at a robust CAGR of 8.2% during the forecast period. The growth of the sterilization equipment market is primarily driven by the increasing prevalence of hospital-acquired infections, a rise in surgical procedures, and an enhanced focus on sterilization within the food industry to mitigate food-borne illnesses. Additionally, there is growing demand for sterilization equipment from pharmaceutical and biotechnology sectors, alongside a trend toward outsourcing sterilization processes to specialized service providers in non-healthcare industries. The industry is experiencing revolutionary transformation through advanced technology integration, including AI and robotics adoption, ozone sterilization innovations, and development of carbon dioxide (CO2) sterilization alternatives to ethylene oxide. Leading companies are embracing digital sterilization technologies while expanding into emerging markets and developing innovative solutions for complex sterilization challenges across healthcare and non-healthcare sectors. For more comprehensive insights, download the FREE report sample: Revolutionary Market Transformation Through Advanced Sterilization Excellence The sterilization equipment market represents a paradigm shift in infection control and contamination prevention across multiple industries. As healthcare facilities increasingly prioritize patient safety while pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies seek specialized sterilization expertise, advanced sterilization equipment offers a revolutionary solution that addresses the growing demand for effective, efficient, and environmentally sustainable sterilization processes. Market leaders are investing heavily in next-generation sterilization technologies and automated systems, establishing capabilities that can deliver scalable, reliable sterilization solutions. This technological advancement is making sophisticated sterilization processes increasingly accessible while delivering superior microbial reduction and operational efficiency benefits. Dynamic Growth Across Key Market Segments Based on offering, the Equipment segment dominates the market in 2025, capturing approximately 55% of the total market share due to rising incidence of hospital-acquired infections, high adoption of sterilization equipment in medical devices and pharmaceutical industries, and increasing need to ensure safety of food & beverages. The Services segment is experiencing significant growth driven by outsourcing trends and specialized sterilization requirements. Based on end users, the Hospitals & Clinics segment leads the market with approximately 35.9% share, reflecting the high prevalence of HAIs, rising number of surgical procedures, growing demand for clean and quality healthcare facilities, and increasing burden of chronic diseases associated with an aging population. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), out of every 100 patients in acute care hospitals, seven patients in high-income countries and 15 patients in low- and middle-income countries will be affected by at least one healthcare-acquired infection during their hospital stay. The Medical Device Companies segment is also experiencing robust growth, driven by stringent regulatory requirements and the need for specialized sterilization processes for complex medical devices and instruments. Get Insightful Data on Regions, Market Segments, Customer Landscape, and Top Companies (Charts, Tables, Figures and More) - Strategic Market Opportunities and Innovation Drivers The market presents extraordinary growth opportunities through advanced technology integration, emerging market expansion, and development of environmentally sustainable sterilization solutions. Companies are discovering new revenue streams through CO2 sterilization capabilities, ozone sterilization technologies, and comprehensive infection control ecosystems. Key market drivers include: Rising Hospital-Acquired Infections: Increasing prevalence of HAIs compelling healthcare facilities to invest in advanced sterilization equipment and protocols to ensure patient safety and regulatory compliance Advanced Sterilization Technologies: Integration of AI, robotics, ozone generation, and supercritical CO2 systems enhancing efficiency, precision, and environmental sustainability in sterilization processes Pharmaceutical & Biotechnology Growth: Expanding demand from pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries for specialized sterilization solutions supporting complex biologics manufacturing and sterile processing environments Food Industry Safety Focus: Growing emphasis on food safety and prevention of food-borne illnesses driving adoption of advanced sterilization equipment in food & beverage processing facilities Regional Market Leadership and Emerging Growth North America commands the largest market share in 2025 with approximately 46% of the global market, driven by growing hospital & outpatient visits, rising number of surgical procedures, growing incidence of HAIs, increasing healthcare expenditure, growth in pharma & biotech industries, and government initiatives to reduce HAIs and implement effective sterilization practices. Asia-Pacific emerges as a high-growth region with significant potential, propelled by expanding healthcare infrastructure, rising quality standards in manufacturing, government initiatives for healthcare modernization, and growing awareness of infection control measures across various industries. Europe represents a substantial market, supported by stringent regulatory frameworks, advanced healthcare systems, growing demand for specialized sterilization solutions, and presence of leading sterilization equipment manufacturers with emphasis on innovation and compliance. Request a customized research analysis tailored to your specific requirements: Dynamic Competitive Landscape Driving Innovation The global sterilization equipment market features an innovative competitive ecosystem comprising specialized sterilization equipment manufacturers, healthcare technology companies, and integrated solution providers. This diverse landscape fosters rapid technological advancement through cutting-edge automation integration and specialized sterilization expertise development. Industry leaders are implementing comprehensive solutions that combine advanced sterilization technologies with monitoring systems, validation services, and regulatory compliance capabilities. Companies are pursuing strategic partnerships and acquisitions while addressing scalability and environmental sustainability challenges across different industry segments. Latest Industry Developments Recent market developments include: Advanced Low-Temperature Sterilization: Launch of innovative low-temperature sterilizers designed for heat-sensitive surgical instruments with advanced cross-contamination barrier technology EU GMP Compliance Solutions: Introduction of specialized sterilization bags and covers supporting EU GMP Annex 1 compliance for biopharmaceutical companies Nitrogen Dioxide Innovation: Expansion of sterilization service portfolios through nitrogen dioxide gas technology offering enhanced microbial efficacy and environmental benefits Steam Monitoring Advancement: Development of comprehensive steam monitoring products including biological indicators, chemical indicators, and indicator tapes for enhanced sterile processing confidence Market Challenges and Revolutionary Solutions While the market shows strong growth potential, it faces challenges including adverse effects associated with ethylene oxide usage, safety concerns regarding instrument reprocessing, complex regulatory compliance requirements, and environmental sustainability pressures. However, significant opportunities exist through rising adoption of e-beam sterilization, growing demand in emerging markets, increasing utilization of CO2 sterilization technology, and enhanced focus on infection control across healthcare and non-healthcare sectors. The shift from reusable to disposable medical devices presents both challenges and opportunities, as manufacturers adapt their sterilization strategies while healthcare facilities balance cost-effectiveness with infection prevention requirements. Immediate Delivery Available | Buy this Research Report (Insights, Charts, Tables, Figures and More) - Market Leaders Shaping Industry Future Key players driving the global sterilization equipment market include STERIS plc (U.S.), 3M Company (U.S.), Getinge AB (Sweden), Cardinal Health, Inc. (U.S.), Advanced Sterilization Products, Inc. (U.S.) (A subsidiary of Fortive Corporation), Fedegari Autoclavi SpA (Italy), Stryker Corporation (U.S.), ANTONIO MATACHANA, S. A. (Spain), SteelcoBelimed AG (Switzerland), Sotera Health Company (U.S.), Benchmark Scientific Inc (U.S.), MMM Münchener Medizin Mechanik GmbH (Germany), Tuttnauer (Netherlands), Consolidated Sterilizer Systems (U.S.), and Andersen Sterilizers, Inc. (U.S.). These companies are focusing on strategies such as advanced automation technology integration, environmentally sustainable sterilization solution development, comprehensive service portfolio expansion, strategic partnerships and acquisitions, and geographic expansion into emerging markets to strengthen their market position. Related Reports: Medical Device Contract Manufacturing Market Pharmaceutical Contract Development and Manufacturing Market Pharmaceutical Processing Equipment Market Disinfection Robots Market Size, Share, Forecast, & Trends Microbial Control Chemical Market by Size, Share About Meticulous Research We are a trusted research partner for leading businesses worldwide, empowering Fortune 500 organizations and emerging enterprises with market intelligence designed to drive revenue transformation and strategic growth. Our insights reveal future growth opportunities, equipping clients with a competitive edge through a versatile suite of research solutions—including syndicated reports, custom research, and direct analyst engagement. To find out more, visit or follow us on LinkedIn Contact:Mr. Khushal BombeMeticulous Market Research Pvt. Ltd.1267 Willis St, Ste 200 Redding,California, 96001, +1-646-781-8004Europe: +44-203-868-8738APAC: +91 744-7780008Email- sales@ Our Website: with us on LinkedIn- Source: Logo: View original content: SOURCE Meticulous Market Research Pvt. Ltd.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store